Katherine Mangu-Ward Discusses CEO Pay on CNBC's Closing Bell
"The thing that makes me nervous is the idea that somehow there is a magic ratio between what the CEO earns and what the janitor earns and that government… can dictate it," says Katherine Mangu-Ward, Reason managing editor. Mangu-Ward discusses whether high CEO pay is ethical on CNBC's Closing Bell.
Airdate: September 12, 2013
About 6 minutes.
Scroll down for downloadable versions and subscribe to Reason TV's YouTube channel to receive automatic updates when new material goes live.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
I would argue that CEO's are generally paid above the market equilibrium wage because the owners of corporations, the shareholders, have most of their property rights stripped and their only recourse is to fire executives and nothing in between. This makes both the CEO pay and the rate at which they are fired/replaced artificially high. In other words a freer market would cause CEO's and other executives to have lower pay. The extra wealth would go to investors and reinvestment instead of higher employee pay, though.