MENU

Reason.com

Free Minds & Free Markets

10 House Races Libertarians Should Watch on Election Night

Democrats are expected to take the House majority, but will libertarian-friendly Republicans like Thomas Massie and Justin Amash keep their seats?

Ron Sachs/CNP / Polaris/NewscomRon Sachs/CNP / Polaris/NewscomWith all 435 seats in the House up for election on Tuesday night, it's far easier to get interested in the aggregate result: Will Republicans hold their majority or will they lose it to the Democrats?

The second outcome seems most likely, with Nate Silver's FiveThirtyEight now projecting that Democrats have an 84 percent chance of emerging from Tuesday with a House majority. Polling aggregator Real Clear Politics also sees Dems with a clear advantage, but a smaller one; it lists three dozen races as "toss-ups" heading into the final 48 hours of the campaign.

Below, we've picked out 10 races that might be particularly interesting to libertarians—either because of who is running or because of specific dynamics at play in the race. And, sure, it helps if the outcome of the race remains in doubt.

Don't forget to check out Reason's coverage of key Senate races and the nation's most important gubernatorial contests too.

Colorado 6th

Incumbent: Rep. Mike Coffman (R)

Cook Partisan Voter Index (CPVI) Rating: D+2

Why It Matters: Republican incumbent Rep. Mike Coffman is likely to be unseated, with polls showing the race leaning toward his Democratic challenger, Jason Crow—and in a district that's already slightly favorable to Democrats, according to the CPVI, which is based on how the district has voted in the past two presidential elections relative to the nation as a whole. This is also one of the most expensive congressional races in the country, with more than $22 million spent by the candidates and outside groups combined.

Libertarian candidate Kat Martin has broken from mainstream talking points to defend less government in all aspects of life. While several of Martin's views include national politics, she has also supported the passage of Colorado's Amendment A. The amendment seeks to change wording in the state constitution to abolish involuntary servitude without pay or compensation as a punishment for crime. An identical amendment was passed unanimously in the state legislature in 2016, but failed in the general election. Supporters of the previous amendment believe that it failed because of confusing language.

Kentucky 4th

Incumbent: Rep. Thomas Massie (R)

CPVI Rating: R+18

Why It Matters: One of the most libertarian-friendly members of Congress, Massie is expected to be on his way to a fourth full term representing this northern Kentucky district. His opponent is Seth Hall, an attorney who won a three-way primary earlier this year.

Even if a Democratic "blue wave" materializes, Massie appears to be on dry land. Both Real Clear Politics and FiveThirtyEight rate the district as safely Republican. The more interesting thing to keep an eye on here may be Massie's margins. He got 62 percent of the vote in 2012, followed by 67 percent in 2014 and 71 percent in 2016.

Iowa 3rd

Incumbent: David Young (R)**
**

CPVI Rating: R+1

Why It Matters: Actually, all four of Iowa's congressional districts are rated as some of the most important in the country. Thanks to the state's politically balanced population, its reputation for having an independent streak, and a redistricting scheme that actually sorta works, three of of Iowa's districts are rated between D+1 and R+1 on the Cook Partisan Voting Index. The fourth is also a close race this year (despite being an R+11 district), because incumbent Rep. Steve King (R) has drawn widespread criticism—including from Sen. Jeff Flake (R-Ariz.), who says he is "rooting for" King's Democratic opponent, J.D. Scholten—for supporting white nationalist candidates in recent Canadian and European elections. **
**

Still, the 3rd District might be the most important bellwether in the state. It's one of the most purple districts in the whole country, but it hasn't turned into a Democratic runaway even as other narrowly Republican districts have. Democrat Cindy Axne, a small business owner, leads by less than 2 points in several late-October polls. She has earned some attention for eschewing the #MeToo narrative as part of her campaign, despite having survived an attempted rape while in college. Trump's tariffs are particularly unpopular in Iowa, potentially an anchor on Young's re-election chances.

Given the balanced population and the close polls, the 3rd District also provides an opportunity for Libertarian Bryan Holder to cover the spread. Unfortunately, pollsters have not seen fit to include him in their surveys.

Michigan 3rd

Incumbent: Rep. Justin Amash (R)

CPVI Rating: R+6

Why It Matters: While many Republicans have used Trumpian language to message to voters in the upcoming election, the libertarian-leaning incumbent, Justin Amash, has spent the better part of the Trump presidency tweeting his unadulterated critiques of the administration. Most recently, Amash decried the president's desire to end birthright citizenship via executive order, saying that Trump could not amend the Constitution so easily. Both Amash's outspokenness and his Arab-American identity have led to scraps with Trump Republicans.

Prior to the 2016 election, Amash was a less polarizing figure in the GOP. Amash is a member of the House Freedom Caucus, which has roots in the Tea Party movement. The House Freedom Caucus has also been criticized in a post-Trump GOP after opposing the equally problematic "Ryancare" bill. After Trump relentlessly attacked fellow Freedom Caucus member Mark Sanford of South Carolina, he lost his primary.

New York 14th

Incumbent: None (Rep. Joe Crowley, a Democrat, was defeated in the primary)

CPVI Rating: D+29

Why It Matters: Democrats experienced a shocking upset when Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, who self-identifies as a democratic socialist, beat 10-year-incumbent Rep. Joe Crowley in the Democratic primary. The 28-year-old's win was considered the Democrats' "Eric Cantor moment," as Crowley was widely predicted to succeed House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi. Following Ocasio-Cortez's win, other Democratic primaries were watched closely for similar upsets.

Ocasio-Cortez, who was previously a organizer for Bernie Sanders' 2016 presidential campaign, quickly became an icon for democratic socialists across America. Despite her success, many other high-profile candidates backed by Ocasio-Cortez and Sanders were not as successful in their races.

Ocasio-Cortez is very likely to win the general election. It will be interesting to see how establishment Democrats deal with being on the political outside.

North Carolina 9th

Incumbent: None (Rep. Robert Pittenger, a Republican, was defeated in the primary)

CPVI Rating: R+7

Why It Matters: One of four toss-up races in a critical swing state, this newly redrawn district—North Carolina had to reconfigure its congressional districts this year after federal courts decided the previous map was unfairly gerrymandered—is exactly the type of mixed rural/suburban place that Democrats will have to win to take the House.

Mark Harris, a former pastor, upset Pittenger in the Republican primary. He's a hardcore cultural conservative who has preached that women should be subservient to their husbands and should shy away from careers. He's also opposed to gay marriage. Democrat Dan McCready, a former Marine, has promised to vote against Nancy Pelosi for House Speaker and has stressed his military service and religious beliefs, positions that make strategic sense running against an extreme opponent in a moderately conservative district.

Three October polls by two different pollsters found everything from a five-point Harris lead to a four-point McCready lead. No one knows how this race will go, but it's safe to say that Libertarian candidate Jeff Scott had the best tweet of the campaign:

Pennsylvania 7th

Incumbent: None (Rep. Charlie Dent, a Republican, resigned in May for personal reasons)

CPVI Rating: D+1

Why It Matters: A court-ordered redrawing of Pennsylvania's congressional districts produced a more compact and competitive map—previously, the area now covered by the 7th district was split between a deeply blue district and moderately red district. The new map figures to wipe away the 13–5 edge that Republicans have enjoyed in Pennsylvania since 2011, and this district (along with the PA-1) are prime pick-up opportunities for Democrats.

The most recent poll of the race, conducted in mid-October by Muhlenberg College, showed Democrat Susan Wild, an attorney, with a 48–41 lead over Republican Marty Nothstein, a county commissioner and former Olympic cyclist. Libertarian candidate Tim Silfies, a television producer who worked on John Stossel's former Fox Business Channel show, got 5 percent of the vote in that poll. Silfies participated in a three-way debate on October 25, potentially raising his profile in the district and increasing the chances that he can cover the spread in what looks likely to be a Wild victory.

Texas 32nd

Incumbent: Rep. Pete Sessions (R)

CPVI Rating: R+5

Why It Matters: This Texas race has entered the tossup category, with Republican incumbent Rep. Pete Sessions polling just one point ahead of Democratic challenger Colin Allred. Libertarian challenger Melina Baker is currently predicted to receive 2.7 percent of the general vote in the close race.

Baker has been a vocal opponent of her Republican challenger, who serves as the Rules Committee Chairman. In June, the committee blocked Oregon Rep. Earl Blumenauer's bipartisan Veterans Equal Access amendment, which would give veterans protections to help them access medical marijuana.

Utah 4th

Incumbent: Rep. Mia Love (R)

CPVI Rating: R+13

Why It Matters: Despite becoming the first black Republican woman elected to Congress four years ago, Rep. Mia Love's tenure could be coming to an end. The race between Love and Democratic challenger Ben McAdams is officially in the tossup category, with Real Clear Politics showing McAdams with a 2.3 point lead.

In 2012, Reason identified the Tea Party Republican as a "libertarian(ish)" candidate during her first bid for office. Love's liberty-friendly views included things from eliminating the federal departments of Education and Energy to opposing the Defense of Marriage Act despite being personally against marriage equality. Since being elected, Love has largely voted in alignment with Republican and conservative bills. As the child of Haitian immigrants, however, she has not hesitated to speak out against the administration on immigration issues. In January, Love said that Trump's "shithole countries" comments were "indefensible." Both Love and McAdams also recently opposed Trump's desire to end birthright citizenship with an executive order.

Virginia 7th

Incumbent: Rep. David Brat (R)

CPVI Rating: R+6

Why It Matters: Brat shocked the political world when he upset then–House Majority Leader Eric Cantor by 12 points in the 2014 Republican primary. It remains the only time in U.S. history that a sitting majority leader (a title that has existed officially since 1899) was defeated in his or her party's primary election. Brat's win demonstrated the extent to which "establishment" conservatism had lost control of the GOP to the party's insurgent right wing.

Now the former college professor and House Freedom Caucus member could be heading toward another symbolic upset. Democrat Abigail Spanberger, a former CIA officer, is running neck-and-neck with Brat in a district that should be relatively safe territory for Republicans. (Romney won the district by 11 points, Trump by 6.) The most recent poll of the race, a late September survey by Monmouth University, showed Spanberger with a 47–42 lead, while Libertarian candidate Joe Walton garnered 2 percent.

Photo Credit: Ron Sachs/CNP / Polaris/Newscom

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

  • Nardz||

    Boehm,
    You look desperate and pathetic (general statement, didn't read this article). Your messiah has been reduced to running around the country and, with quavering voice, begging to be given credit for the economy's performance during Trump's term.
    Sad.

  • Cy||

    If only Obama were in power to institute more government controls and government overseen, company funded welfare!?!?!

    If only...

  • Weigel's Cock Ring||

    I am legitimately worried about what the reaction of the leftards in the JournoList and the fugazi libertarians here at Reason (but I repeat myself) will be if the democrats DON'T take the House.

    They are so convinced it's going to happen that I fear they might lose the last little shreds of sanity they still have remaining and completely go off the deep end.

  • NoVaNick||

    I think they lost all semblance of sanity the day after her heinousness lost, what they have not been, except for the antifa-tards and Scalise shooter is violent, and I think we can expect that to happen if the dems fall short tomorrow.

  • Last of the Shitlords||

    If they lose their shit and uncontrollably riot in the street, I say call out the national guard and order them to shoot into the crowd, then repeat.

  • Calidissident||

    I remember when libertarians used to believe that the president had far less control over the state of the economy than most people believed. I'm sure many who have abandoned that will start singing that tune again if there is a recession in the next two years.

  • Nardz||

    Check your premises, cali. Did you comprehend what you read?

    "the economy's performance during Trump's term."

    That's a subject followed by a prepositional phrase, not a possessive.

  • Calidissident||

    Is Obama bringing that up out of the blue, or is it a response to Trump and his defenders claiming he's responsible for the state of the economy?

  • Nardz||

    And how's Mr. Obama's motivation relevant here?
    You specifically addressed libertarians, not people or Trump supporters generally. You were trying to be snarky.
    Now that you've been called out for your poor assed and prejudiced reading comprehension, you're trying to walk it back.
    Unless you're claim is that libertarians = Trump supporters.
    So, I say again, check your premises.

  • Diane Reynolds (Paul.)||

  • OpenBordersLiberal-tarian||

    I'm especially interested in Ocasio-Cortez. She might be a democratic socialist with different views than I have on issues like the minimum wage and billionaire tax rates. But she's with us libertarians where it really counts — she wants to #AbolishICE. Her victory would represent an important step in strengthening the progressive / libertarian alliance. Together we will oppose Orange Hitler's toxic nationalism once Democrats are back in control of Congress.

    #OpenBorders
    #LibertariansForOcasioCortez

  • Chipper Morning Baculum||

    All libertarians should be for abolishing ICE.

  • Azathoth!!||

    How would you know?

    Have you ever even met a libertarian?

  • Red Tony||

    I dunno, Azathoth, have you? Because indications indicate that you NEVER HAVE.

  • Dillinger||

    Tired of Sessions but Allred not suitable replacement.

  • Last of the Shitlords||

    I miss Wapner........

  • loveconstitution1789||

    An election article just in time for an election where many people have early voted.

    Reason.

  • Azathoth!!||

    Hey look guys! Nate Silver's says the Dems have got it in the bag--just like he did in 2016!

    And he's the bestest rightest of them all when it comes to polling, right?

    #Orangemanbad, #Resist, #stayhomebecausethebluewaveisinthebag

  • DiegoF||

    I assume all the pollsters and prognosticators have learned and adjusted. They are as likely to be Republican-biased as the otheer way this time. In fact, I think it's likely that they are.

  • CE||

    House races are much tougher to poll than presidential races. The turnout is much lower and people are less familiar with the candidates.

  • brec||

    Nate Silver's FiveThirtyEight now projecting that Democrats have an 84 percent chance of emerging from Tuesday with a House majority.

    84% is about 5/6ths. 1/6th isn' t zero.

  • bvandyke||

    at this point what difference does it really make

  • Jeff Scott||

    Did anyone like my tweet? I left out the punchline because i ran out of space: "The encore of Fire and Rain provided a great new surge to the campaign."

  • shane_c||

    There are Democrats that are more libertarian on issues than Amash, Massie,.... Social conservatives are not libertarian.

  • wreckinball||

    The Ds aren't libertarian on social issues any more than economic ones. You must accept their social agenda no choices. That is not libertarian.

  • wreckinball||

    The Ds aren't libertarian on social issues any more than economic ones. You must accept their social agenda no choices. That is not libertarian.

  • wreckinball||

    There are zero Ds that are libertarian or even lean libertarian.

    No Joe Manchin doesn't count.

  • vek||

    "In January, Love said that Trump's "shithole countries" comments were "indefensible.""

    How is a factually true statement "indefensible" exactly?

    LOL

    In other news, I hope every Democrat loses.. Except Crazy Eyes Cortez. I want her to be an anchor around the Democratic Party's neck for the next few years!

    Also, I home Massie and Amash both sail to strong victories, what with them being actually good and all.

GET REASON MAGAZINE

Get Reason's print or digital edition before it’s posted online