MENU

Reason.com

Free Minds & Free Markets

CIA Director Tom Cotton: A Disaster for Foreign Policy or a Boon for Better Lawmaking?

The Senate would lose an authoritarian who wants to crack down on immigrants and fight the drug war. But he's also a hawk in favor of foreign interventions.

Tom Cotton and TrumpSipa USA/NewscomThere are new insider rumors that President Donald Trump's administration is going to see another shake-up at the top.

Secretary of State Rex Tillerson is not long for his job, according to multiple sources for Peter Baker and Maggie Haberman at The New York Times. The plan, the Times reports, would be for CIA Director Mike Pompeo to take over as secretary of state. Then they're considering installing Sen. Tom Cotton (R-Ark.) to lead the CIA.

As always with the Trump administration, be wary when rumors of people quitting or getting fired hit the press. This is a leak-prone administration, and frequently what comes out through unnamed sources are half-baked ideas, trial balloons, or just people within the administration trying to influence the president's decisions by going to the press.

It should not be a surprise if Tillerson gets dumped. He and Trump clearly have been at odds for some time. An entire news cycle in October was consumed with a report that Tillerson called Trump a "moron."

Cotton is one of the bigger champions of allowing the federal government to engage in domestic surveillance without a warrant, so the idea of putting him charge of the CIA might make more than a few folks blanch. He's on board with the Senate Intelligence Committee's bill to formalize the use of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) Section 702 authorities to snoop on Americans to fight crimes, beyond the intent of the legislation.

Cotton also is quite vocal about wanting regime change in Iran. Putting him in charge of the CIA could facilitate further American meddling in that country. We could see more voices for interventionism and even war from within the Trump administration.

On the other hand, Cotton has a nasty record of taking any number of authoritarian, anti-liberty positions. Getting him out of the Senate could arguably be an improvement in terms of lawmaking. He has been a supporter of harsh mandatory minimum federal sentencing for drug crimes and has stood in the way of reforms of the criminal justice system. And about those harsh crackdowns on illegal immigrants in America—Cotton thinks we have too many legal immigrants, buying into the inaccurate talking point that low-skilled immigrant labor is what is keeping Americans' wages down. And he backs legislation to block online gambling. Cotton has been no friend of freedom as a senator.

Cotton has been so in tune with Trump's worst authoritarian urges the administration might want to keep him where he is, given their challenges in building coalitions with lawmakers. Officials told The Times that there is concern that he's more valuable to Trump in the Senate. If Cotton leaves the Senate to head the CIA, Gov. Asa Hutchinson (a Republican) would name a replacement to serve until next fall. Hutchinson initially endorsed Marco Rubio as president and has not been terribly thrilled with the way Trump has been handling himself as president.

Corrected to fix the misspelling of Tillerson's name.

Photo Credit: Sipa USA/Newscom

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

  • Fist of Etiquette||

    Getting him out of the Senate could arguably be an improvement in terms of lawmaking.

    There's always someone worse ready to take a seat.

  • Citizen X - #6||

    Yeah, those are not great odds.

  • Juice||

    In Arkansas, this is assured.

    And I just looked at his wiki page and realized I'm older than him. Ugh.
    He looks way older than me though. ;-)

  • Eric Bana||

    Holy crap you're old. No offense.

  • loveconstitution1789||

    As I said, a "x" D chess move would be to get shitty congressmen to resign their seats and take cabinet positions. Then there is nothing protecting them when Trump fires their ass.

    So far:
    Tom Price

    and other possibles:
    Jeff Sessions
    Mike Pompeo
    Ryan Zinke
    Nikki Haley (SC Governor)

  • Crusty Juggler||

    lol

  • loveconstitution1789||

    rofl

  • Crusty Juggler||

    But Gorsuch.

    And Hillary would've been worse!

  • Crusty Juggler||

    Cotton also is quite vocal about wanting regime change in Iran. Putting him in charge of the CIA could facilitate further American meddling in that country.

    HA! Like meddling in Iran has ever backfired for the United States.

    Prog harder, Shaccford.

  • OpenBordersLiberal-tarian||

    And about those harsh crackdowns on illegal immigrants in America

    Oooh, that's problematic language. Remember, we liberal-tarians try to avoid the expression "illegal immigrant." No human being is illegal! They should be called "undocumented immigrants," "undocumented Americans," or for brevity, simply "the undocumented."

  • some guy||

    War with Iran vs. War on Liberty. Tough call.

    Why not both? Also, any war with Iran wouldn't be a war war, just a kinetic military action.

  • Tony||

    That's "fucking moron."

  • TJM||

    Agreed with the second take. Cabinet positions are temporary, and Senate seats seem to be forever in current times. The less hawks, authoritarians and drug dinos in the Senate, the better.

  • Calidissident||

    On the other hand, a Senator is just 1 of 100 voting members. Cabinet members, the CIA director, etc. often have a lot of unilateral power. And the odds of a Senator's replacement being substantially better and that having a significant impact (given the 1/100 reality) are low. Cotton strikes me as bad even by the standards of CIA directors.

  • Citizen X - #6||

    Cotton strikes me as bad even by the standards of CIA directors.

    On the other other hand, how much lower can that bar really go?

  • Jerryskids||

    Well, damn, I've heard a lot about Cotton and I just assumed he was Jeff Sessions wearing a fake mustache. They really are two different people?

  • DenverJ||

    The CIA should be dissolved. We have other agencies that can provide intelligence, and the CIA has become a quasi-military group that, either on its own volition or by executive orders, violates US laws and international human rights.

  • Colossal Douchebag||

    CIA Director Tom Cotton: Authoritarian Asshole or Human Dumpster Fire?

    Debate.

  • AD-RtR/OS!||

    If only the American People agreed with Reason, life in the Libertarian Bubble would be so much more pleasant.
    Your concerns about Cotton @ CIA, and "domestic surveillance" might be more to the point if he was being touted as DIRNSA, not DIRCIA, since NSA is already doing such surveillance, and I doubt that Congress is willing to expand that mission to the CIA which is forbidden by its charter from domestic actions.

GET REASON MAGAZINE

Get Reason's print or digital edition before it’s posted online