Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
    • Reason TV
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • Free Media
    • The Reason Interview
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • Freed Up
    • The Soho Forum Debates
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Log In

Create new account

FOIA

Why did the FBI Want Dilbert Creator Scott Adams' Twitter Data?

The cartoonist caught the FBI’s attention over a bizarre scheme involving Matt Gaetz, a CIA agent held captive in Iran, and a Florida fraudster.

Matthew Petti | 6.1.2026 4:53 PM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
Scott Adams, with the FBI logo in the background | Illustration: DAN ROSENSTRAUCH/TNS/Newscom/Rokas Tenys/Dreamstime
(Illustration: DAN ROSENSTRAUCH/TNS/Newscom/Rokas Tenys/Dreamstime)

Most Americans knew the late Scott Adams for Dilbert, his beloved comic strip about an office worker and his dimwitted colleagues. Later in life, Adams became known as a kind of right-wing shock jockey. But the cartoonist caught the FBI's attention for something a little bit different: the sex crimes investigation into former Rep. Matt Gaetz (R–Fl.) and a bizarre blackmail scheme that grew out of it.

The FBI released its files on Adams last week, five months after his death, in response to a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request from Reason. The records include the heavily redacted results of a background check and a request to Twitter—the social media network later renamed X—to preserve Adams' account data, including his private messages.

The investigation into Adams seems to have begun in the spring of 2021, when he was entangled in the Gaetz scandal. On March 30, 2021, The New York Times reported that Gaetz was under federal investigation for having sex with an underage teenager. Gaetz claimed that he was actually the victim of blackmail, and the federal investigation focused on the extortionists.

Three days later, The American Conservative published screenshots of a text conversation between Adams and Jake Novak, a former journalist who was then working on the media staff of the Israeli consulate in New York. (The Israeli consulate later told Politico that Novak's involvement in the Gaetz case "was not in any way, shape or form a part of his role at the consulate.")

Novak wrote to Adams that the investigation into Gaetz "is screwing up my efforts to free Bob Levinson," a former FBI agent who disappeared in 2013 while conducting an unauthorized mission for the CIA in Iran. "Gaetz's dad was secretly finding [sic] us. So I'm very much wanting this to be untrue. I've got a commando team leader friend of mine nervously waiting for wire transfers to clear," Novak explained. He claimed that Gaetz's extortion claim "burned" Bob Kent, a private investigator involved in the efforts to free Levinson.

Those efforts were unlikely to succeed. The federal government declared in 2020 that Levinson had died in Iranian captivity.

In a CNN interview, Kent acknowledged that he asked Gaetz's father for money to help rescue Levinson, but denied making any "threats" or "demands." A few months later, Florida businessman Stephen Alford—whom prosecutors called Kent's "associate"—pleaded guilty to making "materially false promises" of a pardon for Gaetz in exchange for funding the Levinson mission. Kent and Novak were not charged with crimes.

Years later, a congressional investigation concluded that Gaetz had indeed paid a 17-year-old girl for sex, though the federal government declined to prosecute him.

Adams never quite gave a satisfying explanation for why he was involved in the case. "Jake [Novak] and I shared an interest in the mechanics of persuasion, and in interesting business/political stories in general. Most often the stuff with a persuasion or Israel angle. That was our initial connection…people often tell me their scoops before they hit the news just to build credibility. Might have been that," he told Politico.

The FBI files do little to shed light on that mystery, but they do put some of Adams' old comments in a new light. "Do you think they looked at my personal data because I ever had a conversation with somebody from another country? Probably. And I can't find that out, can I? If I sued the government, could I find out if they looked at my data? I could FOIA the FBI," he said in a 2022 livestream. It turns out that the answer to these questions was yes.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Trump Broke the Law When He Slapped His Name on the Kennedy Center, a Federal Judge Says

Matthew Petti is an assistant editor at Reason.

FOIAFBITwitterEspionageFloridaCIAIranIsraelDomestic spying
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (10)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Eeyore   2 months ago

    Shock jockey?

    The entire thing sounds like a pretext to go fishing.

  2. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

    I bet israel told america to start doing it. New article up Robby.

  3. Agammamon   2 months ago

    >Adams became known as a kind of right-wing shock jockey.

    Your own link doesn't even support this bullshit.

    1. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   2 months ago

      Nothing supports Petti’s incessant bullshit.

      1. damikesc   2 months ago

        Did Adams support Hillary or Biden?

        No?

        Then he clearly was a far right shock jockey.

  4. DesigNate   2 months ago

    “Why did the FBI Want Dilbert Creator Scott Adams' Twitter Data?”

    That’s fucking weird.

    “The investigation into Adams seems to have begun in the spring of 2021,”

    Hmm, who was president at that time and what had his administration decided to do about conservatives and right-leaning pundits?

    1. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

      Whi can ever know? And dont you dare ask to look why you revenge seeking fascist.

      1. DesigNate   2 months ago

        I know right, complete mystery. Definitely don’t want to dig too deep, people might think I agree with *gasp* Republicans.

  5. Fist of Etiquette   2 months ago

    Later in life, Adams became known as a kind of right-wing shock jockey.

    Lol.

  6. BYODB   2 months ago

    Adams did sort of drift to the right as he got older, or perhaps Democrats simply drifted so far to the left that he appeared to be on the right, but he was a weird guy and I'd hardly say he was a right-wing shock jockey.

    He believed a lot of nonsense, although I did keep buying his books since he was always entertaining even if he was a bit of a nut.

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

Is Court Packing Inevitable If Democrats Retake Congress and the White House?

Damon Root | 7.21.2026 7:00 AM

Brickbat: In-N-Out but Not Thru

Charles Oliver | 7.21.2026 4:00 AM

Research Suggests Trump and His Opponents Are Both Wrong About the Impact of Voter ID Requirements

Jacob Sullum | 7.20.2026 5:25 PM

South Carolina Law Prohibits Tattoo Parlors Near Churches. A New Lawsuit Calls That Unconstitutional.

Meagan O'Rourke | 7.20.2026 4:59 PM

Britain's New Prime Minister Andy Burnham Promises 'Stronger Public Control' of Stagnating Economy

Reem Ibrahim | 7.20.2026 2:16 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS Add Reason to Google

© 2026 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Reason's July 4 Special!

For America's 250th, Get 2 Years of Reason for $17.76

Celebrate your independence with a subscription to Reason magazine, your most trusted source of honest, insightful news and analysis.

Subscribe to Reason