Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
    • Reason TV
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • Free Media
    • The Reason Interview
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • Freed Up
    • The Soho Forum Debates
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Log In

Create new account

Republican Party

The Republican Party Is Nothing More Than a Cult of Trump

The GOP has shifted from endorsing conservative ideas to embodying the whims of one man.

J.D. Tuccille | 5.22.2026 7:00 AM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
Rep. Thomas Massie (R–Ky.) and Sen. Bill Cassidy (R–La.) | BONNIE CASH/UPI/Newscom
(BONNIE CASH/UPI/Newscom)

The Republican Party is dead. Long live the party of Trump, which wears the GOP like a skin suit.

On Tuesday, President Donald Trump took down libertarian-leaning Rep. Thomas Massie (R–Ky.), to whom he'd taken such a profound dislike that he backed a primary challenger in the form of MAGA stalwart Ed Gallrein. Massie was highly ranked for his voting record by conservative organizations, but so were other candidates Trump pushed out of office—and out of the party. In truth, it's been years since the Republican Party was a conservative organization; these days it's a cult of personality around the president.

You are reading The Rattler from J.D. Tuccille and Reason. Get more of J.D.'s commentary on government overreach and threats to everyday liberty.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Trump Turns on 'Unreliable' Members of His Own Party

"Tom Massie of Kentucky, the worst and most unreliable Republican Congressman in the history of our Country, is an even bigger insult to our Nation than Senator Bill Cassidy of Louisiana," President Trump snarked on May 17. That was the day Cassidy lost his state's Republican Senate primary to Trump-backed challenger Rep. Julia Letlow and State Treasurer John Fleming, who now head to a runoff.

By that point, Trump-backed primary challengers had already turned out five Republican Indiana state senators who resisted the president's drive to gerrymander congressional districts to gain advantage in this year's midterm congressional elections.

"Good luck to those Great Indiana Senate Candidates who are running against people who couldn't care less about our Country, or about keeping the Majority in Congress," the president posted on Truth Social prior to release of the Indiana results. "There are eight Great Patriots running against long seated RINOS — Let's see how those RINOS do tonight!"

Massie in turn lost this week to Gallrein, who was backed 54.8 percent to 45.2 percent by Republican primary voters responding to the president's call. Massie had won 99.6 percent of the general election vote in his district in 2024, 65 percent in 2022, and 67 percent in 2020, according to BallotPedia. He was popular until dismissed by Trump, who won 64.5 percent of Kentucky votes in 2024.

When Personal Loyalty Overshadows Principles

Like Cassidy, Massie seemed like a good fit for a nominally conservative political party. Cassidy had a lifetime rating of 79.97 out of 100 from the Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC). He defeated Democrat Mary Landrieu for the seat in 2014 with 55.9 percent of the vote, then took 59.3 percent in his 2020 reelection effort, reports BallotPedia.

But Cassidy was a Republican before he was a Trump supporter. After voting to acquit Trump during the first impeachment effort against him in 2020, he voted (unsuccessfully) for conviction in 2021 following the January 6 riot by the then-outgoing president's supporters.

"Our Constitution and our country is more important than any one person. I voted to convict President Trump because he is guilty," Sen. Cassidy commented at the time.

That lack of personal loyalty gained the Louisiana senator the eternal hatred of the thin-skinned Trump.

Massie's CPAC score is even more impressive, from the perspective of old-fashioned Republican politics, at a lifetime rating of 92.26. His strongest issue, according to CPAC, is taxes, budget, and spending, on which he holds a score of 100 percent.

But like fellow Kentucky Republican Sen. Rand Paul, who has also drawn Trump's wrath, Massie has a libertarian streak. He generally supports limited government, restraint on the executive branch, and a non-interventionist foreign policy, even when that's inconvenient for a president from his own party.

At one time, that would have earned respect from peers as a matter of adherence to principles over political convenience. It would have annoyed some within his party, but given that those principles are largely ones they allegedly share, his clashes with GOP leadership wouldn't have been career-killers.

In fact, Massie held a seat on the powerful House Rules Committee until early 2025. He was booted off last year after crossing the increasingly Trump aligned GOP leadership.

Trump is hardly done with his efforts to purge Republican lawmakers who show anything other than complete loyalty to his leadership of the Republican Party. Next up is Sen. John Cornyn (R–Texas) who has an 86.63 CPAC lifetime score and has held office since 2002. But, complains Trump, "John was very late in backing me in what turned out to be a Historic Run for the Republican Nomination."

Instead, the president favors Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, who has been ensnared in several scandals, including allegations of security fraud. He may win the nomination only to lose the seat. But, importantly, the president describes him as "someone who has always been extremely loyal to me and our AMAZING MAGA MOVEMENT."

A Cult of Personality With a Peronist Future

Loyalty to the president keeps popping up because, as conservative commentator George Will pointed out in 2019, the GOP has "become a cult" centered around Donald Trump. Its beliefs are whatever the party leader says, even if that means rejecting free trade in favor of protectionism and dumping free markets for state ownership of industry. "Trump's Republicans agree with the 'opposition' progressive Democrats that the government should be running the economy," I wrote in January.

The embrace of whim-driven state control explains why the president and New York's left-wing Mayor Zohran Mamdani could so easily find common ground when they met last November. Mamdani is a socialist by expressed choice, while Trump is one when it suits him. That doesn't mean they're on the same side of all issues, but they both like top-down decision making so long as they're at the top.

That the GOP is now little more than an expression of Donald Trump's will holds real risks for the party's future. For one thing, the president is unpopular, with an average approval rating of 39.4 percent and 58.5 percent disapproval. Linking Republican candidates' fates to his is like cutting loose an anchor and holding fast to it as it sinks into the depths (countered only by Democrats' own authoritarian lunacy).

Then there's Trump's advanced age; he turns 80 next month. After he leaves the scene, a party that has reshaped itself as an extension of him will be hard-pressed to define itself in his absence. It's in danger of becoming a U.S. version of Argentina's Peronist party, forever asking itself "what would the former strongman do" while waiting to be pushed aside by an American Javier Milei with fresh ideas.

But fading into irrelevance is what a political movement risks when it becomes a cult built around one man. Its prospects rise and fall with those of single fallible and temporary figure.

The Rattler is a weekly newsletter from J.D. Tuccille. If you care about government overreach and tangible threats to everyday liberty, this is for you.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Review: A Sci-Fi War Movie About the Pentagon's Inscrutable Budget

J.D. Tuccille is a contributing editor at Reason.

Republican PartyDonald TrumpThomas MassieCampaigns/ElectionsPartisanship
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (184)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. minus the clever name   2 months ago

    This is what you want to think, maybe what you have to think.

    I am not Trumper or MAGA or Tea Party. I just hated to its core the way Hillary acted and more the utter shit stupidity of Biden and Harris. As Salena Zito showed beyond any cavil, MANY MANY voted for Trump very reluctanlty and only prodded to it by Hillary and Biden and Kamala.

    You are so blind. I have taught college for 10 years and I live in a neighborhood with whites, blacks, hispanics, many families and they were overwhelmingly Trump supporters. They had Covid, Biden riots, Afghan withdrawal, sht about the border --- my Hispanic students surprised me:They were totallly for Trump because really bad Mexicans were coming across the border and where do they live, they go to nice Hispanic areas !!!

    You make too much money and live too isolated. Your view is silly , that's the best I can say. OUT OF TOUCH.

    1. Heraclitus   2 months ago

      I call bs on your having taught college for ten years. If so, it must have been a fake, failing college. Your ideas are derivative, too much like an old fart who falls asleep to FOX

      1. Spiritus Mundi   2 months ago

        If you think college is not derivative, you have never been.

      2. minus the clever name   2 months ago

        Just to prove that I mute fools...

      3. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   2 months ago

        Poor little leftist bitch.

      4. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

        Retarded leftist thinks every professor is a far left liberal retard. Only 99% are.

        1. minus the clever name   2 months ago

          Jesse, I know you trot this 'original humor' every other post but do consider facts
          I am maybe the most conservative prof at my college (thought to be so but not...I reach principled conclusions on non-conservative starting points) but the facts are that poor education gave us not just current students but current profs.

          "Studies conducted through 2025 and 2026 consistently indicate that only one in three Americans (roughly 36%) would pass a standard U.S. citizenship civics test. While the pass rate for naturalizing immigrants is approximately 90-91%, general U.S."

          You will say this doesn't apply to profs. I KNOW IT DOES

          1. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   2 months ago

            Our democrat run education system has destroyed history and civics education in our schools. It was just starting when I went to school in the late 80’s and now they learn nothing. So again, it’s a democrat created problem.

            1. WellRedMan   2 months ago

              Say what? Leftists have been rewriting U.S. history for a couple of centuries. The entire point of public education was to indoctrinate children into the values of progressivism which was birthed in the U.S. with the creation of the Republican Party in the 1850s and the election of Lincoln, both of which had massive support from German socialist intellectuals who had fled Germany after the 1848-49 revolution. The idea that Left has dominated the American political system and its cultural milieu only since the 1960s is a myth and shows just how ignorant people are of how far modern America has deviated from its founding principles, principles which ceased to exist almost entirely after 1865.

              1. minus the clever name   2 months ago

                Progressivism ? that is an anachronism; there was no organized Progressivism in Lincoln's time and no trace of it in the Republican Party founding. Who supports you says nothing about YOU.

                And on your general hate , know that Lincoln despised people like you and supported those Germans , which is why they supported him, not because he was Socialist !!!

                August 24, 1855: Letter to Joshua F. Speed

                The American or "Know Nothing Party" was an anti-immigrant political party of the 1850's.

                I am not a Know-Nothing. That is certain. How could I be? How can any one who abhors the oppression of negroes, be in favor of degrading classes of white people? Our progress in degeneracy appears to me to be pretty rapid. As a nation, we began by declaring that "all men are created equal." We now practically read it "all men are created equal, except negroes." When the Know-Nothings get control, it will read "all men are created equal, except negroes, and foreigners, and catholics." When it comes to this I should prefer emigrating to some country where they make no pretence of loving liberty-to Russia, for instance, where despotism can be taken pure, and without the base alloy of hypocracy [sic].

      5. Sevo, 5-30-24, embarrassment   2 months ago

        Fuck off and die, asswipe.

      6. Benitacanova   2 months ago

        The ideas are fine; the syntax not so much. I think that's proof he IS a professor.

        1. minus the clever name   2 months ago

          Only on the logical premise that you know syntax. But you make 3 fallacies

          All people with ideas and bad syntax are professors. Obviously false.
          My GRE for English was very high, dean said they rarely got students with such high scores. (No coaching either 🙂

          IF the ideas are clear enough for you to evaluate then the syntax has serverd its purpose, called in English "the register"

          Finally, if we look at your commenting history you often use a derogatory evaluation when you are too cowardly to engage the actual argument.

        2. Vernon Depner   2 months ago

          Agreed. His word salads are convincing me he really is a college professor.

      7. minus the clever name   2 months ago

        Okay, folks, this commenter so antithetical to the real Heraclitus, has laid down the way to discredit him.
        I don't think I have ever watched Fox in my life !!!
        I have taught for 10 years and only did it because begged by a dean who needed someone with my skills. I was not a teacher before.
        The college is renowned for its attention to students.

        Now you should beware that H. doesn't strike you dead for hypocrisy in his name.

        Justice will overtake fabricators of lies and false witnesses.
        Heraclitus

    2. 557e54f   2 months ago

      I am fascinated how people can view events and facts through different lenses and come to diametrically opposed conclusions.

      You write that you hated the way Hillary acted, yet Trump's behavior -- fraud, felon, adjudicated sex assaulter, philanderer, liar, bigot misogynist -- is acceptable for the leader of what once was the Free World.

      You appear to believe that Harris and Biden lacked the intellectual acuity to be president, yet seem to believe that the addled ignoramus in the White House is capable of running the country.

      You mention "Biden riots" yet Charlottesville, January 6th and George Floyd riots occurred under Trump's watch. Apparently, these were "good" riots and those that occurred under Biden were "bad" riots.

      Moreover, the Afghan pullout was negotiated with the Taliban by Trump, not Biden, and was carried out in the absence of input from the Afghan government. And is the move against Iran truly the glorious victory Trump says it is?

      There truly are two different Americas, and one of them is a blinkered cult.

      1. Social Justice is neither   2 months ago

        It is amazing how much of reality you edit out to sustain your blind hatred.

      2. minus the clever name   2 months ago

        Yet I never even referred to your alternatives. Are two fools the same because they are both fools, you moron

        Maybe Hillary was a fool and Trump 1 was too
        Maybe Biden was a fool and Trump 2 was too.
        Had to vote for someone YOU MORON

        1. Liberty_Belle   2 months ago

          And you picked and got what you deserved... a failing democracy plagued by OVERT corruption, dissolution of military expertise, racism, erosion of personal freedoms for women, and the return of Jim Crow for minorities.

          Decades of equal rights advancements gone in 2 terms.

          1. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   2 months ago

            You give a good description of Obama’s presidency.

          2. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

            He was against Biden and obama dummy.

          3. EISTAU Gree-Vance   2 months ago

            Lol. Everything is so racist and unfair, libby. And racist too.

            Idiot.

            1. Liberty_Belle   2 months ago

              HB369, was signed into law Tuesday by Gov. Brian Kemp (R) and makes specific downballot races — like elections for district attorneys, board of education, county commissioners, and other local positions — nonpartisan in five Georgia counties: Clayton, Cobb, DeKalb, Fulton, and Gwinnett.

              Instead of running as a Democrat, Republican, or a candidate for another party, candidates for those races won’t list any party affiliation — likely making it easier to elect non-Democrats.

              The law has been criticized by lawmakers and voting rights advocates for attempting to dilute the voting power of Black voters, since it only applies to five specific counties with significant Black and Democratic populations, and not the whole state.

              Tell me how it isn't racist .

              1. EISTAU Gree-Vance   2 months ago

                So is showing up on time. Nobody cares, libby.

                Lol. Idiot.

          4. minus the clever name   2 months ago

            The major attack on minorities is abortion. so wrong there. and Personal freedoms for women has advanced greatly.

            To the first
            “Since the number of current living blacks
            (in the U.S.) is 31 million, the missing 10 million represents
            an enormous loss for, without abortion, America’s black
            community would now number 41 million persons. It would
            be 35 percent larger than it is currently. Abortion has swept
            through the black community cutting down every fourth
            member.”

            TO THE SECOND
            I go with former pro-choice atheist Leah Libresco that many women are far better off now.

          5. minus the clever name   2 months ago

            But "overt" is much better than non-overt !!! Do you ever look up words ?

            Overt is an adjective that describes actions, behaviors, or events done openly and without any attempt at concealment. It is the exact opposite of covert (hidden or secret)

        2. Murray Rothtard   2 months ago

          I get that you had to vote for someone. And I even fully understand picking Trump over Kamala. I'd have done the same if I were required to pick from one of the major parties.

          Voting for Trump is 100% understandable. Continuing to support his increasingly unhinged administration while it does everything you claim to hate about the other side is not.

          Saying "I voted for Trump cause he was the best choice, but what he's doing now is bad" is a totally ok thing to say.

          1. minus the clever name   2 months ago

            NO, it isn't. this is the "you aren't the person I married' view.
            Well,Murray, you sure have changed over your commenting history. You used to be more open-minded, more independent. What you say now seems like just anarchy. If he is that bad then then congress must be bad,other voters bad, the Judiciary -- -which boils down to you: you married Trump and now you want a divorce because he's changed -- but from your history it is you that has changed.

      3. mad.casual   2 months ago

        I am fascinated how people can view events and facts through different lenses and come to diametrically opposed conclusions.

        You say that like we didn't all just live through "AMA corrects course, declares women born with penises to be men."

      4. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

        Youre really fascinated on how not everyone buys every bullshit narrative you do, are at best midwits like you are, and some are intellectually curious.

        Youre even blaming trump for leftist riots lol.

      5. Sevo, 5-30-24, embarrassment   2 months ago

        yet Trump's behavior -- fraud (lie), felon (you're kidding, I hope), adjudicated sex assaulter (WHAT?), philanderer (OMG), liar (about what?), bigot misogynist (bullshit)--
        557e54f is a steaming pile of lying TDS addled shit ain't s/he?

      6. Scott Free2016   2 months ago

        No one but the deluded far left believes the 'felon' thing anymore.

        Blue Cities or States, Soros Prosecutors (who turned out to be criminals), violations of civil procedure.

        It makes you sound dumb when you include this.

      7. python33   2 months ago

        Wow, you just showed the world you are a idiot.

      8. ravenshrike   2 months ago

        Charlottesville was partially funded, suggested by, and transportation organized for by a SPLC plant. The Jan 6 pipe bomber totes was an autistic black guy living in his mom's basement who planted a bomb 20 ft away from a bunch of cops and not a female cop who immediately transferred to the CIA after the events of Jan 6th. As for the George Floyd riots, they were riots for a black armed robber who died of a drug overdose at most minorly aggravated by a dipshit cop using a training approved hold, the riots themselves being funded and exhorted by the likes of the worthless fucking commies running BLM.

        1. ungulant   2 months ago

          Read Everything You Love Will Burn. It was written as Charlottesville was being planned by white supremacists. The SPLC acted ignorantly but the Unite the Right would have happened without their involvement. Matthew Heimbach has enough hate to fuel that event on his own.

    3. bacchys   2 months ago

      MAGAts lie like they breath, and you're clearly lying.

    4. EdG   2 months ago

      Okay, Boomer.

    5. RJ Mathews   2 months ago

      This is entirely bullshit. Plus, it doesn’t event refute what the article said. Even if your story was true, it doesn’t make the article wrong

    6. ungulant   2 months ago

      You vote for someone because someone else annoys you? That's bizarre.

  2. Homer Thompson   2 months ago

    TINA

    as bad as trump is ... he still is the tallest midget, least dirty shirt, and strongest horse at the glue factory

    1. minus the clever name   2 months ago

      Those are logically 3 different fallacies

      The tallest midget is Argument of the Beard ...The "Argument of the Beard" (also known as the continuum fallacy or line-drawing fallacy) is a logical misstep where someone claims that two extreme states are indistinguishable simply because there is no exact dividing line between them.

      Least Dirty shirt is like worst state for poverty...if everyone in 49 states is wealthy and in the one remaining state there is 1 poor person, it is the least wealthy state.

      Strongest horse at glue factory is really 2 fallacies, one linguistic and one by convention. Even a strong horse can be eligible for the factory -- that is an irrelevancy....and the horses not there are not better , they are just not there .

      ====
      and in case you misjudge that I am pro-Trump like you are but down on him: Biden was the dumbest poorest spoken President (and being President accentuates the other negatives) , and Trump is the least political because he is older and didn't need the money and isn't plumping for a life at the trough, and strongest horse --- well if everybody would flip Hillary, Biden, Kamala, and Obama a well-deserved bird, we just plain wouldn't have Trump.

      1. Homer Thompson   2 months ago

        I wasn't responding to you ... I hadn't even read your comment before I made mine ... I was just snarking at column

        1. minus the clever name   2 months ago

          snarking often seems , rightly or wrongly, to be avoiding taking a stand. Yes, you were responding to an idiot but we need light and not just cursing of the darkness. So it seems to me

          1. tracerv   2 months ago

            Jesus Chirst dude. Piss off.

            1. minus the clever name   2 months ago

              a reader reads you and thinks "What a nasty self-righteous unsocial pig" now they might agree with you too. But you think if someone agrees with you they like you. THEY DON"T>

      2. Sevo, 5-30-24, embarrassment   2 months ago

        Pedants are boring piles of shit.

        1. Alberto Balsalm   2 months ago

          You are an authority on the topic. Fuck off and die asshole.

        2. minus the clever name   2 months ago

          Pedants speak better than you do. I'll grant you that.

  3. Don't look at me! ( Is the war over yet?)   2 months ago

    Still crying about Massie losing. Talk about a cult.

    1. Chuck P. (Now with less Sarc more snark)   2 months ago

      Libertarian leaning? More like leaning back into the reach around that Reason is so eagerly performing on him. Get your tongue up there a little further Tuccille.

    2. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

      How long until they blame the jews like the others?

      1. Kungpowderfinger   2 months ago

        When it becomes an official DNC talking point (almost there), these cosmos won’t stick their neck out that far until it’s safer to do so.

      2. Benitacanova   2 months ago

        Blaming jews was Massie's game.

        Game over.

    3. Heraclitus   2 months ago

      Yeah, move on and talk about Biden and Obama. The Massie election was a whole 48 hours ago. Amiright?

      1. Sevo, 5-30-24, embarrassment   2 months ago

        "...Amiright?..."

        Not since you've been posting here, asswipe.

  4. Ersatz   2 months ago

    Not a cult. Trump is actually just the tip of the spear... actually the tip of the stake.. being driven into the heart of globalism and wokeness. And to drive it deep enough to kill that zombie demon (D)racula you have to do it with ferociousness, fearlessness, force and dedication.
    If you interpret it through the lense of typical Saul Alinsky political and power theory it might look like cultish devotion to a person. NO - Trump was the only one (especially if you look at the R field of candidates and the general woke environment) that could have penetrated the dead flesh of the left cultural hegemony as far as he did.
    Time is short for him to do as much damage to the global leftist causes as possible so his followers - who are just people fed up with the gaslighting OF EVERY INSTITUTION. When he leaves the stage people will look for anyone who can do even a fraction of what Trump has accomplished in exposing the rot and incestuous relationships btwn 'journ-o-listas' and the dems... btwn the cultural industries and the Ds ... btwn the education industrial complex and the Ds.. etc etc.
    So, no- not a cult. Just people who recognize the right person who basically made the right time by force of his indomitable spirit. He was a necessary correction to the continual 'Slouching Towards Gomorrah'

    1. Juliana Frink   2 months ago

      Perfect smack-down to the mindless death CULT of the left, including all the useful idiots like JD, writing this tripe under the guise of reason. Bravo!!!

      "Tip of the spear..." Pretty much sums it up.

      "...gaslighting of EVERY INSTITUTION." Spot on!

      1. minus the clever name   2 months ago

        a volcano of trite hackneyed sayings, you are : 'smack down' 'death cult' 'tip of the spear' 'gaslighting' --- do you still say 'groovy' 'right on" "move the goalposts' "elephant in the room'

        1. Juliana Frink   2 months ago

          I read your post below staring with "Logic is my thing..." and was glad you took the time to counter JFree. The sentence, "Bill Moyers is a very low standard for incisive thought" had me smiling wide, and the rest of your post was impressive. Thanks.

          Then I read the response to JFree by EISTAU Gree-Vance just below yours and laughed out loud.

          Two posts, very different, both very much appreciated.

          Yes, I say "groovy" all the time among friends who know me and realize I use it a la Austin Powers and not in seriousness. And I actually grew up when people said it all the time - seriously - and never uttered it once.

          "Smack down?" So what?

          "Death CULT of the left?" In response to "Cult of Trump" - appropriate.

          "Tip of the spear" and "gaslighting" were both direct quotes of the commenter I was responding to.

          "Lighten up?" ... oh wait. I didn't use that one.

          1. minus the clever name   2 months ago

            I must be fair and compliment the lightness of your reply. Unexpected on here. Still, I think the criticism fits. I have taught college students,have for 10 years, all Philosophy majors and the habit of instinctive knee-jerk reactions to things starts early and stays if you don't cut it out by the roots. I have it on good evidence BTW that a close relative of mine coined the term 'knee-jerk' --- might interest you. So he was the first to use and probably the one that used it most appropriately.

            1. Juliana Frink   2 months ago

              Back in the 90s I submitted dozens of short stories to science fiction magazines and the terms "trite" and "hackneyed" did sometimes appear on rejection slips. It wasn't with respect to the type of expressions you refer to above, but the fact that I was trying to recall the atmosphere of my favorite writings from the "Golden Age" of science fiction. Okay, my own fault.

              But at the same time I was getting a little tired even then of reading the current works which were fast becoming taken over by wokeness. Then I was at a science fiction "con" one year at Stony Brook University where I had the occasion to sit in a room with a number of peers led by none other than Neil DeGrasse Tyson. At one point I posited that I sensed the genre seemed to have become overly concerned with political correctness. The result was blank stares throughout the room.

              Just a funny story I figured I'd share here.

              1. minus the clever name   2 months ago

                If I had to pick one person where the distance is maximal between what he is and what he is taken to be , it is Neil DeGrasse Tyson. Not smart,not nice, not well-spoken, arrogant, and esp someone who hides behind being Black.

          2. JFree   2 months ago

            Here's what Bonhoeffer has to say about that:

            We note further that people who have isolated themselves from others or who live in solitude manifest this defect less frequently than individuals or groups of people inclined or condemned to sociability. And so it would seem that stupidity is perhaps less a psychological than a sociological problem.

            And Lifton talked about how sub-groups work with cults. My paraphrase - the cult leader needs a peanut gallery. The peanut gallery needs a bigger peanut gallery around them playing different roles to reinforce their [pick your term] stupidity or thought reform. One of those roles being - give others in the peanut gallery an attaboy to reinforce their defense of challenges to the cult group.

            1. minus the clever name   2 months ago

              maybe, maybe not. This is all only possible by the rejection of real meanings to words : human, freedom, male, marriage, rights, etc.

              I recur to my LIfton quote about doctors and I applied it to abortionists.

              "“It was like a veil lifted,” she said. “I suddenly saw it for what it was—I was killing babies. And it didn’t matter if they were six weeks or 23. They were all babies.”"

              “I know it sounds strange to people, but for the first time in my life, I looked. I really looked… and I didn’t see a ‘right to choose,’ and I didn’t see what a great doctor I was. I didn’t even see the $800 I had just made in 15 minutes. All I could see was somebody’s son or daughter.”

              “I saw a tiny, beating heart… and I looked squarely in the face of another human being… I just knew that I couldn’t be a part of abortion anymore.”

              “I saw a 13-week baby fighting for his life during an ultrasound-guided abortion. And I knew I could no longer be a part of it.”

              1. JFree   2 months ago

                Again with the obsession about abortion politics. Which does fit with a few of Lifton's eight characteristics of brainwashing or 'thought reform' - the demand for purity; doctrine over person; sacred science; and, if you approve of abortion clinic bombings, dispensing of existence.

                1. minus the clever name   2 months ago

                  you just named how it fits.
                  But the doctrine of abortion is that living being is NOT a person !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! .Do read what you post for once 🙂

    2. Kungpowderfinger   2 months ago

      Couldn’t agree more.

      In truth, it's been years since the Republican Party was a conservative organization; these days it's a cult of personality around the president controlled opposition.

      And Team Red looses elections when they backslide, enjoy it while we can.

    3. Uilleam   2 months ago

      Well said.

    4. EdG   2 months ago

      Definitely a cult. As you described.

    5. EISTAU Gree-Vance   2 months ago

      “….wellll, being a dick ain’t so bad. Ya see chuck, there’s 3 kinds of people in this world: dicks, pussies and assholes….”

      The pussies and assholes are freaking out. Good.

    6. mtrueman   2 months ago

      " actually the tip of the stake.. being driven into the heart of globalism and wokeness. And to drive it deep enough to kill that zombie demon (D)racula you have to do it with ferociousness, fearlessness, force and dedication."

      What have you got against cults? A cult is the perfect weapon if you want to kill globalism and wokeness. You think you can do it with compromise and debate? That's exactly what They want you to believe. No, you need a strong, charismatic leader and a loyal unquestioning following - a cult in other words. You seem to have swallowed the propaganda or the media and academia that a cult is a bad thing. Don't be a dupe. Embrace the cult, destroy the globe and the woke.

  5. Fu Manchu   2 months ago

    Commenters here are a perfect example. Every logical fallacy is on public display to blindly support their master no matter what stupid, deranged shit he does.

    1. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

      You've been failing with this argument for half a decade sarc. You continue to misuse fallacious terms while constantly using fallacies.

      You have yet to make an intelligent argument and you've been here for 20 years.

      Ironically you have pushed every deep state, leftist lie in your blind hatred while screaming into the bottom of your popov vodka bottle. Youre not even a midwit but a halfwit.

    2. But SkyNet is a Private Company   2 months ago

      Are you the idiot who called listing the actual myriad reasons why a Weaponization Fund is needed “Whataboutism”? You wouldn’t know logic if it smacked the malt liquor out of your grubby hands.

    3. JFree   2 months ago

      Never again will we try to persuade the stupid person with reasons, for it is senseless and dangerous...it becomes apparent that every strong upsurge of power in the public sphere, be it of a political or of a religious nature, infects a large part of humankind with stupidity...The fact that the stupid person is often stubborn must not blind us to the fact that he is not independent. In conversation with him, one virtually feels that one is dealing not at all with a person, but with slogans, catchwords and the like, that have taken possession of him. - Dietrich Bonhoeffer

      Logical fallacies only apply to the reasoning - not the mindless stupid dependent spouting cliches.

    4. minus the clever name   2 months ago

      but is blindly attacking everything he does make you less of a fool

      The stupidest person on here is Molly but you are second !!!

    5. minus the clever name   2 months ago

      Of course fallacious to say 'every' and even 'perfect' as neither can apply in any way. and even a truly blind person would not necessarily show blind support so that fails too. In other words support can be blind and justified.

  6. Rev Arthur L kuckland (5-30-24 banana republic day)   2 months ago

    Member when massie voted to increase the debt cealimg under Biden? Rev members

    Massie is a political hack. If reason paid any attention to him, they would hate him...
    If reason in the late 90s paid attention to him they would hate him, current reason is pravda/nbc

    1. Leo Kovalensky II   2 months ago

      The Fiscal Responsibility Act of 2023 was a Republican sponsored bill that places like Heritage and Reason mostly criticized because it didn't cut enough spending. You're grasping if you think this was a gotcha against Massie.

      Key Components:
      Debt Limit Suspension: Suspended the statutory debt ceiling until January 2025, allowing the government to continue borrowing to pay its obligations without defaulting.
      Spending Caps: Imposed limits on discretionary spending for fiscal years 2024 and 2025, setting the framework for overall defense and non-defense spending allocations.
      Work Requirements: Expanded age requirements for work programs like the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) and Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF), while also adjusting hardship exemptions.
      Rescissions: Clawed back billions of dollars in unspent COVID-19 pandemic relief funds and rescinded portions of funding allocated to the Internal Revenue Service (IRS).
      Student Loans: Codified the end of the federal student loan payment pause and interest moratorium, formally requiring repayments to resume.
      Budgetary Impact: The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) estimated that the legislation reduced projected federal budget deficits by roughly $1.5 trillion over a 10-year period

      1. Sevo, 5-30-24, embarrassment   2 months ago

        Fuck off and die, shitstain.

    2. EdG   2 months ago

      Member when trump increased the national debt in just the past 12 months? EdG members

      1. MoreFreedom   2 months ago

        IMHO, if Trump knew he could get spending cuts through Congress, and even a balanced budget (or surplus), he would. He's smart enough to know he can't override Congress because all the Democrats and most of the GOP are big state authoritarians who want to spend MORE of your money. So instead of confronting Congress on spending, he's doing his best to eliminate RINOs.

        IMHO, working against Massie was a mistake by Trump, given Massie's fiscal positions. For many politicians, politics involves collective action pressure or Party discipline to make changes. And I think Trump feels the only way to get the policies the people want through Congress is to use this because the Democrats use it far more than the GOP. And Massie didn't help himself by opposing Trump's use of executive orders, where Congress gave the Executive branch (bureaucracy they counted upon) the authority to write the laws - something Congress regrets given they never expected someone like Trump to win. They expected a political class supporter from one party or the other.

      2. DesigNate   2 months ago

        Couple things, Mr. Ed

        1. Trump isn’t responsible for the budget, Congress is. I know all of you fucks know this cause you went apoplectic when he didn’t want to spend money Congress had allocated.

        2. Even if he WAS, he wouldn’t have been responsible for the past twelve months as fiscal year 2025 didn’t end until fucking September.

        3. His budget proposal for 2026 was actually less than what Congress decided to spend.

        In short you’re a retarded horses ass.

  7. snarling_dog   2 months ago

    I used to tell people my two favorite Republican presidents are Ronald Reagan and Barack Obama; no two people have done more for the Republican party than them. Some day Democrats will say Trump is their second favorite Democrat president. I really hope Republicans lose both the House and Senate so we can look forward to two years of gridlock (along with a long drawn out impeachment trial in the Senate).

    For some weird reason the alleged Libertarians at Reason are appalled by a narcissistic megalomaniac demanding fealty, like no other politician in the history of politics has done that.

    We have seen this Trump endorsement movie before and know how it ends - in the endorsed candidate losing in the general election.

    1. Spiritus Mundi   2 months ago

      The only reason it is noticable with Trump is due to greater heterogenicity of the GOP. The dems are one hive mind and rarely stray from their leaders. Fetterman being a rare exception and soon to be excommunicated like Manchin.

    2. minus the clever name   2 months ago

      Well you were wrong about Hillary and Kamala so if we are to go by previous prognostications , wrong again, moron 🙂

    3. TrickyVic (old school)   2 months ago

      Michelle's two favorite republicans are Barack and Bush Jr.

    4. mad.casual   2 months ago

      Some day Democrats will say Trump is their second favorite Democrat president.

      Name the day. Name the amount. I'll take that bet.

      I'll even suggest a parlay at any rate in any order on the day they say Nixon is in their top 5.

      FFS, the retards hate Jefferson and only acknowledge Lincoln as a Republican as a foil to Republicans they despise.

      Fucking moron.

    5. DesigNate   2 months ago

      The only times we ever get any meaningful gridlock is when it’s a Dem president and Reps hold the House and Senate.

      There has never been real gridlock in the opposite scenario.

  8. Azathoth!!   2 months ago

    I voted for Massie.

    Every time I could.

    I ripped his detractors. The Dems --and the primary opponents.

    And I told Massie, when he started down this path, that it would destroy his career and his support.

    Not because of what he was saying.

    Because of who he was standing with. Democrats and Muslims.

    Liars, cheats and jihadis.

    I told him they were using him to sow discord, to create rifts.

    But he was too far gone. To hear him give that concession speech, that abomination littered with groyper and DSA nonsense was heartbreaking.

    I don't even know Gallrein. He's likely a rubberstamp.

    But it's better to be a MAGA rubberstamp than the leftist one Massie was fast morphing into.

    Hopefully he'll come to his senses.

    1. Quicktown Brix   2 months ago

      leftist one Massie was fast morphing into

      What principles did Massie go left on on?

      Was it when he flipped on "no new wars"?
      Or when he flipped on "release the files"?
      Or when he flipped on cut spending/ reduce the debt?
      Or was it when he flipped on no domestic spying?

      Or is it all just guilt bt association for working with people with under the Baptist and the bootlegger type situations.

      If Chuck Schumer became pro-life, would you flip to pro-choice just to avoid having the same principle as a dumocrat?

      1. mtrueman   2 months ago

        "What principles did Massie go left on on? "

        He sided with the Left on the genocide in Gaza issue. Or, equally true, he sided with the Islamist Right on the Gaza issue. Take your pick.

  9. But SkyNet is a Private Company   2 months ago

    Funny how Massie won reelection easily right up until he embraced the Squad and their values

    1. Quicktown Brix   2 months ago

      This is what you want to think, maybe what you have to think.

      1. Sevo, 5-30-24, embarrassment   2 months ago

        This is what passes for intelligent comment from a TDS-addled asswipe.

        1. Quicktown Brix   2 months ago

          LOL. read up, professor.

          1. Sevo, 5-30-24, embarrassment   2 months ago

            LOL?! When will they let you advance to grade 2, asswipe?

        2. The Average Dude (Who's Smarter Than You)   2 months ago

          Slimey AND steamy!!

          1. Sevo, 5-30-24, embarrassment   2 months ago

            Yes, you are and dumber than a bag of rocks.

  10. JFree   2 months ago

    The cult is more dangerous than the cult leader. Dietrich Bonhoeffer and Robert Lifton both saw that even though they most wrote about how to identify that cult leader.

    1. Leo Kovalensky II   2 months ago

      Can we finally move on to the Koolaid phase?

    2. Spiritus Mundi   2 months ago

      Mohammadeans >>> Mohammed
      Manson family > Charles
      Communists >>> Stalin, Pol Pot, Mao etc

      Kind of checks out

    3. minus the clever name   2 months ago

      You sure don't get those two...Bonhoeffer's leader was JESUS -- do you approve? From his "Cost and Discipleship" :
      "Jesus is the only significance. Beside Jesus nothing has any significance. He alone matters."

      As for Lifton , he showed how abortionists justify killing babies : Lifton wrote about the psychological mechanism of defining certain groups of human beings as a different, lesser species or "sub-human" (e.g., untermenschen). He argued that by stripping people of their humanity through bureaucratic or biological labeling, individuals could accept their deaths without compunction.... modern abortionists experience a similar psychological partition. They must cultivate a "healer self" for their patients while simultaneously utilizing a "destroyer self" to perform abortions.

      1. JFree   2 months ago

        Bonhoeffer was killed resisting Hitler. His short essay - video form linked - essay excerpt On Stupidity from his Letters and Papers from Prison. The word Stupidity - Dummheit - to describe cult followers comes from Schiller and is not the best translation of that idea but he didn't do the translating either.

        And Lifton spent his life studying the psychology of cults, brainwashing, thought-terminating cliches, etc. Towards the end of his life, he was interviewed by Bill Moyers in reference to his foreword in the book The Dangerous Case of Donald Trump - where he pointed to the dangers of combining malignant normality, solipsistic reality, and the immense power of Prez.

        1. minus the clever name   2 months ago

          Logic is my thing, I teach Philosophy college students. Now immediately we have to know whether you are using Lifton's work on the Nazis to add cred to YOUR statement about Trump.

          Bill Moyers is a very low standard for incisive thought 🙂
          As to the book, nobody on here could define such loose sloppy non-referential terms as malignant normality !!! solipsistic reality etc.

          I suspect these are not quotes simply because Lifton DID NOT SAY THEM .:)

          Let's take Lifton as he applies to ABORTION
          “Psychologically, nothing is darker or more menacing, or harder to accept, than the participation of physicians in mass murder. However technicized or commercial the modern physician may have become, he or she is still supposed to be a healer — and one responsible to a tradition of healing, which all cultures revere and depend upon.”
          ― Robert Jay Lifton

          1. JFree   2 months ago

            Lifton is not admiring physicians who engage in abortion. He is saying that they encounter cognitive dissonance in their work and have to deal with it. Can you read?

            I am using his book Thought Reform and the Psychology of Totalism: A Study of "Brainwashing" in China published around the time of the first Manchurian Candidate film. Where he outlines eight characteristics of thought reform (he doesn't like the term brainwashing). Five or six of which apply to the MAGA crowd - and esp the ones who comment here who have bought into the worst tendencies and who continue to double down.

            And yes he used the terms 'malignant normality' (normalizing behaviours and actions that were previously seen as malignant) and 'solipsistic reality' (part of his narcissism where his entire reality is inside his head and nothing/noone of any importance exists outside his head)

            1. minus the clever name   2 months ago

              so silly

    4. EISTAU Gree-Vance   2 months ago

      Lol. Pretentious douchebag name dropping. Impressive, j!

      Idiot,

      1. JFree   2 months ago

        Golly. Here's what Bonhoeffer says about that:

        Against stupidity we are defenseless. Neither protests nor the use of force accomplish anything here; reasons fall on deaf ears; facts that contradict one’s prejudgment simply need not be believed — in such moments the stupid person even becomes critical — and when facts are irrefutable they are just pushed aside as inconsequential, as incidental. In all this the stupid person, in contrast to the malicious one, is utterly self-satisfied and, being easily irritated, becomes dangerous by going on the attack. For that reason, greater caution is called for than with a malicious one. Never again will we try to persuade the stupid person with reasons, for it is senseless and dangerous.

        Am I a pretentious douchebag or are you a self-satisfied, easily irritated, and stupid cult follower? Hell I'll go with both.

        1. EISTAU Gree-Vance   2 months ago

          Self satisfied? You bet. Life is good. Easily irritated? Never. Life is good. Stupid cult follower? Well, if some pretentious douchebag says so…..

          Everything Is So Terrible And Unfair, j. Haha. Idiot.

  11. Leo Kovalensky II   2 months ago

    Mamdani is a socialist by expressed choice, while Trump is one when it suits him.

    It's technically fascism in this case, but collectivism none-the-less.

    The Trump administration has acquired or agreed to acquire equity stakes in at least 20 companies as part of a national security strategy to secure domestic supply chains in key industries.

    https://www.cato.org/commentary/uncle-sam-shareholder

  12. Agammamon   2 months ago

    What did I tell ya?

    One article is Trump's approval rating is cratering, the next is how everyone just worships the guy.

    1. TrickyVic (old school)   2 months ago

      The ghost of Yogi Berra.

    2. mad.casual   2 months ago

      I must say, all the "Yeah! Republicans are gonna backslide!" cheerleading feels more like a bed of nails than cheap, $0.50 Chinese astroturf.

    3. Fu Manchu   2 months ago

      It's the 35% and falling on the right that still support him. A majority of Repubs, hence why Trumpists win primaries. But very far from a majority overall.

  13. Dillinger   2 months ago

    lol @reason waaaaahmbulance babies

  14. TD   2 months ago

    These cults of personalities pass. Trump's will be done in three years and he can't be cloned. Obama is practically forgotten now, but there was certainly a cult of personality around him. There was also short one around Ross Perot before he self imploded. This will pass to be replaced by boring ciphers once again until they've managed to piss off enough people to allow another to rise.

    1. MWAocdoc   2 months ago

      Disagree. Obama was an embarassment to the Dems. He was a token for the wokeness trend that outlived the trend.

    2. mad.casual   2 months ago

      Obama is practically forgotten now

      Ooh, fun!

      https://reason.com/search/Obama?date_start=2026-05-21 - 1 result
      https://reason.com/search/Obama?date_start=2026-05-15 - 5 results
      https://reason.com/search/Obama?date_start=2026-02-22 - 63 results

      https://reason.com/search/Bill+Clinton?date_start=2026-02-22 - 13 results

      https://reason.com/search/Bush?date_start=2026-02-22 - 48 results

      https://reason.com/search/Bush+Sr.?date_start=2026-02-22 - 0 results

      https://reason.com/search/Reagan?date_start=2026-02-22 - 22 results

      https://reason.com/search/Carter+-John -Andrew?date_start=2026-02-22 - 13 results

      Notes-
      Most references: Obama
      Most recent reference: Obama
      Most referenced presidential party: Democrat (even with Bush/Bush Sr. conflations that *should* increase counts *and* Clinton/Carter filters that should suppress them)
      Least references: Bush Sr. (effectively forgotten)

      The issue with Obama and the false conflation you're making is the SSDD retardation that Conservatives opposed him because of the color of his skin. Conservatives (and others) didn't hate Obama as a person. There was comparatively less burning him in effigy and fewer actual attempts on his life. They oppose the fact that he represented a (several) retrograde social policy(ies) that will live on at least until KBJ steps down.

      Suffice to say, neither Obama *nor* Clinton *nor* Carter has been forgotten by Reason, but Bush Sr. has.

    3. minus the clever name   2 months ago

      But the person and the idea they embody are two utterly different things. I know many who can't stand Lincoln but won't dare say they are pro-slavery. Trump for you is just the person but in those 2 elections he was mainly one of 3 things

      1)The better alternative to hateful lying Hillary who announced she would not represent as President the roughly 31.5 million Americans as "deplorable"

      2) The alternative to a bumbling poorly-spoken Biden whose VP incredibly had said
      Vice President Kamala Harris under fire for saying 'the border is secure'
      by The National DeskTue, September 13, 2022
      I was teaching some HIspanic college students at that time and they were enraged that violent and morally vacant fellow Hispanics were coming across the border and going to live -- where else--- in nice Hispanic neighborhoods.

      3) The normal person vote. "I might not like Trump the person but he says he will do X and that is what I am voting for not for Trump"

  15. MWAocdoc   2 months ago

    I think Jay Dee has lost it. Hand wringing is not the proper response to Massie being defeated by the increasingly polarized political climate in the United States. This is actually part of a global swing in the political climate that is part of a much longer cycle over the last two thousand years, and it's a very human society thing. In general, humans cannot stand prosperity or success for very long. Reactionaries start to bloom just when things are actually going great, and I defy anyone to explain it. No matter how good things are for most people; no matter how much the social welfare of people is improving; no matter how wealthy people are compared to previous generations; there will always be someone looking for someone else to blame for their real or imagined personal problems, whether real or imagined. And there will always be a populist craving personal power who will point the finger at a scapegoat, tell disaffected people what they want to hear - that's it's the scapegoat's fault the people are unfairly being victimized. Once the pendulum starts to swing, violence and mindless mobs start to fly into action, and then more and more people become fearful and join in to the reaction. This trend is as irresistible as the daily ocean tides. Trump is nothing new. This particular reactionary swing actually started three decades ago when growing deficit spending increasingly destablized the American economy and the politicians had to switch designated enemies from International Communism to Fundamentalist Islamic Jihad Terrorism. Pulling your hair out will not contribute anything rational to the situation, Jay Dee ...

    1. EISTAU Gree-Vance   2 months ago

      Huh. The “Fundamentalist Islamic Jihad Terorism” had nothing to do with “switch(ing) designated enemies”? Just more scapegoating?

      Fascinating, doc.

      1. MWAocdoc   2 months ago

        When you're looking to find a new enemy it's not hard to find one.

        1. EISTAU Gree-Vance   2 months ago

          Yeah, “Fundamentalist Islamic Jihad Terrorism” has a way of smacking you in the face like that. Lol.

  16. mad.casual   2 months ago
  17. CountmontyC   2 months ago

    So President Trump should be loyal to those who attack him and oppose his policies? No, just no. President Trump did exactly what a political leader should do and that is use the democratic process to replace someone who is acting as on obstacle with someone who is hopefully helpful in accomplishing the agenda.

  18. damikesc   2 months ago

    Cassidy sucking up to Jimmy Kimmel was enough to never support him again.

  19. Sevo, 5-30-24, embarrassment   2 months ago

    Tuccille? Make the word a much better place and your family proud: Get reamed with a barb-wire-wrapped baseball bat, bleed out and die.
    And have your family locate your grave for me so I can do what's appropriate: Piss on it.

  20. Uomo Del Ghiaccio   2 months ago

    Thomas Massie for Senate!

  21. billyjack   2 months ago

    The Republicans have lost my vote. I may never vote for another Republican for the rest of my life.

    For me to vote for a Republican, he will first have to denounce Trump and his MAGA cult.

    1. Sevo, 5-30-24, embarrassment   2 months ago

      One more TDS-addled shit heard from.

  22. Thoritsu   2 months ago

    JD, sweetie, what is the Democratic Party?

    We can talk, but we have two choices for now. The fact that the Republicans are coherent, should largely be positive to Libertarians, until somehow the totalitarian left is not completely united behind the Demonrats.

    Government spending? Bad. Oppression, and institutional government force? Worse. Both parties waste money. One dominates in forcing oppression and removing rights.

    Not even complicated, unless you really don’t care about freedom. That Trump crushed Massie? So what? Massie could have saved his position by speaking but not voting in this way. His ass was not big enough to carry his mouth. Message to you Rand Paul!

  23. minus the clever name   2 months ago

    Molly complains exceedingly about Republicans opposing a woman's right to kill a baby on her lunch break BUT this ? Naaah

    Democrats Sink Women's History Museum Bill Because It Wouldn't Include Transgenders

    Now I am not GOP or Democrat so want to head off that counter-reply

    1. JFree   2 months ago

      But you sure do seem to have a compulsion to frequently mention abortion in a comment thread where the article is not about abortion and you are the only one who brings it up as if it is relevant.

      1. minus the clever name   2 months ago

        And you bring it up as if not relevant.. X or not-X one MUST BE RIGHT and it's me.

        1. mtrueman   2 months ago

          Are you X or not-X?

          1. minus the clever name   2 months ago

            any logical statement can be converted so that X becomes not-X
            so the point is silly.
            Is Biden a white man ?
            Is Biden not a white man ?

        2. JFree   2 months ago

          It is only relevant to you. You are the only person who mentioned it - obsessively - including in response to a completely irrelevant diversion where you conflated Lifton's work on medical ethics with a misinterpreted selecton where he focuses on internal conflicts that abortion DOCTORS have. Despite the fact that all your other posts - and the political issue - though not in the article (or my initial post) which talks about cults (and Lifton's work on those) - revolves around the pregnant woman not the doctor.

          1. JFree   2 months ago

            In particular - Trump doesn't give a shit about abortion. Your cult attributes an attitude to him that he doesn't have but that you use as a purity ring among the cult.

            1. minus the clever name   2 months ago

              I voted for a Democrat Governor 2 elections ago. I am not Republican. I am not Maga either.You want your silly hate to have a basis so you struggle on here to pin some label on me. I tell you in all honesty I am nowhere near what you think

              I say "X' because I have a hard-won basis for saying it , not because it is anybody's party line.

          2. minus the clever name   2 months ago

            If what you said were true you wouldn't have to mention it 🙂
            I think you are obsessive, and you being the only one to take umbrage at my very relevant abortion statements proves it.

  24. MoreFreedom   2 months ago

    The author thinks the GOP is a cult of Trump yet fails to look at or call his citizen supporters the same. There isn't a cult, it's voters showing who they support. Calling the GOP a cult of Trump is something I expect from MSNBC, CBS, CNN and their failing businesses.

    Trump is simply exposing RINOs and Democrats, by their reactions to Trump, and voters are telling us what they want. Just like this article exposes the author's TDS. I'd say it's just as fair to call much of the Reason staff an anti-Trump cult.

    1. mtrueman   2 months ago

      " I'd say it's just as fair to call much of the Reason staff an anti-Trump cult."

      I've told you before. You don't seem to know the meaning of the word 'cult.' It's a group of people who unquestioningly follow a charismatic leader. Those who oppose Trump don't have a leader, let alone a charismatic one. They are not a cult. Those who follow Trump fit the bill to a T. And you should embrace the label. A cult is the ideal vehicle to combat globalism and wokeism, as I pointed out earlier. The main stream media, the effete intellectuals and the leftists will all tell you that cults are bad, and the only acceptable way to solve political disputes is through debate and compromise. Don't fall for their lies. Denying the Trump cult only weakens its potential power. Doubling down on devotion to the dear leader is the only way forward.

      1. Sevo, 5-30-24, embarrassment   2 months ago

        I've told you before.
        You.
        Are.
        Full.
        Of.
        Shit.
        Fuck off and die, asswipe.

  25. Ben of Houston   2 months ago

    I would like to point out that the response to Trump is so intense that many people feel forced to support him.

    For example, I hated the war with Iran. It was extremely foolish. However, when people called it illegal and unconstitutional, I was forced to support Trump to correct them

    When Trump started the ballroom, I didn't care for it, but I felt that I had to correct people claiming everything. It was perfectly legal. The demolished wing wasn't a major historical building. He didn't need permits.

    This goes down the line, even to things like abortion. The left goes nuts about how abortion bans are an evil plot to enslave women, and I feel forced to defend against my own opinions because the logic of the pro-life movement is clear and simple, and anyone who doesn't understand it is willfully lying to themselves and others (it's a baby, we don't kill babies, the end).

    So, it's not that I really support Trump that strongly. It's that I hate the people lying and manipulating against Trump even more.

    1. Juliana Frink   2 months ago

      The media response to Trump is as blatently biased as it is hateful and intense. Anyone with an open mind can see this, thus it is the open-minded who are "forced" to stand up for him. Then they can be labeled as a "cult" by the same conniving media. Pretty slick, ain't it?

      You only have to read the title of this particular diatribe to witness the extent of the propaganda here. When you realize that, you have isolated one facet of a psyop they repeat in order to corrupt the Free Minds of people everywhere.

      1. mtrueman   2 months ago

        "The media response to Trump is as blatently biased as it is hateful and intense."

        The media is under no obligation to be even handed and loving in their treatment of Trump, or any other politician. They have their likes and dislikes and are within their rights to promote them as they see fit. Is it unfair? Maybe, but you are also free to publish what you want about politicians that interest you.

        "Then they can be labeled as a "cult" by the same conniving media."

        The media, academics and the left call it a cult to scare you. They know a cult can unify a large number of people, give them direction under a charismatic leader and effect changes that will disadvantage the media's academics' treasured policies, positions and ideas. A cult is a force to be reckoned with. A force to be feared. In contrast, millions of the dispossessed, isolated, individual and alienated can be dealt with, starting with scaring them into further solitude by stigmatizing the collective power that cults afford.

        1. Juliana Frink   2 months ago

          "The media, academics and the left call it a cult to scare you."

          They also scare a lot of their own useful idiots into shooting anyone they deem part of this "force to be reckoned with."

          Like I said, pretty slick (psyop), ain't it?

          1. mtrueman   2 months ago

            Shooting people is more than a psyop. And I doubt fear is the primary motivation of people who take up arms against their enemy. Think about it for a moment. Anger and revenge is more likely. Doesn't fear have the effect of freezing people into immobility and inaction? That's why stigmatizing their opponents as a cult works so well. 'We're not a cult, we're autonomous, isolated individuals incapable of collective action to address our common grievances,' they think as they sit in their basements venting their anger on home computers.

        2. Ben of Houston   2 months ago

          They can be as biased and opinionated as they like. But they are not allowed to lie. And that's what I'm angry at. Repeated, easily disproven lies that come up constantly.

          From the media
          From commentators
          From ELECTED REPRESENTATIVES

          1. ungulant   2 months ago

            Trump lies every time he opens his mouth. What? If you hate lying that much you'd simply never vote. I can't think of a politician I'd truly believe never lied.

    2. AJinNJ   2 months ago

      Life starts after synaptogenesis which is where neurons wire together in the brain; it's a well defined point in fetal development. Prior to this, there is literally no sentience. That's around 20 weeks of development. Abortion before then is not murder. Sorry but science and all.

      1. Juliana Frink   2 months ago

        I think you meant to say "Sorry, but materialism and all." There are compelling alternate scientific views on the source of consciousness. Christoph Koch and Joachim Keppler are two who challenge the conventional view that consciousness is produced by the brain.

        I for one believe the mysteries of this unimaginably vast universe - or multiverse - in which we become individuals, will steadfastly refuse to be diminished in service of political arrogance.

      2. Ben of Houston   2 months ago

        Except that is as arbitrary as any other point. Life is continuous. Pregnancy is a process to turn secretions into humans. There are numerous point at which we can say they transition and gain rights: conception, implantation, heartbeat, neural development, quickening, potential viability, certain viability, and birth. Whether it's one point or in stages, it doesn't matter.

        The decision on which to choose isn't science. It's not even philosophy. It's a completely arbitrary choice of law.

        However, thank you for the example. People making definitive and absolute statements as indisputable facts

      3. minus the clever name   2 months ago

        Many scientists mock your pseudo-science. So 'it' is alive , it life but it is not 'human life' !!! How unscientific and stupid. I have tons of testimony from ex-abortionists and they loathe your way of thinking.

        "Biologically, they note that a unique set of human DNA is formed at conception. Many former practitioners, such as Dr. Catherine Wheeler, an OB/GYN who previously performed abortions, point to the undeniable reality of a distinct, living human baby in the womb as their reason for leaving the practice."

        I ask you: Have you any personal repsonsibilty in some baby having been aborted? Let's drop the clinical theoretic attitude you are trying to maintain. Have you been in any way responsible for somebody's abortion ?

    3. ungulant   2 months ago

      Forced to support him??? What? If anybody tried to force me to support someone, I'd run the other way. But maybe that's just me.

      I try to vote for people with principles and values which is why Trump and his ilk will never see a vote from me.

      This whole "look what you made me do" excuse for Trump voting is so lame. You got conned. It's no one else's fault. Move on.

  26. Sevo, 5-30-24, embarrassment   2 months ago

    Tuccillie Is Nothing More Than a Lying Pile of Steaming TDS-Addled Shit Who Would Make the World a Far Better Place by Fucking Off and Dying.
    Get reamed with a barb-wire-wrapped baseball bat, shitstain.

  27. Truthteller1   2 months ago

    Tucille is a low IQ regime bootlicker. The "resistance" which cucks like this rat identify with is far more of a cult than anything with Donald Trump.

    1. mtrueman   2 months ago

      "The "resistance" which cucks like this rat identify with is far more of a cult than anything with Donald Trump."

      You don't understand the meaning of the word 'cult.' Your comment is nothing more than the juvenile 'I know you are but what am I?' A cult is a group of people who follow a charismatic leader. The 'resistance' as you call it, could be considered a group of people, but they certainly lack a leader, let alone a charismatic leader.

      "Tucille is a low IQ regime bootlicker. "

      It seems 'regime' is another word you're having trouble with. Read the article again. This time carefully. You'll find it critical of the Republican Party, the party that holds the presidency, the Senate, the House and the Supreme Court - the regime, in other words.

      My advice: don't be afraid to consult a dictionary if you're not sure of the meanings of words. Resist the temptation to parrot these words heard from others even if you like the sound they make.

      1. JFree   2 months ago

        A cult is a group of people who follow a charismatic leader.

        That depends on how 'charismatic' is defined. Too often, it is assumed that the leader creates the cult. The 'great man theory of history' as applied to cults.

        There are at least two other dynamics. One is that there are people who are looking for a cult - follower driven cults. Two there are people who, under particular circumstances, fill a power vacuum with a cult.

        I think Trump is the latter. He just happened to be the first pol in decades to address working class concerns. And despite a complete lack of credibility, he remained the only pol who really addressed that demographic until Biden (who then promptly died-while-breathing) who had the credibility but not the demographic focus. As long as no one else addresses that demographic, then the pol who does will have a cult created around them to protect that pols power.

        No one in the R's will ever take that demographic mantle from Trump. The D's could but they are clueless and focused on other 50%+1 shit.

        1. mtrueman   2 months ago

          I don't want to underestimate the charisma of Trump. His most successful career prior to politics was as a TV celebrity, a position he held for quite a while. He's fading now, but he can still 'work a room,' and is fascinating and entertaining to watch even if he's spouting absolute drivel.

          Trump's main problem as a cult leader is that he's an empty suit without any beliefs or ideology to guide him. Pro-war, anti-war, as the primary example. Rudderless navigation through tariff policy, annexation of Greenland and so on.

          Maybe you could say immigration is something he believes in, but as a developer he relied on people without papers to build his projects. I figure early in in his political campaign, he rambled on and mentioned the immigrants, got a big reaction from the crowd, made a mental note, and each subsequent stop in the campaign became more and more strident on the issue. What we see is a celebrity's desire for audience adulation rather than any sincerely held beliefs. I suspect Hitler was much the same with the Jews, though Hitler did seem to have firmly held beliefs in the destiny of the German nation.

          1. JFree   2 months ago

            I think that empty suit of beliefs is what makes him an effective cult leader. All R's who have won have had to adopt some part of Buchanan's 'southern strategy'. Reagan brought the 'Reagan Dems' on board with true charisma. Old Bush had no ability to connect with anyone outside the country club but Atwater was able to skewer Dukakis (another D with no ability to connect) with race-baiting. Young Bush had his aw-shucks persona and was truly born-again. Romney looked like the billionaire guy who once fired you - which is similar to Trump who had a long long history of screwing his blue-collar employees. But personality wise - the guy in a bar who can keep spouting shit because he never had the shit beaten out of him when he was younger. Trump went for the Rothbard paleo strategy - combine trickle-down economics with Wallace/KKK face-stomping.

            Which worked not because of his charisma but because his opponents were Hillary and a dead guy.

            1. Bruce Hayden   2 months ago

              And, yet, Trump was the first major party nominee, in recent memory, to have had a meeting the day after his first nomination to thank all of the workers, and especially the blue collar workers, along with various groups of LEOs, for the work they did making the nomination pagent possible. He called out the carpenters for building the stage, the electricians for lighting it, etc.

              We have a couple units at Trump International in LV. And the staff there love him, and his older boys. What’s not to love? He listens to them. You know where not taxing tips came from? One of the regular bartenders at the DJT restaurant there. He told one of those at the bar one night that if he wanted to carry, NV, that’s what he needed to do. Next day, it was in Trump’s platform.

              Then there are his older boys. One of the hard core Dems there, working security, tells of his first company picnic. Two guys in wife beater shirts and kacki shorts were running the BBQ grill. Taking orders and talking to everyone. Turns out that it was Jr and Eric. Imagine the Obama girls, or Clinton daughter doing anything that wasn’t elitist. If you want to get anything done or changed there, just buttonhole Eric, as he walks across the lobby. Harder to do though now, with his father back in the WH, and a full USSS detail.

              All the staff there have their Trump stories. Last time we were there, the (middle-aged black) woman in the gift shop told me about an hour she spent with him, personally signing tennis shoes (for charity, of course). My wife bought a pair. She claims she likes the way they look. Don’t believe her… But she is convinced that he recognizes her (as the beautiful French looking woman living there), from the time that one of his USSS advance team got her up front, when she was on a walker. She knows that he is coming when that USSS agent shows up. They are pretty good buddies now.

              So, you can say what you want about the hard headed, hard negotiating, builder and real estate tycoon. But the reality is that blue collar labor are some of his strongest supporters. I still get positive responses for wearing a Trump hat (they sell a collection of them in that gift shop). Got 4 comments yesterday at In-N-Out. And most likely demographic for comments is minority working class or blue collar.

              1. JFree   2 months ago

                But the reality is that blue collar labor are some of his strongest supporters.

                So? I agree that there is a cult around Trump. One of the characteristics of that is what Lifton (who I refer to in other posts in this thread) is the notion of doctrine over person. Meaning - the core ideas of the group (the reasons WHY blue-collar supports him) overrides the personal experiences of those members (the actual way that blue-collar is treated by Trump).

                Trump is certainly not a Romney type - or a D elitist - or a Reason cocktail party. But nor has he ever worked with his hands, been seen without a suit, avoided stiffing his lower-level employees in his bankruptcies, or ever had to think about how he will put food on the table for his family. Nor is his second term 'platform' spending anywhere near the amount of time dealing with the totally legitimate issue of affordability as it is feathering the nests of corrupt cronies and techbros hovering around DC and MarALago now.

                1. minus the clever name   2 months ago

                  "You are hate with a suit on so you can go out in public"

      2. Truthteller1   2 months ago

        You are clueless. Many cults have no charismatic leaders, or even an individual identified as a leader.

        " While many famous examples featured magnetic figures, cults do not actually require charismatic leaders. Many groups function through alternative structures, decentralization, and psychological manipulation."

        1. mtrueman   2 months ago

          I'm happy to concede the point. But it's ridiculous to hold that those who oppose Trump constitute a cult. A group as disparate as Tucker Carlson and Omar Ilhan has nothing to hold it together as a distinct entity. It's also ridiculous to claim that those who oppose Trump suffer from a mental disorder. This is all childish name calling in lieu of cogent argument.

        2. Sevo, 5-30-24, embarrassment   2 months ago

          "...You are clueless..."

          You misspelled "full of shit".

      3. Sevo, 5-30-24, embarrassment   2 months ago

        "You don't understand the meaning of the word 'cult.'.."

        You don't understand much of anything, asswipe. Fuck off and die.

  28. AJinNJ   2 months ago

    Apparently Tuccille hasn't read "Furious Minds" from Laura K. Field. This is the new core "philosophy" of the Republican Party, with or without Trump.

    1. 5Arete22   2 months ago
  29. 5Arete22   2 months ago

    Indeed. "Our Constitution and our country is more important than any one person. I voted to convict President Trump because he is guilty." -- Sen. Cassidy

  30. Brett Bellmore   2 months ago

    Trump sucks, but you know what? He'd never have had a ghost of a chance if the Republican party establishment hadn't been running a bait and switch operation on its voting base for literally decades. And kept it up even after the base figured it out.

    By the time Trump ran for the Republican nomination a large fraction of the Republican base had given up on reforming the GOP, and just wanted to tear it down and start over.

    Trump was hired as a wrecking ball, not a President.

    And then he shocked everybody by actually trying to live up to his campaign promises. No, not out of any principle, just because he wanted to KEEP his voters' support, and had no principles demanding that he cheat them.

    That's what created the 'cult': Republicans finally, after decades, getting a President who, however awful he was in other ways, was actually doing what he said he'd do.

    Well, he's burning that support now, doing whatever he personally wants because he never needs their votes again. That's the problem with a term limited pragmatist.

    But the GOP is never going back to being a bait and switch operation again, the party base will burn it to the ground before they'll tolerate that.

    1. minus the clever name   2 months ago

      Not even close,really.

      As Salena Zito showed, Trump got in on the highly-reluctant Evangelical vote disgusted at the immoral hatred and and constant religious and judgmental degrading of 'deplorables' by Hillary,
      people she publicly showed she would never represent if elected.

  31. DRM   2 months ago

    So, you bring up Cassidy's ACU rating.

    Looking at the eight Senators for Louisiana and its bordering states (Arkansas, Mississippi, and Texas), Cassidy has the second-lowest lifetime rating (Hyde-Smith has a 78.32%), and is tied for the lowest most-recent rating (59% with Roger Wicker). Looking at all fifty Republican Senators as of the last ACU ratings, Cassidy was 36th of 50 lifetime, 41st of 50 latest.

    You later suggest that Rand Paul has "drawn Trump's wrath". But Rand Paul won his 2022 primary by a huge margin -- and Rand Paul is tied for #1 in ACU rating among all Senators both lifetime and as of most recent rating.

    So, we have two Senators who you chose as illustrative examples, and who, by your account angered Trump. By the metric for conservatism you chose, one is a paragon of conservatism, and one was below median among all Republican Senators and well below for his region of the country. The paragon conservative sailed through his primary, the below-median conservative got tossed.

    That would seem to be consistent not with the party being a cult of personality around Trump, but, in fact, a "conservative organization".

    Now, Paul's primary was back in 2022; maybe you claim the party has been transformed from a conservative organization to a cult of personality since then? But . . . then you cite George Will in 2019 speaking of the cult transformation in the past tense.

    Huh.

    1. AJinNJ   2 months ago

      Trump endorsed Rand in 2022.
      https://eu.courier-journal.com/story/news/politics/rand-paul/2021/04/09/donald-trump-endorses-kentucky-u-s-sen-rand-paul-2022-reelection/7153984002/

      https://eu.courier-journal.com/story/news/politics/2020/01/31/kentucky-sen-rand-paul-has-gone-trump-critic-devout-ally/4610465002/

      Rand has been pretty inline with Trump until recently; that's when Trump turned on him... namely over the Venezuelan stuff.

      1. DRM   2 months ago

        Your own second link -- from 2020 -- has Rand Paul calling Trump a "delusional narcissist" and Trump calling Rand Paul "a spoiled brat without a properly functioning brain" in the small portion visible before the subscriber barrier. But, hey, sure, try to sell that as "pretty inline with Trump". 🙄

        So, looking at the endorsement, we can try two different theories here.

        In the first, the Republican Party was transformed into a cult of personality around Trump in 2019 or earlier (per J.D. Tuccille's quote of George Will), but for no discernible reason Trump decided to endorse someone in 2022 who has repeatedly clashed with Trump both before and after that endorsement, rather than replace him with someone complaisant to Trump's will.

        In the second, the Republican Party (as embodied in primary voters) is still a conservative organization, and thus Rand Paul, the ACU-rated most conservative man in the Senate, was predictably invulnerable in the Kentucky primary. Thus, whatever Trump's personal clashes with the man, any attempt to remove him would have been futile and undermined Trump's power and influence. Trump accordingly endorsed Rand Paul in 2022 rather than pick a fight he couldn't win -- and the reason Trump couldn't win the fight was precisely because the party is not a Trump personality cult.

        1. AJinNJ   2 months ago

          "Your own second link -- from 2020 -- has Rand Paul calling Trump a "delusional narcissist" and Trump calling Rand Paul "a spoiled brat without a properly functioning brain" in the small portion visible before the subscriber barrier. But, hey, sure, try to sell that as "pretty inline with Trump"."

          That was during the 2016 Presidential primary (which Rand ran in also; remember when they had like 20 candidates and 2 debates each day there was a debate for the Republican primary field ). If you read the article title you'd see they're inferring that: "How Rand Paul went from calling Donald Trump an 'orange windbag' to being a devout disciple". And by being "inline with Trump" I mean voting record:

          https://www.americanprogressaction.org/article/the-trump-scorecard-how-often-members-of-congress-vote-with-the-trump-administration/

          A whopping 94% of the time (yes, the 2nd least inline Republican, but still over 90% of the time). Massie was below 90% and nearly below 80%.

    2. mtrueman   2 months ago

      "not with the party being a cult of personality around Trump, but, in fact, a "conservative organization".

      Would a 'conservative organization' choose a New York Democrat and friend to child rapists as its leader? No, but a cult could.

      1. Bruce Hayden   2 months ago

        So disingenuous. Trump and Epstein attended the same parties, and shared private plane rides between NYC and Miami, where both had homes. Then Epstein tried to do his thing at MAL, and got banned from there for life.

        1. Sevo, 5-30-24, embarrassment   2 months ago

          You're dealing with a pile of lefty shit who, like turd, never posts without lying.

      2. Sevo, 5-30-24, embarrassment   2 months ago

        "...friend to child rapists..."
        trueman is a lying pile of steaming TDS-addled shit, ain't he? Asswipe, you and your pathetic 'friends' have been trying to tie Trump to Epstein for years. And failing.
        Fuck off and die, shitstain.

  32. Alphonse Gaston   2 months ago

    Massie is a gadfly who thought it would be cool to buddy up with a Democrat Presidential hopeful to amplify the Epstein noise machine, that falsely called Trump a pedophile, and a supporter and protector of pedophiles. Tuccile curiously leaves this out.
    He also mistakes Trump, a classic interwar Republican: anti-immigration like Johnson and Reed, protectionist like Smoot and Hawley, and noninterventionist like Taft. "Free markets" is a luxury when the Chinese are eating our lunch. If we went to war tomorrow, could we even clothe our soldiers?
    The only deviation is that Trump is a philoSemitr, and will do anything Trump wants.

  33. BlueCollarCritic   2 months ago

    No its not a cult but a sizeable portion of it unfortunately is behaving like one and treating Trump more like a king (whom they love) than a president. That said they are not all in a cult. A number of us who supported Trump in all 3 elections also respect Massie and can see that the pro-Israeli lobby purchased this election. They are going to pay a price for this too as the MAGA movement is already bifurcating b/c of this. MAGA has always been a coalition of a mix of people from differing political backgrounds and not just all frustrated Republicans. Because of these peoples need to put Israel first, they very likely may hand power back to the Liberals in a gift wrapped package.

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

Is Court Packing Inevitable If Democrats Retake Congress and the White House?

Damon Root | 7.21.2026 7:00 AM

Brickbat: In-N-Out but Not Thru

Charles Oliver | 7.21.2026 4:00 AM

Research Suggests Trump and His Opponents Are Both Wrong About the Impact of Voter ID Requirements

Jacob Sullum | 7.20.2026 5:25 PM

South Carolina Law Prohibits Tattoo Parlors Near Churches. A New Lawsuit Calls That Unconstitutional.

Meagan O'Rourke | 7.20.2026 4:59 PM

Britain's New Prime Minister Andy Burnham Promises 'Stronger Public Control' of Stagnating Economy

Reem Ibrahim | 7.20.2026 2:16 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS Add Reason to Google

© 2026 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Reason's July 4 Special!

For America's 250th, Get 2 Years of Reason for $17.76

Celebrate your independence with a subscription to Reason magazine, your most trusted source of honest, insightful news and analysis.

Subscribe to Reason