Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
    • Reason TV
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • Free Media
    • The Reason Interview
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • Freed Up
    • The Soho Forum Debates
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Log In

Create new account

Taxes

Trump's Illegal War in Iran Is Financed by Your Taxes. That's a Good Reason To Stop Paying Them.

If Congress will not deploy the power of the purse to restrain a lawless administration and an illegal war, then it falls to the public to do so.

Eric Boehm | 4.15.2026 11:15 AM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
Tax forms | Charles Cuau/SIPA/Newscom/Internal Revenue Service
(Charles Cuau/SIPA/Newscom/Internal Revenue Service)

This Tax Day, America needs a tax revolt.

The executive branch is out of control. We're now more than six weeks into a deeply unpopular, unnecessary war with Iran that lacks any semblance of congressional authorization. The Trump administration has sent masked, unaccountable goons into American cities, where they have harassed and arrested innocent people and killed multiple times. President Donald Trump's signature economic policy is an illegal tax increase that his administration is refusing to refund.

Congress has been unwilling or unable to stop these unlawful actions. If legislators will not deploy "the power of the purse," then it falls to the rest of us to do something.

That's why I have stopped paying the federal income tax. I'm not the only one doing it. I think you should, too.

What can this accomplish? I'm not naive enough to believe that my paltry contribution to the federal coffers matters much—I just finished filing my 2025 taxes and paid a sum in the low-five-figures. This is, first and foremost, a moral calculation rather than a fiscal one.

It's roughly the same conclusion that Henry David Thoreau reached when he looked at a federal government waging an unnecessary, unpopular war abroad and violently suppressing fundamental rights at home. "What I have to do is to see, at any rate, that I do not lend myself to the wrong which I condemn," he concluded.

There is probably never a bad time to revisit Thoreau's "Civil Disobedience" (or to read it for the first time). The essay, first published in 1849, was a response to the then-ongoing Mexican-American War and the state-level debates over policies similar to what would eventually become the Fugitive Slave Act, a federal law passed in 1850 requiring that escaped slaves be returned to their owners, even if captured in states that banned slavery. As a rumination on the relationship between citizens and the state, perhaps only the Declaration of Independence is a more important text. There is a good reason why "Civil Disobedience" influenced everyone from Mahatma Gandhi to Leo Tolstoy to Martin Luther King, Jr.

On this Tax Day, many of us should grapple with the same question that Thoreau did. A Reuters/Ipsos poll released Tuesday shows that just 24 percent of Americans believe the Iran War has been "worth it." The majority of Americans oppose the war, yet we are continuing to fund it at the rate of billions of dollars every day.

What can be done? That's ultimately a question everyone has to answer for themselves. I believe that Thoreau's conclusion is a good one: Do not lend support to the wrongdoing.

Were you waving a flag or banner at a "No Kings" protest in the past six months? That's fine and good. But then why continue sending a portion of your hard-earned money to the Trump administration? Yes, the federal government borrows much of what it spends these days. A cratering of tax receipts in the coming months wouldn't immediately grind the gears of government to a halt, but it would certainly cause a reaction in Washington.

"If a thousand men were not to pay their tax-bills this year, that would not be a violent and bloody measure, as it would be to pay them, and enable the State to commit violence and shed innocent blood," Thoreau wrote.

Are there any better ways to signal your disagreement? Many critics of the administration are eager for the midterms in November—but is one single vote really more valuable than thousands of dollars in taxes that you'll pay between now and then?

Indeed, if the millions of Americans who plan to vote in November were to cancel their income tax withholding this week, it would certainly have a more immediate impact, and arguably a larger one. (That's even more true in an era when so few congressional districts are actually competitive, rendering so many votes utterly meaningless.) By all means, vote your conscience—or abstain from voting, if that's what your conscience says to do—but please don't accept the premise that voting is the only way to send a signal in a democratic system.

So, don't wait for November. Voice your disagreement now. Stop paying your federal income tax.

Practically, here's what I'm suggesting. Simply eliminate the automatic withholding of income tax from your pay.

This is much easier than you might believe it to be.

"If I wanted to turn off my income tax withholding, how difficult would that be?" is the question I put to our CFO last week. "Not especially hard," was the reply. He was right. All it took was a follow-up email, and the deed was done. I am utterly lost when it comes to managing any aspect of human resources—so if I can do this, so can you.

What about the consequences of this decision? In the very short term, there are none.

In the absence of income tax withholding, federal law requires quarterly "estimated tax" payments. Failing to make those can result in a penalty when this year's taxes are due next April.

If the Trump administration changes course between now and next year, or if the midterms are successful at creating a congressional majority more interested in checking the excesses of the executive branch, then you'll have the option to pay what's owed and carry on. In the meantime, however, you'll have stopped lending material support to the federal government's illegal actions.

And don't let the potential consequences dissuade you. Yes, Thoreau famously went to jail (for one night) as punishment for refusing to pay his taxes. In modern times, however, very few tax protesters have been hauled into federal court, and fewer still have been jailed.

"In fact, only two war tax resisters—James Otsuka (1949) and J. Tony Serra (2005)—were ever jailed for not paying taxes," according to the National War Tax Resistance Coordinating Committee. (The group also provides some helpful guidance on determining what part of your federal taxes is used for wars, if you want to make a partial payment.)

In fact, some careful planning and savvy investing of your larger, tax-free paycheck might leave you better off—the federal government doesn't pay interest if you have too much tax withheld, after all. I'll be setting aside the amount of money that I would have paid in taxes each month, investing it in a stable mutual fund, and hoping the illegal war and/or illegal tariffs don't dent those earnings too much. (I'll report back on how this works out, but please don't take any of this as actual financial advice.)

When next April rolls around, you'll have a decision to make—and that's when I'll weigh the consequences too.

Here's what I plan to do, because if you've read this far, you're probably wondering about these things.

Yes, I'm still paying the federal payroll taxes that fund Medicare and Social Security—yes, despite disliking how both those programs run. Those are separate pots of money, not directly funding the war or the bloody immigration crackdown.

Yes, I'm also continuing to have income tax withheld by the state of Virginia, where I live. State governments can also violate rights—and I'm wary about many of the ideas kicking around Richmond right now. Even so, Gov. Abigail Spanberger is not waging an illegal war, has not illegally taxed commerce, and has not sent masked goons into the streets to intimidate, harass, and murder Americans and immigrants. Seems like an important distinction. We can and should fight usual policy disagreements in the usual political channels.

Again, some guidance from Thoreau. Not every injustice can be met with maximum resistance, he notes in "Civil Disobedience." In fact, it is often true that we should abide by or quietly ignore laws that don't make sense or aren't entirely legal.

But when certain lines have been crossed, there is a moral obligation to respond. America needs a tax revolt to show the government who is really in charge.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: House Readies Spy Powers Vote

Eric Boehm is a reporter at Reason.

TaxesIncome taxHenry David ThoreauCivil DisobedienceIranWar
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (58)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. jonnysage   2 months ago

    Actually, its funded by debt. All revenue has been consumed by mandatory spending and interest.

    5.2T revenue
    -4.2T mandatory spending
    -1T interest

    and its gone.

    1. JFree   2 months ago

      100%. Even if the expected spending and interest was less than tax revenues - the unexpected spend (war/etc) requires a debt issuance auction

  2. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   2 months ago

    Boehm is fomenting insurrection. He should be locked up duo immediately. In the same jail as the J6 detainees, and for four years without bail or a trial.

    1. damikesc   2 months ago

      IRS.gov had a tip sent to them.

      Not because I like the IRS. I just loathe the author more.

      1. Hickamore   2 months ago

        You loathe the author because he's a libertarian writing in a libertarian publication, and you're not a libertarian? WTF are you doing here at all?

        1. MK Ultra   2 months ago

          Reason previously - "Taxation is theft."

          Reeeeson presently - "Orange Man Very Bad. All else is far less important."

        2. damikesc   2 months ago

          He's not a libertarian anything.

      2. Flaco   2 months ago

        To rat someone out to the IRS is the loathsome activity here, even if he has stated his actions publicly here.

        Shame.

        1. damikesc   2 months ago

          Yup. Eat shit.

      3. Bruce D   2 months ago

        Rat.

        1. damikesc   2 months ago

          One of the best moves I've done. If it fucks him over, then all the better.

    2. Hickamore   2 months ago

      "Detainees" = proven insurrectionists. 65% pled guilty. How many convicted after trial? 255. How many acquitted after trial? = two. Those held without bail were from elsewhere and a high flight risk, plus the defiant crime advocates from Proud Boys and Oath Keepers. Standard practice. Trial delays? The court system was predictably overwhelmed. As those who come to town to break the law in mass numbers of a mob ought to expect.

  3. Sometimes a Great Notion   2 months ago

    Sure but you first. If there is one thing the government loves more then war it's taking the fruits of your labor.

  4. DesertCat   2 months ago

    Not paying taxes is a TERRIBLE idea! The IRS can garnish wages and sieze property. If you don't like the US policies, get involved in the political process and work to elect representatives that reflect your views.

    1. Rick James   2 months ago

      And you can die in prison.

      1. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   2 months ago

        So you’re saying democrats should refuse to pay taxes?

        1. damikesc   2 months ago

          I'm saying somebody should and then sue Boehm for making such an asinine suggestion.

          Drive his family into bankruptcy, hopefully.

          1. Hugo S. Cunningham   2 months ago

            Leftists Randy Kehler and Betsy Corner of Colrain MA tried non-payment of income tax in the 1980s. Eventually, the IRS gained payment by seizing their house, evicting them, and auctioning it.

  5. Rick James   2 months ago

    That's why I have stopped paying the federal income tax. I'm not the only one doing it. I think you should, too.

    "In fact, only two war tax resisters—James Otsuka (1949) and J. Tony Serra (2005)—were ever jailed for not paying taxes," according to the National War Tax Resistance Coordinating Committee. (The group also provides some helpful guidance on determining what part of your federal taxes is used for wars, if you want to make a partial payment.)

    Irwin Schiff, Peter Schiff's father:

    Irwin Allen Schiff (/ʃɪf/; February 23, 1928 – October 16, 2015) was an American libertarian and tax resistance advocate[1] known for writing and promoting literature in which he argued that the way in which the income tax in the United States is enforced upon individuals, as a tax on one's time or wages, is illegal and unconstitutional. Judges in several civil and criminal cases ruled in favor of the federal government and against Schiff. As a result of these judicial rulings Schiff was in a hospital prison serving a sentence of 162 months (13.5 years) at the time of his death.

    Schiff was the father of businessman and former United States Senate candidate Peter Schiff.[2]

    You do you, Boehm.

    1. damikesc   2 months ago

      I'll note that he has exactly zero problem with spending on welfare et al. JUST military.

      Weird.

      1. jimc5499   2 months ago

        No. His problem is that it is Trump doing it.

        1. damikesc   2 months ago

          More accurate there, yes.

      2. Rick James   2 months ago

        Those of us old enough to live through multiple presidents notice that Republican wars always get the left in a tax-protest mood, but never Democrat wars... or welfare, or... or... or...

      3. BigFish92672   2 months ago

        NOT weird at all, commie. War spending DESTROYS Wealth. Transfer payments MOVE Wealth. If you liberals understood Economics, you could not be liberal

        1. damikesc   2 months ago

          Transfer payments obliterate wealth. Encourages a reduction in seeking additional wealth to avoid giving it away to incompetent buffoons.

          Suck the big government cock more, son.

  6. Rick James   2 months ago

    Bad News: Income tax systems are spying regimes. They're looking for and/or watching you. Let's hope you slip through undetected.

    Good News: Income taxes aren't regressive.

  7. JFree   2 months ago

    Trump's Illegal War in Iran Is Financed by Your Taxes. That's a Good Reason To Stop Paying Them.

    No it's not. It is financed by issuing debt. Taxes only fund the predictable spending streams or the minimum spending required to issue debt - not the unpredictable spending streams.

    The economic nonsense sold at this website is stunning. Thoreau was protesting the Mexican War. That war did increase public debt from $15 million in 1846 to $63 million in 1849. $18 million of that increase was used to pay Mexico for the land cessions (CA/TX/AZ/NM/UT/etc - 336 million acres - or 15c per acre) and for US assuming liability for individual citizen debts. The higher number being roughly equal to peacetime federal spending then. Debt then stayed constant - $63 million to $64 million in 1860 - until the Civil War. Which means revenues only increased to pay interest on that debt (and prevent financial crises if it had to be rolled over). Those revenues did not increase by taxes but by land sales. The means of financing that debt - land sales - is what broke the compromises between South/North and directly precipitated the Civil War (which was about slavery in federal territory).

    This article isn't merely stupid. It is willfully stupid and lazy for the purposes of hawking a bullshit ideology that is both stupid and lazy.

    1. Rick James   2 months ago

      Everyone at Reason wants to pretend they're a member of the Electric Kool-Aid Acid Test club.

      I have this picture of walking through the venerated halls of Reason and hearing a lot of "Far out" and "right on, man".

  8. Stupid Government Tricks   2 months ago

    How silly. You're actually increasing US debt because the government has to borrow more to make up the difference.

    You're also confused if you think FICA deductions pay pensions. They go into the same general fund as all taxes, and pensions are paid from the general fund. They mess with the books some, which is why the SSA "account" is not yet broke, but money is fungible.

    1. Rick James   2 months ago

      I believe last week Reason used the much debunked "Trust fund" phrase in conjunction with Social Security.

      1. damikesc   2 months ago

        You can tell Koch no longer expects this site to convince anybody of anything,..outside of the truth that Koch likes spending money on lame bullshit.

      2. Sometimes a Great Notion   2 months ago

        A lockbox with two different locks...

        https://youtu.be/zDgRRVpemLo?si=K-mk6NRczJj0agmI

  9. Agammamon   2 months ago

    Yeah, the war on Iran is the reason. Not TDS.

  10. Agammamon   2 months ago

    >That's why I have stopped paying the federal income tax. I'm not the only one doing it. I think you should, too.

    What can this accomplish? I'm not naive enough to believe that my paltry contribution to the federal coffers matters much—I just finished filing my 2025 taxes and paid a sum in the low-five-figures. This is, first and foremost, a moral calculation rather than a fiscal one.

    And in the next paragraph he says he is paying his tax. What a pussy.

    Even worse, he thinks not withholding makes a difference.

  11. Vernon Depner   2 months ago

    You'll just end up giving them even more money when they levy fines and interest against you, and seize your money or property to pay it.

  12. Mickey Rat   2 months ago

    "Yes, I'm still paying the federal payroll taxes that fund Medicare and Social Security—yes, despite disliking how both those programs run. Those are separate pots of money, not directly funding the war or the bloody immigration crackdown."

    As an official policy they are. As a real practical matter, that is all smoke and mirrors.

    "When next April rolls around, you'll have a decision to make—and that's when I'll weigh the consequences too."

    If you are salary for Reason, then I am not sure you have a choice to not accept withholding. If you are technically self-employed consultant, then you have to pay income taxes quarterly, so that moment of decision comes a lot quicker than next April.
    "Yes, I'm also continuing to have income tax withheld by the state of Virginia, where I live. State governments can also violate rights—and I'm wary about many of the ideas kicking around Richmond right now. Even so, Gov. Abigail Spanberger is not waging an illegal war, has not illegally taxed commerce, and has not sent masked goons into the streets to intimidate, harass, and murder Americans and immigrants."

    Her government is going to be banning guns in her state. She is going to send goons after US citizens to violate an explicitly Constitutionally protected civil liberty.

    So Boehm is recommending that his audience commit crimes, and his own alleged lawbreaking is oddly selective to support Democrat authoritarianism. Let us see how that works out, or if he even goes through with it.

    1. damikesc   2 months ago

      Boehm is a whiny cunt. Who has been reported to the IRS just for shits and giggles.

  13. Neutral not Neutered   2 months ago

    "If Congress will not deploy the power of the purse to restrain a lawless administration and an illegal war, then it falls to the public to do so."

    This really has me leaning toward cancelling my subscription. Why is anyone paying for this bullshit writing?

    1. Rick James   2 months ago

      It's definitely very insurrection-ey. Which I guess is back in fashion, bigly.

    2. Vernon Depner   2 months ago

      People actually subscribe?

  14. Its_Not_Inevitable   2 months ago

    I guess this is the obligatory Tax Day anti-tax column.

    And are we letting Congress off the hook here? Is it just the spending on this war that's the problem? Or just the tariffs?

    JFC. It's Trump ad infinitum here. It's ridiculous.

    1. damikesc   2 months ago

      It's not the obligatory anti-tax column. It is the only one this clown has written in years.

  15. Chuck P. (Now with less Sarc more snark)   2 months ago

    "If I wanted to turn off my income tax withholding, how difficult would that be?" is the question I put to our CFO last week. "Not especially hard," was the reply. He was right. All it took was a follow-up email, and the deed was done.

    You are a fucking idiot and so is your CFO.

    When the IRS learns you are not withholding, it will send a Form 2800C to your employer instructing them to ignore your falsified W-4 and withhold at the correct rate. Your employer is then legally required to withhold at that rate.

    ChatGTP could have told either of you that. I already knew it because I am an actual payroll professional.

    1. Ben of Houston   2 months ago

      Yeah. Admitting to financial crimes in a public forum means the author is either an absolute fool or an absolute liar. If he does pay estimated taxes instead of withholding, then it is extra work for the same result. If he doesn't pay the estimated taxes, then he's evading.

  16. Chuck P. (Now with less Sarc more snark)   2 months ago

    Yes, I'm still paying the federal payroll taxes that fund Medicare and Social Security—yes, despite disliking how both those programs run. Those are separate pots of money, not directly funding the war or the bloody immigration crackdown.

    This is equally idiotic. Your employer withholds your portion of these taxes (and pays an equal amount). You have no choice in the matter.

  17. CharlieG   2 months ago

    Much more of our tax dollars are spent on wasteful entitlement programs and the massive fraud that goes with those programs. They are the main reason to not pay taxes. The government is supposed to have a military and use it in the country's best interest and defense, it isn't supposed to have so many entitlement programs that are all rife with fraud.

    Eric, your incompetence is truly astounding.

    1. BigFish92672   2 months ago

      Wrong as usual, commie. War spending DESTROYS Wealth, imbecile. Transfer payments merely moves Wealth. You love destroying Wealth because your father satan shat you out in order to create despair.

      Souless golem, your degeneracy is truly astounding.

      1. damikesc   2 months ago

        Suck more government cock, cuck.

  18. Roberta   2 months ago

    Or stop doing things that are taxed. Keep your taxable income below the limits, don't buy goods on which there are tariffs or excises, etc.

  19. James K. Polk   2 months ago

    Such bullshit. Come April next year, you will pay all your taxes as well as the penalties for under-withholding.

  20. BigFish92672   2 months ago

    "...and fewer still have been jailed."
    If it jails you, it has to feed you. Instead the Evil Empire will seize all your property it needs to pay your tax bill plus astronomical fines and interest, In Fact, it won't tell you you owe it money until the last possible minute in order to maximize interest you owe.
    I've known people who tried to live off the grid to avoid the Evil Empire's gaze. The effort it takes will eventually wear down someone in your family.
    I fought the Evil Empire because it is the right thing to do but I would never do it again nor advise anyone else to try. It has infinite money, infinite manpower, and infinite time to fight you with

  21. IceTrey   2 months ago

    Coercive taxation is an immoral violation of our natural right as sapient beings to liberty.

  22. hmi   2 months ago

    LOL
    Shades of the '60s Vietnam conflict tax protests and memories of one of my favorite jazz pianists, Tupper Saussy.
    Saussy eventually did 14 months, for the failure to pay taxes, plus an attempt to run.
    Check out his music on YT.
    Bake a cake with a hacksaw for Mr. Boehm.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tupper_Saussy
    https://www.studicata.com/summaries/united-states-court-of-appeals-sixth-circuit/united-states-v-saussy-1986-8100ic/

  23. car-keynes   2 months ago

    Switching to barter may be a legitimate method of getting around the backstabber system.

  24. Ssemans   2 months ago

    You're all reinventing the wheel, or too young to remember the heyday of: https://www.warresisters.org/

    1. Ssemans   2 months ago

      oops, fact-checked myself and it was actually National War Tax Resistance (WTR) which folded in 1975. That was before it was made a finable offense to attach a statement to your income tax form, a reg. which I believe still exists.

  25. jabbermule   2 months ago

    Our tax dollars also went to all the billions sent to Iran during the Biden years, which in turn went to fund terrorism across the Middle East, including 10/7/23.

    I haven't heard you complain about that, Boehm, so go fuck yourself you anti-Semitic leftist piece of shit.

  26. KHFleischer   2 months ago

    Mr. Boehm;
    Before Trump's masked goons, the closest the USA had to State Secret Police (in German: Geheimnis Staats Polizei, Gestapo for short) was the IRS. My best wishes to you, but be careful!

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

Comic: It's America's Founding Fake News Terrorist, Samuel Adams

Peter Bagge | From the July 2026 issue

The White House UFC Fight Is the Perfect Event for the Present, Not the Past

Billy Binion | 6.14.2026 6:00 AM

Your Uber Driver May Soon Be Unionized. At What Cost?

C. Jarrett Dieterle | 6.13.2026 7:00 AM

Disillusioned Revolutionaries: Many Founders Died in Despair About the American Experiment

Matt Welch | From the July 2026 issue

Terrorists and Criminals Reportedly Got $37.5 Billion From COVID Relief and Other U.K. Aid Programs

Reem Ibrahim | 6.12.2026 5:05 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS Add Reason to Google

© 2026 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

I WANT FREE MINDS AND FREE MARKETS!

Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.

Make a donation today! No thanks
r

I WANT TO FUND FREE MINDS AND FREE MARKETS

Every dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.

Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interested
r

SUPPORT HONEST JOURNALISM

So much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.

I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanks
r

PUSH BACK

Push back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.

My donation today will help Reason push back! Not today
r

HELP KEEP MEDIA FREE & FEARLESS

Back journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

STAND FOR FREE MINDS

Support journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.

Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanks
r

PUSH BACK AGAINST SOCIALIST IDEAS

Support journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

FIGHT BAD IDEAS WITH FACTS

Back independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

BAD ECONOMIC IDEAS ARE EVERYWHERE. LET’S FIGHT BACK.

Support journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

JOIN THE FIGHT FOR FREEDOM

Support journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

BACK JOURNALISM THAT PUSHES BACK AGAINST SOCIALISM

Your support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

FIGHT BACK AGAINST BAD ECONOMICS.

Donate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks