Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
    • Reason TV
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • Free Media
    • The Reason Interview
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • Freed Up
    • The Soho Forum Debates
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Print Subscription
    • Subscriber Support

Log In

Create new account

Taxes

Trump's Illegal War in Iran Is Financed by Your Taxes. That's a Good Reason To Stop Paying Them.

If Congress will not deploy the power of the purse to restrain a lawless administration and an illegal war, then it falls to the public to do so.

Eric Boehm | 4.15.2026 11:15 AM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
Tax forms | Charles Cuau/SIPA/Newscom/Internal Revenue Service
(Charles Cuau/SIPA/Newscom/Internal Revenue Service)

This Tax Day, America needs a tax revolt.

The executive branch is out of control. We're now more than six weeks into a deeply unpopular, unnecessary war with Iran that lacks any semblance of congressional authorization. The Trump administration has sent masked, unaccountable goons into American cities, where they have harassed and arrested innocent people and killed multiple times. President Donald Trump's signature economic policy is an illegal tax increase that his administration is refusing to refund.

Congress has been unwilling or unable to stop these unlawful actions. If legislators will not deploy "the power of the purse," then it falls to the rest of us to do something.

That's why I have stopped paying the federal income tax. I'm not the only one doing it. I think you should, too.

What can this accomplish? I'm not naive enough to believe that my paltry contribution to the federal coffers matters much—I just finished filing my 2025 taxes and paid a sum in the low-five-figures. This is, first and foremost, a moral calculation rather than a fiscal one.

It's roughly the same conclusion that Henry David Thoreau reached when he looked at a federal government waging an unnecessary, unpopular war abroad and violently suppressing fundamental rights at home. "What I have to do is to see, at any rate, that I do not lend myself to the wrong which I condemn," he concluded.

There is probably never a bad time to revisit Thoreau's "Civil Disobedience" (or to read it for the first time). The essay, first published in 1849, was a response to the then-ongoing Mexican-American War and the state-level debates over policies similar to what would eventually become the Fugitive Slave Act, a federal law passed in 1850 requiring that escaped slaves be returned to their owners, even if captured in states that banned slavery. As a rumination on the relationship between citizens and the state, perhaps only the Declaration of Independence is a more important text. There is a good reason why "Civil Disobedience" influenced everyone from Mahatma Gandhi to Leo Tolstoy to Martin Luther King, Jr.

On this Tax Day, many of us should grapple with the same question that Thoreau did. A Reuters/Ipsos poll released Tuesday shows that just 24 percent of Americans believe the Iran War has been "worth it." The majority of Americans oppose the war, yet we are continuing to fund it at the rate of billions of dollars every day.

What can be done? That's ultimately a question everyone has to answer for themselves. I believe that Thoreau's conclusion is a good one: Do not lend support to the wrongdoing.

Were you waving a flag or banner at a "No Kings" protest in the past six months? That's fine and good. But then why continue sending a portion of your hard-earned money to the Trump administration? Yes, the federal government borrows much of what it spends these days. A cratering of tax receipts in the coming months wouldn't immediately grind the gears of government to a halt, but it would certainly cause a reaction in Washington.

"If a thousand men were not to pay their tax-bills this year, that would not be a violent and bloody measure, as it would be to pay them, and enable the State to commit violence and shed innocent blood," Thoreau wrote.

Are there any better ways to signal your disagreement? Many critics of the administration are eager for the midterms in November—but is one single vote really more valuable than thousands of dollars in taxes that you'll pay between now and then?

Indeed, if the millions of Americans who plan to vote in November were to cancel their income tax withholding this week, it would certainly have a more immediate impact, and arguably a larger one. (That's even more true in an era when so few congressional districts are actually competitive, rendering so many votes utterly meaningless.) By all means, vote your conscience—or abstain from voting, if that's what your conscience says to do—but please don't accept the premise that voting is the only way to send a signal in a democratic system.

So, don't wait for November. Voice your disagreement now. Stop paying your federal income tax.

Practically, here's what I'm suggesting. Simply eliminate the automatic withholding of income tax from your pay.

This is much easier than you might believe it to be.

"If I wanted to turn off my income tax withholding, how difficult would that be?" is the question I put to our CFO last week. "Not especially hard," was the reply. He was right. All it took was a follow-up email, and the deed was done. I am utterly lost when it comes to managing any aspect of human resources—so if I can do this, so can you.

What about the consequences of this decision? In the very short term, there are none.

In the absence of income tax withholding, federal law requires quarterly "estimated tax" payments. Failing to make those can result in a penalty when this year's taxes are due next April.

If the Trump administration changes course between now and next year, or if the midterms are successful at creating a congressional majority more interested in checking the excesses of the executive branch, then you'll have the option to pay what's owed and carry on. In the meantime, however, you'll have stopped lending material support to the federal government's illegal actions.

And don't let the potential consequences dissuade you. Yes, Thoreau famously went to jail (for one night) as punishment for refusing to pay his taxes. In modern times, however, very few tax protesters have been hauled into federal court, and fewer still have been jailed.

"In fact, only two war tax resisters—James Otsuka (1949) and J. Tony Serra (2005)—were ever jailed for not paying taxes," according to the National War Tax Resistance Coordinating Committee. (The group also provides some helpful guidance on determining what part of your federal taxes is used for wars, if you want to make a partial payment.)

In fact, some careful planning and savvy investing of your larger, tax-free paycheck might leave you better off—the federal government doesn't pay interest if you have too much tax withheld, after all. I'll be setting aside the amount of money that I would have paid in taxes each month, investing it in a stable mutual fund, and hoping the illegal war and/or illegal tariffs don't dent those earnings too much. (I'll report back on how this works out, but please don't take any of this as actual financial advice.)

When next April rolls around, you'll have a decision to make—and that's when I'll weigh the consequences too.

Here's what I plan to do, because if you've read this far, you're probably wondering about these things.

Yes, I'm still paying the federal payroll taxes that fund Medicare and Social Security—yes, despite disliking how both those programs run. Those are separate pots of money, not directly funding the war or the bloody immigration crackdown.

Yes, I'm also continuing to have income tax withheld by the state of Virginia, where I live. State governments can also violate rights—and I'm wary about many of the ideas kicking around Richmond right now. Even so, Gov. Abigail Spanberger is not waging an illegal war, has not illegally taxed commerce, and has not sent masked goons into the streets to intimidate, harass, and murder Americans and immigrants. Seems like an important distinction. We can and should fight usual policy disagreements in the usual political channels.

Again, some guidance from Thoreau. Not every injustice can be met with maximum resistance, he notes in "Civil Disobedience." In fact, it is often true that we should abide by or quietly ignore laws that don't make sense or aren't entirely legal.

But when certain lines have been crossed, there is a moral obligation to respond. America needs a tax revolt to show the government who is really in charge.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: House Readies Spy Powers Vote

Eric Boehm is a reporter at Reason.

TaxesIncome taxHenry David ThoreauCivil DisobedienceIranWar
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (26)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. jonnysage   4 hours ago

    Actually, its funded by debt. All revenue has been consumed by mandatory spending and interest.

    5.2T revenue
    -4.2T mandatory spending
    -1T interest

    and its gone.

    Log in to Reply
    1. JFree   4 hours ago

      100%. Even if the expected spending and interest was less than tax revenues - the unexpected spend (war/etc) requires a debt issuance auction

      Log in to Reply
  2. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   4 hours ago

    Boehm is fomenting insurrection. He should be locked up duo immediately. In the same jail as the J6 detainees, and for four years without bail or a trial.

    Log in to Reply
    1. damikesc   2 hours ago

      IRS.gov had a tip sent to them.

      Not because I like the IRS. I just loathe the author more.

      Log in to Reply
  3. Sometimes a Great Notion   4 hours ago

    Sure but you first. If there is one thing the government loves more then war it's taking the fruits of your labor.

    Log in to Reply
  4. DesertCat   4 hours ago

    Not paying taxes is a TERRIBLE idea! The IRS can garnish wages and sieze property. If you don't like the US policies, get involved in the political process and work to elect representatives that reflect your views.

    Log in to Reply
    1. Rick James   4 hours ago

      And you can die in prison.

      Log in to Reply
      1. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   4 hours ago

        So you’re saying democrats should refuse to pay taxes?

        Log in to Reply
  5. Rick James   4 hours ago

    That's why I have stopped paying the federal income tax. I'm not the only one doing it. I think you should, too.

    "In fact, only two war tax resisters—James Otsuka (1949) and J. Tony Serra (2005)—were ever jailed for not paying taxes," according to the National War Tax Resistance Coordinating Committee. (The group also provides some helpful guidance on determining what part of your federal taxes is used for wars, if you want to make a partial payment.)

    Irwin Schiff, Peter Schiff's father:

    Irwin Allen Schiff (/ʃɪf/; February 23, 1928 – October 16, 2015) was an American libertarian and tax resistance advocate[1] known for writing and promoting literature in which he argued that the way in which the income tax in the United States is enforced upon individuals, as a tax on one's time or wages, is illegal and unconstitutional. Judges in several civil and criminal cases ruled in favor of the federal government and against Schiff. As a result of these judicial rulings Schiff was in a hospital prison serving a sentence of 162 months (13.5 years) at the time of his death.

    Schiff was the father of businessman and former United States Senate candidate Peter Schiff.[2]

    You do you, Boehm.

    Log in to Reply
    1. damikesc   2 hours ago

      I'll note that he has exactly zero problem with spending on welfare et al. JUST military.

      Weird.

      Log in to Reply
      1. jimc5499   1 hour ago

        No. His problem is that it is Trump doing it.

        Log in to Reply
        1. damikesc   1 hour ago

          More accurate there, yes.

          Log in to Reply
  6. Rick James   4 hours ago

    Bad News: Income tax systems are spying regimes. They're looking for and/or watching you. Let's hope you slip through undetected.

    Good News: Income taxes aren't regressive.

    Log in to Reply
  7. JFree   4 hours ago

    Trump's Illegal War in Iran Is Financed by Your Taxes. That's a Good Reason To Stop Paying Them.

    No it's not. It is financed by issuing debt. Taxes only fund the predictable spending streams or the minimum spending required to issue debt - not the unpredictable spending streams.

    The economic nonsense sold at this website is stunning. Thoreau was protesting the Mexican War. That war did increase public debt from $15 million in 1846 to $63 million in 1849. $18 million of that increase was used to pay Mexico for the land cessions (CA/TX/AZ/NM/UT/etc - 336 million acres - or 15c per acre) and for US assuming liability for individual citizen debts. The higher number being roughly equal to peacetime federal spending then. Debt then stayed constant - $63 million to $64 million in 1860 - until the Civil War. Which means revenues only increased to pay interest on that debt (and prevent financial crises if it had to be rolled over). Those revenues did not increase by taxes but by land sales. The means of financing that debt - land sales - is what broke the compromises between South/North and directly precipitated the Civil War (which was about slavery in federal territory).

    This article isn't merely stupid. It is willfully stupid and lazy for the purposes of hawking a bullshit ideology that is both stupid and lazy.

    Log in to Reply
    1. Rick James   4 hours ago

      Everyone at Reason wants to pretend they're a member of the Electric Kool-Aid Acid Test club.

      I have this picture of walking through the venerated halls of Reason and hearing a lot of "Far out" and "right on, man".

      Log in to Reply
  8. Stupid Government Tricks   4 hours ago

    How silly. You're actually increasing US debt because the government has to borrow more to make up the difference.

    You're also confused if you think FICA deductions pay pensions. They go into the same general fund as all taxes, and pensions are paid from the general fund. They mess with the books some, which is why the SSA "account" is not yet broke, but money is fungible.

    Log in to Reply
    1. Rick James   4 hours ago

      I believe last week Reason used the much debunked "Trust fund" phrase in conjunction with Social Security.

      Log in to Reply
      1. damikesc   2 hours ago

        You can tell Koch no longer expects this site to convince anybody of anything,..outside of the truth that Koch likes spending money on lame bullshit.

        Log in to Reply
      2. Sometimes a Great Notion   41 minutes ago

        A lockbox with two different locks...

        https://youtu.be/zDgRRVpemLo?si=K-mk6NRczJj0agmI

        Log in to Reply
  9. Agammamon   2 hours ago

    Yeah, the war on Iran is the reason. Not TDS.

    Log in to Reply
  10. Agammamon   2 hours ago

    >That's why I have stopped paying the federal income tax. I'm not the only one doing it. I think you should, too.

    What can this accomplish? I'm not naive enough to believe that my paltry contribution to the federal coffers matters much—I just finished filing my 2025 taxes and paid a sum in the low-five-figures. This is, first and foremost, a moral calculation rather than a fiscal one.

    And in the next paragraph he says he is paying his tax. What a pussy.

    Even worse, he thinks not withholding makes a difference.

    Log in to Reply
  11. Vernon Depner   1 hour ago

    You'll just end up giving them even more money when they levy fines and interest against you, and seize your money or property to pay it.

    Log in to Reply
  12. Mickey Rat   1 hour ago

    "Yes, I'm still paying the federal payroll taxes that fund Medicare and Social Security—yes, despite disliking how both those programs run. Those are separate pots of money, not directly funding the war or the bloody immigration crackdown."

    As an official policy they are. As a real practical matter, that is all smoke and mirrors.

    "When next April rolls around, you'll have a decision to make—and that's when I'll weigh the consequences too."

    If you are salary for Reason, then I am not sure you have a choice to not accept withholding. If you are technically self-employed consultant, then you have to pay income taxes quarterly, so that moment of decision comes a lot quicker than next April.
    "Yes, I'm also continuing to have income tax withheld by the state of Virginia, where I live. State governments can also violate rights—and I'm wary about many of the ideas kicking around Richmond right now. Even so, Gov. Abigail Spanberger is not waging an illegal war, has not illegally taxed commerce, and has not sent masked goons into the streets to intimidate, harass, and murder Americans and immigrants."

    Her government is going to be banning guns in her state. She is going to send goons after US citizens to violate an explicitly Constitutionally protected civil liberty.

    So Boehm is recommending that his audience commit crimes, and his own alleged lawbreaking is oddly selective to support Democrat authoritarianism. Let us see how that works out, or if he even goes through with it.

    Log in to Reply
  13. Neutral not Neutered   1 hour ago

    "If Congress will not deploy the power of the purse to restrain a lawless administration and an illegal war, then it falls to the public to do so."

    This really has me leaning toward cancelling my subscription. Why is anyone paying for this bullshit writing?

    Log in to Reply
  14. Its_Not_Inevitable   22 minutes ago

    I guess this is the obligatory Tax Day anti-tax column.

    And are we letting Congress off the hook here? Is it just the spending on this war that's the problem? Or just the tariffs?

    JFC. It's Trump ad infinitum here. It's ridiculous.

    Log in to Reply
  15. Chuck P. (Now with less Sarc more snark)   5 minutes ago

    "If I wanted to turn off my income tax withholding, how difficult would that be?" is the question I put to our CFO last week. "Not especially hard," was the reply. He was right. All it took was a follow-up email, and the deed was done.

    You are a fucking idiot and so is your CFO.

    When the IRS learns you are not withholding, it will send a Form 2800C to your employer instructing them to ignore your falsified W-4 and withhold at the correct rate. Your employer is then legally required to withhold at that rate.

    ChatGTP could have told either of you that. I already knew it because I am an actual payroll professional.

    Log in to Reply

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

ICE Is Determined To Unmask a Reddit User Whose Only Crime Seems To Be Criticizing ICE

Jacob Sullum | 4.15.2026 4:00 PM

Hungary Breaks Free: How Voters Ended 16 Years of Orbán's Iron Rule

Tom Palmer | 4.15.2026 3:20 PM

Mamdani's Fix for Food Deserts: Opening a $30 Million City-Owned Grocery Store Near Other Grocery Stores

Meagan O'Rourke | 4.15.2026 12:58 PM

Child Care Costs Over $13,000 a Year. Regulation Is a Big Reason Why.

John Stossel | 4.15.2026 12:25 PM

Anti-Hate Poster Has No Home in Ohio Classroom, Says School District

Elizabeth Nolan Brown | 4.15.2026 11:46 AM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS Add Reason to Google

© 2026 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

I WANT FREE MINDS AND FREE MARKETS!

Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.

Make a donation today! No thanks
r

I WANT TO FUND FREE MINDS AND FREE MARKETS

Every dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.

Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interested
r

SUPPORT HONEST JOURNALISM

So much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.

I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanks
r

PUSH BACK

Push back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.

My donation today will help Reason push back! Not today
r

HELP KEEP MEDIA FREE & FEARLESS

Back journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

STAND FOR FREE MINDS

Support journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.

Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanks
r

PUSH BACK AGAINST SOCIALIST IDEAS

Support journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

FIGHT BAD IDEAS WITH FACTS

Back independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

BAD ECONOMIC IDEAS ARE EVERYWHERE. LET’S FIGHT BACK.

Support journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

JOIN THE FIGHT FOR FREEDOM

Support journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

BACK JOURNALISM THAT PUSHES BACK AGAINST SOCIALISM

Your support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

FIGHT BACK AGAINST BAD ECONOMICS.

Donate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks