Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
    • Reason TV
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • Free Media
    • The Reason Interview
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • Freed Up
    • The Soho Forum Debates
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Log In

Create new account

Feminism

Daniel Biss Wins in Illinois Despite Student Dating Scandal

Does this mean the #MeToo era is officially over?

Elizabeth Nolan Brown | 3.18.2026 11:20 AM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
Daniel Biss | Credit: Chicago Tribune/TNS/Newscom
(Credit: Chicago Tribune/TNS/Newscom)

Illinois Democrats on Tuesday voted in favor of Evanston Mayor Daniel Biss being the party's nominee to replace outgoing U.S. Rep. Jan Schakowsky. His win came amid stiff competition—more than a dozen people were competing in the Democratic primary for the chance to represent Illinois' ninth district—and, perhaps, tells us something interesting about sexual politics along the way.

There are already ample signs that the #MeToo era is ending, and Biss' win may serve as another coda.

You are reading Sex & Tech, from Elizabeth Nolan Brown. Get more of Elizabeth's sex, tech, bodily autonomy, law, and online culture coverage.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

You see, Biss won despite a sex scandal—I use that term loosely; no sex per se seems to have occurred—involving an age gap and a power differential. Five or eight years ago, these may well have doomed the former state senator and college professor.

Of course, go back a bit further and Biss' behavior may have merely raised eyebrows. Go back just a few decades, and it would have been unremarkable.

Here's the allegation, in short: As a math instructor at the University of Chicago, Biss had a brief relationship with an undergraduate student. The woman, Megan Wachspress, had been in one of his math classes, but Biss waited until the semester was over to ask her out. She was younger than him, but not by a lot—he was 26 and she was 20. And, after what Wachspress describes as "a few very intense evenings" that included "making out," Biss "had second thoughts" and decided "it was wrong to date a student."

So, both parties were adults, the age gap was relatively minimal, and Biss was not in a direct position of power over Wachspress when their relationship began. But by the logic of the #MeToo movement, all but the most minuscule age gaps are suspect and a professor should never, under any circumstances, ask a student out.

I strongly disagree about the age-gap bit. (I am, in fact, six and a half years older than my husband.) And, obviously, professors dating students in their classes should be off limits.

As for the appropriateness of dating between professors and students who are not in their classes, that's a tougher call. I know it used to happen all the time. But there still seems something untoward and off about it, to me. And that's especially true when the student is a major in the same department in which the professor teaches.

Even if a student isn't in the instructor's class at the time, they could wind up needing to take a class with that instructor in the future. They may want to rely on that professor for recommendations. And mightn't a student reasonably worry that saying no to a date could lead to the professor disparaging them to colleagues? Or to diminished opportunities in some other way?

I'm not going to say it should never happen. But a norm of frowning on it seems OK.

That being said, this business between Biss and Wachspress took place in 2004. Norms were at least somewhat different then (though it still would have been weird). I absolutely do not think any of this should be disqualifying for Biss now.

Wachspress—now a lecturer at Stanford Law—seems to feel differently. "If he's going to get a national profile on the strength of a younger woman's campaign, I'm going to come out and say it: during his short-lived tenure as a math professor, Biss had an inappropriate romantic relationship with one of his undergraduate students. I was that student," she posted to Bluesky on Monday.

Later that day, she went into more detail on Substack, suggesting that "this thing that had happened to me, that had been a huge part of why I gave up on a career" in math.

Far be it from me to question Wachspress' interpretation of her own life, but…I don't completely buy it. That a brief, consensual relationship with a young math professor stopped her from fulfilling her math dreams seems like the kind of thing one might tell oneself later as an explanation for a regret. And Wachspress did finish her undergraduate degree in math at the University of Chicago; she just decided to go to graduate school for something else.

Yet Wachspress' post is interesting, nonetheless. She reflects on why, as a professor herself, she's come to feel strongly that this was wrong, and points to a 2021 essay by Oxford professor Amia Srinivasan on the topic. "The question, I want to suggest, isn't whether genuine consent or real romantic love is possible between teachers and students. Rather, it is whether, when professors sleep with or date their students, real teaching is possible," writes Srinivasan.

Srinivasan goes on to offer an interesting glimpse of how feminist thought on this subject has changed:

U.S. universities began regulating student-teacher sex only in the 1980s. This shift was an outgrowth of the feminist campaign against sexual harassment that began in the 1970s [.…] Despite the bans' origins in feminist activism, some feminists at the time denounced these prohibitions as a betrayal of their principles. To deny that women students could consent to sex with their professors, they argued, was infantilizing and moralizing. Were women university students not adults? Were they not entitled to have sex with whom they pleased? Did such policies not play into the hands of the religious right, which was all too keen to control women's sex lives?

But in the past two decades, these arguments have been less prominent, and comprehensive bans on teacher-student relationships have had little pushback from feminists. This is in keeping with a deepening feminist anxiety as to whether true consent is possible when sex is marked by an imbalance of power.

For (at least some) feminists of another time, the idea that young women were unable to decide for themselves whether they wanted to be in a romantic or sexual relationship with a professor was an affront to women's agency. For (at least some) feminists of the #MeToo era, the idea that a professor-student relationship of any sort could ever be OK was not only wrong but also part of a continuum that included sexual abuse and rape.

I think the truth is probably somewhere in between. And that the Biss-Waschspress situation warrants an in-between response.

Let's not cancel Biss for briefly dating a student 20 years ago. But in our desire to defend him, let's not blithely assert that professors dating students is 100 percent fine.

And perhaps Biss' congressional run will show that's indeed where we're at as a culture in 2026.

Biss' win yesterday comes in a liberal, highly educated, and relatively affluent district, which includes the Far North Side of Chicago, its northwest suburbs, and the college town of Evanston, home to Northwestern University.

That Biss was able to win despite the Wachspress story might just be a function of the fact that the story hadn't had time to penetrate before the primary, since she had just shared it the day before.

As it stands, Biss "is favored to win the general election in November against the Republican nominee," per The New York Times. Whether the Wachspress story ends up coming back to bite him in the general election will be the true cultural barometer.


On Substack 

Can you be a pronatalist without backing womb transplants? That's the question at the heart of this recent Emma Gilland post. "Some conservatives seem to be stuck between demanding women have more children while expressing disgust at new medical breakthroughs that would allow more women to do just that," she writes. More:

The birth of Hugo Powell, the first baby in the UK to be born via a donated womb transplant, has been criticised by conservative feminists, seeing it not as progress but further evidence that motherhood is being undermined by science. Grace Bell (with Steve Powell) was the first woman in the UK to give birth to a baby born from a womb transplanted from an organ donor, a woman who had recently passed away and donated her reproductive organs. Grace was born without a womb, as a result of Absolute Uterine/Womb Factor Infertility, and is one of 15,000 women in the UK with a similar condition.

This surgery was a huge step forward in reproductive technology, as alongside rounds of IVF, it allowed Grace to carry her own child, despite the fact she was told at 16 that she would never be able to do so. But it was heavily criticised by conservative feminists who are digging their heels into the sanctity of undisrupted, natural motherhood rather than embracing the fact that women, like Grace, are driven so strongly by the desire to become a mother, that they are willing to undertake complex and risky surgeries to overcome unimaginable medical challenges.


Read This Thread 

???????? @FoxNews: 1 BILLION identity records exposed in ID verification data leak — INCLUDING +203 MILLION America records

Governments requiring Digital ID w/ "age verification" mandates create MASSIVE security risks

The threat is NOT hypothetical. Another unfortunate example: pic.twitter.com/eNYpBOcBvA

— NetChoice (@NetChoice) March 17, 2026


More Sex & Tech News

• "The White House and the House GOP have been quietly preparing to block state AI laws as part of a package that includes children's online safety legislation," reports Benjamin Guggenheim at The Washington Post.

• "Minnesota legislators are considering a troubling amendment to their state constitution," warns Kevin T. Frazier of the Cato Institute. "In short, the amendment would carve AI out of the state's protection of free speech."

• A new Proton program called Born Private "allows families to reserve a private, encrypted email address for their child for up to 15 years for just $1."

• "Today's AI-generated prose is riddled with flaws," bad metaphors, and "a cloyingly sycophantic tone," writes Jasmine Sun at The Atlantic. She talked to AI experts to figure out why.

• An update on Anthropic's case against the U.S. government:

So we have the first response from the government in the Anthropic case. The DoJ argues on behalf of the DoW & others that the red lines make Anthropic a national security risk. https://t.co/yAXn230cJJ

Some thoughts below 1/7

— Jennifer Huddleston (@jrhuddles) March 18, 2026

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: This Virginia Bill Expands Affirmative Action in State Contracting

Elizabeth Nolan Brown is a senior editor at Reason.

FeminismMeTooCollegeIllinoisSex
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (40)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. InsaneTrollLogic (smarter than The Average Dude)   2 months ago

    And not one mention of Bliss’s shitty carpetbagger opponent, Kat Abughazaleh who is best known for antagonizing ICE and getting dumped, famously, on her ass.

  2. Use the Schwartz   2 months ago

    "this thing that had happened to me, that had been a huge part of why I gave up on a career"

    When critique of the patriarchy is practically indistinguishable from puritanism you are through the Looking Glass.

    Agency - it's a thing.

    1. mad.casual   2 months ago

      Hyperpuritanism

      The Puritans were called Puritans in the derogatory by The Catholics for foregoing idolatry of Mary, eschewing indulgences, etc. The Catholics were (and are), in fact, the ones who, as doctrine, hold the enjoyment of sex (lust), even within marriage, as sinful. Puritans were largely OK with sex, even premarital sex, as long as it wasn't generating a bunch of wards of the state, breaking up families, and fomenting disputes/unrest.

      Relatedly, one of my college roommates dated a girl who was between personally and religiously forbidden from PDA. She wouldn't even hold hands with him in public. I and the other roommates and our girlfriends would be laying all over each other, fully clothed, while studying or watching TV or whatever (no affection other than physical contact being expressed). She very much disapproved.

  3. Dillinger   2 months ago

    >>Does this mean the #MeToo era is officially over?

    means the guys you vote for hate you, babe. hate. you. babe.

  4. Don't look at me! ( Is the war over yet?)   2 months ago

    Does this mean the #MeToo era is officially over?

    It means democrats have no shame.

  5. Stupid Government Tricks   2 months ago

    professors dating students in their classes should be off limits.

    But the professor who waited til the end of the semester to date, why, heavens, of course he would never have given her good grades during the semester to influence her decision afterwards!

  6. MWAocdoc   2 months ago

    "I think the truth is probably somewhere in between."

    This is a colossal understatement! Human relationships are ALWAYS complex. Even analysis of individual relationships is frought with complexity and doubt; trying to analyze the entirety of human interrelationships across an entire spectrum of possibilities for eight billion people and countless cultures and social contexts - including unequal power and heirarchical settings - is beyond impossible. Setting social norms and unofficial or official punishments in that context seems egregious and indefensible.

  7. Rick James   2 months ago

    Illinois Democrats on Tuesday voted in favor of Evanston Mayor Daniel Biss being the party's nominee to replace outgoing U.S. Rep. Jan Schakowsky. His win came amid stiff competition—more than a dozen people were competing in the Democratic primary for the chance to represent Illinois' ninth district—and, perhaps, tells us something interesting about sexual politics along the way.

    There are already ample signs that the #MeToo era is ending, and Biss' win may serve as another coda.

    No, the #MeToo era was over at least a couple of years ago. And... this doesn't speak to 'sexual politics' writ large at all, it just shows us, for the eleventeenth time, that Democrats don't care about 'sexual politics' when it comes to voting for their own.

    Let me give you an example... do you remember Governor #BlackFace in Virginia, Ralph Shearer? Do you remember the picture that was released of him in blackface, and do you remember how Democrats voted for him, and voted hard? And the media hailed it as an "amazing comeback" from a scandal? And how actual real observers with a braincell noted how Democrats never actually cared about blackface? Trust me. If we were still in the middle of #MeToo, none of this would matter, they're two separate things.

    1. Rick James   2 months ago

      There are already ample signs that the #MeToo era is ending

      *re-reads this sentence*

      I can't believe anyone typed that out in 2026.

      *thinks*

      I remember listening to a Chris Williamson podcast interviewing a young woman in what... 2023? Maybe 2022... anyhoo, this woman was kind of a cultural chronicler who herself admitted she was 'too online' in that that was the world she watched. She noted the #MeToo era was on the wane back then.

      1. mad.casual   2 months ago

        Five or eight years ago, these may well have doomed the former state senator and college professor.

        Of course, go back a bit further and Biss' behavior may have merely raised eyebrows. Go back just a few decades, and it would have been unremarkable.

        ENB needs to go have a chat with conservative commentator Robby Soave about a speech and letter in 2011, which was based on a 2007 study about how "1 in 5 girls are sexually assaulted on college campuses".

        Then maybe she could track down Robert Swope who, in 2000, pointed out that the "It was a good rape" sketch in The Vagina Monologues depicted a no-shit, statutory *and* non-consensual rape (and either shouldn't be celebrated or, at least, wasn't appropriate for the oldest Catholic university in the country) and was told to shut up.

        If the #MeToo era is ending, unless some sort of sex-work-is-work miracle (Whoresmas? Horizontal Labor Day? Halloween?) occurred and rape and sexual assault are no longer a thing, we're just going back to the time when between 4 and 40% of rapes/sexual assaults were between provably false and voluntarily rescinded, respectively.

        1. Rick James   2 months ago

          My favorite artifact of the #MeToo era were the Slut Walks organized by feminists. That was the ultimate expression of "I should be able to wear whatever I want and not be sexualized! Keep your eyeballs off of me, quit looking at my ankles and...HEY! Subscribe to my OnlyFans!"

    2. Dillinger   2 months ago

      >>none of this would matter

      never matters. communist party above all.

    3. MWAocdoc   2 months ago

      "Does this mean the #MeToo era is officially over?"

      Since this trend was never official in the first place, how could it be "officially over?" Words have meanings, Liz. You should be more careful not to get carried away with clever titles and subtitles.

  8. MollyGodiva   2 months ago

    Democratic Scandal: 26 yo asks out 20 yo where not laws, rules or ethics is violated.

    Republican Scandal: The president is a kiddy diddler.

    1. Dillinger   2 months ago

      Biden is the nipple-pinching hair-sniffing pedo, Jimmy.

      1. Rick James   2 months ago

        He was referring to Biden.

  9. damikesc   2 months ago

    What? Democrats ignore their professed ideals for political expediency? No way.

    What next? Democrats supporting a dude who had a Nazi tattoo for 20 years and claiming it was not a big deal?

    1. mad.casual   2 months ago

      Not just having a Nazi tattoo. Having a Nazi tattoo, claiming he didn't know it was a Nazi tattoo, and then rationalizing it by saying everyone should go see a 40 yr. old film where a Nazi SS officer (with the symbol the tattoo replicates prominently displayed on his hat) orders a woman to be raped stupid while he sets fire to the barn that he locked her children inside.

    2. charliehall   2 months ago

      70 percent of Democratic primary voters voted for someone else.

  10. Liberty_Belle   2 months ago

    more than a dozen people were competing in the Democratic primary for the chance to represent Illinois' ninth district

    Out of a dozen people ... this guy ?

    1. Agammamon   2 months ago

      Does not bode well for the next election if this is indicative of the level of quality of Democratic candidates.

      1. InsaneTrollLogic (smarter than The Average Dude)   2 months ago

        Well, they could’ve voted for the lady ICE dumped unceremoniously on her ass.

  11. mad.casual   2 months ago

    Five or eight years ago, these may well have doomed the former state senator and college professor.

    Of course, go back a bit further and Biss' behavior may have merely raised eyebrows. Go back just a few decades, and it would have been unremarkable.

    Phbbbt. 5 or 8 yrs. ago it may well have doomed *some* former senators, attorney general or supreme court nominees, but not others. Go back a bit further and it may have merely raised eyebrows if he lied under oath about it. Go back just a few decades and, before everyone was making $0.30/hr. on OF and parading their sexual identity in the streets, it all would've been whispers and innuendo about what may or may not have happened in any given department store dressing room.

  12. BYODB   2 months ago

    I do give them props for one of the worst thought out hashtags in internet history for a 'serious political movement', but a bunch of rich and famous women being upset that they slept around to become rich and famous was never all that big of a surprise to anyone that knew anything about Hollywood.

    Hollywood is still there, so we can presume the perverts are still there too. After all, look what they're still filming.

    1. Rick James   2 months ago

      Hollywood is still there

      Eehh...

      1. BYODB   2 months ago

        Fair point, streaming has basically killed the industry and they bought up it's remains.

        1. Rick James   2 months ago

          Well, streaming, bad quality output, social-justice jammed into every production, writers not being able to write any more, a union which shot itself in the foot while thinking it 'won' something... there's a lot going on. It's not as if streaming is some other entertainment product, created by aliens or AI that just landed in America on the surface of a meteor that landed in the gulf of Mexico. Hollywood would/was/should be the ostensible creator of everything on streaming.

  13. BYODB   2 months ago


    • "Minnesota legislators are considering a troubling amendment to their state constitution," warns Kevin T. Frazier of the Cato Institute. "In short, the amendment would carve AI out of the state's protection of free speech."

    Does your toaster have free speech?

    At some point, you have to question if allowing an amalgamation of retards to be the distribution of all human knowledge is a good idea, right?

    Humans can be held liable for actions, including libel, but who is held liable in the case of AI making shit up exactly?

    1. mad.casual   2 months ago

      Humans can be held liable for actions, including libel, but who is held liable in the case of AI making shit up exactly?

      Astronaut A: Wait! I was prompted by retards!
      Astronaut B: It's prompting by retards all the way down.

    2. Agammamon   2 months ago

      I didn't murder that man!

      All I did was tell the AI to murder him.

    3. Rick James   2 months ago

      I have to admit, I don't like ANY of the framing here.

      Proper framing (in reference to your statement):

      Reason: They're taking away AI's freedom of speech!
      Normies: Does your toaster have free speech?

      Putting aside Minnesota's (progressive as all getout) attempt to remove a right from something that would be under the U.S. constitution-- this presumes that AI already HAS free speech and something must be done about it.

      It's like calling people who believe the world is round "Flat earth critical". It starts from the premise that all normal, right-thinking people know the world is flat, and over here sits a small oddball corner of of the room where people believe it's round, so they get special status with lots of throat clearing and to-be-sure's about how we don't agree with them, but we'll defend to the end of happy hour their right to think their crazy round-earth thoughts.

  14. Azathoth!!   2 months ago

    Democrats voted for someone with a sex scandal? So? Do they ever not?

    1. charliehall   2 months ago

      "Today's AI-generated prose is riddled with flaws,"

      I think AI chatbots are remarkable. They produce text that sort of resembles English with believable but false alternative facts!

    2. Liberty_Belle   2 months ago

      Wait... are we really throwing stones on this topic ?

  15. Heraclitus   2 months ago

    Scandal? Says who? Just because the women wrote a substack does not mean you need to launder it to create a "scandal".

    You even had to take it all back and really stretch it to tsk tsk Biss. Do you have nothing else to write about today or are you trying to create controversy for clicks?

  16. Agammamon   2 months ago

    ENB doesn't mention the quality of his opposition. Typical.

    Also, what scandal was there? He slept with one of his college students - and that's the worst case (he, hilariously, claims it was 'only kissing').

    That's a #MeToo only to the most insane of the Blue-Hair Brigade.

  17. Rick James   2 months ago

    You know, I have been paying no attention to any of these elections here, and while ENB turned this into a discussion of #MeToo politics, I've been learning throughout the day what's really going on in Illinois.

    I don't know anything about Bliss, but Illinois has apparently had enough of tranny/hijab/identity/your-mask-protects-me-my-mask-protects-you/open borders politics...

    The 'Squad' left faces complete wipeout in Illinois Democratic primaries

    The left suffered a virtually total collapse in the Illinois Democratic congressional primaries on Tuesday night — even in races where the AIPAC-backed candidate lost.

    Why it matters: It's a bad sign for the dozens of insurgent Democrats running in congressional races across the country, both in open seats and as primary rivals to older or more establishment-oriented incumbents.

    It's great news for House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-N.Y.), who is most popular among the moderate and mainstream liberal wings of his party.
    Most of the Democratic House candidates who have refused to commit to supporting Jeffries for leader or speaker are leftist insurgents.
    Driving the news: Kat Abughazaleh, a left-wing influencer and journalist backed by Justice Democrats and the Sunrise Movement, lost to Evanston Mayor Daniel Biss in the closely watched race in Illinois' 9th district.

    So as usual, this has NOTHING to do with #MeToo politics... it has everything to do with a politically captured state where your choice is:

    Democrat
    Chariman Mao
    Stalin
    Pol Pot

    It appears that Illinois voters chose "Democrat" in this rare circumstance. You know, probably because crime is down, all the immigrants are contributing to the economy and we can get back to normal now.

  18. Agammamon   2 months ago

    >mightn't a student reasonably worry that saying no to a date could lead to the professor disparaging them to colleagues? Or to diminished opportunities in some other way?

    No. That is just not how college works.

  19. Rick James   2 months ago

    Can you be a pronatalist without backing womb transplants? That's the question at the heart of this recent Emma Gilland post. "Some conservatives seem to be stuck between demanding women have more children while expressing disgust at new medical breakthroughs that would allow more women to do just that," she writes. More:

    I like how polite society blissfully swings between "We're pregnant" and "conservatives demanding women have more children".

    But it was heavily criticised by conservative feminists who are digging their heels into the sanctity of undisrupted, natural motherhood rather than embracing the fact that women, like Grace, are driven so strongly by the desire to become a mother, that they are willing to undertake complex and risky surgeries to overcome unimaginable medical challenges.

    It's like we're discovering why the old bumper sticker "Feminism is the radical notion that men and women should be treated equally" was laughable horseshit.

  20. Kawliga   2 months ago

    No surprise she was a staff attorney for the insufferable Sierra Club.

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

Trump's Responses to Kimmel and Comey Highlight His Contempt for Freedom of Speech

Jacob Sullum | 5.6.2026 12:01 AM

Elizabeth Warren Wrongly Implies Jeff Bezos Isn't Paying Enough Taxes

Robby Soave | 5.5.2026 5:40 PM

The People vs. CEQA

Christian Britschgi | 5.5.2026 3:25 PM

How the Slaveholding Founders Really Felt About Slavery

Timothy Sandefur | 5.5.2026 1:20 PM

Can We Ever Trust the Government To Be Honest About War?

Alexander Langlois | 5.5.2026 12:27 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS Add Reason to Google

© 2026 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

I WANT FREE MINDS AND FREE MARKETS!

Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.

Make a donation today! No thanks
r

I WANT TO FUND FREE MINDS AND FREE MARKETS

Every dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.

Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interested
r

SUPPORT HONEST JOURNALISM

So much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.

I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanks
r

PUSH BACK

Push back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.

My donation today will help Reason push back! Not today
r

HELP KEEP MEDIA FREE & FEARLESS

Back journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

STAND FOR FREE MINDS

Support journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.

Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanks
r

PUSH BACK AGAINST SOCIALIST IDEAS

Support journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

FIGHT BAD IDEAS WITH FACTS

Back independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

BAD ECONOMIC IDEAS ARE EVERYWHERE. LET’S FIGHT BACK.

Support journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

JOIN THE FIGHT FOR FREEDOM

Support journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

BACK JOURNALISM THAT PUSHES BACK AGAINST SOCIALISM

Your support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

FIGHT BACK AGAINST BAD ECONOMICS.

Donate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks