Trump's SOTU Lies
Plus: Entitlement reform, gas prices, the Reason SOTU drinking game, robo-vac spies, and more...
Well, that was long.
President Donald Trump set a new record for the longest State of the Union address, with a speech that lasted nearly two hours. There was a time when the State of the Union was just a letter. This could have been an email, or, ahem, a newsletter. Can we get the president on Substack? They don't have editors there.
The Reason Roundup Newsletter by Liz Wolfe Liz and Reason help you make sense of the day's news every morning.
Trump did his usual showman shtick. He called out the U.S. hockey team, which just won Olympic gold (and produced an AI-generated meme in which the president was battling on the ice with the team). He said, "Space Force is my baby." (How does Trump's son, Barron, feel about that?) He referred to Democrats as "pro-crime." He claimed to have ended eight wars in 10 months, producing a memorably pained look on Secretary of State Marco Rubio's face. (He nearly did the meme.) And he got Democratic Sen. Elizabeth Warren to stand and clap for a line about congressional insider trading, making for a little bit of real-life horseshoe theory.
But hey, at least we didn't bomb Iran. Yet.
Despite the length, Trump's speech was fundamentally designed to deliver two messages.
First, we're winning, and by we he means he.
And second, they're losing, and by they he means Democrats and haters. Minutes after the speech ended, the White House press secretary posted a list of things Democrats "refused to stand for." That's the takeaway, the big idea the White House wants people to focus on.
This was a movie-length assertion of success—and a series of attacks on Trump's political enemies.
We'll see whether voters buy it. Because so far they haven't. "Polls find that Americans are unhappy with Trump's handling of the economy," The Wall Street Journal reports. "In a Wall Street Journal survey last month, voters gave the president low marks when asked if he cares about 'people like you.'"
For the past year, Trump has presided over a "vibecession" in which voters dislike the economy, despite some reasonably good numbers. As a recent Echelon Insights newsletter notes, Democrats, especially, think Trump's economy is rotten, while Republicans think it's improving, an effect that was clearly visible as early as February 2025. Funny enough, voters had similar negative sentiment about Biden's economy, except that the partisan roles were reversed.
And voters have never approved of his signature economic policy, tariffs: The Echelon Insights newsletter calls Trump's tariffs "uniquely unpopular." Yet he spent part of the speech insisting that, despite a ruling from the Supreme Court last week, he would reinstate a tough tariff regime based on alternative (probably illegal) authority. (In a post-SOTU reaction video, Reason's Reem Ibrahim took on the president's tariff nonsense.)
Trump also suggested, for the umpteenth time, that tariffs would help relieve the national debt and deficit—and might even replace the income tax. Sorry, but, as Eric Boehm wrote last night, that is just not going to happen.
Trump said a lot of things that weren't true. As Jack Nicastro wrote in an economic fact-check last night, Trump said the Biden administration stuck Americans with the worst inflation in history; it was high, but not the worst ever. Trump also said that he'd secured $18 trillion in investments from foreign countries around the globe; even the White House's own website only claims $9.7 trillion worth of "major investment announcements." Trump also suggested he'd beaten inflation and replaced it with "tremendous" growth. Again, nope. Inflation is still elevated.
There were other falsehoods as well. A CNN fact check goes through a number of his SOTU claims and finds them lacking. One of the most notable was Trump's claim that gas prices are "now below $2.30 a gallon in most states, and in some places, $1.99 a gallon." It's like the president was trying to mimic GasBuddy.com, a website that tracks gas prices all over the country, but in human form. As it turns out, the head of petroleum analysis for GasBuddy has thrown cold water on Trump's boasts of sub-$2 gas: He's only aware of four gas stations in the United States with sub-$2 gas. Meanwhile, CNN reports, the car-rescuers at AAA say no state had an average gas price below $2.37.
Fraud couple: Trump also claimed that in Minnesota, "members of the Somali community have pillaged an estimated $19 billion from the American taxpayer. We have all the information, and in actuality, the number is much higher than that." I wrote about this for Reason's print edition recently. It's true that there's been a lot of welfare fraud in Minnesota, and many of those arrested were Somali.
It is, in fact, a scandal, and Democrats in the state let it happen on their watch. But when Assistant U.S. Attorney Joe Thompson announced in December that the state was suffering from "staggering industrial fraud," the initial number he provided was "half or more" of $18 billion in federal Medicaid funds. That's generally been taken to mean about $9 billion, and while or more leaves open the possibility of a much larger fraud, even if literally every single dollar were spent in an outright fraudulent manner—which isn't likely—that's still less than the $19 billion Trump claimed.
In any case, this is a good reason to reform Medicaid, a program that is funded jointly through state budgets and federal matching grants that drive up spending without commensurate improvements in health. But Trump has mostly used this scandal as an opportunity to pursue hardline immigration enforcement, not entitlement reform.
Forever entitled: Yet meaningful entitlement reform is exactly what Trump has taken off the table. Once again, Trump reiterated his promise to "always protect Social Security and Medicare," the two old-age entitlements that are primarily responsible for the long-term run-up of debt and deficits. Without change, both of those programs are set to see significant shortfalls within the next decade. The current trajectory is unsustainable for both the broader federal budget and the programs Trump is promising to preserve.
Eventually, they're going to run out of gas.
Scenes from Washington, D.C.: In some cities, people go to bars to watch sports. In Washington, D.C., people go to bars to watch the State of the Union. And bars offer specials to try to lure in customers.
For example, Penn Social, a bar in downtown D.C., offered free beer "until the first insult." No word on how long that lasted.
QUICK HITS
- In an unusual bipartisan display, GOP Rep. Thomas Massie of Kentucky and Democratic Rep. Ro Khanna of California sat next to each other at last night's big speech. The way this worked is that Massie ended up sitting with the Democrats. I feel like this is begging for a riff on the anime butterfly meme: Is this…a buddy comedy?
- More seriously, Massie and Khanna have sponsored a war powers resolution that would force members of Congress to go on record about the attack on Iran that seems to be in the works.
- People can now bet on exactly what word Trump will say next. And they are betting…bigly.
- Speaking of Trump bets, someone anonymously placed a very large wager on the likelihood that the United States will confirm that aliens exist before 2027. Some suspect insider trading, which, if true, would make this a sort of preconfirmation. Prediction markets surface information!
- Your robot vacuum is probably spying on you. A Spanish engineer tried to hack his DJI Romo vacuum cleaner so he could control it with his PlayStation controller. He soon discovered that he was able to control 7,000 of the robo vacs worldwide, and see house plans and other data too.
- A new poll from Echelon Insights finds broad support for legalized marijuana…and strong opposition to vaping. Who is the pro-pot/anti-vaping voter?
- The Reason staff drinking game was to take a drink every time Trump said "like never before." Did that mean we were going to drink like never before? Look at our coverage, and I think you'll find it remarkably sober-minded. That said, this—in one drinking game, or perhaps one presidential speech—is the case for nonalcoholic Negronis.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please to post comments
Poor Damon and sullum.
https://thepostmillennial.com/us-appeals-court-rules-irs-can-share-data-with-ice-for-immigration-enforcement
LOL, all those articles last night that nobody read.
Can get the same shit from maddow. Why read?
Apparently CNN was distraught that trump ended the night 10% more positive with its viewers.
https://pjmedia.com/matt-margolis/2026/02/25/cnns-instant-poll-of-the-state-of-the-union-will-trigger-the-left-n4949943
President Donald Trump set a new record for the longest State of the Union address, with a speech that lasted nearly two hours.
Everyone who was in attendance is a patriot. Everyone who was not is not. No exceptions.
Except me.
You were in attendance and not a patriot?
What about dems who were there for some of it?
So there the total number of patriots in the county is limited by how many people can fit into the House chamber?
You’re so retarded you can’t even pick up on a Fist joke.
Fist's humor doesn't come thru the Mandarin translator very well.
I think Biden would have crumbled into dust if he tried to do 2 hours.
That crazy awful who rammed into a dhs office with an ambulance full of gasoline was also a rabid trans activist.
https://thepostmillennial.com/revealed-suspect-in-ramming-stolen-ambulance-into-idaho-dhs-building-identified-as-lgbtq-activist
"political violence is mostly right wing"
I bet the guy issuing membership cards to the right wing is really kicking himself at this point.
They all donate to Act-Blue, which is the sure sign of their right-wingedness.
Those of us in the Panhandle are *begging* for something like this to happen. Need to dust off that lingering Hayden Lake reputation.
There was a time when the State of the Union was just a letter.
Yeah, the letter F. Now it's the letter A+.
School board demands 1.2M in costs for FOIA regarding public school contracts.
https://justthenews.com/accountability/watchdogs/patently-absurd-school-district-demands-12m-see-contracts-voters-consider
You have to pay for transparency. Everything else should be free.
I only made it two sentences in to Suderman's whinging before I had to stop.
Maybe we should count his lies
Inflation is not "elevated".
There is much more fraud than Medicaid (as most of us are "learing")
Fortunately, we have actual data to understand the differences to the hyperpartisan reactions to Trumps private sector growth and Biden's government economy.
Suderman "trump is a lier because he hurts my feelings. Wahhhhhhh!"
Made it to the byline myself.
Newly released memo shows Garland wasn't exactly independent of Biden for mar a lago raid.
https://justthenews.com/government/federal-agencies/fbi-memo-confirms-jtn-2022-reporting-biden-involvement-raid-trumps-mar
And then nothing happened.
Never would have happened if only Trump had cooperated!
-sarc (pbuh)
It is amazing how many criminal cases would not happen if the person did not commit the crime in the first place.
Or if we just legalized theft. At least up to $1000, right?
What crime tony?
Exactly. The Biden’s, Fanni Willis, Letitia James, Comey and his FBI minions, they really shouldve followed the law
nonalcoholic Negronis.
Gay
Does chase know?
What are you implying?
I just heard he was gay. Sarc never confirmed for me.
Who the fuck would want a non-alcoholic version of this drink?
Yeah, I think if you microwaved an orange starburst to the point of burning it you'd be close enough.
I liked the part where some lawmakers refused to stand up for the people they swore to serve.
Not true. They are serving themselves.
^ He gets it.
Who were the lawmakers sworn to serve?
It's right there in the sentence.
the people they swore to serve
Congress and Senators are sworn in.
Who do you think they are meant to serve?
They serve the US Constitution.
"I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter: So help me God."
The people, you stupid retarded fuckwad.
The fundamental duty of the American government is to protect the rights and liberties of all people within its jurisdiction. This duty flows directly from the Declaration of Independence. If you disagree then I am ashamed of you, and I question your loyalty and patriotism.
I’m not finding what you are claiming
https://www.archives.gov/founding-docs/declaration-transcript
You have to remember jeff is a Marxist retard. He doesnt understand what the term the people meant when written. His only job here is to be retarded and lie.
Come on, man. Every person has the automatic right to be within US borders. And every person within the borders has automatic rights to all kinds of free stuff.
Let me fix that for you:
Every person has the natural right of freedom of association. And every person choosing to exercise that right ought to have that right protected by the government.
Would you agree or disagree?
If you disagree, then I claim that you are not a true patriot, and I question your loyalty and patriotism.
Do gangs and mafias and terrorists groups and racists clubs fall under freedom of association?
Every individual has the natural right to associate with whomever they choose in a peaceful manner. Whether the government labels an association a "club" or a "gang" is an arbitrary distinction.
If a group of individuals violate the NAP by committing a crime, it does not matter if those individuals chose to associate with each other as a "gang", the important point is the crime that they committed.
And now you are going to bring up edge cases like "well what about criminal conspiracy?" I don't think that individuals "conspiring" should be considered a crime unless individuals in that group commit a tangible ACTION that is a violation of the NAP. But just sitting around talking about committing a crime, but not doing anything about it, should not be a crime IMO.
"Well, what about prisoners?" Prisoners because of their choices temporarily forfeit some of their rights, but even prisoners should not be denied all rights. Prisoners still get to visit (associate) with visitors in prison.
Anything else I can help you with?
So you can be a member of ISIS as long as you don't commit acts of violence got it. And burning a cross on somebody's lawn is just free speech, nobody is getting hurt.
Pedojeffy, the defender of rights.
So you can be a member of ISIS as long as you don't commit acts of violence got it.
If by "member of ISIS" you mean "someone who freely chooses to follow an oppressive version of Islam", then sure. I strongly disagree with their religious views of course.
How far do you want to let the government have the power to label groups it doesn't like as "gangs" and "terrorists" who should be spied upon? Wait until President AOC declares gun clubs to be "domestic terrorist organizations".
And burning a cross on somebody's lawn is just free speech
No, that is a violation of the NAP. It is trespassing and vandalism.
Any other strawmen that you want me to knock down?
And every person choosing to exercise that right ought to have that right protected by the government.
If those rights are to be protected by this government, what are the responsibilities of the person choosing to be protected under this government's laws?
To exercise those rights peacefully. But that is true for everyone in every case.
Natural rights are not a privilege. They are a birthright of every human being. It is the obligation of the government to protect those rights.
Would you agree or disagree?
Disagree.
If Natural Rights are not a privilege but a birthright of every human being as you claim, why is the government obligated to do anything for them? And in particular, protect those rights?
Under what circumstances does the government become responsible for these birthright privileges? Say it with me, under the laws of the governing body.
And if one has broken these laws, or even under the NAP, does harm/affects others by just showing up for their free association, what then does the government owe them beyond a handshake and a goodbye/good luck?
I choose to associate with the Swedish Bikini team.
I’m glad that’s not a reciprocal requirement or anything. Just my right
Of course the association has to be consensual. Otherwise it is a violation of the NAP.
"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.--That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed"
Yeah that sounded great, but we decided to keep slavery anyway.
Amazing. Tony's china based education didnt teach him the difference between the constitution and the declaration.
Oddly enough he ignored the very last phrase "consent of the governed" ie those the government was formed to represent.
If an illegal is giving this consent, then he is agreeing to the laws. Yet openly violating the laws, so guess they aren't consenting.
But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.
Descriptor of the Democratic Party. And the coming reaction to the Despotism.
""The fundamental duty of the American government is to protect the rights and liberties of all people within its jurisdiction.""
American government has a history full of NOT doing that.
American government has a history full of NOT doing that.
You're right! The American government has a very mixed record of fulfilling that duty. But it IS their duty nonetheless. Would you agree with that as their duty?
In the very first few phrases of the Declaration, the founders separate the American people from the British people.
So, no. Not ALL people.
And illegal aliens are NOT living within the jurisdiction of the US. They are steadfastly and deliberately trying to AVOID that jurisdiction because, should they come under it, they will be deported.
They are steadfastly and deliberately trying to AVOID that jurisdiction because, should they come under it, they will be deported.
Or taxed, wages fixed, and accounted on public doles appropriately. Probably mostly what you said though.
Then you are a traitor to the American revolution. All people have inalienable rights, whether they are American or British or from anywhere else. If you think that some people have natural rights and some people don't based just on where they were born, then you are an authoritarian traitor.
"All people have inalienable rights, whether they are American or British or from anywhere else."
Then they should be able to claim those rights wherever they are. They shouldn't need to move to a particular country.
If, say, Venezuelans want their rights, they should claim them in Venezuela and take the same risks Americans did in claiming their own rights. If Americans want to help them, then they can. Just because right are inalienable doesn't mean one isn't required to fight for them (see, for example, the Revolutionary War.)
Then they should be able to claim those rights wherever they are.
They SHOULD be, yes. But this world has many, many unjust governments which oppresses people and violates their rights. Until every government respects the natural rights of all within their jurisdiction, then individuals who live in oppressive regimes have a choice to make: either they can stay and fight against the government for their rights that they are entitled to, or they can leave and flee oppression in order to find a place that does respect their rights. IMO either choice is a valid choice for those who are seeking liberty. After all, the original American colonists were fleeing British oppression of their religious practices. Was it invalid for them to come to America in the first place, when they "should have" stayed and fought against the King?
either they can stay and fight against the government for their rights that they are entitled to, or they can leave and flee oppression in order to find a place that does respect their rights.
It's interesting that your expectation is the US is that place and these rights you claim should be automatically bestowed and protected by our government just because. Yet, if you invoke the NAP, which you do in most of these arguments, you absolve the arriving party of any responsibility to honor the NAP on their side. And what about their responsibility to respect the laws of the government they arrive in and ask for protection from?
After all, the original American colonists were fleeing British oppression of their religious practices. Was it invalid for them to come to America in the first place, when they "should have" stayed and fought against the King?
Did they come with the expectation that the existing government there would protect their rights and provide for them?
And illegal aliens are NOT living within the jurisdiction of the US.
Then the US government has no legal authority to deport illegal aliens, because they are not subject to US laws which make illegal immigration a crime. Is that really your argument?
Actually, that does kinda sound like the MAGA argument when it comes to illegal aliens. The government doesn't NEED "legal authority" to deport illegal aliens, they just need the raw physical power to do so, whether it occurs legally or not. Is that what you are claiming?
Ohhh bohem said it's wrong so it must be wrong.
You can't hat reason enough.
And the horseshoe theory is complete shit
To be fair... the horseshoe theory of Marxists and liberaltarians seems likely legitimate. Push the same shit.
For "Nolan Chart" thinkers to adopt a "strong" version of horseshoe theory, they have to pretend an entire dimension that they argued exists is really just a meaningless abstract social construct.
For them to adopt a "weak" version of horseshoe theory, centrists are constantly one "horseshoe gap" away from being other centrists, conservatives are one "horseshoe gap" away from being liberals, and more extreme libertarians are one horseshoe gap away from being authoritarians.
Of course, most regular people today recognize that the Nolan chart is really multi-dimensional and shifts and changes shape through time, and that a "strong horseshoe theory" is actually a retrograde expression of a false dichotomy, but it is a thing that people can think or believe in.
>>the horseshoe theory of Marxists and liberaltarians seems likely legitimate.
that's a carbon rod not a horseshoe
Minutes after the speech ended, the White House press secretary posted a list of things Democrats "refused to stand for."
I mean, it's all performative so everyone is playing their part here.
Capitol hill is becoming the House of Commons.
Orville Redenbacher must be pulling the strings.
Is Pelosi invested in popcorn futures?
One of the most notable was Trump's claim that gas prices are "now below $2.30 a gallon in most states, and in some places, $1.99 a gallon."... As it turns out, the head of petroleum analysis for GasBuddy has thrown cold water on Trump's boasts of sub-$2 gas: He's only aware of four gas stations in the United States with sub-$2 gas.
Incredibly weird way to say that "four" is not "some".
Numbers are racist.
Reason was just paid to push talking points, not paid to think if they made sense.
Like the umpteenth article claiming AI power demand is not driving up prices.
No *widespread* sub-$2 gas.
Look, if all gas can't cost less than $2 then why bother with any?
Also incredibly weird to take a pretty clear goalpost of "most" (26 states) and "below $2.30" and interpret it as "four stations below $2".
It would probably be fair to point out that "most" states had at least a few, sub-$2.30 gas stations *before* 2026 and probably even 2025, but who wants a thing like honesty in politics and, more critically, market analyses?
Trump also claimed that in Minnesota, "members of the Somali community have pillaged an estimated $19 billion from the American taxpayer."
CLAIMED WITHOUT EVIDENCE, you mean.
Visit your local learing center for more information.
But Trump has mostly used this scandal as an opportunity to pursue hardline immigration enforcement, not entitlement reform.
Weird way of saying he's trying to fix a problem.
What a weird statement as entitlement reform was part of BBB. And congress wont act on social security.
A problem that was front and center when he was elected.
I get it, trying to keep a campaign promise isn't something people on capitol hill want to mention as possible. It makes everyone else look bad.
He added adjustments during reconciliation and has gotten quite a few recissions. Only so much can be done due to democrat vote share in the senate.
He's only aware of four gas stations in the United States with sub-$2 gas.
What is this called? Vibe factchecking? FOUR GAS STATIONS COUNTS AS SOME.
Do you even nuance bro?
Without change, both of those programs are set to see significant shortfalls within the next decade.
Be the change you want to see, Suderman. Work until you're 80.
Why wont trump do this without congessso we can complain about him not asking congress!!!! - suderman
For example, Penn Social, a bar in downtown D.C., offered free beer "until the first insult." No word on how long that lasted.
The thin skinned see honest critiques as insults.
Or as violence.
The way this worked is that Massie ended up sitting with the Democrats.
No one on his team is in charge of controlling optics?
He should have sat there with pieces from his personal arsenal. See how long he'd be welcomed on that side of the aisle.
His best friend is wealth tax ro Khanna now.
Almost seems like he wants trump to help push him out of congress to go the Cheney route.
...force members of Congress to go on record about the attack on Iran that seems to be in the works.
Make yourself irrelevant and no one gives a fuck what you think.
Just ask Europe.
The Mullahs running Europe would never approve of attacking Iran.
...someone anonymously placed a very large wager on the likelihood that the United States will confirm that aliens exist before 2027.
They exist and they will be duly deported once they arrive.
If the wager was placed by Donald R. DeCicco, is it still insider trading?
I thought you meant Giorgio A. Tsoukalos .
von Daniken died like 6 weeks ago sucks he couldn't stick around for the truth
Or was he an alien fleeing being discovered?
We'll need a federal court in orbit to fast track the habeas petitions.
They exist and they will be
duly deportedgiven taxpayer funded benefits and registered to vote once they arrive.He soon discovered that he was able to control 7,000 of the robo vacs worldwide, and see house plans and other data too.
Well, that sucks. But if you want to spy on people just follow them on Insta.
Who is the pro-pot/anti-vaping voter?
"Social conservative, fiscal liberal."
-Dennis Duffy
I've got no issues with vaping, per se. It's just that so many vape users (vapers, vapors?) are just gigantic douches.
Some people are purists. To them, vaping is sacrilege.
Suderman's TDS-addled Lies.
Fuck off and die, asswipe.
When the headline (and subhead) includes the bias without any shame.
Give him a break. Was a bad night optically for the dems. Suderman is still angry.
"For the past year, Trump has presided over a "vibecession" in which voters dislike the economy, despite some reasonably good numbers."
"Vibecession" was a Biden thing and it was a stupid thing to say then too. Stop trying to make fetch happen.
"...in which voters dislike the economy, despite some reasonably good numbers."
Perhaps if the TDS-addled media (including this rag) didn't constantly LIE about the economy, things might be different.
"Vibecession" is a perfectly cromulent word.
I don't recall. Did Reason grace us with articles like "Biden's SOTU Lies"??
"members of the Somali community have pillaged an estimated $19 billion from the American taxpayer."
What's the Somali total from Minnesota, Ohio, Maine, and seems like one other place was in the news.
Negronis.
I think the preferred term these days is African-Americanonis.
Makes a bunch of white people sitting on the porch, enjoying their Negronis, having brown people paid below living wage serve them every time they say "Negroni please!" seem kinda racist.
"having brown people paid below living wage serve them every time they say "Negroni please!" seem kinda racist."
It's the closest I can get to having "the pass"! Dont spoil this for me damnit
hey my first thought was is that what you wash down the Soylent Green with?
Is this not the only important point? Democrats policies are horrific and caused the harm to America that Trump and the GOP are fixing now?
Just tell the truth. It's that easy to call out the democrats.
"And second, they're losing, and by they he means Democrats and haters. Minutes after the speech ended, the White House press secretary posted a list of things Democrats "refused to stand for." That's the takeaway, the big idea the White House wants people to focus on."
That's the takeaway, the big idea the White House wants people to focus on."
Yes. It is. These are not small items in terms of being a nation. And the argument that Trump means HE? No, dumbass, he means we. The voters that voted for Trump and his policies. The people seeing our hope come back to life along with our resources. The people watching the corruption fraud and graft come to light. That is the 'we' and the 'they' are getting exposed for their shallow hatred and clear self-interest. Enjoy the show.
There was a time when the State of the Union was just a letter. This could have been an email, or, ahem, a newsletter.
Apparently that time lasted from Jefferson (who thought Prez speechifying was too monarchical) to Woodrow Wilson who personalized the Presidency into a - well -monarchical imperial form. Teddy Roosevelt would have done the same had he won the 1912 election.
In Wilson's 1913 SotU, he pushed Congress to sign the Federal Reserve Act which was signed 2 weeks later - and to push primaries as a way of turning party nominations into electoral events. Reinforcing all future Prez to use SoTU to sell an agenda to Congress and, later with media, to use the opportunity to sell the Prez to voters directly.
reason writes. We can't stand the truth. We hate the truth. We must lie to destroy orangemanbad.
Tell the world Trump lied in his speech because he's winning and the truth hurts and we hate him?
SOTU speeches rarely have any long term impact. This one will be no different.
Rush Limbaugh, a person who already has a cell reserved in hell, railed against the SOTU every year, no matter who was in office. Rush was/is right on that.
A 60-100 page annual written SOTU would be so much better.
Well. This tracks.
I’d be interested in knowing under what spiritual authority Molly makes her pronouncements
Reeeeason's largest butt hurt:
Open borders progressives hate america and flood the US with illegals. They care not if some of the illegals are rapists, murderers, and theives. They only care that millions of illegals are avenues to power. Power they use to enrich themselves by fraud.
Immigration is a net economic positive. That is well established. One could say that those who put their hatred of immigrants ahead of the US economy are in the wrong.
Truly open borders would lead to a massive economic boom.
MG.
Is.
Full.
Of.
Shit.
Fuck off and die, 混蛋.
Yes, we see how the economy boomed once the borders opened up in 2021. Certainly net economic positive for MN and its immigrant community. At the expense of the American taxpayer of course. I'm sure those businesses that were non-existent and subsidized by the Federal Government were a net gain for all of us!
MAGAs are the dumbest shits on the plane.t
Poor china plant.
One could say that those who put their hatred of immigrants ahead of the US economy are in the wrong.
More accurately - one could say that whenever the foreign-born% of the population (as a proxy for unassimilated) exceeds 12% or so of the total population, then there have ALWAYS been immigration tensions because immigration has costs that hit the bottom of the economic ladder and benefits that accrue to the top/connected. It is NOT a universal 'benefit to the US economy'. It is UTILITARIAN which means divide and conquer works.
Reason will always ignore that because obviously they advocate for the donor class. But the reality is that those tensions were part of every immigration wave - from the 1846 Irish Catholic and 1848 German - to the shutting down of all immigration in the 1910's and 20's. That latter time frame was where foreign born immigrants were 15-17% of the population. That dropped to 6% or so by the 1960's when immigration opened back up. And is now up to 13-14% or so.
Moralize that if you want but that is just the donor class koolaid that you are selling. The US has had a great history of assimilating immigrants over time. And yes an ugly history of the inbred trailer trash commentariat here resisting it as the useful idiots they are. But for a country like the US - that is NOT blood-and-soil but is about chosen values - then assimilation IS important and that takes time.
Worked out great for the 'native' americans. Look how prosperous they have become.
Immigration is a net economic positive.
Importing 1 million south africans would be a net positive if one of those is Elon Musk and the other 999,999 are all jobless and on welfare.
i.e. how to lie with statistics
This remains false no matter the bullshit model you choose.
Just look at the economic explosions in Europe lol.
Just like in Western Europe, huh?
Iryna Zarutska's killer didn't enter the country though "open borders." He was a U.S. citizen.
https://x.com/i/status/2026497825693974959
Soave is such a shit heel. He's doing the meme.
Guess it's back to Callahan Auto Parts, Sandusky, Ohio.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/autos/enthusiasts/brake-giants-go-bust-stoptech-and-raybestos-dead-after-6-billion-fraud/ar-AA1X2A8B
The immediate halt of manufacturing for StopTech, Raybestos, and Centric isn't just a corporate hiccup; it’s a systemic failure. First Brands Group, the parent entity that gutted these names to service a $6 billion debt load, has entered Chapter 11 bankruptcy. This move follows federal fraud indictments against the company's founders in late 2025.
Knew they couldn't resist...
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/zohran-mamdani-s-dsa-pals-push-to-tax-rich-in-albany-but-it-s-not-just-millionaires-who-will-be-squeezed/ar-AA1X0iNp
Mayor Zohran Mamdani campaigned on raising taxes on people raking in $1 million a year – but his pals in the Democratic Socialists of America are scheming to also squeeze New York married couples making half that.
The far-left group is planning to hold a “Tax the Rich” rally in Albany on Wednesday pushing legislation that would boost state income taxes by nearly 10% on couples filing jointly who make more $500,000 – and soaking top earners with a whopping 220% hike that’d make New York’s top tax rate the highest in the country.
The current top rate for other joint filers is
9.65% for those making over $2.15 million
10.3% for those making $5 million
10.9% for those making $25 million.
But the DSA bill would boost rates and double the top rate for the highest-income earners to:
12.0% for incomes over $2 million
14% for incomes over $3 million
16% for incomes over $4 million
18% for incomes over $5 million
20% for incomes over $10 million
22% for incomes over $15 million, and
24% for incomes over $20 million
Single filers making more than $450,000 would see their rates jump at least 7.5%
BTW:
"Recommended
The Supreme Court just struck down Trump's 'emergency' tariffs under IEEPA
After SCOTUS loss, Trump's new tariff argument contradicts what he said before
The SCOTUS tariff decision vindicates the separation of powers
Even without the 'emergency' powers SCOTUS rejected, Trump has tariff options
SCOTUS struck down Trump's 'emergency' tariffs. His new tariffs are on even shakier legal footing."
Or:
TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!.
Does anyone else notice a certain 'syndrome'?
>>This could have been an email, or, ahem, a newsletter. Can we get the president on Substack? They don't have editors there.
lol you don't have editors here ... and your Envy mask is down
>>Trump said a lot of things that weren't true.
... speaking of failing the open book test ^^^
>>More seriously, Massie and Khanna have sponsored a war powers resolution
seriously and war powers resolution should never be in the same sentence and neither Massie nor Khanna should ever be given the keys
>>and in some places, $1.99 a gallon ... four gas stations in the United States with sub-$2 gas
now you're failing the psat too
So the dude that handed Obama the Nobel prize because he is purportedly black is charged with corruption involving ...Epstein?
https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/former-norway-pm-attempts-suicide-after-epstein-linked-raid-corruption-charges-report
Norway's former Prime Minister Thorbjørn Jagland was hospitalized a week ago after a failed suicide attempt, days after he was charged with "gross corruption" after a police probe into his ties with the late sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, local outlet iNyheter reports.
Jagland, 75, who gave Barack Obama a Nobel peace price less than nine months into his presidency, was charged on February 12 after police carried out an extensive search of his properties - including apartments in Oslo and in Risør.
According to the report, Norway's Økokrim - which investigates economic and environmental crimes - took the serious step of sending a letter to the Council of Europe requesting that Jagland's immunity be lifted. It was revoked one day before the raids took place. In the letter, Økokrim says that Jagland and his immediate family used Epstein's private apartments in Paris and New York multiple times between 2011 and 2018, and stayed at Epstein's villa in Palm Beach, Florida - with travel being likely covered by Epstein in connection with one of the stays.
Epstein also reportedly paid for travel and hotel costs for Jagland and five other adults in the Caribbean, and reportedly asked Epstein for a loan, though it's unclear whether that was actually made.
If convicted, and he doesn't successfully kill himself, Jagland faces up to a decade in prison if convicted.
In one 2018 email exchange, Epstein wrote to Jagland suggesting that "I think you might suggest to Putin, that Lavrov, can get insight on talking to me."
Jagland served as Norway's Prime Minister from 1996 to 1997, and held other prominent international roles - including Secretary General of the Council of Europe (2009-2019) and chairman of the Norwegian Nobel Committee.
Apparently Epstein was in bed with several top Norwegians;
When Trump said,"The first duty of the American government is to protect American citizens, not illegal aliens.", who stood up?
Hopefully no one since that is not even close to being true.