How a Kids' Soccer Game Became a Child Welfare Case
A routine neighborhood soccer game was escalated into a state investigation, illustrating how ordinary parenting disputes are increasingly routed through government systems.
Heather Bryant, a teacher in Park City, Utah, only learned that a Division of Child and Family Services (DCFS) worker had interviewed her three kids after the fact.
"I got a call from the DCFS investigator," Bryant said in a phone call. "I was sitting at work and was absolutely knocked sideways by it. My hand was shaking—I couldn't believe I was having this conversation."
The investigator informed Bryant that someone had called DCFS to report overhearing a conversation between their son and Bryant's middle son. The 8-year-old boys were talking about how Bryant's 12-year-old son had been rough with them during a neighborhood soccer game.
This was labeled "child-on-child physical aggression during play" by the DCFS.
"We want to reassure you that your children are all clearly well-adjusted," the caseworker told Bryant after going to their schools and asking her three children about their home life. Bryant was informed that "no further action will be taken." In other words, an investigation was opened without announcement, and was now being closed. "She was clearly apologetic," recalls Bryant.
Months afterwards, Bryant was still shaken. "It was fear mixed with shock," Bryant says. Feeling betrayed by an anonymous mom made Bryant wary about letting her kids play with their friends. She only recently felt ready to write about it in an op-ed in The Park Record, although the incident occurred over a year ago.
The fact that an overheard discussion of 8-year-olds prompted government investigation made Bryant start to see how fear and over-reaction "is increasingly routed through public systems." She couldn't understand why a mom would call the authorities, rather than just speaking to her. "This wasn't about genuine risk to children. It was about outsourcing discomfort," Bryant wrote.
Getting the state involved in parenting decisions is something Utah has been at the forefront of fighting. In 2018, Utah became the first state to pass a Free-Range Parenting law. Since then, 10 more states have followed suit with "Reasonable Childhood Independence" bills. These bills say that "neglect" is when you put your child in obvious, serious danger—not anytime you take your eyes off them, including letting them play outside unsupervised.
If a casual soccer match could be described as "dysregulated," then almost all true play environments could be considered overly rough. "Normal physicality was reframed as aggression," wrote Bryant. "Healthy competition became cause for alarm." If we take all the spontaneity and risk out of play, it's no longer play. It's yet another orchestrated, scrutinized, adult-run activity.
Maybe one reason kids are so anxious and depressed these days is that they don't get a lot of chances to work things out on their own. If you never figure out how to deal with an older kid playing rough, you never learn how much you can handle. Instead, an adult is always there to solve the problems—or call the authorities—and kids are growing up as bystanders.
Parents, meanwhile, are stuck in anxiety mode, seeing and hearing so many of the once-hidden ups and downs of their kids' day. Between constant surveillance and near-constant supervision, childhood spats that would have been forgotten are now witnessed, worried about, and turned into bigger issues.
This kind of excessive intervention knows no boundaries. When kids are over at her home, Bryant says, she gets a stream of texts from parents asking her to remind their kids to hydrate, or eat a protein snack, or not to eat sugar.
As a high school teacher, Bryant sees the impact on students growing up this way. "You ask them to do something, and I need to provide step by step instructions, because that's what they're used to," says Bryant. "They need directives for simple tasks."
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please to post comments
Keep it up Lenore. Been a long time since I've had a kid in the house but even thirty years ago every parent was terrified of DCFS. And it's only getting worse.
The Child Protective Services Star Chamber is a really scary place. I've been there myself.
Many years ago, when custodial fathers were as rare as honest politicians, I was a custodial father of two daughters. Their mother had lots of problems, and the courts had ruled that she could only visit them when supervised. Evidently, she concluded that CPS was her best path to custody, and she contacted them often.
After about the 5th secret investigation from CPS, the social worker averred to the fact that they were aware of Mom's machinations, but still had to investigate anyway.
A few months later, Mom got arrested again and committed to a State Psychiatric facility. You would think that would end things...Nope! Even from a funny farm 300 miles distant, she was able to report that she had personally witnessed all manner of naughtiness on my part, and CPS felt obliged to investigate.
Oh well...
“This wasn't about genuine risk to children. It was about outsourcing discomfort," Bryant wrote.”
Or, alternatively, this was an active revenge from somebody who is pissed off at her. Sad to say, using child protective services as a means of revenge against somebody who offended you is not unheard of.
Back in the day, parents were alerted, words were exchanged, and everything forgotten. I remember being bullied by my next-door buddy. One day, I had enough and lit into him. His mom called my mom and said " your son bloodied my son's nose." Mom said, "Well, it's about time!" Within days, we were happily playing together again.
A consequence of "Female Empowerment!!" or "It's for the Kids!!"?
My wife has commented a number of times on the lack of imagination and initiative in new hires. She has to give them a specific task and steps on doing it. When the task is done they just stop and wait for someone to tell them what to do instead of finding something themselves. It's like they are afraid of doing anything on their own.
Remember, folks. The right to remain silent doesn't just mean you, instruct your kids not to talk to government workers in such a manner and insist they call you, the parent, first.
When my Nephews were in elementary school they had a shortage of substitute teachers. My Sister took the training to be a substitute. A friend of my Nephews was playing with them when their Mother asked if my Sister would keep an eye on him while she went to the store. A bit later one of my nephews came in and said that their friend had fallen from a tree. My Sister took him to the hospital. He had a nasty bruise on his hip. His parents grounded him because he had been told not to climb the tree.
A few days later my Sister was teaching his class when they had to go to the Nurse's Office for some check up. They noticed the bruise and asked "Did you parents beat you?" He was mad from being grounded and said "Yes!" My Sister tried to say what happened, but, the school wouldn't let her. Deputies removed both parents from their places of employment in handcuffs. My Sister told the School what they could do with their job and spoke up. It took about two weeks to clear it up, with the child in Foster care the whole time. Then CYS still insisted on a one year probation cycle of visits and inspections.
Ah, another example of "The Warmth of Collectivism".