Mamdani's Promise of the 'Warmth of Collectivism' Is a Lie. Just Ask All the Failed Communes.
History is very clear that property rights and capitalism are necessary for society to flourish.
"Replace the frigidity of rugged individualism with the warmth of collectivism!" says my new socialist mayor, Zohran Mamdani.
Sounds so nice.
No more greedy capitalists hoarding wealth. People share. It's the socialist dream.
What will replace capitalism and individualism? One model is the commune—that socialist system where people share, rather than greedily chasing money.
In my new video, TikTokers claim capitalism is "ending." They sing about the beauty of communes. One asks, desperately, "Where is my commune?!"
Good question. They're hard to find because they keep failing.
One of the most famous was founded in 1825 in New Harmony, Indiana. Private property was banned and residents shared everything.
The result?
After just two years, most residents left.
Today, New Harmony is a tourist attraction, meant to "inspire progressive thought," says the assistant director of the expensively renovated site. "It just has some magic here."
But New Harmony's magic only exists today because a nepo baby poured her rich father's money into it. Robert Blaffer started Humble Oil, which became ExxonMobil. After his death, his daughter spent millions of her father's dollars turning the failed commune into an expensive museum.
The "magic" tourists experience in New Harmony comes from capitalism, the only system that creates lasting wealth.
The "warmth of collectivism" fails again and again.
It's failing now in Cuba, North Korea, Nicaragua, and Venezuela.
It was tried and abandoned in the Soviet Union, Mongolia, Afghanistan, Ethiopia, Angola, Mozambique, Benin, the Congo, Somalia, Grenada, and Cambodia.
Even China and Vietnam's leaders, to allow their countries to prosper, felt they had to give up pure socialism and allow private property and capitalism.
But my new mayor still wants to give "the warm of collectivism" a shot.
If he were my age, he would have been a hippie. Hippie communes were popular then.
One in Tennessee called The Farm forbade members to have their own money or property. Everyone shared everything.
"Mothers would nurse each other's babies—other parents would take care of you," said a former member.
"If you want to become a member of the community," warned The Farm's lawyer, "you got to put everything you have in the pot. We're doing this for a lifetime!"
But they couldn't do it for a lifetime. They couldn't even keep it for a dozen years.
There just wasn't enough money, says the commune's bookkeeper: "Everybody was saying…there's not enough food, not enough vegetables, not enough diapers, shoes. All things the children needed."
Only when the commune allowed members to own things, and keep profit from their labor, was The Farm able to survive.
Residents now say, "We're not socialists anymore. We have our own money."
New York's Oneida Community was founded as a free-love, socialist commune, where "every man in the community was essentially married to every woman and all the property was shared."
But Oneida survives today only because they dropped socialism and became capitalists, selling expensive Oneida silverware.
Likewise, an Iowa commune, Amana Colonies, survives because they abandoned socialism to sell appliances.
Some Americans (falsely) think Israeli communes, Kibbutzim, succeeded. But they mostly failed, despite getting heavy taxpayer subsidies. Why?
Yaron Brook of the Ayn Rand Institute explains, "People envied one another…and treated one another really, really bad. It's obvious why. Some people worked hard. Others didn't. Yet they had exactly the same."
The surviving few Kibbutzim are capitalist. Members own property and earn their own money.
The "warmth of collectivism" doesn't last.
But socialists never admit that their communes fail.
"Because to them it's a moral ideal," says Brook. "Moral striving for the good, even though it's a complete disaster and a complete failure everywhere and anywhere it is tried."
No matter what my new mayor and other "progressives" say, the only thing that works—the only thing that really makes life better for people—is private ownership and capitalism.
COPYRIGHT 2026 BY JFS PRODUCTIONS INC.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please to post comments
#1 There isn't a single law on USA books that forbid the creation of willfully entered commune's or a socialist society by willful admittance.
#2 Every single one of you socialist morons can DO exactly what you preach RIGHT NOW. There is NOTHING stopping you. That's what freedom is all about.
#3 The FACT that you won't DO unless you can pack Gov - 'Guns' against those 'icky' people is precisely the BS in your BS claims.
So in reality. Socialist just want 'Guns' to enslave and STEAL from capitalism wealth. Otherwise; they'd just get together collectively and go DO it. Once the party of Slavery. Still the mentality of Slavery through and through.
Oh fuck off - when it's your people with the Guns, you're fine with it.
to what are you replying? You simply prove you are too stupid and low IQ to respond to any of his statements.
And you're evidently unfamiliar with TJJ2000's brand of monomania.
Elon Musk has more wealth than a billion people living on $1 a day. And he earned every penny of it, with the help of billions in California subsidies and laws to save Tesla from bankruptcy and tens of billions in government contracts and subsidies. He earned every penny of his 800,000 million in wealth. And of course he moved out of California, which saved him from bankrupticy with state help, to avoid paying state taxes! Wouldn't you! Socialism, tho successful in Norway and Finland, has failed everywhere (Libya, Venezuela, Cuba, etc) it has succeeded so much it had to be destroyed.
You've got a good 3 full-on contradictions in there.
When you decide to stop chasing your own tail maybe I'll respond.
Just Ask All the Failed Communes.
Even the "successful" ones aren't that warm, tovarich.
If he were my age, he would have been a hippie. Hippie communes were popular then.
Pretty sure your Islamist mayor would have thrown hippies off buildings.
the FREE MARKET performs BETTER that capitalism (as John Stossel frequently claims)
As capitalism is just a SUBSET of a Free Market !!!!!!!!! 😐
Did you have a point to make, or just want to prove you're incapable of making any sort of judgement?
BTW, he ought to ask Bernie about the commune which tossed him out on his ass, since he was (and still is) not able to produce anything of value.
Didn't know about that! Asked AI, which cited Reason: In 1971, Sanders visited a Vermont “back-to-the-land” commune called Myrtle Hill Farm. The story (as retold in the book We Are As Gods by Kate Daloz) is that the commune had a 3-day “all are welcome” rule, and after Sanders spent those days mostly talking politics instead of doing physical work, he was asked to move on. 
"One asks, desperately, "Where is my commune?!""
Lady, there is nothing stopping you under a capitalist society from forming your own commune with other like-minded people. Go right ahead! What these custard-heads usually mean is, "Where is the safe-space commune that government authority is supposed to create for me at someone else's expense while forcing everyone onto communes against their will?"
Mamdani is a fuckwit. I wonder whether he simply thinks that socialism has worked in the past, so can be tried again, or that this time it'll be different.
I expect the Reason fuckwits to continue to insist that by being pro-capitalist and hence anti-Trump, one is a leftist.
To be fair there is no downside for Mamdani cosplaying Lenin with the lives of New Yorkers. He doesn't particularly need the income so if his experiment fails catastrophically he will not personally suffer. And, also playing fair here, the voters of New York City overwhelming demanded whatever happens to them as a result. The Governor of New York has already committed to bankrolling the effort and the President of the United States is a New Yorker, so perhaps everyone in America will eventually feel the pain when the dollar crashes and the money train goes off the tracks.
"No matter what my new mayor and other "progressives" say"
I show my commitment to rugged individualism by living in the country's largest, most packed city. I don't blaze my own trails, grow my own food, or dispose of my own garbage, but nevertheless I'm an individualist, and as rugged as they come.
Nobody has to do everything themselves to qualify as an Individualist.
All it takes is respecting others as-individuals who offer their service.
Instead of treating them as milking-cows to be taken-of every last drop of milk some [WE] gang can squeeze out them by force.
Democratic socialism is not hippie communes but workers and consumer coops, state regulation of the private sector, and guaranteed access to healthcare and education for all.
Mondragon in Spain has been successful for over 60 yrs as a federation of workers coops, from banks to steel foundaries to candle shops, with over 80,000 members....producing 11 billion last year in revenue.....and so it is libertarian socialism without any state subsidies (unlike Tesla and Exxon and Cargill and Boeing and Ford, etc etc) surviving deep recessions, the pandemic.....succeeding. So let us not praise the communes but use them to brainwash people into thinking socialism always fails (except in Spain and Norway and Libya (which rose the from the poorest African nation to the one with the highest human development index) and Venezuela where poverty was cut in half (*until this success brought on US econmic warfare designed to cripple the economy). And dare I mention Communist China where wages have risen 22 fold and life expectancy risen 20 yrs...oh that's capitalism, market socialism is capitalism? Oh, I see, so if a nation is too white (Norway, where the state generates and owns the majority of wealth) or too powerful (China, where a robust private sector helps create the wealth and industrialization Marx thought necessary to realize communism) but if your socialism is brown and successful, bombs away!
And dare I mention Communist China where wages have risen 22 fold and life expectancy risen 20 yrs...oh that's capitalism,
Funny how the Chinese economy really took off once they let capitalism in and let capitalists join the CCP, and started slowing down once they moved to a more centralised economy.
This chart is salutary.
https://mgmresearch.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/China-Real-GDP-Growth-1980-2020.png
I confess I didn't think that the evidence would have been quite as strong as it is.
Funny how murder really took off once they let capitalism in and let capitalists join the CCP, I guess putting a price on human life will do that.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abortion_in_China#/media/File:Percentage_of_conceptions_aborted_in_China.svg
And everyone who believes your pure-BS can MOVE to Spain or China.
The USA doesn't need to be conquered by foreign [D]emon-crap [Na]tional So[zi]alist[s].
Nor does it need to be 'conquered and consumed' by socialist-warrior ?workers? and consumer-ism co-ops who once they EAT the nation to its death (Venezuela) will run around blaming the USA because they couldn't EAT their cake and have it too.
If you want something you can learn how to *EARN* it or MOVE your criminal *ss to the 'criminals' safe-haven you so choose.