Venezuela's Acting Dictator Is Delcy Rodríguez, a Maduro Regime Ally With a History of Human Rights Violations
Trump chose to work with a sanctioned regime insider rather than the country's elected opposition.
When U.S. special forces captured Venezuelan dictator Nicolás Maduro in a predawn raid on Saturday, it should have been a moment of triumph for Venezuela's democratic opposition. But rather than endorsing the leadership of Edmundo González, whose victory in July's 2024 election was stolen by Maduro, President Donald Trump announced he'd work with Delcy Rodríguez, Maduro's vice president for the past six years. After Trump called her "gracious" and claimed she was "essentially willing to do what we think is necessary to make Venezuela great again," the Maduro-controlled Supreme Court swiftly appointed her as acting president on Saturday, once again sidelining the elected opposition.
Rodríguez is neither gracious nor a reformer. She's a self-identified communist who has held key positions under both former dictator Hugo Chávez and Maduro, Venezuelan political writer Paola Bautista de Alemán tells Reason. In 2017, Maduro tapped Rodríguez to be president of the illegitimate constituent assembly that usurped the powers of the elected National Assembly to silence the opposition. Later that year, Maduro appointed her to the "Anti-Coup Command," tasked with taking measures against alleged coup plotters and terrorists, labels routinely applied to peaceful opposition figures.
As vice president, she oversaw the agencies responsible for repression and mass human rights violations. From 2018 until April 2021, Rodríguez exercised direct hierarchical control over the Bolivarian National Intelligence Service (SEBIN), Venezuela's feared intelligence service responsible for domestic surveillance and counterintelligence. Under Rodríguez's leadership, the SEBIN acted as a political police to prosecute perceived enemies of the Maduro regime, including opposition leader Freddy Guevara, whom the agency detained in 2021, two days after Rodríguez publicly accused him of being involved in gang violence. Former SEBIN Director General Cristopher Figuera testified to the United Nations that he communicated with the vice president "practically every day," including updates on wiretaps and surveillance of politicians.
In 2020, the U.N. concluded there are "reasonable grounds to believe" Rodríguez "knew or should have known" of crimes committed by SEBIN officials, including arbitrary detention and torture. Despite having the authority to prevent these crimes, she failed to do so.
In addition to human rights violations, Rodríguez has been accused of corruption and bribing international officials, as seen in the "Delcygate" scandal. Spanish investigators believe Rodríguez orchestrated a scheme in 2020 to sell 104 bars of Venezuelan state gold to Spanish businessmen through corrupt Transport Ministry officials. The deal allegedly took place at Madrid's airport, where Rodríguez met with Spanish Transport Minister José Luis Ábalos despite being banned from entering E.U. territory.
The alleged operation extended further. After receiving $62 million in Spanish state aid in March 2021, Spanish airline Plus Ultra allegedly used the funds to repay "loans" to accounts linked to Venezuela abroad. Investigators believe the scheme laundered proceeds from both gold sales and embezzlement of Venezuela's food distribution program—meaning funds meant to feed hungry Venezuelans may have been funneled into European bank accounts.
On top of this, there are accusations from former Venezuelan officials about Rodríguez's role in the Cartel de los Soles, the narco-trafficking network allegedly run by senior regime figures. Former Venezuelan General Cliver Alcalá Cordones, now serving a federal prison sentence in the United States after pleading guilty to narcotics-related charges, sent a damning letter to Trump in December 2025. Published by The Dallas Express, the letter claimed that Rodríguez and her brother Jorge, president of Venezuela's National Assembly, are the cartel's real leaders, managing illicit gold revenues and narco-trafficking proceeds.
Rodríguez's track record has earned her sanctions from the U.S., European Union, Switzerland, and Canada for corruption and undermining democracy. In 2018, the U.S. Treasury froze her assets and added her to the Specially Designated Nationals list for her role in solidifying autocracy in Venezuela. The E.U. sanctioned her the same year for actions that "undermined democracy and the rule of law in Venezuela."
By supporting top officials of Maduro's illegitimate regime, the Trump administration is missing a chance to work with the local political leaders who have both legitimacy and popular support.
When Maduro was captured, González and María Corina Machado, the opposition leader who won the 2025 Nobel Peace Prize and dedicated it to both the Venezuelan people and Trump, immediately called for González to assume his constitutional mandate as the legitimately elected president. David Smolansky, González's official spokesperson, laid out the opposition's vision: free political prisoners, restore democratic order, and welcome back the millions of Venezuelans forced into exile by the regime's failures. Instead, Trump chose to work with Rodríguez, effectively sidelining Venezuela's democratically elected opposition and forcing them to watch the U.S. partner with the very regime that stole their victory.
It's unclear whether Rodríguez will become a reformer who leads the country from Chavismo toward democracy or an authoritarian consolidator with American backing. Venezuelan trust isn't in Rodríguez, as Bautista, the Venezuelan writer, notes; it's in Trump's ability to use force, or the threat of force, to compel democratization. That's a precarious foundation for building a democratic transition.
Trump is betting he can foster a transition of power by partnering with a sanctioned regime insider whose résumé includes overseeing a torture-linked intelligence service, alleged narco-trafficking operations, and an international bribery scheme. What could possibly go wrong?
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please to post comments
*scratches head*. Well she must stroke Trump's ego enough,regardless of political affiliation, to be uselful. Happy for the people of Venezuela but this whole thing is a dog's breakfast.
Why doesnt trump dictator more asks Alberto.
This is temporary until new elections. This is the change of leadership process. Even with illegitimate ones like Maduro.
Did you want Trump to personally run Venezuela so you could scream Hitler more?
New elections are not needed. The old elections were clear. New elections will be just as corrupt as the previously stolen ones.
That is what gives me pause about his intentions and the road ahead.
So youre demanding the US complete a regime change over elections we believe are corrupt. Instead of just monitoring until the 30 day period under their constitution triggers a new election. Cause more chaos because 30 days is too long. Got it.
This, after they spent all weekend screeching and whining about ‘No regime change!’.
Democrats are living contradictions.
Nah. Trump has learned how to stop Marxists from stealing elections, after the democrats did just that in 2020.
I didn't scream Hitler you stupid fucking asshole. Fuck off. Time will tell if your anointed one will be benevolent or not. I hope so. If so, it is a political masterstroke.
Lol. Look at the maddow follower so angry.
I don't watch maddow, cocksucker. However, you are similar in that she is just as stupid, programmed, and incapable of critical thought as you. She might actually be capable of arguing against what somebody actually says instead of arguing against what the voices in your head tell you someone says.
We can't tell, cocksucker and please wipe the cum off your face, asswipe.
Keep gargling Jesse's sack, motherfucker.
Poor, stupid, confused angry bitch………..
Walz +6
Leaving the vice president in place to assume the role naturally neutralizes any regime-change accusations. By contrast, installing Edmundo González, who was likely the legitimate winner of the 2024 election, would have given those accusations real validity.
Everyone knows this. Reason is just playing dumb.
Trump does not have the ability to "install" anyone in Venezuela. His raid was successful and even he should realize that any attempt to "control" or "run" the country would be a disaster.
So youre now saying to let the process play out. Make up your mind.
Yes trump will have some form of international monitors for the next election. Similar to what happened in Iraq. Ensure the corruption doesnt occur.
I assumed there would be some version of this, pending new (closely supervised) elections. And I’m going on record right now, predicting our democrats will attempt to interfere with the election to ensure a Marxist Cuba/ChiCom/Iranian regime friendly president is installed.
As democrats are always reflexively on the side of tyranny, totalitarianism, and slavery. ESPECIALLY slavery.
Playing?
She was fired by Hugo Chavez in 2006 during a trip to Russia when the schedule that she had put together fell apart. She didn't work for the govt again until 2013. She was deemed conceited, arrogant, incompetent, disrespectful, and refused to show personal homage to Chavez. Add corrupt and authoritarian and it's like a perfect personality fit for Trump.
Almost as pathetic as JFucked!
*Scratches head* Finds Alberto Balsalm to still be the lying, steaming pile of TDS-addled lefty shit AB has always been.
Fuck off and die, asswipe.
So not regime change? Isn’t that good?
Trump is a dictator but he isnt enough of a dictator.
At the risk of taking a DLAM joke seriously...
It's probably good (considering regime changes usually cause years of instability/fighting/violence/poverty etc.). It sure beats a protracted war. But why bother with the billions of dollars spent and lives lost for no change?
That's assuming Trump didn't make some kind of deal with Delcy Rodríguez (like has been hinted at).
Trump's talk about her seems like pretty standard Trump. And I bet they have a deal. Something like "play ball and we won't come and snatch you up in the middle of the night".
send one more fucking boat at us and it's next girl up.
Whatever Trump does will be deemed Orangemanbad.
So, how do you go about installing Gonzalez in the Venezuelan presidency without occupying Venezuela?
The legitimacy of Rodriguez's vice presidency may factually dubious, but she is de jure Maduro's successor for the moment.
Again, the complaint is that Trump has simultaneously gone too far and not far enough.
Again, the complaint is that Trump has simultaneously gone too far and not far enough.
The fact that Venezuela is, conclusively and in full view of the international community, a failed, corrupt, authoritarian kleptocracy is right out.
Trump was wrong to even set foot on the same continent as Putin, The Rocket Man, or Dictator Pooh, but deposing the head of a regime corrupt down to the meter maids and demonstrating that he has the power to depose anyone he likes while, potentially, allowing them to select their own leadership in honest and fair elections is beyond the pale.
The Venezuelan government is so corrupt and the plight so hopeless that removing the President and leaving the Vice President in place to oversee reformation with the Sword of Damocles swinging over her head is too precarious to tolerate. Best to have stayed with the stable, belligerent, socialist dictatorial, kleptocracy.
Somehow I knew you'd favor the corrupt dictator.
Not enough blood and regime change to slake your thirst, you need more?
So, how do you go about installing Gonzalez in the Venezuelan presidency without occupying Venezuela
You don't.
Again, the complaint is that Trump has simultaneously gone too far and not far enough
He "went too far" by an executing an dubiously legal, expensive campaign that (at this point) looks like it may be quite ineffective to attain any useful outcome, and is diplomatically very messy.
"He didn't go far enough" is the sunk cost fallacy or more generously: if it's worth doing, it's worth doing right. Or in Breaking Bad parlance, "no half measures."
Be honest. There is nothing Trump can do that you will approve of, with the exception of resigning and turning the government over to the democrats.
Off the top of my head, I liked his pot rescheduling, DOGE, deregulation, tax cuts, Ulbricht pardon, Gorsuch appointment and squashing of woke culture which is already a much longer list than I have for Biden or Obama.
Until we get up into specific discussions of those things where you will find ways to attack him. Just like here.
Yeah, mostly true. It's no secret I don't like the guy or his policies.
There is no version of events where you don’t attack Trump, and it doesn’t make much difference what he does. And like the rest of your democrat brethren, you have no place in a free America where anyone like Trump tries to solve problems and make things better.
I would normally suggest you flee to experience the ‘warmth of collectivism’ and ‘camaraderie’ offered by the Marxist regime in Cuba, it that might be going tits up next.
Maybe socialist Canada might be a good fit for you, eh comrade?
You don't have the capacity to see beyond the binary and you flaunt it daily here, revealing your comments as useless to any intelligent discussion.
It is no secret that you are a TDS-addled slimy pile of lying shit. Glad you agree.
So, if the USis going to do this, it must do nation building in the aftermath?
Yes, I think that is the point some are making, but not me. I favor doing none of it.
Arguments from imagination is a favorite past time of the left.
Remember when Biden complained that Trump would never stand up to Venezuela?
LOL. Trump removed Maduro with less loss of life than when Biden peacefully transitioned Kabul.
32 Cubans were snuffed.
That’s a good start. 32 more good commies.
And the suicide bomber that killed 13 US Soldiers in Kabul killed 170 Afghans. Whether you love Maduro or hate liberty, it's pretty clear you don't actually care about sacrificing fewer lives one way or the other.
"...when Biden peacefully transitioned Kabul..."
turd (when he's not too embarrassed to show up) continues to make light of droolin' Joe's enormous fuck-up.
But then turd is both a lying pile of lefty shit and an abysmal ignoramus.
I would not say "de jure" although "de facto" might be apropos. There is nothing about Venezuela that could possibly suggest rule of law. If this is an example of Trump recognizing the facts and calling it good enough, then I agree.
"...If this is an example of Trump recognizing the facts and calling it good enough, then I agree..."
Seems you haven't read Sowell's "Visions in Conflict". Suggest you do; it might clarify your thinking: Utopia (perfection) is not an option.
Sir Bedevere: There are ways of telling whether she is a witch.
Journalist 1: Are there? Oh well, tell us.
Sir Bedevere: Tell me. What do you do with witches?
Journalist 1: Burn them!
Sir Bedevere: And what do you burn, apart from witches?
Journalist 1: MOAR WITCHES!
Fun Factoid: Trump took less time to reform, or more permanently alter, the course of the Venezuelan government than it takes for the BTC network to, on average, add a new block to the blockchain.
LOL.
If Trump installed a new government, legitimate or not, it would be regime change and not a law enforcement action which gave the action legal legitimacy. I would very much like Trump to put pressure on the regime to hold elections but I don't know the timeline under Venezuelan law. We're only a few days out here and hopefully a longer term strategy will come into focus. Trump is playing by the rules at this point and still being labeled a criminal.
He was labeled a criminal for engaging in a legal financial transaction with a bank where all parties were happy.
Which was based on Trump’s estimation of the subject property’s value. Even though the bank ordered there own appraisals and arrived at their own assessment of value.
Just like every mortgage transaction in America.
Every mortgage is a crime by the seller who overestimated the value of their property. Lock 'em all up.
Oh, wait, that includes me...
The whole case was laughable. Especially to someone like me that has spent decades originating commercial mortgages. As if any lender just looks at a loan app and says “You say your property is worth $xxxxxxxx? Ok, no need to have an appraisal done then.”
And every one of the leftist faggots here kept spouting on like that ever happens.
And he was convicted of 43 *felonious* late returns of library books! Or unpaid parking tickets. Or something like that.
Do these assholes expect to be taken seriously?
Gaear, that's one of the more useful comments here.
If Trump merely installs ANYONE, that person would be called a puppet of Trump. He or Marco must work with both the interim Prez and the opposition and come up with a plan to get to elections. If the Prez doesn't agree, send her packing and gather others from the current regime & military that are reasonable. The plan must have election(s) to make the new regime legitimate.
He's got my number if he needs my help.
It wont stop the left from still screaming puppet.
Edmundo González life expectancy about the same as a snowball in hell. There are no good options. Leveraging the current power structure to change, or else, is the best of a bad lot.
Weirdly, the choice was framed as Rodriguez vs Machado, not Gonzalez.
Given that the constitution requires an election within a month, it seems dumb to trigger a civil war over who remains in power for January.
If there isn't an election within a month, then what difference does it make which puppet Trump is jerking?
Neat how Trump turned an ardent communist and Bolivarian like Rodriguez into his puppet just like that. I swear you people think he has superpowers.
“Bolivarian”, you mean she wants to rid South America of Spanish rule?
I mean, it sounds like a good idea but its already been done
I wonder why everyone here seems to be relying on the Venezuelan Constitution and the rule of law there ...
Why do those most critical of trump preach impatience and demand he dictator harder?
This.
"...Given that the constitution requires an election within a month, it seems dumb to trigger a civil war over who remains in power for January..."
Uh, suggest you stuff your magical predictions up your ass.
My two favorite things about all this are that there was a Chinese official delegation visiting when it all went down, and that they blew up the Chavez mausoleum because FYTW.
Ive seen different reports on the mausoleum.
Initial reports were it was. Subsequent reports were that was a lie and it was a fort 500 meters away.
Well, I want to believe.
Yeah, both of those aspects make the move straight gangster.
It provided some much needed comic relief.
Delcy is either a puppet or a temp placeholder. For all we know she sold out Maduro in exchange for own safety and round of future concessions.
As someone who supports Trump, I can’t believe that he masterminded a perfect plan that extracted a dictator with zero loss of life and equipment. I wouldn’t be surprised if Maduro was temu ceasar and his senators and generals conspired with America to stab him one day.
Trump’s primary objective in Venezuela is to fend off Russian, chinese and Iranian influence over the country. He also obviously covets their natural resources, but he’s not going to risk the lives of American oil workers by sending then to unresolved situations.
Again I think desks were already made with people who are now moving to positions of power. We’ll see wha happens.
*Shrug.*
Actually installing Gonzalez would require far more extensive action than an hour and a half of zero-US-deaths military action.
What Trump just did was put the shitty leadership of a bunch of little shitholes on notice that he is willing to take them out if they annoy him too much. Not order symbolic airstrikes or something, but take out their individual persons.
Trump's expressed willingness to work with Rodriguez then sends the message that if they are willing to work with him, he won't take them out.
Assuming they are reasonably rational actors, this should make the shits more willing to work with the United States.
Well, at least as long as Trump is around. A future administration could well screw that up, the way that Obama and Clinton fucked up a similar dynamic by taking out Kaddafi.
>>President Donald Trump announced he'd work with Delcy Rodríguez
author tells everyone he's never played poker.
Or paid any attention to Trump and how he talks to/about people he's negotiating with. I don't love his style there, but it does seem to work in at least some cases.
I have no problem with the style either but I grew up in New Jersey
Author tells everyone in the Ohio Valley region he's never played euchre. 🙂
Once again, excellent article from Báez.
I do think people are glossing over the fact that Maduro is still alive. I don't know what exactly that means, but that was not the way the Obama Administration did these sorts of things.
And he will get proper legal assistance. Not in love with the entire process, but no irreversible results yet.
Well until people figure out that it isn't 'democracy' that made the US great they'll never figure out how to FIX anyone else's problems.
[D]emocratic [Na]tional So[zi]al[ism] isn't going to FIX the curses of socialism.
It is NOT the [WE] Identify-as gang RULES w/'Guns' that keeps the 'Guns' from committing Human Rights Violations. It is having a SUPREME LAW that states what is a Human Rights Violation.
First we should not have used force without a vote in the legislature. The tactic of not getting authorization from congress is not unique to Trump, but is extremely common.
This being said, it is better for us to step back and allow the Venezuelans to assert themselves and take back their government.
The author seems to be advocating for boots on the ground, to overthrow the government. Neocons always believe that people will welcome our troops as saviors, but in reality we are usually seen as invaders that bring the opposing sides together to oppose us.
Better to let their vice president to become the new president and allow their own power struggles provide openings for the people to revolt. Out only role would be to keep the sanctions against the government and provide aid (food and medical supplies) to citizens who rise oppose their dictatorship.