Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
    • Reason TV
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • Just Asking Questions
    • Free Media
    • The Reason Interview
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Print Subscription
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Housing Policy

The Contradictions of Supply-Side Socialism

Zohran Mamdani signs executive orders to speed up new construction. His housing policy picks also want to abolish private property.

Christian Britschgi | 1.6.2026 12:50 PM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
Zohran Mamdani | Photo: Anthony Behar/Sipa USA/Newscom
(Photo: Anthony Behar/Sipa USA/Newscom)

Happy Tuesday, and welcome to the first Rent Free of the New Year. This week's newsletter includes stories on:

  • Newly inaugurated New York Mayor Zohran Mamdani's first housing policy moves
  • Congress' dueling housing supply bills
  • Yet another cautionary rent control tale in suburban Washington, D.C.

Mamdani's First Housing Moves Highlight the Contradictions of Supply-Side Socialism

Zohran Mamdani has been mayor of New York City for less than a week, and he's already issued several executive orders related to housing and staffed up housing roles within his administration.

The new mayor's moves so far include all the contradictions one might expect from a self-proclaimed socialist who says he wants to freeze the rent and get the city (including its private sector developers) building again.

Rent Free Newsletter by Christian Britschgi. Get more of Christian's urban regulation, development, and zoning coverage.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Two of Mamdani's executive orders directly address that latter goal. One creates a Streamlining Procedures to Expedite Equitable Development (SPEED) task force dedicated to identifying and removing bureaucratic barriers to new housing construction and leasing.

The second creates the Land Inventory Fast Track (LIFT) task force that will identify city land that can be used for housing construction.

Both are fine ideas. They're also not exactly novel.

Mamdani's predecessor, Eric Adams, likewise convened task forces to speed up the city's permitting process and to identify city-owned land that could be used for housing.

In December 2022, Adams' Building and Land Use Approval Streamlining Taskforce (BLAST) released a "Get Stuff Built" report that proposed 111 bureaucratic tweaks and reforms designed to cut the permitting timeline in half.

Around 90 of the proposed reforms were within city agencies' power to enact unilaterally. A solitary six-month progress report released in June 2023 listed 16 of those 111 reforms as complete.

By September 2025, Adams' effort to build housing on city land had led to 10 housing projects on city-owned land totaling 1,000 units of new housing.

Perhaps a Mamdani administration will be able to squeeze more juice out of new task forces.

But as the Manhattan Institute's Eric Kober details in a new report, substantially increasing new supply will require more comprehensive legislative changes to city zoning and permitting laws.

The end goal of those reforms, like many of the zoning reforms the City Council passed under the Adams administration, is to induce private developers to add more units to the housing-starved city.

Several of Mamdani's other initial housing moves may well make them less likely to do that.

On his first day in office, Mamdani appointed Cea Weaver, a tenant activist and one of his campaign advisers, to lead the city's Office to Protect Tenants.

A few days later, the New York Post reported on Weaver's long history of hard-left social media commentary. She's called for seizing private property and derided homeownership as a "weapon of white supremacy."

People who pay close attention to New York housing politics won't be shocked by any of Weaver's unearthed comments.

People should watch this 2021 Reason documentary on New York's disastrous eviction moratorium, which includes an interview with Weaver, who argues that landlords who are being bankrupted by their inability to remove delinquent tenants are just the cost of doing business.

In addition to appointing Weaver, Mamdani has directed city agencies to host a series of "rent ripoff" hearings, in which tenants will be given a public forum to complain about conditions in their buildings.

Mamdani, beginning his administration by appointing communists and scheduling housing struggle sessions designed to demonize landlords, might not be the most surprising development. It's not entirely unprecedented either. Former Mayor Bill de Blasio liked to talk about seizing private property from time to time.

It's nevertheless worrisome for anyone who does care about private property protections. It's also maddeningly hypocritical.

Weaver was a primary proponent of New York's 2019 rent stabilization law that made it much more difficult for landlords to fund maintenance and building improvements through higher rents.

As recent lawsuits and reports have highlighted, the result has been declining housing quality and a growing number of units sitting empty because their owners cannot finance needed, often city-mandated repairs.

Neither Mamdani nor Weaver can expropriate private housing all by themselves. The U.S. Constitution provides some protection against that. They can, however, scapegoat landlords for problems that are caused by overbearing regulation.

Certainly, one doesn't expect either to support productive reforms to New York's rent regulations and tenant protection laws that might lead to an improvement in housing quality.

On the margins, individual property owners might look at the hostility of the new city administration to their property rights and decide that leasing out an existing unit or building a few more isn't worth the risk.


Congress Considers 2 Major Pieces of Housing Legislation

A major bipartisan housing reform bill failed to clear Congress last year, but hopes are high that similar legislation will become law in 2026.

Last year, the Senate banking committee unanimously passed the ROAD to Housing Act, a lengthy piece of legislation that includes a number of pro-supply tweaks to existing federal grant programs. (Read Rent Free's breakdown of the bill here.)

The ROAD to Housing Act seemed set to become law when it passed the full Senate as an amendment to that year's National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA).

Ultimately, House Republicans on the Financial Services Committee stripped the ROAD to Housing Act out of the NDAA in December, preventing the bill from clearing Congress.

But, just a few weeks later, the House Financial Services Committee approved a very similar piece of legislation, the Housing for the 21st Century Act, on a 50–1 vote.

The Bipartisan Policy Center has a useful explainer piece comparing the House and Senate housing bills.

With the two relevant committees both approving similar housing bills unanimously or near-unanimously, and affordability being the political buzzword of the day, it seems quite likely that some version of supply-side housing reform will pass this Congress.


In Montgomery County, Another Cautionary Rent Control Story

Housing production has plummeted in Montgomery County, Maryland, which borders Washington, D.C., following the implementation of a local rent control ordinance.

In 2023, the county council approved a rent control policy that caps annual rent increases at the lesser of inflation plus 3 percent or 6 percent.

To avoid impacting new supply, the bill exempts buildings constructed after 2000 for a period of 23 years. Nevertheless, developers appear to be skittish about starting new projects in the country.

At his local news blog, Montgomery Perspective, Adam Pagnucco notes that multifamily housing permits have fallen by some 96 percent since the implementation of rent control. County planning officials report that the multifamily projects that are getting permitted are generally for-sale units.


Quick Links

  • For a similarly themed but generally sunnier assessment of Mamdani's early days, read Matt Yglesias' column from today.
  • ICE raids slow home construction in South Texas.
  • The Department for Housing and Urban Development flags $5 billion in questionable rent assistance spending, out of a $50 billion total, in its latest financial report.
  • New Jersey's Fair Share Housing Center reports widespread compliance with the state's new affordable housing law, which (broadly speaking) requires municipalities to zone for additional housing.
  • The Los Angeles Times reports on a new survey finding that seven out of 10 people displaced by last January's Palisades fires have not returned to their homes. Home rebuilding has been a painfully slow process, despite local officials' promise of streamlining rebuild permits.

Rent Free is a weekly newsletter from Christian Britschgi on urbanism and the fight for less regulation, more housing, more property rights, and more freedom in America's cities.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Is This the End of American Capitalism?

Christian Britschgi is a reporter at Reason.

Housing PolicyZoningNew YorkRent controlZohran MamdaniMarylandCongress
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (24)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Rick James   2 days ago

    Zohran Mamdani signs executive orders to speed up new construction. His housing policy picks also want to abolish private property.

    What have I been saying all these years about your 'YIMBY' movement?

    It's really "Yes in Your Back Yard"

    Log in to Reply
  2. Longtobefree   2 days ago

    Nothing creates housing like hiring more committee members to suck up tax dollars.

    Log in to Reply
  3. I, Woodchipper   2 days ago

    The fact that Matt Yglesias is still being read, on purpose, by people who should know better is unbelievable.

    What is it with Reason and this guy? he's the dumbest fucking pundit on the internet and that says a lot.

    Log in to Reply
    1. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 days ago

      He is a blast at cocktail parties.

      Log in to Reply
  4. MWAocdoc   2 days ago

    "Streamlining Procedures to Expedite Equitable Development (SPEED)" and "Land Inventory Fast Track (LIFT)"

    Not mentioned in this article is the "Task Force to Identify Task Forces to Identify Task Forces to Fast Track Task Force Designation and Implementation (TFITFITFFTTFDI)" task force.

    Log in to Reply
    1. Gaear Grimsrud   2 days ago

      Focus groups didn't think it rolled off the tongue very well.

      Log in to Reply
  5. Quo Usque Tandem   2 days ago

    So we’re back to (fill blank with your favorite target) is white supremacy

    Log in to Reply
  6. MasterThief   2 days ago

    Isn't this the same as the "abundance agenda" this same writer has advocated for?

    Log in to Reply
    1. B G   2 days ago

      It's meant to look like that, but with the whole thing undermined by the draconian price controls.

      Pretty standard "progressive" playbook really, pay lip service to actual markets with one face while sabotaging them with the other so that when the designed-in failure occurs they can point to the "deregulation" half of their agenda and claim that it all proves that "markets don't work" and that only the statist "anti-authoritarian" (someone will have to explain to me why everyone who wants the government to seize private property and nationalize entire industries think they're somehow opposing authoritarian ideology) solutions are viable.

      Log in to Reply
      1. Roberta   9 hours ago

        "Authoritarian" is usually used by people as a pejorative to describe any regime of bossism they don't like, or of the one giving commands to the many. Basically, management of any kind can be described by them as an authoritarian regime, so that putting just about any other arrangement in its place is being "anti-authority". It doesn't matter to them that we would describe the arrangement they would have as authoritarian.

        Log in to Reply
  7. Marshal   2 days ago

    I'm not clear what the contradiction is supposed to be. The Socialist Mantra has always been "You Make It, We Take It". There's nothing "contradictory" about wanting you to work harder so there is more for them to take.

    Log in to Reply
    1. Social Justice is neither   2 days ago

      Nobody said Christian was smart or honest

      Log in to Reply
  8. Marshal   2 days ago

    People who pay close attention to New York housing politics won't be shocked by any of Weaver's unearthed comments.

    Nor would anyone who understands the left at all.

    Log in to Reply
  9. Don't look at me! ( Is the war over yet?)   2 days ago

    This is going to be epic.

    Log in to Reply
    1. Use the Schwartz   2 days ago

      I kinda feel like there will be swinging from lamposts in a couple years. Who will it be? Stay tuned next week!

      Log in to Reply
  10. Mike Parsons   2 days ago

    "The Contradictions of Supply-Side Socialism"

    - it doesnt fucking work, and never works

    next?

    Log in to Reply
  11. TrickyVic (old school)   2 days ago

    The end of private property?

    ""In New York City, property tax represented 44% of all the city tax dollars collected in fiscal years 2024, which ended on June 30, 2024.""

    https://www.nyc.gov/site/finance/property/property-bills-and-payments.page

    Log in to Reply
  12. TrickyVic (old school)   2 days ago

    """By September 2025, Adams' effort to build housing on city land had led to 10 housing projects on city-owned land totaling 1,000 units of new housing.""

    ""NYC developers build 99-unit buildings to avoid wage requirements""

    https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/realestate/nyc-developers-build-99-unit-buildings-to-avoid-wage-requirements/ar-AA1Mc9pu?ocid=msedgdhp&pc=DCTS&cvid=68c02a0c21ea45a8be9d1a509107b201&ei=16

    Log in to Reply
  13. Rick James   2 days ago

    It's just college kids, man.

    Log in to Reply
  14. I, Woodchipper   2 days ago

    The warm embrace of property seizure

    Log in to Reply
  15. TJJ2000   2 days ago

    The title is the contradiction.
    There is no such thing as Supply-Side Socialism.

    Point & Case ... She's called for seizing private property and derided home-ownership as a "weapon of white supremacy."

    That's not a Supply (supplying) Side action; that is a Demand-Side action.

    Holy Cow the media is really at it trying to indoctrinate confusing about socialism.

    Log in to Reply
  16. shadydave   2 days ago

    I do wonder what the argument will be for "strategically and reluctantly" voting for this stuff in the future.

    Log in to Reply
  17. Garth Vader   2 days ago

    "She's [Cea Weaver] called for seizing private property and derided homeownership as a 'weapon of white supremacy.'"

    If you think non-whites can't buy houses, you are a white supremacist. That's pretty much the definition.

    Log in to Reply
  18. Azathoth!!   1 day ago

    Reason used to deride Sadbeards inane commentary, now they link to him?

    Log in to Reply

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

Trump's Proposed Ban on Institutional Investors Owning Single-Family Homes Would Make No One Better Off

Christian Britschgi | 1.8.2026 5:35 PM

The Minnesota Fraud Scandal Is Just the Tip of the Iceberg

Veronique de Rugy | 1.8.2026 4:35 PM

Venezuelan Socialist Regime Announces Release of a 'Number of Important' Political Prisoners

César Báez | 1.8.2026 3:39 PM

Why Insulting Brigitte Macron Online Can Mean Prison Time in France

Jack Nicastro | 1.8.2026 2:49 PM

Elon Musk Said Rand Paul Is the One Person in Washington Who 'Gets It'

Billy Binion | 1.8.2026 12:33 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS Add Reason to Google

© 2026 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

I WANT FREE MINDS AND FREE MARKETS!

Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.

Make a donation today! No thanks
r

I WANT TO FUND FREE MINDS AND FREE MARKETS

Every dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.

Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interested
r

SUPPORT HONEST JOURNALISM

So much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.

I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanks
r

PUSH BACK

Push back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.

My donation today will help Reason push back! Not today
r

HELP KEEP MEDIA FREE & FEARLESS

Back journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

STAND FOR FREE MINDS

Support journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.

Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanks
r

PUSH BACK AGAINST SOCIALIST IDEAS

Support journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

FIGHT BAD IDEAS WITH FACTS

Back independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

BAD ECONOMIC IDEAS ARE EVERYWHERE. LET’S FIGHT BACK.

Support journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

JOIN THE FIGHT FOR FREEDOM

Support journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

BACK JOURNALISM THAT PUSHES BACK AGAINST SOCIALISM

Your support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

FIGHT BACK AGAINST BAD ECONOMICS.

Donate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks