French Study on mRNA COVID-19 Vaccines Finds a Drop in Severe COVID—and No Increase in Deaths
Vaccinated adults had a 74 percent lower risk of dying from COVID-19—and a 25 percent lower risk of dying, period.
A few years before he took over the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Robert F. Kennedy Jr. called COVID-19 shots the "deadliest vaccine ever made." More recently, various anti-vaccination activists have been claiming that the mRNA vaccines are causing a turbo-cancer epidemic.
A huge new French study in the Journal of the American Medical Association Network deflates those claims and confirms the safety and efficacy of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines. The researchers followed 22.7 million vaccinated individuals and 5.9 million unvaccinated individuals for nearly four years. They found not only that vaccinated people have a 74 percent lower risk of death from severe COVID-19, but also that those individuals have a lower risk of death, period. Specifically, people who received the shots have a 25 percent lower risk of all-cause mortality.

As for the turbo-cancer claims, the researchers report that the incidence of tumors among vaccinated adults is 769 per million. For the unvaccinated, the rate is versus 853 per million. In other words, vaccinated adults were about 15 percent less likely to be diagnosed with cancer than those were unvaccinated.
The researchers sought to control for various confounders, such as a healthy-vaccinee effect, where healthier individuals are more likely to opt for vaccination, or a frailty-related bias, where those in poorer health may avoid it. They also note that vaccinated individuals in their study were generally older and tended to have more co-morbidities, such as obesity and chronic illnesses, which would usually be associated with an increased risk of dying. (The different results, they note, might be partially explained by the fact that vaccinated individuals tend to be more socioeconomically advantaged.)
"This study helps to put an end to the misinformation spread about mRNA vaccines," the study's lead author, Mahmoud Zureik, told Le Monde. "Providing data on the absence of long-term risks helps strengthen confidence in these vaccines, which will be developed for other viruses and diseases."
Their results should indeed strengthen confidence. But Kennedy, who has been shifting research dollars to purportedly "safer" vaccines, will likely ignore it.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please to post comments
"A huge new French study in the Journal of the American Medical Association Network . . . "
Oh goody.
Talk about reliable sources - - - - -
A French study? (which confirms the government position)
Published in JAMA? (which IS the government position)
Let me guess, Loki reviewed and approved it?
Cherries...they be picked.
Dingleberries... they be picked, from the so-called "brains" of Damned-and-Sick!!!
Vaccinated adults had a 74 percent lower risk of dying from COVID-19—and a 25 percent lower risk of dying, period.
Deaths from, with or adjacent to covid-19?
The vaccine even extends your life! Ignore global life expectations dropped post vaccine.
Killing people is good ass long ass anti-vaxxers have their way in promoting anti-vaxism ass THE most fashionable of ALL Marks of Tribal Virtue!!!
https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/united-states-rates-of-covid-19-deaths-by-vaccination-status?country=~All+ages
Just LOOK at the interactive graph right at the top of this link!!!! COVID deaths among the unvaccinated VASTLY outnumbered, and still outnumber, the deaths among the vaccinated!!! WHY do You Perfectly Lust SOOOO Much for death and suffering, LYING servant and serpent of communicable diseases?!?!
PS, "food" is dangerous! People get sick and even die from food poisoning!!! Be SAFE!!! STOP eating!!!!
Didn't France lose all scientific credibility with climate science and being the usual country that finds everything causes cancer so regulate it?
74% lower risk of dying from Covid 19 over 4 years?
Once Delta was replaced with Omnicron the death rates greatly diminished.
The percentage of vaccinated folks prior to Delta was nil or low.
This study is biased by the difference of severity of the VOC as much as anything else.
During the main phase of delta as many or more folks vaccinated were dying than unvaccinated. Of course the deaths were with comorbidities or elder age.
Not sure how the data can be considered usable because of the actual reporting of covid deaths completely falsified.
Does the study include the 65% ish of deaths reported as Covid deaths originally but were revised later to be deaths caused by the comorbidity which actually killed them?
Too many folks had their elderly loved ones with stage 4 cancer or equivalent dying in a hospice or in palliative care prior to becoming infected with covid but were reported as covid deaths because in their last couple days of life they contracted covid in the care center.
Ass to ALL of Your PervFected ASSertions... Your cites fell off!!!
Also...
Anti-COVID-vaxxers often harp on heart-tissue damages or inflammation (heart-lining tissues of some sort?). Yet I very recently read a for-pay hardcopy science magazine that discussed a reputable study that showed that children who are vaccinated get less of this heart-tissue swelling than those infected with COVID. Do you have a good link that shows this?
AI response:
Yes. There are now several large analyses showing that myocarditis and related heart complications are more common after COVID infection than after mRNA vaccination in children and adolescents.
Here are two very clear, accessible links:
Child/teen-specific study (UK data)
• University of Cambridge summary: “Risk of rare heart complications in children higher after COVID-19 infection than after vaccination” (2025).cam+1
o Using English health records, they found that children and young people had higher and longer lasting risks of myocarditis, pericarditis, and related inflammatory heart problems after COVID infection than after vaccination.cam
o Over six months, infection was estimated to cause about 2.24 extra cases of myocarditis/pericarditis per 100,000 infected children versus 0.85 extra cases per 100,000 vaccinated children.cam
o After vaccination, the risk bump was short term (first ~4 weeks) and then returned to baseline, whereas after infection, elevated risk persisted for months.cam
That Cambridge page is probably very close to the article you saw in spirit.
Broader comparative data (including youth)
• A systematic review/meta analysis comparing myocarditis after infection vs vaccination concluded the risk of myocarditis is more than seven times higher after SARS CoV 2 infection than after COVID vaccination overall.pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih
• CDC linked analyses similarly report that cardiac complications are significantly more common after infection than after mRNA vaccination, across sexes and age groups, including adolescents.cdc+1
These don’t say vaccination is risk free (vaccine associated myocarditis, especially in teen males after dose 2, is real but rare), but they support exactly the point you mention: for kids and teens, the net myocarditis/inflammation risk is higher from catching COVID than from getting vaccinated.gavi+3
1. https://www.cam.ac.uk/research/news/risk-of-rare-heart-complications-in-children-higher-after-covid-19-infection-than-after-vaccination
2. https://www.gavi.org/vaccineswork/covid-19-infection-poses-higher-longer-heart-risks-children-vaccination
etc. ...
Rates of mortality in Canada by age group. 2015 to 2023
https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/t1/tbl1/en/tv.action?pid=1310071001&pickMembers%5B0%5D=1.1&pickMembers%5B1%5D=3.1&cubeTimeFrame.startYear=2015&cubeTimeFrame.endYear=2023&referencePeriods=20150101%2C20230101
Very consistent rate of death year over year from 2015 to 2023.
Odd how 2019 is reported as the lowest rates of death for all ages throughout the period from 2015 to 2023.
Without knowing would anyone see massive increase in rate of death due to covid or a reduction in death from vaccines? No...
Yes, well, how about all the unvaxxed people who got "long COVID" and died from it, AFTER 2019?
My favorite AI, Perplexity, has this to say about your post:
Canada’s official mortality table does show very stable age‑specific death rates from 2015–2019 with a low point in 2019, followed by clear increases in 2020–2023, especially at older ages; read directly, the table does not support “no signal” of the pandemic in mortality.[1]
## What the StatCan table actually shows
The Statistics Canada table you linked is “Mortality rates, by age group, both sexes, Canada, per 1,000 population,” and the snippet in your file is for 2019–2023; the downloadable CSV for the full table includes 2015–2018 as well. Across most age bands, rates drift slightly over 2015–2018, then are lowest in 2019, and rise in 2020–2023, with the largest absolute increases in the 65+ groups (for example, the 90+ mortality rate is lower in 2019 than 2015–2018, then higher in 2020–2023 than in 2019).[1]
Put differently, 2019 is a local minimum before a step‑up: that pattern is exactly what you would expect from a relatively benign pre‑pandemic year followed by a respiratory pandemic that hits older age groups. The increases are age‑graded: very small in children, moderate in mid‑age adults, and large in the oldest groups, which again matches COVID’s risk profile rather than looking like random noise.[1]
## Why the “very consistent” impression is misleading
Looking at a single crude death rate (all ages combined) compresses a lot of structure; because the population is aging, a small change in the crude rate can mask bigger changes in older bands. In the StatCan table, the “all ages” crude rate goes from 7.6 in 2019 to 8.6 in 2022, which is more than a 10% increase in three years; that is not nothing, especially when it comes almost entirely from older ages.[1]
The year‑to‑year changes are also systematic rather than random: many older age bands rise in 2020, stay elevated or rise again in 2021–2022, and only ease slightly in 2023, which is hard to explain as ordinary fluctuation. So if one actually inspects the table by age, there is a clear mortality perturbation after 2019, even though the numbers are not “massive spikes” in an everyday‑news sense.[1]
## What you can and cannot infer about COVID vs vaccines
From this table alone, you can say:
- There was no obvious mortality disaster in Canada before 2020; 2019 looks relatively good.[1]
- There is a noticeable, age‑structured rise in mortality starting in 2020, consistent with pandemic‑era excess mortality.[1]
From this table alone, you cannot say:
- How much of the post‑2019 increase is direct COVID infection vs. indirect effects (health‑care disruption, delayed care, etc.).
- How much vaccination reduced deaths, because that counterfactual requires comparing observed mortality to estimated “no‑vaccine” mortality, not just eyeballing a single time series.
So the commenter’s rhetorical question—“would anyone see massive increase from covid or reduction from vaccines? No”—only works if someone skims the crude rate and ignores the size and direction of the changes by age band. A more careful reading is that the StatCan series is fully compatible with a sizable COVID mortality impact and says nothing either way about vaccine effectiveness without additional analysis.[1]
[1](https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/t1/tbl1/en/tv.action?pid=1310071001&pickMembers%5B0%5D=1.1&pickMembers%5B1%5D=3.1&cubeTimeFrame.startYear=2015&cubeTimeFrame.endYear=2023)
This study is a joke
A - the oldest age was age 59. That alone sshould discredit the study especially when the age 65+ composed 80% of the deaths.
B - The computed deaths are
85 deaths per million unvaxed = 0.0085%
18 deaths per million vaxed - = 0.0018%
Those %'s are note even remotely statistically significant.
Bottom line - the study is a joke!
Yup I agree
Since it is a Poisson distributed random variable, those are statistical significant.
More
testingboosters needed!More food needed!!!
If food is SUCH a viable "fix", then WHY do people have to KEEP ON eating?!?!?
Ron, this makes no sense. Just how gullible are you?
Pardon my ignorance, but this doesn't pass the smell test. Get a COVID shot and have a 74% less chance of dying from COVID, well, sure, I suppose it's possible. But then also have 25% less chance of dying from other causes? What is this miracle shot which covers everything, not just COVID? Or does it imply that without the COVID shot, the chances of dying from COVID are so horrendous that merely preventing COVID reduces overall mortality by 25%?
Good God that is stupid. If there were that many people living so much longer, it wouldn't take a peer-reviews scientific study to notice it.
Again — this appears to claim that the COVID shot also protects against cancer. What doesn't it protect against? I'm surprised they didn't throw in measles, mumps, and herpes while they were at it.
Ron, this is bollocks. It doesn't pass any kind of smell test. You are the most gullible science reporter I have ever heard of.
80% of covid deaths were in the 65+ age group
This study covered only individuals age59 and younger.
This study is complete joke!
From the article above...
"(The different results, they note, might be partially explained by the fact that vaccinated individuals tend to be more socioeconomically advantaged.)"
Cause and effect aren't always totally clear, and that is acknowledged here. Correlation may or may not reflect causation.
I could see how total paranoia, and BLEEVING that the medical establishment is out to "get" us all, and BLEEEVING in crystal healing power, etc., instead, could lead to some BAD outcomes!!! Well-adjusted, mainstream-trusting, NON-paranoid, mentally and physically and economically advantaged people take vaxxes... And come out ahead! WhetHer this is PRECISELY due to vaxxes alone, isn't clear, granted. Butt... Butt WHERE are all the people KILLED by the vaxxes, is twat I want to know! In Heaven or in Hell, and, are people sent to Hell for getting vaxxed?
https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2021/10/centner-academy-vaccine-rules-leila-centner-david-centner
“Florida School Run by Idiots Says Vaccinated Students Must Stay Home for 30 Days After Each Shot”
This is the same school where a teacher told students not to hug their vaccinated parents for more than five seconds.
(End subtitles and excerpts).
See? We are ALL data-driven by now! My data says the OTHER (evil) tribe believes in vaccines, so MY tribe must BAN and SHUN the BAD tribe (and their cooties) ass much ass possible!
The unvaccinated are now CLEAN and the vaccinated are UNCLEAN! Civic-minded BAD! Afraid of micro-chips in vaccines GOOD! Black is white, and good is evil!
The shot allows you a lower chance of death from falling, transportation and drowning according to the study... Wow it truly is a miracle drug.
Well - we know the jab protects people from car accidents.
Odd that Teen Reason chooses to feature the statist rants of Ron Bailey and the TDS malignancy of Jacob Sullum during their webathon. Not a good look. But do carry on.
What the hell is the association between the covid vaccine and overall death? What else did it do to the human body to keep those who took it 25% less likely to die? This is raising all sorts of red flags about this study.
"What else did it do to the human body to keep those who took it 25% less likely to die?"
They were significantly less likely to have the researchers shove them off a cliff when they weren't looking.
Where's Aaron Brown when we need him?
Wow. It is almost like medical science works.
It's 5 years later. If you have to point to a French study five years later to find evidence that the vaccines work, they don't work.