Los Angeles City Council Votes To Lower Rent Caps on 650,000 Rent-Stabilized Apartments
The new rules would permit landlords to raise rents by a maximum of 4 percent per year, a decrease from the 8 percent maximum allowable increase under the current rules.
The Los Angeles City Council voted yesterday to lower the allowable rent increases on some 650,000 rent-stabilized units in the city.
The new formula endorsed by the city council will allow landlords to raise rents by 90 percent of the consumer price index (CPI), a common measure of inflation, with a maximum allowable rent increase of 4 percent. Landlords are guaranteed a floor of 1 percent annual increase under the new rules.
Under the old rent-stabilization formula, landlords could raise rents by 100 percent of CPI, with a maximum allowable annual rent increase of 8 percent. Landlords were guaranteed a minimum 3 percent annual increase each year.
Los Angeles' rent stabilization ordinance applies to rental properties built before October 1978. California also has a state-level rent control policy that limits landlords to increasing rents by the lesser of 5 percent plus inflation or 10 percent on buildings at least 15 years old.
The measure passed by the city council yesterday directs the Los Angeles City Attorney to draft an ordinance incorporating this new formula into the existing rent stabilization ordinance. The city council will have to vote again to enact that ordinance.
State law also guarantees landlords' ability to raise rents to market rates on vacant units.
Proponents of Wednesday's changes argued that the lower rent caps will enable tenants to stay in their units.
Some property owners argue the new caps will deter new construction.
City regulations stipulate that when a lot containing any rent-stabilized units are redeveloped into new rental housing, the entire new development also falls under rent-stabilization.
In this way, Los Angeles' rent regulations do cover some portion of new construction.
By lowering allowable rent increases on rent-stabilized units, Los Angeles' new rent caps will make projects that redevelop rent-stabilized housing into larger developments less attractive.
Politico interviewed one landlord who is abandoning his plans to convert a rent-stabilized triplex into a 48-unit development because the new project would have to be rent-stabilized as well.
Rent Free is a weekly newsletter from Christian Britschgi on urbanism and the fight for less regulation, more housing, more property rights, and more freedom in America's cities.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please to post comments
Let the market decide what rents should be. Caps encourage developers and investors to increase housing supply elsewhere.
the housing crisis exists everywhere Reason writers live!
Ugh, and all that progress the YIMBY movement was making!
The left: Let's turn it up to 100!
Everyone: Whoa, that's too much, we gotta turn that back down!
*fight ensues, things get turned back down to 60*
*the left rolls around holding their ankle*
Everyone: Wow, can you imagine how bad things would be if they were 100?!
*20 years pass*
The left: Let's turn it up to 200!
Everyone: Whoa, that's too much, we gotta turn that back down!
*fight ensues, things get turned back down to 100*
*the left rolls around holding their ankle*
Everyone: Wow, can you imagine how bad things would be if they were 200?!
*20 years pass*
The left: Let's turn it up to 290!
Everyone: Whoa, that's too much, we gotta turn that back down!
*fight ensues, things get turned back down to 175*
*the left rolls around holding their ankle*
Everyone: Wow, can you imagine how bad things would be if they were 290?!
Reason: Everyone return to normal! Conservatives, quit being mean, return to your corner and leave the left alone! *goes back to forging left/libertarian alliance*
"I know. Let's bankrupt the rental industry then wonder why Tent-Cities pop-up.", [D]emon-rat politicians.
Wondering, yet again, why their 'Guns' didn't make housing/sh*t.