Does Mental Health Awareness Make Things Worse?
Illinois wants to give mental health screenings to elementary schoolers. Will that actually help struggling kids?

Last week, Illinois Gov. J.B. Pritzker signed a law mandating mental health screenings for students attending the state's public schools. The bill orders that students be screened at least once per year, starting in third grade, though it did not specify what the screenings would consist of.
"Mental health is essential to academic readiness and lifelong success," Illinois State Superintendent of Education Tony Sanders said in the Thursday press release. "Too often, we only recognize a student's distress when it becomes a crisis. With universal screening, we shift from reaction to prevention. The earlier we identify a need, the better support we can provide to that student to help them thrive—in school and in life."
However, there's good reason to be skeptical of claims that mental health screenings actually help prevent student mental health crises. In fact, there's some evidence that attempting to increase mental health "awareness" among children can actually make things worse.
For example, one Australian study broke 1,000 teenagers into two groups: one received a typical health class, and the other received what was essentially group therapy. While researchers thought that the students who got therapy would do better, the opposite was true. "The therapy seemed to make the kids worse. Immediately after the intervention, the therapy group had worse relationships with their parents and increases in depression and anxiety," Atlantic writer Olga Khazan wrote in an article discussing the study. "They were also less emotionally regulated and had less awareness of their emotions, and they reported a lower quality of life, compared with the control group."
"Alleviating the teen-mental-health crisis may require something that is not altogether comfortable for adults: trusting that teenagers will know when they need help," Khazan concluded. "We may need to make treatment available but not obligatory. Teens have plenty of obligations as it is."
We don't know what the Illinois mental health screening program is likely to involve. But outcomes like the Australian study suggest that asking kids to focus on their negative feelings might make them less happy. If the state doesn't use the screening to sort kids into some kind of school-provided mental health treatment, it's especially likely that the screenings won't do much at all. There's not much that compels students to be honest about their feelings.
Over the past decade or so, American culture has become obsessed with mental health awareness. Campaigns to raise public awareness of mental illness and suicide swept social media and popular culture in an attempt to normalize asking for help in times of crisis. While well-meaning, this effort has led to the formation of an all-encompassing therapy culture. Now, most Americans—especially teenagers and young adults—are extremely aware of mental health. We know that everyday distress can probably be categorized as anxiety and depression. We also know about more serious conditions like bipolar and personality disorders and whether or not we have them. We know never to call ourselves "a little OCD" or to say that everyone is a "bit on the spectrum." We know to call our romantic foibles "avoidant attachment" and to insist that our ex-boyfriend "lovebombed" us.
We are profoundly, achingly "aware" of mental illness, but we don't seem to be getting much happier for it. During the 2010s, the suicide rate climbed for adolescents, and so did rates of emergency room visits for nonsuicidal self-harm. In one 2022 survey, 36 percent of 18- to 25-year-olds reported experiencing anxiety and 29 percent reported experiencing depression.
It's hard to fully tease out the cause and effect here. Obviously, young people are feeling terrible for lots of complex reasons: a lack of independence, economic uncertainty, permanent damage from COVID lockdowns, and—that old chestnut—the phones. Therapy culture might be making things worse, but it also is an outgrowth of an environment in which most people seem to be feeling pretty lousy and are looking for a way to explain why they're so miserable.
While everyone wants children to be happy—and wants to be able to identify the kids who are struggling before the worst happens—it's just not at all clear that grilling kids, some as young as 8 or 9 years old, about their psychic pain will have the intended outcome. Sometimes, less is more.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
jeffsarcShrikeSqrlsy all know they have issues. Their posts are available to read by all. What say you?
I say just ignore them. But you do you.
Ignoring stuff is how colleges allowed current post modernist and far left ideologies such as support for socialism to fester.
OT - I just finished reading The Ministry of Time recommended by Emma Camp last week.
Our characters may have been rescued from lives that would have seen them die of disease or in battle, but if they want real freedom, it will require something even harder to achieve than time travel: escaping a bureaucracy.
While I admit this summary is correct, the crux of the novel is about bouncing back in time to correct climate change and sermon the reader on racism/homophobia. 2/10.
https://reason.com/2025/08/01/the-ministry-of-time/?comments=true#comments
Most people don't read Emma let alone her book recommendations. Kudos to you. You are brave indeed.
People have been posting the Maine Mental Health hotline for sarc and he seems to have gotten worse.
They blocked his number.
Would the policy in question require probable cause?
"In loco parentis". Once they have your kids they own them.
"A village will take your child and raise it".
(the original quote was mistranslated)
I live in Illinois and have two grandkids in the public schools. Pritzker can shove this bullshit up his fat ass if he can reach it. My granddaughter is just going into puberty and becoming "awkward" as we used to say. She'll be fine but she doesn't need some mental health expert making her more self absorbed. My grandson is just entering high school and he rules his world. If confronted by these assholes I'm sure he'll tell them to fuck off, in the nicest way possible. If Illinois has an army of mental health experts to deploy maybe they could start with all of the crazies stinking up Chicago. In the meantime leave the kids alone.
Welcome to the free state of Florida, we're glad you're here.
I wish.
I have to wonder how many wise-ass teenagers will just fuck with the screeners for the lols.
>>Last week, Illinois Gov. J.B. Pritzker signed a law mandating mental health screenings for students attending the state's public schools.
better act out I hear he eats the Normies
What?
Emulate Canada and have the suicide prevention hotline referring people to MAID!?
Fake news
I guarantee they will -
1. find a lot of mental health issues
2. decide they need new government programs to deal with the "crisis"
3. hire a bunch of fired USAID workers as staff
4. form the new workers into a union
5. have the union endorse democrats
Dispensing drugs to kids is the goal.
Also mutilation
4. form the new workers into a union
They're already generally part of the teachers' union. This is folded into 1 and 2 to swell the ranks.
But they'll be overwhelmed with crazy kids. Some may have to work six and a half hour days. That's when the NGOs step in.
It seems like there is an uptick in "Behavioral Health " programs funded by government. The latest and greatest to make you dependent on the government and happy about it?
It was a required part of ACA compliance and part of the SEL in schools under Obama. Had to fund the party members.
The therapy seemed to make the kids worse.
They learned nothing from setting off a trans-gender craze. If you ask kids if something is an issue for them, they will tell you it is. The more grade-seeking the child, the more likely they will try to come up with the "right" answer. They are young and impressionable and have been trained to appease people in authority for rewards.
They will also leverage it if it will get attention from their family, peers or teachers.
I recently saw a video that explained that non-drug techniques to treat ADHD (ie, therapy) have their own side effects, and that if neither the patient nor the therapist are aware of them, it could lead to misery.
I cannot help but think that it makes no sense to subject random people to therapy, expecting it to to help anyone -- particularly since even when using therapy to address a diagnosed concern, it's possible for the therapy to be counter-productive -- I cannot help but think that therapy for people without problems (or, just as bad, for the wrong problems) would expose those people to the side effects without getting any benefit!
School districts should butt out of this, unless there's a certain concern that obviously needs to be addressed -- this is something that parents and kids need to work out for themselves.
On the one hand, when I had a daughter assessed for mental issues (it turned out she's autistic, and knowing that has helped us work through things a lot easier), her psychologist said something that resonated greatly with me -- she suggested that everyone should get an assessment, if for no other reason than if you get a head injury later in life, you will have a "baseline" to know what behavior you started out with, and what has changed since the injury (or at least since the assessment, which includes the injury).
On the other hand, to get a proper assessment is expensive, and each one is time-consuming as well. Who is going to pay to assess everyone?
Additionally, what should be done with the results? Currently, autism and ADHD should only be diagnosed if those conditions affect your life -- but under this requirement, I don't think I would have been "diagnosable" during college, which seemed to have the right combination of structure and chaos to satisfy both my autism and my ADHD -- however, had I known that I have those conditions, and how they might interfere with various endeavors, I could have potentially avoided 15 years of burnout in a rather patchy career.
On the third hand, however, I cannot help but fear what might be done with such assessments: how will they be used by bureaucrats to make the lives of students a living hell? I have become convinced that the biggest reason school is so hard for autistics and ADHDers and intelligent students and "stupid" ones (among other issues) is that we have a school system that has a rigid expectation of what each child is supposed to do, and be ready for, from year to year. If you depart from that, it will make people miserable -- because there's no such thing as "average", and the stretching and squishing and cutting people to fit the same bed is going to ensure that everyone will be hurt, one way or the other.
So, in principle, I agree with the notion that everyone needs an assessment. I don't think that assessment should be shown to government bureaucrats, though -- it should be kept private between the parents, the children, and the assessors -- but we are in desperate need to get away from this "one size fits all" education system we created, and personalize education for every individual instead.
Once again, we find that the nine most terrifying words in the English language are still: "I'm from the government, and I'm here to help."
Sounds like the same bullshit as the full body scan MRIs they were pushing a few years back that had more false positives than actually found ailments.
Except an MRI is at least an objective, impartial machine while a psychoanalyst has specifically been conditioned to disregard sexual orientation and changes thereof even as an associative indicator of any disease up front (not that they could make the call one way or the other anyway).
The "get an assessment up front" is horseshit. Especially for the reasons given. And this is pretty obvious up front if you even traipse around what he describes. For all the talk of Junk Science around Reason, mental health is the biggest junk science shitshow of them all. It's not science, it's hokum. Like saying "Take some Oscillococcinum to prevent a cold and if you still get a cold, next time take two." It was a pretty squishy science 70+ yrs. ago and it's only been more co-opted by dimwitted hacks since then.
Your brain isn't fully developed until you're 25? Fuck you retards. People learn new things; morality, impulse control, motor patterns, facts and knowledge, etc. into their 90s. Your brain, your intellect, doesn't stop developing until it starts decomposing. Which happens sooner for some of us than others.
Well said.
Over the past decade or so, American culture has become obsessed with mental health awareness. Campaigns to raise public awareness of mental illness and suicide swept social media and popular culture in an attempt to normalize asking for help in times of crisis.
Follow the money. This is just a marketing campaign to sell more psychoactive drugs.
Psychoacctive drugs may be part of it but the more proximate cause is growing teachers' unions. DEI is out again, for now, so you can't hire more useless 1619 Project and CRT administrators to consume tax dollars and produce no benefits. Mental health is the next best thing.
We have to find all those third graders trapped in the wrong body before they hang themselves.
You know there will be therapists who brand every black kid as ADHD and every white kid as autistic, destroying these students' self-image for years. It's a bold move to switch from the typical subliminal influencing done in government schools to overt reprogramming.