Trump Is Shutting Off America's Talent Pipeline
A new push to end work programs for international students will drive away skilled graduates and restrict U.S. innovation.

With attention focused on workplace raids and National Guard troops in Los Angeles, it is easy to overlook the Trump administration's policies on legal immigration. Those policies came into focus at a Senate hearing last month when Joseph Edlow, nominated to be the director of United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS), pledged to shut off America's talent pipeline.
Edlow told the Senate Judiciary Committee on May 21, 2025, that he would end Optional Practical Training (OPT), which allows international students to work for 12 months in their course of study, typically after graduating. He said he would also eliminate STEM OPT, which enables students to gain practical experience by working an extra 24 months (beyond OPT) in a science, technology, engineering, or math field. The additional 24 months in STEM OPT gives employers a better chance to obtain an H-1B petition for students by entering the H-1B lottery in multiple years, a primary reason the Bush administration added STEM OPT in 2008.
Edlow said he wanted to "remove the ability for employment authorizations for F-1 students beyond the time that they are in school." That phrasing may be sleight of hand. A program already exists for working while in school, called Curricular Practical Training, but it's not as widely used as OPT and STEM OPT.
In the 2023–2024 academic year, 163,452 international students engaged in post-completion OPT, and 79,330 students were in STEM OPT, totaling 242,782, according to the Institute of International Education.
Edlow may be promoting the policy already determined by Stephen Miller, the architect of the administration's immigration policy, who has a history of opposing international students staying in America. The Wall Street Journal reported that during President Donald Trump's first term, Miller tried to eliminate STEM OPT but was blocked by Trump's son-in-law, Jared Kushner. In 2015, Miller helped draft a bill as a staffer for Sen. Jeff Sessions (R–Ala.) that would have ended OPT, banned international students with master's or bachelor's degrees from working in the United States in H-1B status for at least 10 years after graduation, and prohibited doctorate holders from doing so for at least two years. The Financial Times reported that Miller sought to ban Chinese students from U.S. universities during Trump's first term.
The first six months of Trump's second term have seen several policies directed against international students, including new limits on Chinese students, attempts to deport thousands of students for minor offenses, new social media screenings for international students, and ending Harvard University's ability to enroll foreign students.
"Foreign graduates of U.S. universities cause major increases in innovation," according to research by George Mason University economics professor Michael Clemens. "Immigration policy that broadly seeks ways to entice foreign graduates of U.S. universities to remain in the United States, the overwhelming mass of evidence suggests, would serve the national interest. Terminating OPT would do the opposite."
Madeline Zavodny, an economics professor at the University of North Florida, found in a study by the National Foundation for American Policy that, contrary to some concerns, OPT is associated with lower unemployment rates for U.S. workers in STEM fields. Zavodny also found that enrolling immigrants and international students could allow many U.S. universities to survive as the U.S.-born college-aged population declines.
Ending the ability of international students to work after graduation would contradict what then-presidential candidate Trump told venture capitalists during the All-In podcast in June 2024. "What I want to do, and what I will do, is you graduate from a college, I think you should get automatically, as part of your diploma, a green card to be able to stay in this country."
Michelle Zatlyn, president, COO, and cofounder of Cloudflare, a company with a market capitalization of $54 billion and 2,400 U.S.-based employees, told me, "The best thing the U.S. government has done on immigration is OPT to allow international students a chance to stay and work for a time after graduation. It allowed me to work with Matthew Prince on the business plan that helped create the company."
International students represent 71 percent of the full-time graduate students in computer and information sciences and 73 percent in electrical and computer engineering at U.S. universities. It is already much easier to transition from a student visa to a work visa and then to permanent residence in Canada and other countries than in the United States. International student interest in coming to U.S. universities will plummet without the ability to work in their field after graduation. That will sever America's talent pipeline.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Essentially, Reason here is letting the head of an NGO write propaganda for the magazine.
It's not the DNC propaganda that I mind. It's the assumption that we are all blind and retarded as to why certain Chinese students are being restricted.
It’s disgusting. A mer low for Reason. In a series of new lows.
No one needs smart people to turn millions of tiny screws in the Khmer Orange.
--Don Pot.
You’re not clever, or funny.
Did you know that?
I've not seen much of the benefit of having foreign people learning utter bullshit.
Yeah right. Like the country needs more leftist students from leftist countries going to leftist schools learning leftist knowledge before doing leftist things.
You must have missed all the articles on how that is working out for NYC.
Trump should just ban colleges with an executive decree. They're all run by leftists and the knowledge they spread is leftist. Economics is leftist. History is leftist. Math is leftist. It's all leftist. Trump defenders don't need that leftist knowledge, and neither does anyone else.
I will take that as conformation you approve of the islamic marixist take over of NYC.
Sarcasmic would welcome the gates of hell itself if it would let him rant about Jesse and cover for the Democrats.
I will take that as confirmation that you're retarded.
Poor sarc.
Poor, pour sarc.
Pour, poor gray box.
Of course he does. Free shit for Sarc! That’s all he needs to know.
As a notable example of why immigration restriction is not only sensible but necessary, just consider what would have been if the US has capped it after The Communist Manifesto. We wouldn't even have had a progressive era, but the drunkard doesn't care.
“Unmuted” as I thought you might actually have something to say. Turns out you’re still just a drunken, retarded Democrat shill.
Poor sarcbot.
If the US can't sustain innovation without importing foreign talent then we have a problem. And I do not think that importing foreign talent is the best solution.
We should be exporting our leftists, permanently.
Why do hate these poeples' home countries and want to deprive them of their best and brightest?
"International students represent 71 percent of the full-time graduate students in computer and information sciences and 73 percent in electrical and computer engineering at U.S. universities."
The high percentage rate of foreign students in computer and information sciences has nothing to do with their intelligence, abilities, and experience.
It has everything to do with the fact that they (or someone on their behalf) pays full freight when it comes to tuition. Universities could easily admit well-qualified, or even better qualified American students, in those slots if they so wished.
Just as it is in the jobs market, American citizens are discriminated against when it comes to admissions in university grad school programs.
International students represent 71 percent of the full-time graduate students in computer and information sciences and 73 percent in electrical and computer engineering at U.S. universities."
Now imagine for a moment that the universities might create some kind of an race-based admissions program that favored students "of color" or some crazy never-before-thought-of nonsense. Then imagine that because they can't fulfill those race-based quotas with domestic students "of color" they have to simply pump those numbers up by admitting foreign students.
Except Asians never count as people of color from a University standpoint. Why do you think Harvard was sued?
Oh no. Poor you. Were you discriminated against in getting admitted to a graduate level STEM program?
Oh god no, I was way too smart for college. I recognized early on that only a complete 'tard would go into debt to earn over 6 figures. So I decided to earn way over 6 figures with $0 debt.
JewFree can’t understand that.
This is simply not true. It is the predictable outcome of getting the behavior you incentivize. The people with skills and talent in an area tend to gravitate towards where they see the most potential benefit - just how in the US people who are athletically inclined tend towards football/basketball/baseball while in Europe they tend towards the other football.
Chinese/Indian/Korean culture puts emphasis on getting a STEM degree as a ticket to a middle class or higher status. American culture has, until recently, only emphasized getting a degree. This has resulted in large numbers of American students credentialed in utterly useless things.
FWIW - I was a graduate student in Computer Science at at a state university where basically anyone with good grades and a high ACT score could attend. Roughly half of the students were foreign-born (most SE/SW Asian but quite a few Europeans as well) and only 10% or so of us were female. Putting this out as anecdotal evidence that the demand for high level STEM education is just greater among the international community than the native.
American culture has, until recently, only emphasized getting a degree. This has resulted in large numbers of American students credentialed in utterly useless things.
I agree but the way you phrase it makes it seem as if that is a culture created by the student. It isn't. That is ENTIRELY created by American employers. Michael Spence and George Akerloff won Economics Nobels in 2001 for work they did in the early 1970's re markets with asymmetric information. Over/miscredentialing is a consequence of that. American employers had already bought into that and over time doubled-down and tripled down on it. Employers who might need degrees that have value - no longer hire students between the age of 18-22. They don't do apprenticeships or provide training/education to those who haven't acquired what those employers view as their 'entry level' hiring requirement. The labor market landscape is entirely two-tier. So the kid has to pursue a degree on their own dime - with no info about a work future that they are obviously ignorant about anyway - and that's the whole point from the employers perspective.
One of the reasons foreign students gravitate towards degrees with value is because their childhood growing up had a whole slew of companies that hire young and THEN train. So all those people - as HS students - knew the job market for HS graduates. In many cases, those who are capable of college get their college paid for - in America - by employers back home. One reason why American universities (and in particular tech companies) have instead focused on graduate level rather than undergraduate level.
The quote is solely about graduate studies. They over represent in graduate schools as most are on student visas and attempting to stay. Undergrads with those degrees go and get actual jobs.
Right now around 20% of citizen STEM majors dont have a STEM job.
Stop falling for propaganda.
The democrats have done a great job turning Americans into second class citizens in our own country.
The foreign students are a part of this. The foreign professors are a much bigger deal. They bring expertise and a different perspective to the US that is greatly needed.
No, we dont need any more third world commies teaching young americans to hate themselves.
100%. What we need is Americans like you teaching young Americans to worship themselves by giving them gold stars or spanking them or whatever your 'teaching' method is.
Yep. Get rid of all of them.
I will never understand why MAGAs always pick the option that will be worse for our county.
The tech industry is going to go into a death spiral. And frankly - about fucking time. And not just re foreign students. The semiconductor bans to China are eliminating tech's biggest customer and giving a HUGE boost to autarkic innovation in China (and soon enough India).
And no this has nothing to do with whatever corrupt horseshit comes from the tech industry and the Reason/Cato/open borders crowd
WHAT?
Globalism does not work for China?
I'm stunned.
Americans walked on the fucking moon without the help of indian and chinese mass immigration. We'll be fine.
Except we did it with the foreign-born STEM graduates of the time - German and Eastern European immigrants.
This reflexive anti-immigrant stance is the part of MAGA that I hate. I support deportation of those who are here without following the process - illegal immigration hurts almost all parties involved in one way or another. I would also love to ditch the H1-B visa process as it creates a semi-permanent "wage slave' class that depresses tech wages and inhibits innovation.
Cutting off or severely restricting all immigration is both antithetical to American ideals and something that will erode a large part of what has enabled us to become and remain a superpower.
blah blah blah. "a handful of german war criminals were part of the team! So therefore you must support letting a million asians take all the spots at university" is peak boomer libshit.
Not a boomer or a liberal.
See above where I referenced my real-world experience of the actual supply/demand curve for graduate degrees in STEM fields. The issue isn't with the universities, it is both pre-university level with the dumbed-down American education system and a culture that still stigmatizes certain disciplines AND post-university with the job-market-distorting carve outs for the tech industry.
FWIW, I don't necessarily disagree with discontinuing this program, especially as it seems to be a pipeline into the H1-B system that I consider to be pure poison. The latter should be scrapped altogether and replaced with a merit/relational points-based system to encourage intelligent, risk-taking individuals to immigrate here.
Honestly, I would much rather have my H1-B holding, America loving, well assimilated, highly skilled colleagues here as citizens than any of the useless 'studies' degree activist class trying to destroy the country.
Again. Graduate degrees are a fraction of bachelor degrees. Citizens get jobs, those on student visas reapply for school if they dont get an h1b.
How are you people so easily fooled?
America must be for the benefit of Americans. Period.
DEI plays into some of this. I'm required to hire a percentage of protected class candidates. Generally speaking, I can't find qualified American engineering candidates that are pigmented sufficiently or have the proper genitalia. So, we hire imports.
Full disclosure - The facility in question is in a northern rural area, and many qualified American candidates don't want to live in the sticks and endure winters.
So it sounds like you are having trouble finding Americans willing to live in shit hole places so you have to import workers from shit hole places.
Only have trouble finding lefties (POCs and white women) willing to live rural. Truly qualified American engineering candidates always send resumes. Racist policies prevent me from hiring the truly qualified.
DEI must be outlawed.
Cutting off or severely restricting all immigration is both antithetical to American ideals and something that will erode a large part of what has enabled us to become and remain a superpower.
And as Milton Friedman pointed out, the country isn't the same place that we were when we became a superpower. You don't become and 'remain' a superpower when you turn your entire country's economy into a welfare ATM, as Europe long ago discovered.
America’s talent pipeline doesn’t include Americans? Very telling.
The additional 24 months in STEM OPT gives employers a better chance to obtain an H-1B petition for students by entering the H-1B lottery in multiple years
Found the real reason that this shill is mad.
Muh cheap labor.
Zavodny also found that enrolling immigrants and international students could allow many U.S. universities to survive as the U.S.-born college-aged population declines.
And here's the other.
Can't possibly just let the universities die.
Yes, the H1-B system is pure poison to all involved except CEOs.
No it won't. None of this is about anything but cheap labor. Particularly as the labor becomes more skilled, there are more opportunities to use the leverage businesses and government have over people on visas to crush their wages.
This is really stupid, and hence to be expected. Attract and retain the best talent you can. Why is that not a good idea?
It’s cool to rob other countries of talent.
Countries own its peoples' talent?
It's DLAM. What do you expect?
These students aren't the best retard. It is them staying on a visa. Nothing more.
We need more student visas like Mahmoud Khalil? Yeah... pass. I don't see the value.
Further, if our schools are really that good then they would be producing the sorts of professionals we need.
This.
You do realise that there are more than the two choices of "let 'em all in" and "don't let any of 'em in", right?
"Foreign graduates of U.S. universities"
"MORE Commie-Indoctrination please!" Leftard Reason Magazine.
When the headline implies that America has no domestic talent and must import talent, the article isn't worth reading.