This Military Wife and Mom Is Part of the 65 Percent of ICE Detainees With No Criminal Record
The recent immigration-related arrest shows that ICE is more concerned with targeting all immigrants than with ensuring public safety.

In May, President Donald Trump's administration directed Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) to make a minimum of 3,000 arrests per day. To meet this quota, ICE has resorted to arresting people who pose no risk to public safety.
New data shared by the Cato Institute revealed that 65 percent of people taken by ICE had no previous convictions, and 93 percent had no violent convictions. Since the beginning of 2025, ICE arrests have increased from an average of 215 to 1,100 per day. One tactic used by the agency to increase arrests is targeting law-abiding immigrants during routine appointments, which happened to Paola Clouatre in May.
Clouatre, a 25-year-old Mexican national, came to the United States with her mother more than a decade ago seeking asylum. After meeting Adrian Clouatre in 2022, during his final months of military service, the two married last year. Shortly after, Clouatre began the process of obtaining her green card to live and work in the U.S. legally. But during the green card process, she learned that ICE had issued a deportation order against her in 2018 after her estranged mother failed to appear at an immigration hearing in California—something her husband says she had "no idea" about.
On May 27, Clouatre attended an appointment in New Orleans as part of her green card application and explained that she had requested that her case be reopened. In Adrian Couatre's video interview with the Associated Press, he said that after they finished the interview, he and his wife were asked to wait in the lobby for paperwork regarding their next appointment. Instead, the couple was approached by ICE agents, who then handcuffed Clouatre and took her into custody.
While she and her family wait to hear back after filing a motion for a California-based judge to reopen the case on her deportation order, Clouatre is being held at an ICE detention facility near Monroe, Louisiana. Despite the distance, Adrian Clouatre, who qualifies as a service-disabled veteran, says he makes the eight-hour round trip from their home in Baton Rouge, Louisiana, every chance he gets. He is also concerned for his two young children, a 2-year-old and a 3-month-old, who are being deprived of bonding time with their mother.
Unfortunately for the Clouatre family, the Trump administration ended discretion for veterans seeking legal status for family members earlier this year. In February, the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) announced that groups that received more grace in the past will no longer be exempt from potential enforcement.
Alluding to Clouatre's case, USCIS posted on X that it was a bad idea for her to defy her deportation order and apply for a green card, stating that the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) "has a long memory and no tolerance for defiance when it comes to making America safe again." In an emailed statement to the A.P., DHS spokesperson Tricia McLaughlin said that Clouatre "is in the country illegally" and the administration is "not going to ignore the rule of law."
But as Clouatre's arrest and the data show, the Trump administration's immigration crackdown has less to do with "making America safe again" and more to do with discouraging immigration to the U.S. altogether. Attempting to meet such an unreasonably high quota has meant that immigration authorities have had to focus less on dangerous criminals on the street and more on low-hanging fruit like the Clouatres of the world, who are taking the steps to become legal residents.
"I'm all for 'get the criminals out of the country,' right?" Adrian Clouatre told the A.P. "But the people that are here working hard, especially for the ones married to Americans—I mean, that's always been a way to secure a green card."
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
So... she was here illegally?
Having no criminal record is not the same as not being a criminal. By definition, if someone is here illegally, they are a criminal even if they have no criminal record.
Show us some evidence that ICE has mistakenly picked up and detained people that are either (a.) demonstrably citizens or (b.) here entirely legally. Otherwise, fuck off with the bullshit, appeals to emotion over another illegal alien who had no criminal record.
A criminal has violated criminal law. Violating civil laws and regulations does not make one a criminal by itself.
This is also a website that has published multiple articles about how often people (including citizens) can be violating federal law without even knowing it. That seems to be the case here. From what it says in the article, Clouatre came here legally, as far as we can tell, and her mother applied for asylum for them both. But then her mother didn't show up to an appointment, and Clouatre didn't know about this because she had been estranged from her. (She'd have been 17 or 18 at that time, since she's 25 now and that was 2018.)
So, yes, she was not legally permitted to live in the U.S. because of circumstances she did not know about. She was actively in the process of trying to reconcile that so that she could legally remain in the U.S. with her military veteran husband.
If that makes her a criminal, then apply that definition to anyone else that violates civil laws. I'll wait while you think about who else might fall into that category under that definition.
Clouatre came here legally, as far as we can tell, and her mother applied for asylum for them both.
Apparently not, on both points.
Civil crimes are still crimes dumdum. False application to a green card is also a crime, not stating her status. She didnt apply for a fiance visa, she just went straight green card based on the story.
I like how you are fine with all the 20 year charges against non violent j6ers who ended up with parading charges foe the most part, but then declare illegals have more rights. Truly a principled stance.
Oh. And she is in fact a criminal who committed a felony. See below.
But as Clouatre's arrest and the data show, the Trump administration's immigration crackdown has less to do with "making America safe again" and more to do with discouraging immigration to the U.S. altogether.
Pretending one has no effect on the other would appear absurd.
Clouatre, a 25-year-old Mexican national, came to the United States with her mother more than a decade ago seeking asylum.
That's a lot of time in which she could have done something. Also, she was a teenager not a baby.
After meeting Adrian Clouatre in 2022, during his final months of military service, the two married last year. Shortly after, Clouatre began the process of obtaining her green card to live and work in the U.S. legally.
No word at all on what happened between 'more than a decade ago' up until 'last year' eh? No surprise, since apparently she did less than nothing to become a citizen for 'more than a decade'.
But during the green card process, she learned that ICE had issued a deportation order against her in 2018 after her estranged mother failed to appear at an immigration hearing in California—something her husband says she had "no idea" about.
Maybe true, but since she's an illegal alien and clearly knew that it's a wonder that she never connected that to a possible deportation.
Over a decade ago would put her in line with DACA but they didnt even care to apply for that.
I wondered the same thing since I saw no mention of DACA in the article.
She came to America seeking asylum from a country where millions of Americans go every year to vacation and then became estranged from the woman that brought her to safety? And how did she get money to live after the estrangement? You would think a journalist might flesh out those aspects of the story a bit more.
And then this tidbit: the two married last year. Shortly after, Clouatre began the process of obtaining her green card to live and work in the U.S. legally.
So, a very young man collecting disability knowingly married an illegal alien a year after knocking her up with their first kid and then they decided when Trump was elected that she should finally get a green card after more than 10 years. If this is somehow supposed to be egregious enough to elicit a sympathetic response, how unsympathetic are the rest?
I have at least a little empathy given that dealing with the government is very unpleasant and labyrinthian even for a citizen, but given that she knew her own immigration status (one doesn't try to get a green card otherwise) and did nothing about it for 'over a decade' my sympathy is, shall we say, limited.
I put off my vehicle registration constantly, mostly because it's a hassle and I just don't like doing it, but I don't bitch and moan when I get a ticket for it since I was well aware what would happen if I fuck up and forget about it entirely.
And you know what? If I fuck that up badly enough I can go to prison for something as minor as vehicle registration. Is that unjust? Perhaps, but it's the law.
I have at least a little empathy given that dealing with the government is very unpleasant and labyrinthian even for a citizen, but given that she knew her own immigration status (one doesn't try to get a green card otherwise) and did nothing about it for 'over a decade' my sympathy is, shall we say, limited.
She came here over a decade ago. The missed appointment and deportation order was 7 years ago, which is less than 10 years, the last I checked.
I don't see any empathy here.
I put off my vehicle registration constantly, mostly because it's a hassle and I just don't like doing it, but I don't bitch and moan when I get a ticket for it since I was well aware what would happen if I fuck up and forget about it entirely.
I guess that makes you a criminal, just like her.
It is in fact. He can be cited with civil fines. Failure to pay can become criminal.
She violated a civil law. The consequence is deportation. Failure to deport after an order can go up to a felony.
Good work buddy. Youre learning.
She came here over a decade ago. The missed appointment and deportation order was 7 years ago, which is less than 10 years, the last I checked.
Last I checked, she could have done something about it at any point since she was obviously well aware she was an illegal immigrant. Citizens don't normally think they need a green card to work, genius. In fact, she was obviously working without one for quite some time meaning she really knew this since they would have asked her about this at literally any job she applied to. No doubt she found a job that didn't ask and no doubt that was intentional.
And yeah, registering my vehicle late makes me a criminal. I pay the fees so I don't go to jail, she didn't do jack shit about her status and when she tried she discovered they already found out about her illegal status. Just like once I'm found out with an expired registration I have to pay, now she does too. Sucks that she willfully stayed in a country she knew she wasn't allowed to be in, but like any other trespasser now she'll be removed from the place she's trespassing in.
Reason always picks the worst people to champion as their case studies.
Maryland Man, now this girl. Next up - articles about how hard it is to afford rent on a 100k salary in Palo Alto because I need to spend 50k/yr on Funkopops.
Do they? Or are there no better people to champion?
Correlation does not imply causation.
But...But... I thought no one was above the law? No?
Trump is so shitty at finding illegals to deport that he’s creating them by revoking visas and revoking parole, often without their knowledge, and then going after these “criminals” who are easy targets because they followed the rules which means the Feds know where they are.
What visa or parole was in this story dumdum?
Clouatre, a 25-year-old Mexican national, came to the United States with her mother more than a decade ago seeking asylum.
So... an illegal migrant then?
They were seeking asylum. Asylum turned down so go home. Hey, no one is above the law.
and more to do with discouraging immigration to the U.S. altogether.
What the hell is up with this obsession to maximize infinity migrants to the US? What's wrong with not wanting that?
How is Autumn supposed to afford her avocado toast and get her arse wiped if we don't have a permanent underclass to exploit?
First off, they are all eligible for deportation because they all are here illegally. I am not going to say abuela is fine just because she hasn't been convicted of a crime outside of entering the country illegally. It's bleeding heart bullshit like that that creates a crime and immigration problem.
Next, a cursory glance shows that roughly 1/3 of Americans have a criminal record and about 8% have felonies. If we correlate violent crime with felonies then the people picked up mirror domestic criminality.
It's worth noting that people here illegally do a lot to evade the law and the community itself allows a lot of crime in an attempt to avoid deportation.
My understanding is that a lot of Trump's deportation raids are seeking out criminal individuals and they end up nabbing a bunch of other illegal aliens who they find in the same place (workplaces with majority immigrant labor and overpopulated homes/apartments.)
I'm completely fine with all of them being kicked out. The plan to focus on known criminals is mostly about marketing deportation efforts to emotional simpletons. Reason and Autumn have fought hard against even the violent criminals getting kicked out, so the entire line of argumentation in this article is pointless from her moral and political position.
I don't care that she's a military wife.
I don't care that she's a 'mom.'
I don't care that she has no criminal record.
Deport. Deport them all. First, they refuse to deport them when the law says they should. Then they say the government has waited too long and they cant' be deported now. Ronald Reagan signed off on a huge amnesty bill, saying 'From now on, no more.' Tens of millions later, they're still pulling the same sh$t.
Cato Institute revealed that 65 percent of people taken by ICE had no previous convictions, and 93 percent had no violent convictions.
A literally meaningless statistic as many are deported instead of trial. This is generally what happens with turnbacks as well.
Cato knows this but chose the path of dishonesty.
One tactic used by the agency to increase arrests is targeting law-abiding immigrants during routine appointments, which happened to Paola Clouatre in May.
They abided every law did they? They seem to be intentionally violation of the INA.
But during the green card process, she learned that ICE had issued a deportation order against her in 2018
Literally the only salient fact.
You know what bugs me the most about this appeal to emotion? The full lack of empathy this site had foe the hundreds of families whose lives were disrupted in a far worse way for the J6 Inquisition. The vast majority of cases ended up as misdemeanor parading. Yet families held in bail across the country for months to even years. Reason defended these acts.
Appeals to emotion dont work when you have no principled application of the appeal.
She gave birth to her 2 kids while unable to legally work and knowing she could be deported. How does this not read more like someone gaming the system rather than a victim of it?
Reasons love of freedom from responsibility. But only for certain classes.
I don't really read it that way - it could be what happened, OTOH it could also just be someone not putting their life on hold, hoping for a good outcome.
Of course, it would help if she had maintained the required contact with ICE . . .
Also, when her husband was going to get orders out of the country how were they planning on moving her because there is no way he's have gotten command sponsorship for his wife.
Adrian Clouatre, who qualifies as a service-disabled veteran
He is not currently serving, and the "qualifies as" reads like a contrivance. I would think that an actual journalist would clarify for the audience. When they fail to do so, I usually assume it is because it does not promote the author's narrative.
So, 35% have a criminal record? That seems to be higher than I’ve been led to believe.
So Autumn, you're saying she was in the country illegally?
1. You were told they were going after everyone. *EVERYONE!*
2. The *priority* were the dangerous criminals. But they were taking everyone they find.
3. Deportation order. That she didn't know about? Because she did not maintain the required contact with ICE?
4. I thought immigrants committed fewer crimes than native born - yet 35 percent of those on custody have criminal charges?
Another classic 'reason' strawman. Sure, Trump talked about deporting criminals prior to the election. That was when illegals were burning people on subways and stabbing college girls, not that 'reason' cares. But he never said he would deport only criminals. Does 'reason' think that if the government discovers a murderous illegal alien, they'll just say "nope, sorry, too busy deporting maids and gardeners"?
We'll at least give Billings credit for explaining the problem deep into his blog.
The lady was DEPORTED in 2018. She didn't get around to leaving voluntarily, so now she's getting the bum's rush.
The "criminal" thing is a canard. Illegals who have been deported need to leave.
What do you think the word "deported" means? I think it means that someone has been removed from the country. Past tense of "to deport". She was supposed to leave the country because of a a deportation order that she didn't know about? (According to her husband.)
The consequences for failure to deport, specifically willfully failing or refusing to depart from the United States within 90 days of a final administrative or judicial order of removal, are outlined in the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act (IIRIRA). This act amended 8 U.S.C. § 1253 to make it a criminal offense. The penalties include a fine, imprisonment for up to 4 years, or both.
So a felony.
Good work buddy. Youre making a strong argument!
Is she an illegal alien? Sucks to be you so goodbye and apply the right way. I don't need to hear any sob stories.
I'm not hard core. I'm in favor of giving well behaved, productive illegals who have been here 5 years a path to come back legally.
But illegals who ignored a deportation order have not been "well behaved".
"This Military Wife and Mom Is Part of the 65 Percent of ICE Detainees With No Criminal Record"
Did she break the law by staying in the country illegally or not...
wait...
35% of the detainees have criminal records?
Wow! That's fucking huge.
Talk about a self-own, Reason.
Every day the media has a new "sob story" which they are positive that this time--this time for sure--will convince mean ole Trump and his supporters that all illegal aliens should be allowed to stay.
First it was "Maryland man, a wife-beating child trafficking gang member"; the other day it was the roofer that lost his employees who were working for him illegally; yesterday it was an illegal alien street vendor (who had none of the required city permits) taking business away from the permitted and tax-paying restaurants.
Today, it is the "poor" wife of a disabled veteran who had previously been ordered deported and until now thought there was no rush to do anything about her illegal status.
All were committing crimes and/or had orders of deportation.
Move them all to the homes of Autumn, Somin, and others at Reason who support illegal aliens taking jobs and housing from the little people. House them with those law professors who have little care for the victims of their crimes.
They can all be sent home. I don't care. Deport them all.
Autumn, what would you say if someone burglarized your house and raped you?
Would you want justice against that criminal, or would you want to give him a pass because he didn't have a criminal record?