Iran's Warning Shot Gives Trump a Way Out of Israel's War
Trump now has a choice between exiting from a position of strength—or jumping further into an endless war.

When U.S. bombers attacked three Iranian nuclear facilities on Saturday, the Iranian government downplayed the damage. And Iran's response was a piece of kayfabe. Iranian missile forces launched 14 missiles, the same number of bunker-buster bombs dropped on Iran, at Qatar's Al Udeid Air Base, the largest U.S. base in the Middle East. The Iranian government reportedly warned Qatar beforehand to prevent any casualties.
This performative warning shot is a chance for the U.S. to duck out of the war. President Donald Trump claims that the Iranian nuclear program, the pretext for this war in the first place, has been "completely and fully obliterated." Even though there are questions about the whereabouts of Iran's enriched uranium, it would take a long time to rebuild the facilities to do anything with that uranium, buying time for a negotiated solution. And Iran seems far more eager to fight Israel, the country that attacked it in the first place, than to expand the war.
"Iran has officially responded to our Obliteration of their Nuclear Facilities with a very weak response, which we expected, and have very effectively countered," Trump wrote on Truth Social. "I am pleased to report that NO Americans were harmed, and hardly any damage was done. Most importantly, they've gotten it all out of their 'system,' and there will, hopefully, be no further HATE. I want to thank Iran for giving us early notice, which made it possible for no lives to be lost, and nobody to be injured. Perhaps Iran can now proceed to Peace and Harmony in the Region, and I will enthusiastically encourage Israel to do the same."
But hawks have continued moving the goalposts through the war. After the Saturday air raids, the neoconservative Foundation for Defense of Democracies began pointing out potential new underground Iranian facilities that need to be bombed. And Fox News host Mark Levin, reportedly an influential voice in Trump's ear pushing for the attack, wrote today that it would be "disastrous" to give the Iranian government a "lifeline" after its retaliation. Trump himself flirted with regime change last night.
They seem to be in a rush to make total war a fait accompli without having to sell it to the public. When the Israeli-Iranian fighting began, only 16 percent of Americans and 23 percent of Republicans wanted to join. New polling suggests that a significant minority of Americans now supports the strikes—the change was mostly from Republicans rallying around the president—but a whopping 85 percent of Americans do not want to be "at war with Iran" afterward.
House Speaker Mike Johnson (R–La.) is opposing any kind of vote on Trump's war powers, and Vice President J.D. Vance is insisting that "we're not at war with Iran," a sign that hawks are not confident in their public support.
Although Trump was reportedly excited by Fox News coverage of the Israeli first strike, a sucker punch that killed Iranian leadership and left Iran disoriented, the conflict is now looking more like a long slog. Iran has managed to fire off consistent missile salvos and grind down U.S.-Israeli air defense ammunition stocks, knocking out infrastructure, including Israel's main oil refinery last week and a major Israeli power plant after the U.S. strikes.
Israeli officials, who had promised a conflict that would only last a few days (and entered the war expecting U.S. involvement), are now warning citizens to prepare for a "prolonged campaign." Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu promised on Sunday not to be "dragged into a war of attrition" and hinted that he would declare victory soon. Iran, however, gets a vote. Iranian officials have promised not to negotiate under fire, and are continuing to fire missiles back at Israel, so the Israeli military is promising even more escalation to convince Iran to stop.
The drift in Israeli expectations—from a campaign of a few days to an indefinite, constantly escalating war—is a bad omen for Americans. What hawks promise as a series of one-off strikes can easily become an uncontrollable exchange of fire. Monday's warning shot demonstrated that Iran can do a lot more to menace U.S. forces in the Persian Gulf and the fragile, oil-rich Arab monarchies that host them.
Fortunately, America is not in Israel's bind yet. The United States can easily stay away from the battlefield. The only way Iran can harm (and has ever harmed) Americans is if the U.S. government puts them in harm's way. The Iranian nuclear program, the sole potential global threat emanating from Iran, is off the table for now. And Iran does not seem eager to threaten oil shipping, the only other issue that will affect Americans' lives, unless it feels it has no more cards to play.
But avoiding further conflict means resisting the pro-war sirens of temptation, whether calls for a U.S.-directed regime change or Israeli pleas for support. This war is not America's war. If it wasn't clear before, it should be clear now that Iran does not want to fight America unless it has to. Trump should take the opportunity to declare victory and walk away.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Looks like a job for Gloria Nuland. Organic insurrections follow her wherever she goes.
>>But avoiding further conflict means resisting the pro-war sirens of temptation
where are these sirens? who is trumpeting for war? I hear nothing but you worried about shit that isn't happening. twice today even.
Go check out Zerohedge, they have receipts. Tons of the usual subjects, arguing for MOAR BOMBS!!11!1!!One.
Even Trump was suggesting that Iran needed regime change, which I'd have written off as nothing more than his standard bluster, before Sunday's strikes.
Are you denying that Iran needs a regime change from a US perspective? Have you seen anything indicating that there are actions being taken to follow that up beyond bluster? Or are you one of those that thinks a nuclear Iran will will be fine because "death to America" is just cute sloganeering?
Well, that seeks like an OK statement from the President.
Iran just agreed to a ceasefire.
Stay out of foreign nations disputes, and stop spending our tax dollars on horseshit in the middle east. America First, this is not. If you'd like to see war over there, feel free to start a fund and donate or suit up and go yourself, the libertarian way, the voluntary way.
So it's clear, if Iran had bombed within our borders, I'd have a completely different attitude and would support their obliteration. Unfortunately we bombed them first, so if you believe in the NAP (you should otherwise why are you here?) we fucked up already.
This performative warning shot is a chance for the U.S. to duck out of the war.
Take your bets on if Trump 'backs off' after 'warning shots' Democrats will call him weak on terror and demand retaliation.
"US President Donald Trump announces that Israel and Iran have agreed to a “complete and total ceasefire.”
In a Truth Social post announcing the development, Trump says the ceasefire will start to take effect in about six hours after Israel and Iran have “wound down” their final strikes against each other."
https://x.com/TruthTrumpPosts/status/1937271183311020068
CONGRATULATIONS TO EVERYONE! It has been fully agreed by and between Israel and Iran that there will be a Complete and Total CEASEFIRE (in approximately 6 hours from now, when Israel and Iran have wound down and completed their in progress, final missions!), for 12 hours, at which point the War will be considered, ENDED! Officially, Iran will start the CEASEFIRE and, upon the 12th Hour, Israel will start the CEASEFIRE and, upon the 24th Hour, an Official END to THE 12 DAY WAR will be saluted by the World. During each CEASEFIRE, the other side will remain PEACEFUL and RESPECTFUL. On the assumption that everything works as it should, which it will, I would like to congratulate both Countries, Israel and Iran, on having the Stamina, Courage, and Intelligence to end, what should be called, “THE 12 DAY WAR.” This is a War that could have gone on for years, and destroyed the entire Middle East, but it didn’t, and never will! God bless Israel, God bless Iran, God bless the Middle East, God bless the United States of America, and GOD BLESS THE WORLD!
*sigh* Word salad.
Came by to post the same announcement. It's welcome news, hope it holds.
Yet again, Trump is right and Reason is wrong.
Will it ever end?
Petti is a real top asshole. His faggoty article didn’t know Ben make it half a day before it aged badly.
Petti is a retarded subversive. It’s about time we started purging these anti American elements,
Seems Petti is stuck in a TDS doom loop. Never considered 'leverage a ceasefire deal' as an option. Just more orange. man. bad.
They seem to be in a rush to make total war a fait accompli...
Who is "they"? And why should we care what "they" think?
The only way Iran can harm (and has ever harmed) Americans is if the U.S. government puts them in harm's way.
If you believe that, you're a retard.
Petti is a retard, and a cunt.
The lack of interest shown by so many commentators in the life and liberty of all civilians--Israelis, Gazans, Lebanese, and Iranians--is striking and startling. There is far more interest in the Big Beautiful Bomb and the details of the US attack. It's possible that the US attack resulted in few or no civilian casualties, but all the Israeli attacks have almost certainly caused hundreds of them.
It's also possible that someone will point out to Trump the opportunity he has for an achievement that could increase his chances for the Nobel Peace Prize, which actually does interest him I think. Could be wrong. Anyhow, Bibi owes Trump something really big in return for the US air strike. Trump could say to Bibi, "My dearest friend, for your own good you will now cease all offensive activity in Gaza. Again, it's for your own good!"
It's not a demand for an immediate two-state solution or withdrawal of all the settlements from the West Bank. Rather it's a demand that acknowledges the erosion of international support for Israel. There have been far too many civilians killed and injured; too many regardless of what the actual numbers turn out to be. The Israeli assault on Hamas/Gaza was certainly justifiable, but the principle of proportionality has to figure into the discussion. Trump can call out Bibi for excessive agression while also calling out Hamas for keeping the remaining hostages and using the civilian population as human shields. He could do all that and earn genuine praise for it.
Wow, this article certainly aged like fine milk, didn't it.