Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Social Security

We're 8 Years Away From an Automatic 23 Percent Cut in Social Security Payouts

Social Security’s board of trustees expects the program to be insolvent in eight years.

Jack Nicastro | 6.19.2025 4:30 PM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
An illustration of an empty bank vault with a sign inside that reads "Bust 2034 Social Security Trust Fund" | Illustration: Eddie Marshall | Media Amazon
(Illustration: Eddie Marshall | Media Amazon)

Reckless spending has been driving Social Security toward a fiscal cliff. Scheduled benefits will have to be cut by 23 percent in 2033 to keep the program solvent.

This is the grim conclusion drawn by the trustees of Social Security's Old-Age and Survivors Insurance and Disability Insurance (OASDI) trust funds, who published their annual report this week. OASDI comprises two trust funds, but the main one—the Old-Age and Survivors Insurance (OASI) trust fund—is on track to be depleted in 2033. That means all retirees receiving benefits in that year will face a 23 percent cut to their monthly checks.

The trustees' report also warns that OASDI will become insolvent in 2034. The trustees calculate this earlier depletion date in part because of a law Congress passed late last year to expand Social Security benefits to some workers who previously did not receive them.

Reason's Eric Boehm explains that the Social Security Fairness Act expanded Social Security benefits to public sector workers hired before 1984, despite those workers being exempted from contributing to the payroll taxes that fund the program. The Cato Institute's Romina Boccia and Ivane Nachkebia affirm that the "significant worsening of the program's finances since last year is largely the result of the repeal of the Windfall Elimination Provision (WEP) and Government Pension Offset (GPO)," which reduced Social Security payouts to public workers and their spouses.

The trustees highlight two other factors hastening the depletion of OASDI's trust funds. First, they project that the country's total fertility rate of 1.62 children per woman today won't reach 1.9 children per woman until 2050 (10 years later than originally anticipated), which means fewer workers to support beneficiaries. Second, they anticipate the ratio of total labor compensation to gross domestic product to be 61.2 percent in 2034—1.6 percentage points lower than projected in last year's report—which means lower taxable payroll income (OASDI is funded primarily by employment taxes).

OASDI's smaller trust fund, Disability Insurance (D.I.), provides monthly benefits to disabled workers and their families. Despite D.I. paying out $155 billion to 8 million recipients in 2024, D.I. ran a $36 billion surplus, increasing its reserves to $183 billion. OASI, meanwhile, paid out $1.316 trillion in Social Security benefits to 60 million Americans, running a $103 billion deficit and decreasing its reserves to about $2.5 trillion.

If Congress passes a law permitting the Social Security Administration to dip into the D.I. trust fund to cover OASI's shortfalls, then OASDI's combined reserves will be "depleted and unable to pay scheduled benefits in full on a timely basis in 2034," at which time the program's continuing income will be sufficient to pay only 81 percent of scheduled benefits. 

The fiscal crisis for OASDI began in 2010, when its costs exceeded its non-interest income. The outlook worsened in 2021, when Social Security's costs exceeded its income, including interest, forcing the program to dip into its $2.9 trillion "trust fund"—mostly an accounting gimmick consisting of claims on Treasury bonds bought from 1984 to 2009 with the program's surplus income—to make up the difference.

As of December 31, 2024, OASDI's total reserves were $2.7 trillion, roughly $200 billion lower than they were in 2021. And it's losing money at an increasing rate: OASDI's 2024 deficit of $67 billion was $26 billion greater than it was in 2023.

In short: More beneficiaries, fewer workers, and less taxable employment income than expected mean higher deficits and an earlier depletion of Social Security's reserves.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Texas Legislators Say They Are Protecting Free Speech on Campus by Banning 'Expressive Activities' at Night

Jack Nicastro is an assistant editor at Reason.

Social SecurityCongressEntitlementsGovernment SpendingFederal government
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Show Comments (18)

Latest

Florida Used a Nationwide Surveillance Camera Network 250 Times To Aid in Immigration Arrests

Autumn Billings | 6.19.2025 5:30 PM

ICE Insists That Congress Needs Its Permission To Conduct Oversight

Joe Lancaster | 6.19.2025 4:45 PM

We're 8 Years Away From an Automatic 23 Percent Cut in Social Security Payouts

Jack Nicastro | 6.19.2025 4:30 PM

Texas Legislators Say They Are Protecting Free Speech on Campus by Banning 'Expressive Activities' at Night

Jacob Sullum | 6.19.2025 3:20 PM

Los Angeles Is Beating Trump by Not Punching Back: Dispatch from L.A.

Nancy Rommelmann | 6.19.2025 3:05 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!