The Latest Escalation Between Russia and Ukraine Isn't Changing the Course of the War
Neither Russia nor Ukraine has a clear path to victory. The Ukrainian drone attack last week and the Russian air raids on Friday don't change that.

The empire strikes back. Last week, Ukrainian spies destroyed a large chunk of Russia's fearsome nuclear bomber fleet using small, smuggled drones. On Friday, Russia retaliated with some of the largest air raids against Ukraine to date.
The Russian air raids killed eight Ukrainians and wounded 46. They also sent the message that, as Russian President Vladimir Putin said Thursday, the current round of peace talks is over. On the whole, however, neither the Ukrainian guerrilla operation nor the old-fashioned Russian retaliation changed the course of the war.
Russia has a slight, but not decisive, advantage. Russian forces have been gaining ground in Ukraine at a slow rate and high cost. Although they have continued to suffer from manpower shortages, Ukrainian forces have managed to inflict greater losses on the Russian side. The human butchery on the front lines can continue for the time being.
Of course, the attack on the Russian nuclear bomber fleet matters a lot for the global balance of power. And Ukraine has grown quite bold at attacking Russian interests outside of Ukraine.
Ukrainian operatives have reportedly blown up the Nord Stream pipeline in the Baltic Sea, captured Russian mercenaries in Sudan, enabled Tuareg rebels to kill dozens more Russian mercenaries in Mali, and trained Syrian rebels to use drones against the former government of Bashar Assad, a Russian ally.
Rather than changing the balance of forces on the battlefield, these moves serve two psychological purposes. On one hand, they blunt Putin's confidence that he can simply wait Ukraine out. U.S. President Donald Trump reportedly told European leaders last month that Putin doesn't want to end the war because he believes Russia is winning.
On the other hand, Ukrainian operations help demonstrate Ukraine's usefulness to its foreign backers. Even more than having to justify the financial cost of U.S. aid, over $128 billion in total, Ukraine has to compete for scarce physical resources with other theaters of war. (Late last month, the U.S. military decided to move anti-drone proximity fuzes from Ukraine to American forces in the Middle East.) And Trump has made no secret of his belief that Ukraine is a freeloader that doesn't "have the cards."
After the drone attack, Ukrainian spokespeople bragged that they do, in fact, hold "the cards." The Trump administration was reportedly very impressed by the "badass" Ukrainian attack. As one White House adviser told Axios, "you've got a chihuahua inflicting some real damage on a much bigger dog."
Feats of reckless defiance might prove more effective than the half-baked scheme to market Ukraine's non-existent mineral wealth to Trump. Many political figures have misread Trump as someone who enjoys flattery. But he does not necessarily respect those who grovel before him, whether it's domestic politicians or allied heads of state, and he does enjoy winning over adversaries.
Congress is also getting ready to impose new economic sanctions on Russia, something that Trump has threatened to do over the past few months. The Wall Street Journal reports that the White House is fighting to "water down" the legislation, but the dispute seems to be more about keeping the president's options open to lifting sanctions than the strength of the pressure.
Unlike in the Middle East, where U.S. enemies are relatively weak and American partners are extremely reliant on U.S. support, the United States does not have an easy "off" switch for the Russian-Ukraine war. Europe provides Ukraine with slightly more aid than the United States.
Although U.S. aid to Ukraine has been massive—and irreplaceable in the areas of air defense and intelligence—Ukraine can fight on for quite a while with European support and its own domestic capabilities.
"Both sides are suffering before you pull them apart, before they're able to be pulled apart," Trump told reporters at the White House on Tuesday. "You see in hockey, you see it in sports. The referees let them go for a couple of seconds, let them go for a little while before you pull them apart."
That's a lot of suffering in the meantime. A recent estimate put overall casualties of the war—which includes both wounded and killed—at 1.2 million troops since 2022. And the United Nations has recorded 45,000 civilian casualties in Ukraine throughout the war. Each of those numbers represents a family torn apart forever.
However depressing the situation sounds, the fact that neither side has a clear path to victory means that they will both have to come back to the negotiating table. It's in America's interest for this war to end as quickly as possible, and as other conflicts show, the U.S. can do a lot of good as a distant but powerful mediator.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Seizing territory is how you win wars; and Russia is willing to pay that price.
If everyone works together to crash petroleum prices, that will make the price too high for Russia.
Until, suddenly, they’re not willing to pay the price. Russians may have to kill Putin to make it stick, but I have no doubt that millions of Russians would be willing at this point.
Everybody blames Russia for this but it explains why so many Americans are so ignorant of the circumstances that created this .
Much like the circumstances behind Hitler’s invasion of Poland in 1939.
Hint: Washington and London were involved.
You can’t expect Putin to ignore that over 12,000 ethnic Russians in the Donbass were slaughtered by Ukraine’s Azov/Nazi Btn.
Nor should anyone disregard what Washington aka Vicky Nudelman and the zio-cons were involved as well.
If any of the fault/blame falls it should fall squarely on Washington, NATO and Brussels.
There are clear paths to victory for both. Russia wins if Putin stops playing games and commits to winning quickly. Ukraine wins if NATO (the US really) either brokers a deal where Putin gets no land or decides to drop the proxy war pretense and commit to turning back Russia.
The reasonable resolution is Ukraine gives up the culturally and ethnically Russian eastern lands. That would come with an agreement that Russia encroach no further West and NATO doesn’t give Ukraine membership
The reasonable resolution is Ukraine gives up the culturally and ethnically Russian eastern lands.
That was evident in the first week, but Biden wouldn’t allow it because the war was covering his corruption.
Speaking of evident in the first week and covering up corruption:
Ukrainian operatives have reportedly blown up the Nord Stream pipeline in the Baltic Sea
Further (from the cite):
Private businessmen funded the shoestring operation, which was overseen by a top general; President Zelensky approved the plan, then tried unsuccessfully to call it off
They literally committed an act of war against NATO allies and violated the Geneva Convention in doing it. The idea that Zelensky knew, the CIA knew and warned Ukraine, Biden knew and made the same threat… all coincidentally? Fuck ’em all to hell for all I care.
The lack of any serious inquiry into the Nord Stream sabotage tells me that the NATO-related intelligence communities are seriously compromised. It is clear that people know what happened and who the players were but nobody will say anything? The word got out that bringing this to light would have serious consequences. It screams of CIA political fuckery.
It screams of CIA political fuckery.
Bigger.
COVID, Big Tech censorship fuckery. No shit Big Brother “We have always been at war with Eastasia.” fuckery.
Read the article and other related stories. Ukrainian generals were just hanging out with wealthy businessmen when… all of a sudden. All those generals and businessmen and none of them had *any* connections to the EU, Soros, Schwab, Staruss-Kahn, Biden. Just a bunch of Ukrainian generals, businessmen, and Zelensky, got together and accidentally planned out an attack on NATO civilian infrastructure and, even though Zelensky tried to call it off, once it was done, might as well blame Russia like everyone did.
So, so very fucked up.
Again “Fuck the EU” – Victoria Nuland, 2014
Russia made more than enough money thanks to the risk premium after the explosion to pay for the repairs…that’s why it was reasonable to believe Putin did it. And NS2 was operable the entire time and Germany still refused to import natural gas from Russia. Biden played everything perfectly and made America energy dominant!!
OMG
Ultimately, I don’t understand how NATO isn’t effectively done and even the UN and EU are effectively punching themselves in the dick.
Makes an alliance where one of the leaders ups the tariffs in response to tariffs against them seem like a no-shit, mostly peaceful exercise in soft power.
Do you think it was also an accident Ukraine pushed a raide to take out Russia planes planes same day Trump was working with both sides to get a cease fire? Then big z has the temerity to say he’d agree to a cease fire hours later?
It’s kinda funny because apparently, inside Russia, they’ve been calling this their “Pearl Harbor” and the refutation is “No way, these two countries have been at war for too long for this to be considered their Pearl Harbor.” which isn’t wrong, but still comes across as a “I can neither confirm nor deny.” backhanded dodge that doesn’t exactly refute the assertion.
The use of Russian civilians and civil infrastructure as literal delivery vehicles is, in the best of interpretations, still a very terrorist-y/”non-uniform combatants” situation.
In the end Putin will get what he came for. The vast majority of casualties are due to the Biden neocons.
Indeed and Mr. Z may very well end up as Ceausceu of Romania did.
Ukraine is on the verge of being absorbed into the Russian Federation for good or ill.
That’s “reasonable” for 8 months until Putin decides to take the rest of Ukraine as well because fuck it why not.
Like what happened right after he took Crimea and you dipshit s all praised it because Obama? Fuck off with your projection.
“ That would come with an agreement that Russia encroach no further West and NATO doesn’t give Ukraine membership”
Russia agreed to that before the war started. They didn’t honor that agreement, so why would Ukraine believe they would honor the same agreement now?
No one should ever make any agreement with any western government, especially Washington and NATO. I wouldn’t trust Brussels and London either.
All ruled by the Zios.
“Russia wins if Putin stops playing games and commits to winning quickly.”
That assumes the Russians have the capacity to win quickly that they have not been using for some reason.
You had me until you said no NATO membership.
No other nation on the planet is barred from applying to be in NATO.
Even Putin played with the idea.
No one has yet explained how Afghanistan won against the USSR (and the US) but Ukraine is doomed facing off against a smaller version of the Soviet state.
The Afghans had no drones, nor contiguous allies shipping arms to them.
The only significant advantage the Soviets enjoy is a greater population to sacrifice for empire. It may be enough, but the advantage was even greater against Afghanistan.
A voice of reason, like Gorbachev, needs to rescue the Russian people from the pursuit of 20th century Tsarism.
It might help the effort on Ukraine side if European country stopped buying oil and gas from Putin. You know, like Trump told them to do during his first term.
The sophisticated Europeans laughed at him for suggesting Putin couldn’t be trusted.
I’m very happy that I’m not ‘sophisticated’ too.
Who said he could be?
The idiots who made themselves dependent on his gas pipeline.
Euros put their economic existence solely on his back.
So….they did.
I wouldn’t trust Washington, D.C either.
Biden made us energy dominant after Trump bankrupted the fracking industry. You believe natural gas companies should pay you to burn their natural gas…but do you pay your clients so you can give them handjibbers?? On second thought, don’t answer that! 😉
Fine. I’ll add a Ukraine flag to the handle. Should take care of it.
Didn’t you pee your panties thinking Saddam was going to shoot scuds at Dallas?? $3 trillion and 4500 fallen later you are now so brave! 😉
a
b
F
See
It looks more like for Ukraine to exist it will have to agree to the Borders Putin expects and it becomes part of NATO. Otherwise it will eventually be conquered.
It would have been far cheaper and no loss of life had Ukraine joined NATO in 2020-2021.
That threat is a huge reason why Russia attacked.
There is zero benefit for NATO to add Ukraine.
Don’t forget to thank bath house Barry Soetoro and Boris Johnson for this. Don’t leave out the Trotskyite zionist neo-cons as well: Vickey Nudelman, Bill kristol, John the walrus Bolton, the kagans and every other zio slime- neo-con that was involved.
NATO/North Atlantic Terrorist Organization is also involved as is the little pedophile tyrants in Brussels.
They should all be kidnapped and dropped off at the front lines. It would be funny to see light loafered Lindsay Graham finally getting his due taking pot shots at Russians or would he be hiding behind a tree and sobbing?
These are the people responsible for this and they need to pay a heavy price for it.
Is this based on everything you learned at the Command and General Staff College and the U.S. Army War College?
Russia’s path to victory: largest nuclear arsenal in the world
Ukraine’s path to victory: ?
Russia’s path to victory: Ukraine blows up NATO assets, crushes its own population under martial law, performs every act of terror and warfare outside modern bounds in the book and invents a few new ones in the name of “self preservation”. Gets inducted into NATO. Triggers infighting and lawlessness inside NATO which precipitates its further collapse into irrelevance.
Ukraine’s path to victory: They get to join a collapsing, ineffective, declining EU/NATO/UN that they helped corrode and destroy.