Trump's Team Discovers That Diplomacy Is Hard
Diplomacy is better than war in Ukraine, Gaza, and Iran. But that doesn't mean it's easy.

You can have your cake and eat it, too. That was the promise of President Donald Trump's "peace through strength" pitch on the campaign trail, promoted most loudly by his former national security adviser Mike Waltz. By looking powerful and fearsome, the United States could get what it wants from its opponents without either costly wars or uncomfortable diplomatic concessions.
After all, the Biden administration's combination of moralizing words and military intervention had been the worst of both worlds. And Trump's outside-the-box approach allowed him to snatch some low-hanging fruit that his predecessors failed to. Over the past month, he has freed the last living American hostage from Gaza, cut a deal to get U.S. forces out of Yemen, helped broker an Indian-Pakistani ceasefire, opened negotiations with Iran over its nuclear program, and brokered a Russian-Ukrainian prisoner exchange.
Trump's tour of the Persian Gulf two weeks ago was supposed to be a victory lap for his diplomatic efforts. The president declared the end of "neocon" meddling and announced the lifting of economic sanctions on Syria, while Arab leaders announced huge new investment deals in the United States. But since then, the Trump administration's efforts to end conflicts in the Middle East and Ukraine seem to have stalled—and Trump himself is getting frustrated.
"I don't know what the hell happened to [Russian President Vladimir] Putin," Trump told reporters on Sunday after Russia launched major air raids on Ukraine, killing 12 people. "I've known him a long time, always gotten along with him but he's sending rockets into cities and killing people, and I don't like it at all."
Afterward, Trump wrote on Truth Social that Putin "wants ALL of Ukraine, not just a piece of it, and maybe that's proving to be right, but if he does, it will lead to the downfall of Russia!" Although Russian government spokesman Dmitry Peskov shrugged off the comments as "emotional overload," the Trump administration followed up on the comments with a serious escalation. German Chancellor Friedrich Merz announced on Monday that the United States and European allies were lifting all restrictions on the range of weapons provided to Ukraine, an option Waltz had been a fan of.
Last week, Trump had convinced Russia and Ukraine to enter the first direct talks since the beginning of the war. During the meeting in Turkey, the two sides agreed to trade 1,000 prisoners of war for 1,000 prisoners of war—and not much else. Peskov told reporters that further negotiations would be possible only after the two sides "achieve certain results in the form of agreements."
The fundamental issue is still the same as it was before Trump came to office: Russia wants to keep the land it seized and neutralize Ukraine as a military threat, while Ukraine wants to get its land back and gain protection against further Russian attacks. Trump reportedly told European leaders that Putin doesn't want to end the war because he believes Russia is winning, while Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov publicly accused Trump's ceasefire proposal of being a way to buy time in order to "rearm Ukraine in a calm atmosphere."
U.S.-Iran talks are dragging on with a similarly unclear outcome. At the same press conference where he attacked Putin's air raids, Trump claimed that the two countries concluded "very, very good talks" in Rome on Friday and "I have a feeling I might be telling you something good" over the next few days. But Oman's Foreign Minister Badr al-Busaidi, who has been mediating the talks, said that the last round was "not conclusive."
The U.S. and Iran have publicly incompatible positions on the nuclear issue. Secretary of State Marco Rubio told the Senate last Tuesday that Iran can have a civilian nuclear energy program if it gives up on domestic uranium enrichment and imports all of its fuel instead, because "all you need is time" to turn low-enriched fuel into weapons-grade uranium. Iran, on the other hand, sees enrichment as a "source of national pride, our moon shot," and a sovereign right.
"Figuring out the path to a deal is not rocket science," Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi stated going into talks. "Zero nuclear weapons = we DO have a deal. Zero enrichment = we do NOT have a deal. Time to decide."
More fundamentally, Iran wants to hedge against the possibility that the U.S. will break its side of any deal. In 2015, the Iranian government agreed to restrictions on its nuclear program in exchange for lifting the U.S. economic embargo, only for Trump to impose "super maximum economic pressure" four years later. In that first deal, Iran had given up concrete concessions—including filling a nuclear reactor with cement—in exchange for paper guarantees.
When it comes to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, the Trump administration has been repeatedly pulling the rug out from under its own diplomacy. During the last ceasefire in Gaza, the Trump administration offered a ceasefire extension if Hamas were to release Israeli-American captive Edan Alexander. After Hamas offered to release him, U.S. envoy Steve Witkoff accused Hamas of "making demands that are entirely impractical without a permanent ceasefire," and Israel resumed its war.
Hamas eventually did release Alexander on May 12, with the understanding that Israel would end its 10-week blockade of all imports and aid to Gaza. (At least 58 people have died from malnutrition, 242 people have died from shortages of food or medicine, and 300 women have miscarried since the lockdown began, according to the Palestinian health ministry.) Israel and the U.S. have announced a new plan to distribute food to Palestinians in heavily guarded, access-restricted compounds that leaked internal documents warned would be seen as "'concentration camps' with biometrics."
Meanwhile, Arab Americans for Trump founder Bishara Bahbah has continued negotiating on Witkoff's behalf for a new ceasefire deal. After Hamas agreed on Monday to Bahbah's proposal for a 70-day temporary ceasefire in exchange for 10 hostages, with a path to fully ending the war, Israeli officials told local media that they would reject the proposal. Witkoff then denounced the ceasefire proposal, which his own deputy had made, in an interview with Axios.
"The deal Bahbah reached with Hamas was totally rejected by Israel, and it seems that when Witkoff realized that, he pulled the brakes on it," an Israeli official told Axios.
As with Ukraine and Iran, there is a fundamental disagreement that can't be papered over. Hamas does not want to give up hostages without an end to the war. Israel does not want to end the war short of satisfying vengeance for the October 2023 attacks. Last week, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu added physically removing the Palestinian population from Gaza as one of his victory conditions.
To resolve all these cases, the U.S. would either have to make compromises—giving concessions on European security, allowing Iranian enrichment, and pressuring Israel to moderate its goals—or escalate further. Both come at a political cost that Trump is so far unwilling to pay. Instead, he's resorted to making vague promises and blaming others when they fall short.
"This is [Ukrainian President Volodymyr] Zelenskyy's, Putin's, and [former President Joe] Biden's War, not 'Trump's,' I am only helping to put out the big and ugly fires, that have been started through Gross Incompetence and Hatred," Trump wrote in his Truth Social post on Ukraine. That rhetoric might have cut it on the campaign trail. But now that he's in the White House, Trump owns these conflicts, too.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Who said it was easy?
To be fair, I believe DT said something about him being able to end the war on day one of his presidency.
Time: You said you would end the war in Ukraine on Day One.
Trump: Well, I said that figuratively, and I said that as an exaggeration, because to make a point, and you know, it gets, of course, by the fake news [unintelligible]. Obviously, people know that when I said that, it was said in jest, but it was also said that it will be ended.
-------------
Adding in his walk back of the hyperbole, he does still see seem to think that he could end it. I think he finally realized that to Russia this is a war of vital national security, that the Russians see Ukraine as integral to the nation and it should never have been allowed to vote on independence. And given Russian history, hard to argue them out of that position.
"Annexing another country by killing their people is wrong". It is sat that it is an argument that does now sway them. And that argument will not sway MAGAs when Trump ties to take Greenland or Panama.
WTF is "sway MAGA's"? Let me guess you think Trump will use military force against Greenland and Panama? That just shows how out of touch with reality you really are. Dr's can help with paranoia and fear, perhaps you should make a visit to try and ease your worried mind?
The Blueanon conspiracy theories you spread, Tony, are always amusing.
Maybe Obama should have done something about Putin taking Crimea in 2014...
Obama thought Russia annexing another country wasn't worth going war over. Putin literally waited until Biden became president to invade Ukraine, because he was team Obama.
Were you upset that rebels took over Syria? Should we go to war with China when they take over Taiwan?
Yeah, the answer's not so easy.
Ukraine has made great progress rooting out corruption which is why the Trump administration decided to send lethal aid after Obama refused. So time is linear and sometimes things get better…not sure why you don’t understand that??
Ukraine has made great progress rooting out corruption ..
That’s right! Hunter doesn’t have a “job” there anymore.
Rebels, it's pretty plain to see that Putin stepped on Assad's head just before he was going to sign a deal for NG pipelines to run through Syria into Europe from Qatar Turkey and Egypt. Putin wanted 100% control of Europe's energy and ended that. And just a few weeks after a new agreement was on the table for Assad allowing Iranian and Iraqi NG pipelines to cross into Europe and that is when the rebellion began. Qatar would not have it and the media helped "fake" the supposed Arab Spring against Assad.
Unlike the Leftist hyperbole this has never been about all of Ukraine except to the extent Z makes it so, just the primarily ethnically Russian & Russian speaking section along with sea access.
I use Tucker's interview with Putin, in which Putin explains for the first 30 minutes how Ukraine is Russia. I don't really listen to Zelensky at all.
This century we’ve spent $2 trillion preparing for a war with Russia. The leader of that spending was John McCain because presidents have had to deal with the GWOT this century and so they just didn’t have the bandwidth. Now that Ukraine is degrading Russia’s military you don’t want to spend money?? That’s crazy because McCain turned out to be prescient AND we are actually getting real value for defense spending by helping Ukraine!!
It's a shame you don't spend $5 for a second brain-cell, fuck-face.
Now that Ukraine is degrading Russia’s military ..
LOL
“ just the primarily ethnically Russian & Russian speaking section along with sea access.”
So the Sudetenland, so to speak?
So your position is that if a country has sections that are ethnically dominated by one race or culture, then that area isn’t actually under the control of the nation it’s a part of?
"...Adding in his walk back of the hyperbole, he does still see seem to think that he could end it..."
And TDs-addled shits like you are whining that 4 months in office he hasn't ended a multi-year law.
Fuck off and die, asswipe.
Go suck off Fauci. And for the record, I was agreeing with Trump's current position.
It’s not pimpin’. So why would it be easy?
"wants ALL of Ukraine, not just a piece of it, and maybe that's proving to be right, but if he does, it will lead to the downfall of Russia!"
Yup. 100% correct.
Though Russia will be in a downfall regardless of Ukraine war outcome. Nearly 100 years of commie rule and low birthrates have that affect. They'd be in the toilet already if the "evil" capitalist western nations hadn't bailed them out hoping to avoid these regional conflicts.
Yup, Russia is a country without a future, which is why supporting the EU’s bid to carve off the Ukraine makes cynical sense. Russia is basically the Ottoman Empire, it will be carved up by more vital powers eventually. It’s only the nuclear arsenal that keeps it from falling apart now. Whatever the EU doesn’t grab will fall under Chinese or Turkish domination eventually.
He's already light years ahead of what the Biden admin and all of Europe were able to do.
No doubt. How many people even realize Europe paid Putin more money for energy since he began his invasion than Europe gave to Ukraine to fight against the invasion?
uk! ohmygawd! he's been president since like January and there isn't world peace yet!
Diplomacy is better than war in Ukraine, Gaza, and Iran.
Ukraine, yes.
Gaza and Iran need to be eradicated.
Exactly how many billions of people would you like to murder? Just curious.
Smartest thing you’ve ever said Tony. Stick with that.
He said another smart thing!
Billions? I'll add demographics to another topic sarc is ignorant to.
Funny thing is I remember you supporting the ukraine war.
AT: Gaza and Iran need to be eradicated.
Sarckles: Exactly how many billions of people would you like to murder?
This is the same Sarcasmic who claimed that nobody was killing the Boers. The same Sarcasmic who never shed a tear over the genocide in Nagorno-Karabakh or the plight of the Uighur.
In case anyone is wondering, AT make a post a while back where he said that America should go on a world conquest and turn the entire planet into one big US of A. Anyone who doesn't want to assimilate should be murdered on the spot. Dude makes Hitler look like a piker.
I never said they should be murdered on the spot. That was your fantasy, not mine.
I said that the USA is indisputably the greatest country in the world, and that it would be an overall positive FOR the world if EVERY country was the USA. Hence, global conquest. They'll thank us later. Only the most horrible ones would put up any kind of meaningful resistance - and let's face it. They deserve to go.
And let's also face it, you're not a student of history. Go Google the "Iron Curtain" sometime. Specifically, google what happened when it was lifted. For everyone behind it, it was like neanderthals seeing fire for the first time EVER.
"What in God's glory is that!?" they'd say, seeing a microwave used for the first time. Most of the world doesn't know what they're missing. Africa could have abundant food. The Middle East could have individual rights. Asia could not be under the thumbs of oppression. Being the USA, under our Constitution - the second-greatest document ever written - can make ALL of that a reality for them.
I don't want to kill anyone. I want to liberate EVERYONE. Why do you object so much to that?
Look at Sarckles pretend he didn't read my post, lol. The drunken hypocrite.
AT make a post a while back where he said that America should go on a world conquest and turn the entire planet into one big US of A
The stupid fucker also said a depression for the US would be good for us. Maybe the dumbest commenter here.
I'll need you to cite that one.
Alberto Balsalm's Sarcasmic samefagging. He's just making shit up.
Putin’s asinine invasion of Ukraine made us energy dominant…that’s why Speaker Johnson switched his vote because LNG comes from Louisiana and LNG has made us energy dominant.
Don't have to eradicate them, just send them to the places where they love the politics and religion so much. Certainly DON'T need Gaza for an extra Islam-jew-hating shithole. We have legion. If they don't leave, well then ... they did prove they weren't human on Oct 7th.
In 10 years, Israel will have Gaza as a resort destination for the world.
They're never going to play nice with any free society that respects rights. There is no "place" to send them, because such a place does not deserve to exist.
It's kind of impossible when at least one side in a conflict is dedicated to continuing the conflict.
Exactly. Not much intellectual honesty in not asking, What was Putin's goals for the invasion and what are they now? Until some resemblance of an answer is given by Putin, there's no ending the war unless something significant is done to thwart his invasion. So far that has not occurred.
By Europe and the US agreeing to allow ranged weapons and attacks on Russia itself, perhaps Ukraine can turn Putin's desires into agreeing to terms.
Sadly Ukraine may run out of population before that day arrives.
"Zero nuclear weapons = we DO have a deal. Zero enrichment = we do NOT have a deal. Time to decide." That is also what the NPT says.
Putin hasn't "suddenly" done anything. He's been consistent the entire time ... consistently evil and consistently playing Rump for a sucker the whole time. Rump has been wrong about the war the whole time from saying Ukraine started it to saying only Rump himself could end it. Lame.
You’re a dumb cunt.
"...Rump..."
Oh, how...........
infantile.
Fuck off and die, you pathetic waste of oxygen.
Shame Obama stood by when he took Crimea. And Biden encouraged him to attack further.
Putin was consistently evil, just like Saddam Hussein, The Vietcong, and North Koreans. Did the left approve of war when they all invaded sovereign territory?
Putin faced little resistance from Obama when he first annexed Crimea. He expected the same response from Biden, never realizing that he was braindead and the TDS was willing to fund a proxy war against Donald Trump.
Putin is the aggressor, but your side owns the escalation. You never sought peace. Trump did. Take the L as the new neocons.
You can't sell peace to someone who isn't interested in buying.
Obama kept trying to work with the world, trying to make it USA and EU are standing up to Russia ... meanwhile Europe kept trying to scuttle off into the shadows while having to be scruffed by the collar to stand back in place. Obama had to pull teeth just to get Europe to agree to sanctions and a stern posture towards Russia. Obama failures usually include trying to get buy in from other people.
Though, I guess Russia did a good job of playing tough guy all those years. Nobody realized their army was pathetic & underfunded, and a good portion of their arsenal was dry-rotting and rusting in place. Only now that Ukraine is actually fighting is that becoming apparent. Classic bully tactics. They aren't weak, but Russia certainly isn't proving to be as formidable as they convinced the world that they were.
Regardless, none of Obama's failures (and there are lots) provides cover for Rump's incompetence. "Putin, stop ! Whaaah. You are making me look bad. Whaaah! " (Sigh) America has lost in months what it took decades to build; one of those things being prestige on a global scale.
Putin started land grabs in 2008 when America was at its weakest…remember when you voted for Bush/Cheney?? That was weird, right??
We have known about the President Trumps limitation in foreign diplomacy since his first administration and there is no reason to think there would be improvement in his second administration. He treats enemies like friends and treats friends with little or no respect. Trump ended the Iran Nuclear Deal for no good reason. Trump sold out the Kurds and the former government of Afghanistan.
Yeah. Those Abraham accords just sucked. Just fire blindly into the ME, the M4E way.
Abraham Accords made Hamas desperate which is why they attacked Israel.
Abraham Accords
The part where the USA payed billions to rich oil producers and their cronies sucked (not sure if checks ever got mailed).
Pulling our the "what about the Abraham accords" is getting old. It is just what this article is about, the unwillingness to put in the hard work that is diplomacy. The Abraham accords were low hanging fruit. Just getting countries that were ready to make peace with Israel make an announcement. They never really tackled the hard issues, especially the Palestinians.
If I called you a stunned cunt would you want to sit down and make a deal? Geesh get a clue, it doesn't have to be a big one.
Biden's 'team' didn't know what it is.
They were shitty at diplomacy with the American public.
Seriously, The Diary, 10% for 'The Big Guy', illegitimate grandkids, mental decline... they were literally mum, the media carried all the water for them, and it was still dragging them down.
The press will use that to justify performing regular rectal exams on Trump.
Well let's see. In just his first few hundred days, Trump help put out a brewing fire between Pakistan and India, brought back trillions of dollars of investment from the middle east, cut down migrant invasion at the borders by 95%, defunded universities that tolerated bigotry, practically got rid of USAID.
Basically he did more for his country in his first year than the last three presidents combined, "diplomacy" or otherwise. That's with granting that his trade war is causing some short term pains.
This is the sad game the TDS crew plays. They list a bunch of difficult goals and gloat that "I thought your lord Trump was supposed to fix this" then ignore all of Trump's real time accomplishment. Trump made progress on peace more than Biden ever did in 4 years. The war in Ukraine is literally Biden's war. Putin waited until he became president to invade Ukraine. If you voted for Biden, YOU own the war and his escalation.
Most Americans don't really care about Gazans or the nuclear situation in Iran, so the degree of difficulty in diplomacy in those areas is irrelevant. There's no genocide in Gaza, who got more food than North Korea in 3 decades.
How much PCP did you take??
I don't take mind altering substances, unlike you ilk. Why open your mouth at all, if you can't engage in substance?
This is the sad game the TDS crew plays. They list a bunch of difficult goals and gloat that "I thought your lord Trump was supposed to fix this"
Um, he set those goals himself with his own big mouth.
Not only is diplomacy hard, but it's none of our business in the first place. Although America has been entangling itself in foreign alliances without regard to consequences for generations and it may be hard to disentangle ourselves from the mess that has resulted in, nevertheless our goal now should be to require our politicians to: stop trying to make the world safe for democracy; stop trying to prevent the dominoes from falling; stop trying to end all terrorism on the globe; stop trying to ban drugs worldwide and at home; and stop pretending to protect some imaginary vital national interests as an excuse to attack everyone we don't like. We should require our politicians to develop and maintain the best unbeatable military defenses we can and use them ONLY for national defense against military attack from outside and only after reasonable buy-in on the necessity from the people whose children and grandchildren would be put in harm's way.
I give Trump credit for at least attempting to negotiate an end to this war. The democrats didn't even try and just whipped out their war boners. Unfortunately, both tribes of my country are now coalescing towards the inevitable. The best we can hope for is a massive MI
There are more than two tribes in America. Twenty-five percent of the population is in one tribe and thirty percent of the population is in the second tribe, leaving 45% of the population in the largest tribe, who have no effective representation against the war-boner tribes in government.
And 'reason' discovers that journalism is hard, so they're just going to put the ol' keyboard on random and see what spews out.
No shit Diplomacy is not easy. Trump knows this, but what, y'all want him to hem and haw when reports ask him about diplomatic subjects and say, "uhhhh, maybe, I don't know" or would you prefer out President show confidence and strength? Seriously, do all reporters at Reason just want the man to fail? He could achieve complete peace in the middle east and Reasons' article on such would say, "Trump's mideast peace took too long"
No, I want him to sit down and shut up. NONE of the situations mentioned in this article are any of the President of the United States' business in any way. Then I want him to quietly and systematically disengage the United States of America from any and all entangling alliances and, thereafter, stop trying to entangle us in any future alliances. Then he should quietly and systematically close all of our embassies and foreign offices and bring all of the ambassadors and their staffs home permanently.