Pope Leo's Childhood Home Faces Eminent Domain as He Relocates to a More Eminent Domain
The last Pope Leo denounced state seizures of private property as "emphatically unjust."

"Every man has by nature the right to possess property as his own," wrote Pope Leo XIII, in his famous 1891 encyclical Rerum Novarum, laying down the basics of Catholic social teaching.
The plans of contemporary socialists to seize private property, Leo XIII denounced as "emphatically unjust, for they would rob the lawful possessor, distort the functions of the State, and create utter confusion in the community."
The last Pope Leo's defense of private property adds no small amount of irony to the small Chicago suburb of Dolton, Illinois' plan to honor the new American-born Pope Leo XIV by seizing his childhood home from its private owners.
Yesterday, Chicago-area media reported that Dolton officials plan to use eminent domain to take the home where Leo XIV, formerly Robert Francis Prevost, was raised from its current private owners to create a publicly accessible historic site.
At present, the owners are auctioning off the small, 1949-built home for a reserve price of $250,000.
In a Tuesday letter to the auction house running the sale, Dolton attorney Burton Odelson cautioned buyers against purchasing the house.
"Please inform any prospective buyers that their 'purchase' may only be temporary since the Village intends to begin the eminent domain process very shortly," reads Odelson's letter, per NBC Chicago.
Odelson told Chicago's ABC7 that the village had initially tried to voluntarily purchase the home but had snagged on the sale price.
"We've tried to negotiate with the owner. [He] wants too much money, so we will either negotiate with the auction house or, as the letter stated that I sent to the auction house, we will take it through eminent domain, which is our right as a village," Odelson said.
One wonders how outrageous the owners' offered sale price was given its current auction price of $250,000.
The fact that the home was once lived in by the current pope surely doesn't enable the owners to command that much of a sale premium on what is undeniably a quite modest dwelling.
While a papal museum is certainly a lovely idea for the property, there's no reason the village can't pursue a voluntary sale.
That would seem to be more in line with Leo XIII's defense of private property. It would also seem to be more in line with the current Leo XIV's view of the Church as an institution characterized by voluntarism and love.
"The Church of Rome presides in charity and its true authority is the charity of Christ. It is never a question of capturing others by force, by religious propaganda, or by means of power. Instead, it is always and only a question of loving as Jesus did," said Leo XIV in his first Sunday homily as pope.
"[Saint] Peter must shepherd the flock without ever yielding to the temptation to be an autocrat," he added.
Autocracy is certainly a powerful temptation. It's one that not even the Village of Dolton seems able to resist.
Rent Free is a weekly newsletter from Christian Britschgi on urbanism and the fight for less regulation, more housing, more property rights, and more freedom in America's cities.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
"We've tried to negotiate with the owner. [He] wants too much money, so we will
go away and leave the owner unmolested in their pursuit of happiness.
- Said no government goon ever.
I'm guessing the village will rezone the neighborhood, so the other residents are forced to tolerate the Catholic tourists visiting the "museum".
For the record, the village doesn't have a right to eminent domain. The tyrants have the power
It’s an old house. Probably has bad wiring. No wonder it burned down.
'The last Pope Leo denounced state seizures of private property as "emphatically unjust."'
Unless the state is the church?
Well Dolton is broke thanks to the tenure of one of the most corrupt mayors in Illinois history. The house is probably a dump but 250k doesn't seem like a big premium to pay if it has historic value, value that the city admits. Seems like they could probably find private donors to do the deal without controversy. But instead they want to be assholes about it.
Judging from the pics it's a complete remodel with what appears to be new white oak floors with kitchen and baths redone as well. I can't imagine anything in it is of any "historic value" so unless they're willing to spend a fortune restoring it to function as a museum they're nuts. Also the premium doesn't seem that high with similar sized remodels with similar rework going around 210k. So that's a premium of about 40k.
That said, Justice Souter isn't around any more so maybe this SCOTUS wouldn't mind another bite at the Kelo apple.
“We had to steal, I mean, eminent domain it so we would have enough money to rip out all the improvements and turn it back it to the shit hole it was when the pope lived there”
Future Burton Odelson, probably
Cue Pope Jesse trying to immanentize the eschaton
Britches wrote this whole article simply so he could write that headline.