Brickbat: What'd I Say?

Police in the United Kingdom are arresting about 33 people per day for
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Okay but Reason gave a pass to utterly foolish Biden's Government Disinformation Board AND --- for the sake of what? freedom of the market --- Reason let Kerry's winking at China's grotesque human rights violations go unanswered. You abandon Christian and Biblical principles and you have nothing but 'free trade' ---- and as Trump says that is to put people below profits.
When Idi Amin ATE other people, you did SNOT say SHIT about tit!
That means that twatever Trump does, is OK!!! Trump and Trumpanzees can then do NO wrong! Shit is THAT simple! QED!
Idiot. What is wrong with profits earned by people? Your complaint makes as much sense as "human rights not property rights", a deliberate misunderstanding that "property rights" is the right of people to own property. News to you, bub: profits is how people earn money.
Fuck off, slaver.
No, Reason was harshly critical of Biden's ridiculously stupid Disinformation Board and called out Kerry's hypocrisy on China's human rights violations.
Not sure where you're going with that religious rant but if you're trying to say that the Bible is the only souce of morality, you're so very wrong that I'm not even sure where to start. I suppose we could start with the fact that the formal study of ethics and morality is first attributed to the Greeks and predates christiantiy by about a millennia. Or look at all the non-Christian cultures that nevertheless managed to develop their own systems of morality. Or we could take the other tack and look at the many, many historical atrocities committed in the name of those biblical principles you now revere.
Libertarianism and its focus on economic freedom is a deeply moral philosophy that, yes, prioritizes profits because that's good for people - and yes, for all the people including the poor consumers.
Western Europe and Canada have fallen. The USA is the last stand of liberal values.
And the Democrats are working on that.
Only a filthy racist would assume that free speech is an exclusively Western idea and synonymize the fall of free speech with the fall of White/Western ideology. The people openly subverting free speech are just as talented and just as enlightened as white kids. That's why they're using Western social structures to cast civilization back some 1000 yrs. or more. You filthy racist.
The colonizers have become the colonized.
It could be worse, they could be French.
Hint to england, the ones with rags on their heads are the criminals you need to get rid of
WOW!
We really need this over here.
Think of the fun Trump could have with every single democrat who is online.
Some such people have received fairly hefty prison sentences, like the mother of a young child who made a despairing post about the Southport knifings of little girls in a dance class (which were apparently racially motivated against ethnically British). She received a two year prison sentence for an wmotionally motovated post (she had recently lost a one of her own children), more than some people who were convicted a child rape.
The Beitish government has a problem in which it would rather punish those who point out the problems associated with mass immigration than deal with the hatred directed against the native population.
Communications Act 2003 and the Malicious Communications Act 1988
Sounds like they really need a Section 230 of the 1997 Communications Decency Act to fix the excessive blocking and screening of offensive material they're doing under their Communications and Malicious Communications Acts. That'll probably fix it.
Fuck ENB.
WE NEED MOAR LAWZ FOR FREEDOM!