Trump Administration To Restart Collections on Defaulted Student Loans
"Student and parent borrowers—not taxpayers—must repay their student loans," reads a press release from the Education Department.

On April 21, the Department of Education announced that it would resume collections on defaulted federal student loans, making a clear break from student loan policy under President Joe Biden, who consistently worked to forgive or pause federal student loan payments even as he faced legal defeat.
"American taxpayers will no longer be forced to serve as collateral for irresponsible student loan policies," Secretary of Education Linda McMahon said in a press release. "The Biden Administration misled borrowers: the executive branch does not have the constitutional authority to wipe debt away, nor do the loan balances simply disappear."
The Trump administration has already taken several steps to reverse Biden-era student loan policy. Last month, the Education Department took down applications for a Biden administration income-driven repayment plan that had been halted in federal court. Soon after, the department replaced it with a revised, significantly less generous plan. Last month, Trump signed an executive order preventing borrowers who work at ideologically disfavored employers from being eligible for public service loan forgiveness, such as those "aiding or abetting violations of…Federal immigration laws" or providing child gender transitions.
The Biden administration, on the other hand, was marked by a significant—and ultimately failed—effort to reshape federal student loan policy. The most well-known plan in this effort was Biden's attempt to forgive up to $20,000 in federal student loans per borrower, though that plan was swiftly stopped by federal judges—and, later, the Supreme Court—who ruled that the Education Department simply didn't have the power to spend billions of taxpayer dollars on loan forgiveness. Biden's plans to enact significantly more generous repayment programs were also largely halted by courts.
While the Trump administration started a pause on federal student loan payments in 2020, the Biden administration continued it for over three years. In 2023, a working paper found that the pause had actually left the average federal borrower with more, not less, debt. According to the Education Department's press release, only 38 percent of student loan borrowers are even up to date on their payments.
The Trump administration's move to restart student loan collections marks a definitive end to this period of illegal, expensive, and ultimately ineffective attempts to forgive and reduce federal student loan payments. However, permanent change can only come if the federal student loan program, which drives up the cost of college and often encourages individuals to take on debt they are unlikely to repay, is retired for good.
"Student and parent borrowers—not taxpayers—must repay their student loans," reads the press release. "There will not be any mass loan forgiveness. Together, these actions will move the federal student loan portfolio back into repayment, which benefits borrowers and taxpayers alike."
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
"..."Student and parent borrowers—not taxpayers—must repay their student loans," reads the press release..."
There'll be some real estate available soon.
What? People are responsible for their own debts?
That's racist.
BTW, I use "racist" in the (post) modern vernacular, i.e. anything the left does not like and thinks is unfair.
The Trump administration's move to restart student loan collections marks a definitive end to this period of illegal, expensive, and ultimately ineffective attempts to forgive and reduce federal student loan payments.
That sentence right there means this article doesn't exist, because Reason always supported Biden's student loan forgiveness schemes. Either that or the narrative is a lie.
Poor sarc.
You mean when you were outraged when "your friend" didn't qualify?
Want to show us when you criticized the student loan debt relief attempts? Only about a dozen to look through.
Bet as usual you're criticizing conservatives.
That whole pandemic freeze rolling into the Biden administration's repeated attempts to cancel student debt in every way but the one possibly legal one, set me back 4 or 5 years in my repayment schedule.
I would be done by now if I had been allowed to continue making payments while they were holding the interest rates at 0 for the 'moratorium'.
Wait, you COULDN'T make payments during the moratorium? I thought it just meant you weren't required to.
My loan service provider (Nelnet) took their entire payment system offline. I spent hours on the phone trying to get them started again, and they kept bouncing me around to various people whose job was apparently to explain to me that the payments weren't required.
They couldn't understand why I might want to pay them when the interest rate was 0 and everything was going to principal. Even more flabbergasted that I was actually looking to double them.
I was eventually sent to a 'credit counselor' on their staff, who was even more perplexed - apparently her job is typically to find ways to lower someone's payments based on their income. But they didn't have any method set up to do what I wanted to do.
That sounds like the hassle I had with GMAC in the late 80's. I'd bought a new car. I started making payments and then moved to a different State for a new job. I was doubling up on my payments, but, during the move, I'd lost the coupon book. I had the information to put on the check so I didn't think twice about the book. Well the repossessed the car for lack of payments even though I was ahead on them. Without the coupons, I wasn't making the designated payment for the month so technically I was behind. I went off on them over the phone. That was about the same time that the guy shot up the Jacksonville Florida office of GMAC. I came back to my hotel and found the Birmingham Police waiting to talk to me. I was on that office's list of disgruntled people so I was investigated.
"apparently her job is typically to find ways to lower someone's payments based on their income"
Car dealerships have analogous people. It's because they are used to most of the American public being financially irresponsible and willing to take on debt significantly higher than they should.
I could have killed the last lady who they had sit down with me. She wouldn't stop talking about the payment. "I dont care about the payment, I just want whatever you are offering at the lowest interest rate"...."well if you do 6 years, we can get the payment down as low as XXX!"..."I...DONT...CARE...ABOUT...THE...PAYMENT...I just want whatever term steals the least amount of interest money from me."
They are very used to people who are willing to extend the payback of a loan to infinity so they can pay 50$ a month, and they are happy to do this, as the person will pay them exorbitant amounts of interest and take 5x as long to pay off their principle.
That shtick really is old and boring
Some district judge will rule Trump doesn't have the power to make people payback their debts. They will use the same But Trump! exemption found in the king loretta james version of the constitution they have been using to say he can't deport illegal aliens.
He's taken a wartime law meant to allow deportation of citizens of the government our government is at war with, and is using it to deport anyone he doesn't like. And you're attacking judges who rightly think that's absurd. Must be a day that ends in 'y'.
The law doesn't require war. It requires the President to declare an emergency. And guess who told the President that he gets to define emergency? Congress!
If you know otherwise, prove it.
But he didn't agree, so it must be wrong...
He'll change his mind about the time he meets an MI-13 guy who wants his lunch money. Until then, it is other people's money, like the student loans the socialist wants taken care of my others.
The law didn't require war but invasion.
It was used after the war.
Have you tried not being ignorant?
Why are the judges right when SCOTUS disagreed dumdum?
Hmm, wasn't the smoke screen for broad student loan forgiveness based on war and military veterans?
It's about time.
The resumed collection efforts will produce broad economic effects as millions of borrowers default and have decreased credit scores and purchasing power.
Right before the pandemic, less than 1 percent of Nelnet’s accounts were at the edge of default. Now, more than 9 percent have reached the brink.
“Without immediate intervention, we could face the largest wave of defaults in the program’s history,” Nelnet warned.
https://archive.is/5kJSH
Gosh, you mean a bunch of morons with college degrees, who love to peacock about how much smarter they are than everyone else, are actually too stupid to figure out the basic math involved with paying back a loan?
Or even taking it out in the first place.
Imagine getting a prime rate-interest loan in any other market that can be paid back in 20 years, when you're 18, with no minimum down payment to avoid loan insurance, that requires no co-signer to get a good deal. Only in the educational-industrial complex can you get something like this without getting cornholed with a 25% interest rate.
And then these morons compound the situation by doing "income-based repayment" that doesn't pay down a penny of the principle, resulting in them owing more than they took out ten years later when they expect their Uncle Sam "public service" gravy train to pay off the entire amount increased debt they accrued in one shot.
I’d have an easier time if I didn’t have to jump through a million hoops to get an architectural license, only to lose out on jobs thanks to globalization. Of course, if the government didn’t require a masters degree to even qualify for sitting for the exam I wouldn’t have taken any loans.
Having said all that, I still made the choice to pursue architecture instead of switching to engineering like Mrs. Designate kept telling me to, so the responsibility ultimately falls on my shoulders.
Mrs Designate sounds like a smart lady. But I'm sure she has pointed that out to you many times.
Funny how the left will use any excuse to continue stealing tax dollars for other leftists.
These same cretins will ignore hurricane victims for living in red counties.
I guess they shouldn't have taken out the loans. If you're worried about them, you can help them pay it all back.
I'm not worried about any of them individually. I don't know any of them. As I stated, I'm concerned about the broad effects on the economy as millions of new defaulted loans will turn active purchasers into non-purchasers at the precise time (mid to late this year) that a recession has already been widely predicted. Starting collection efforts now adds kindling to the upcoming fire that will effect everyone, even those that don't have any student loans.
AEI, not exactly a squishy left outfit, agrees:
“It’s not a problem we want to add to the pile,” Preston Cooper, an economist and senior fellow at American Enterprise Institute, a conservative think tank
It's one I want to add: "Pay your debts, deadbeat!"
Active purchasers already defaulting on the 1T in CC debt? Lol
Heffernan has to be a recent grad, right?
Maybe he graduated Harvard with Charlie.
Well then, we'll just redefine "recession" to something else that exempts us. Isn't that what the left does, redefine bad things so it doesn't apply to them?
*Racism is now only applicable to white people.
*Recession is something that can only be acknowledged during an R administration
*A woman is anyone who identifies as a woman, even if they have a huge cock
So those degrees are worthless? Wow. Nobody saw that coming.
You can't trust this type of "conservative" outfit. Infested with neocons and Atlantic Council/The Economist academics.
And this is bad exactly how? Perhaps learning to take responsibility for actions is a better education than they (or YOU) ever got.
Making people responsible for their own shit? What an authoritarian.
This is why sarc has been so angry the last week.
In rebuttal to Stossel's critique of hyperbolic catastrophism, THIS LOAN APOCALYPSE IS HAPPENING RIGHT NOW!
>Biden's plans to enact significantly more generous repayment programs were also largely halted by courts.
We, of course, will not mention Biden's flouting of the court's authority during all of this.
"Biden's plans to enact significantly more generous repayment programs were also largely halted by courts.
Yes, a Biden may have pushed that. Which one? We don't really know.
So, do I have to keep paying my car loan too.
This is the perfect opportunity for people to start a GoFundMe campaign. Truly. Religious people do this kind of thing ALL the time. We take collections to help people in need, and appoint responsible people to distribute the funds. It works fine.
You don't need the government to do your acts of mercy for you!
And THAT (article) is but one of many reasons the Trump Administration has fans.
Simple way to get the government to pay your student loans, Trump or no Trump: https://myarmybenefits.us.army.mil/Benefit-Library/Federal-Benefits/College-Loan-Repayment-Program-(LRP)?serv=122
The Loan Repayment Program (LRP) is a special incentive that the Army offers to qualified applicants entering the Army. Under the LRP, the Army will repay part of a Soldier's qualifying student loans.
My son did this in reverse with no loans. Went to a very expensive private college. Lived off campus and never spent a dime of his ( or my) money. My daughter on the other hand.....
But FAFSA is still okay. Right? Right???!!!