Wasteful FEMA Spending Topped $9 Billion During the Pandemic
One grant for $1.1 billion was supported by one sheet of paper and didn’t include itemized costs for the project.

It's been nearly five years, and the total cost of wasteful COVID-era spending is still being realized. A recent Department of Homeland Security's Office of Inspector General (OIG) report illuminates several examples of waste, fraud, and abuse at the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA).
The OIG found the agency overobligated "at least $1.5 billion in funds for one state's medical staffing grant." Additionally, FEMA failed to properly vet funding to the state, leading to $8.1 billion of questionable spending.
During the pandemic, FEMA developed a streamlined process to award reimbursements through its Public Assistance Program. Instead of awarding funding to a project based on actual costs that were comparable to current market rates, the agency offered reimbursements based on cost estimates. The new process, designed to get disaster funding out of the door faster, generated less oversight and more fraudulent spending.
The state, which the OIG does not name, received about $853 million from FEMA in September 2020 to address staffing shortages at over 200 health care facilities statewide. Over the next year, FEMA incrementally increased funding, eventually awarding over $9 billion, which the state did not need. From May 2021 to April 2023, unspent grant funds reached $4 billion, before falling to $1.5 billion. FEMA was unaware of this until April 2023, when an OIG investigation was conducted. The agency subsequently de-obligated $500 million of the state's funding.
FEMA did not "validate cost estimates or determine cost reasonableness before obligating funds," according to the OIG. One of the cost estimates, which totaled $1.1 billion, was supported by one sheet of paper, which did not include itemized costs and was not conducted by a "cost-estimating professional" (which is required under FEMA guidelines).
The OIG also found that FEMA failed to determine cost allowability for $8.1 billion of the nearly $9.1 billion awarded to the state. In August 2021, FEMA began to review a 2020 award totaling $1.3 billion to determine if the project's expenses were appropriately documented and the project's funding was justified. As of April 2024, the agency had not completed its review for this amount or any money it had awarded to the state. The lack of documentation has led the OIG to question $8.1 billion in FEMA spending.
On top of the billions of dollars in unsupported spending, the OIG investigated a random sample of 20 other FEMA grants and found the agency awarded over $32 million worth of improper payments. Six of these projects "did not have the required supporting documentation to validate completion of the work and actual costs incurred before project award and reimbursement," according to OIG. The report also found three FEMA staff members were instructed in 2020 to not conduct "deep dives" when reviewing project eligibility.
The OIG has offered seven recommendations to FEMA, which include conducting an audit of the state's health care staffing program and ensuring project costs are sufficiently documented and reviewed before disbursements are given. Of the seven recommendations, OIG considers five to be "open and resolved" and two to be "open and unresolved."
From the Paycheck Protection Program riddled with fraud to unnecessary bailouts for local and state governments, the full cost of the government's spending during the pandemic may never be known with certainty. FEMA's mismanagement is just another drop in an extremely large bucket.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Nothing left to cut! Get permission from congress!
Not bad for two weeks of work.
They needed the time and the $9B to slow the spread. Thankfully it worked so well.
Only took two weeks, if I recall correctly.
They didn’t do squat for North Carolina.
Should have spent it on Politico subsricptions. Then FEMA could have learned about the disasters and it would become a nonstroversy.
FEMA is the epitome of wasteful federal spending.
It needs to be defunded and terminated.
I'm sure people in HI, NC and OH would agree.
Well ya no shit. When you have the whole US healthcare system stressed to it's breaking point, you need to inject funds. There is no time to "validate cost estimates or determine cost reasonableness before obligating funds." It is expected that in such extreme conditions, not all bureaucratic processes will be followed and there will be some improper payments. Overworked hospital administrators needed help, and they did not have the resources to provide perfect documentation.
Are you one of the fed employees locked out of their computers now?
I wonder how much child porn Molly had on it’s government computer?
So its ok to break 'procedure' and 'ignore law' when there's an emergency?
Also, we're talking the Covid pandemic - where the healthcare system was not stressed. At all. Anywhere in the US.
TikToks of crying nurses shedding fake tears on social media to get internet points notwithstanding.
When you have the whole US healthcare system stressed to it's breaking point, you need to inject funds.
Or you need to let it do precisely what it was designed to: fail.
The US healthcare system is a bucket with no bottom. Doesn't matter what you put in it, you will NEVER get that bucket filled.
Because here's the dirty little secret: health care is not a right, and no amount of money wishes or corruption will EVER make it work as if it could be.
Here's what caused the "US healthcare system" to be "stressed to it's [sic] breaking point": the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Whose five year mission was to reduce the spendy-ness of the best medical care available anywhere in the history of the world. After forty-five years there is a doctor shortage of over 100,000 and growing; healthcare is now massively more expensive; and wait times for routine and urgent appointments and specialist consultations and treatments are getting longer and longer. The ongoing effort to collectivize doctors, on the other hand, has succeeded brilliantly! Definitely more democratic. Congratulations on a job well done!
And this spending is what the democrats are taking to the streets to defend!
No, no, no! They're taking to the streets to defend the public employee unions' incestuous death-grip on corrupt elected and appointed deep-state bureaucrats. As the trade union movement slowly fades everywhere else (well, perhaps not Starbucks) public sector employment had been flourishing - at least until Javier Milei demonstrated the chainsaw approach. Although The Donald may not be as principled and elegant as the President of Argentina, his wrecking ball tactic seems to be working faster on the much larger and more deeply entrenched US Federal leeches. I am enjoying watching them howl at the moon in impotent rage.
Remember though - you have to act as if the agency is run by competent people and if you cut it the things it says it does in its mission statement will no longer be done.
You must ignore that its not doing what its core mission is and that that money is usually going to support deep-state Progressive payola.
This is the lesson we're learning from the USAID audit.
Trump: "I'll be the oversight."
Why is it taking these agencies so long to provide a report on their spending? They should already have accurate accounting for all taxpayer money they spend. All agencies should have accurate accounting for taxpayer money they spend so the only thing required for a report is to hit print.
What color is the sky on your planet?
Orange.
D.C. the only State in the Union who produces NOTHING and makes 2.4 to 5 - Times more than any other State in the Union. Does anyone really need to ask where the UN-itemized 'waste' is going?
What did "the people" think would happen when they voted for figure-heads that promised to go STEAL from their neighbors and give it to them??? They were electing CRIMINAL minds. Did they really think those who promise to STEAL would all the sudden be honorable when the $ passed by their wallet?
COVID Gov - 'Gun' spending was ~$7T. There are 160M working US citizens. That's is $43,750/ea. Was your Stimulus Checks $43,750? Can you think of any extra government service you got during COVID that justified you saving $43,750????
Socialism is nothing but a collective of criminal minds pretending that naming their crimes a government ideology excuses their 'armed-theft' of masses.
If you want to know how many criminal minds this country is housing just look at how many are railing against socialist structures being destroyed.
If that wasn't a spot-on analysis they'd all be willing to *EARN* (and donate, if they really felt charitable instead of being 'armed-theft' criminals) in a free and just environment.
Instead of awarding funding to a project based on actual costs that were comparable to current market rates, the agency offered reimbursements based on cost estimates.
"Hey, Pat, what do you think a forklift goes for these days? Say, six million?"
So, where exactly did all of this money end up?
According to NY Judge Engelmeyer, this should only be looked at by dedicated FEMA employees. You can always trust people who have created the waste and abuse to clean it up, it's the Democrat way!