A Massachusetts School District Rolled Back Advanced Classes. Teachers Are Starting To Revolt.
A group of parents tried to resist the changes years ago but say they were smeared as racists.

In 2021, a school district in Newton, Massachusetts, got rid of advanced classes in a bid to increase racial equity. But instead of reducing achievement gaps between racial groups, teachers are now sounding the alarm that the strategy is resulting in classrooms that serve neither struggling students nor high achievers.
According to a Boston Globe article by reporter Carey Goldberg, several parents brought up similar concerns with the new policy—but say they were smeared as "racists" and "right-wingers."
Goldberg writes that, in 2022, a group of three moms—all Democrats—started a petition to create a parental advisory panel for the school district. The move was motivated by what one parent described as "ideology superseding student needs," following the school district's decision to place students in "multilevel classes." In these new classes, rather than sorting students by ability, students would learn together in the same classroom. The school also decided to stop allowing advanced math students to skip a year to access higher-level classes. The parents also shared concerns that the school's approach to race and identity issues "emphasized differences rather than commonalities."
The women say they were branded as far-right conservatives motivated by racial animus rather than a genuine concern for academic opportunities. According to Goldberg, Parent Teacher Organization newsletters urged parents to speak out against the petition at a public meeting. An email from local activist group Families Organizing for Racial Justice said that the petition was "tied to the apparent belief that diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) efforts that take race into account compromise academic excellence" and claimed that some petitioners "challenge the need for any activities related to micro-aggressions, inclusion, respect or belonging."
"The mothers and their allies found themselves portrayed online and in public as dog-whistling bigots doing the bidding of right-wing national groups. Social media comments painted their side as 'racism cloaked as academic excellence' and 'right-wing activism cloaked as parental concern,'" Goldberg wrote. At one meeting, a speaker compared those who supported the petition to "white women who helped perpetuate segregation and white supremacy."
But years later, the Newton mothers are being vindicated. Teachers themselves are now openly criticizing multilevel classes, arguing that it isn't serving students' needs.
"Our surveys of the staff showed that 61 percent of the 31 respondents in STEM classes believed that multilevel classes were 'not at all beneficial' for students (the lowest rating) and only one respondent answered on the 'beneficial' end of the rating scale," Newton teacher Ryan Normandin wrote in a Boston Globe opinion article in December. "Classes may appear more diverse with all students mixed in one room, but no data have been presented to suggest these classes are actually helping Black, Latino, or low-income students."
"I've heard about multilevel classes from many, many parents over the last three years, and the feedback has been consistently negative," School Committee member Rajeev Parlikar said in November "I actually have not heard from a single parent who thought their child benefited from being in a multilevel class."
According to Goldberg, the district is now working on reinstating leveled classes.
"We were really, truly three innocent moms just trying to get conversations going," one of the moms originally involved in the petition told Goldberg. The three used to joke that if they had indeed been funded by right-wing groups, "maybe we would have done a better job."
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
We need school choice. Now.
Every statist agenda is collectivism -- racism, classism, and as shown here, government schools. One size fits nobody solutions to problems caused by government.
Government funding is a separate issue; if government didn't ladle out the tax dollars, prices and efficiency and bullshit would drop like a rock.
The real evil is government control, government standards, government tests. Government does NOT know best. Bureaucrats of all stripes care only about keeping their jobs going and expanding their bureaucracies, not about fixing the problems that keep them employed, and government bureaucrats are the worst because they have no competition.
1. Funny how many politicians on both sides of aisle arrogantly pontificating the joys and wonders of public education, yet send their snot nosed kids to private and charter schools.
2. The left does not want to end public education because they control the public schools, Hence, they are able to produce illiterate or near-illiterate kids who believe all the Marxist bullshit that is shoved down their throats. After all, an ignorant person is much more easily duped than truly educated one.
3. Parents, not politicians, should make the decision to where they send their offspring to school.
But his idea is vilified because then the politicians would lose control of the masses the oppress, and the teachers' unions, who most politicians represent, would go into a nut roll.
4. Public education is a pet project of most politicians because of the teachers, administrators, staff, etc. in public education would stop voting for them.
Hence, any politician openly advocating school choice could be committing political suicide.
Public education is a pet project of most politicians because of the teachers, administrators, staff, etc. in public education would stop voting for them.
Right, but this is a double edged sword. The left cannot reform education because it pits their constituencies against each other: poor and minority parents vs teachers vs Admin / Educrats / politicians. Real reform would require teachers be allowed to effectively manage the students which parents and educrats resist and call racism because it's easier that managing their own kids. Admin needs to be able to get rid of lousy teachers, but really almost everyone fails when you don't allow them to manage the kids so how can you identify the problems? Politicians want it all swept under the rug so the donations and votes keep flowing, all while using education dollars to fund consultants and educrats who are really far left political activists.
The result is a stalemate. The kids aren't educated which pisses off the minority of parents involved enough to realize this. To mollify them and protect the system the educrats offer race and political preferences into universities and then protected government employment afterward. But as more and more people realize the school's failures the number of positions necessary to pay off this exchange exceeds their capacity. That's why they tried to move DEI into the corporate world, to tap a new funding source.
Ironically, School Choice is one of the things that's done in literally every "Scandinavian" country which nobody who claims to want to emulate those nations would even consider the possibility of adopting here.
People mock California, but California (at least outside of the Los Angeles Unreality Zone) does not do this. Why no one mock Massachusetts?
Uh .... bud ... this very fucking article mocks Massachusetts.
People mock Massachusetts all the time.
Any state that produces the Kennedy's, Kerry, Pocahontas Warren, and Trip O'Neil will be ridiculed...and justifiably so.
Calvin Coolidge, Henry Cabot Lodge... I'm sure there's another one maybe John Hancock?
Larry Byrd? Tom Brady? Bill russell? Will hunting?
I kid I kid. None of those people are from mass, and one of them is fictional. I mean come on bill russell? Do you think Boston would let a black in?
Why no one mock Massachusetts?
"Also, where is this Taxachusetts place everyone keeps talking about?" - Brandybuck
What? Mock the Massholes of Marxistchusets?
A regular Cliche' Guevera , isn't he.
"In 2021, a school district in Newton, Massachusetts, got rid of advanced classes in a bid to increase racial equity. But instead of reducing achievement gaps"
Didnt a copy-paste of this happen in San Diego, as well as many other spots in CA?
because massachusetts is comically irrelevant. its just as pathetic as california but because no one but its victimized residents cares it does not get mocked. just like cali no mass politician is worth a damn or sane.
*staggers off sidelines*
Hello my fellow kids... this DEI stuff is like... the worst... amirite?
Mmmm. Pretty sure Doge is the worst.
I love how the autistic space man has made so many people here turn in their Libertarian Card and revealed that they've had a Marxist Card underneath it the whole time.
doge is the worst only if you are a leftard or stupid.
"Classes may appear more diverse with all students mixed in one room, but no data have been presented to suggest these classes are actually helping Black, Latino, or low-income students."
"That's because data are racist. We feel those students are being helped."
So is long division, rationalizing a radical or solving triangles banned or included?
I can't speak to the other two, but in California the Teachers Union is pretty solidly committed to radicalizing rationals.
America has been doing schooling wrong for centuries. Any time you got Dems, of all people, saying mass common-denominator schooling is hurting the kids you should pay attention. You don't get good outcomes by holding down over-achievers, you get it by assigning extra help to the under-achievers.
But since the days of educating factory workers' kids just enough to replace their cog-parents, we have staunchly refused to break down larger wholesale classes into smaller more intimate ones where we can give special-ed, remedial, advanced, honors program, ESL, etc on a case-by-case or even boutique size classes (10 or less per class). Cattle call education is failing the kids and mashing them into homogenous groups is making it worse. Let them spread out and learn at their pace, not everybody else's in the class.
America hasn't been doing schooling wrong - the state governments have. Under the 'guidance' of the federal department of education we saw ever increasing tax bills to pay for more and more administrators while the classroom sizes ballooned.
My grade school (8 years, before they broke out the "middle" school) had only 4 classrooms. Two classes per room, one teacher who taught one class while the other studied and then taught the other class while the first studied. We generally had 40 students per room. Many of us went on to get degrees, we generally all graduated with a decent education. But parents and teachers all demanded we behave and get an education, we didn't have distracting cell phones, we weren't all fighting over ludicrous issues like transgenderism and who could use what bathroom, the teachers were teachers, not social engineers, misbehavior wasn't tolerated and if you got a spanking at school (coach was the designated spanker and had a dedicated spanking paddle on his wall behind his desk) you could expect another when you got home. I myself went on to get a chemical engineering degree and have been a programmer for 40 years.
Shoulda pulled the kids out, let 'em take the GED and SAT and enroll in a community college or go to work
At this point we should just openly and frequently declare our racism (and fascism, chauvinism, genderism, etc.). Progressive chicken little, wolf-crying boys have just about eliminated any impact, outside of the faculty lounge and barista break room. Let's help them move on the the next stage.
And this is why pretty much anything the anti-CRT side in the Culture Wars does to oppose CRT and DEI at this point is justified. The DEI Nazis and "Me Too" fascists damaged the reputations and sometimes careers of thousands of innocent people over the last few decades in their effort to squelch dissent or even rational discussion while pretending to be the good guys just trying to engage in a rational discussion. Now all they can do is sputter in impotent rage as the retributional tidal wave engulfs them and sweeps their mean-spirited social justice away around them.
And here I was thinking Idiocracy was a fictional comedy.
Hank makes the characters of Idiocracy look like Stephen Hawking by comparison.
The women say they were branded as far-right conservatives motivated by racial animus rather than a genuine concern for academic opportunities.
Sucks, doesn't it. But that's the only way the Democrats know how to operate. And it HAS BEEN the only way they've ever operated going back two hundred years.
They do NOT like it when their slaves start thinking and doing things on their own. You step off that plantation, ladies, and it's a thousand lashes - and at no point will they ease up on you out of mercy.
They are a political party of slavery. They can't own the black people anymore, so they bring in the illegals. They can't keep you from thinking and learning and reading and speaking, but boy howdy can they make you pay for it. They find some uppity bo-oy like an orange hue and and a New York tone to his voice, and they will do everything in their power to eliminate him, up to and including murder if they can get away with it. Same with the autistic kid who likes spaceships and robots and self-driving cards - right up until he stops toeing the line, takes away something they controlled (in order TO control their slaves). And then he's Public Enemy #1.
Democrats - Leftists - hate you. They hate your freedom. They hate your autonomy. They hate your rights. They hate your free minds and free markets. They hate your faith, because it liberates you from them. They hate your speech. They hate it all.
And they especially hate your independent thinking and reasoning and ability to tell True from False, Right from Wrong, Good from Evil, Fact from Fiction, and A from ~A. Because, more than anything else in the world, THEY want to be the exclusive arbiters of those things.
This is, incidentally, why the Libertarian Party is such a laughingstock of a joke; why nobody anywhere takes you seriously Because every time any one of you goes along with the Democrats - you openly betray every single thing you claim to stand for. And you do it all the time. Especially here at "Reason."
My true and genuine hope is that these ladies continue to survive as escaped slaves. I hope they get redpilled and turn on their masters to tear his throat out with their teeth.
Just like this guy has: https://x.com/IsaiahLCarter/status/1887290743032561803
Actually the democrats still own blacks, though that seems to be turning. They used blacks through slavery in their KKK and Jim Crow days to get the white vote, then when that wasn't going to work anymore (thanks to republicans) they continued using blacks by making them dependent on government while claiming to be the champions of black folk and blacks overwhelmingly have voted D since.
"I'll have those niggers voting Democratic for 200 years."—Lyndon Johnson
>In 2021, a school district in Newton, Massachusetts, got rid of advanced classes in a bid to increase racial equity.
Everyone wants 'equity' - until they have to be clawed back down and their own achievements distributed to other people.
In other news nobody could have ever seen coming, water is wet.
The idea to eliminate AP classes seems to be growing. It was brought up for Madison a while back and was shut down quickly. I cannot think of faster way to get middle class people to abandon public schools that by denying their high achieving kids access to AP classes. The same liberals bemoaning school choice are making choice more attractive.
Newton went 78% for Harris. F them and F their kid's education. Professionals, business managers, college professors .... $202K median family income.
are you jealous? get a job
Has anyone ever tried to get traction with the fact that the only people who actually seem to notice all of the "dog whistles" are the ones pretending to adhere to an ideology they call "anti-racism"?
I've seen occasional efforts to shine a light on the high likelihood that the "anti-racists" spend far more energy and time sub-dividing people by race and other attributes than any actual bigot/supremacist would bother with. That never seems to land, but maybe there could be some kind of inroads made with the idea that the "dog whistles" are things which only the activists notice and react to and have no actual meaning to the real bigots (maybe Misek could confirm that for us?)
So they wanted to seperate the advanced and less-advanced students and they were called segregationists. Interesting that people came to that conclusion.
!0 years of teaching at the college level convinces me of the utter stupidity of Biden's approach to education. The greatest thing the nation will suffer from his policies is that playing to the lazy, the poorly-prepared, to those who can't read or write or do math is: The smart kids will drop out , and if they stay will be held back and bored and stifled by the declining tenor of intelligence in any class that matters.
a bunch of massachusetts karens on school boards are ruining everything except their own calorie intake.