Trump Expands School Choice, Narrows What Schools Can Teach
Trump signed two executive orders expanding federal funding of school choice while banning "radical indoctrination" in federally funded schools.

On Wednesday, President Donald Trump signed a pair of executive orders that could transform public K-12 education in the United States. The first is an order directing federal grants to help fund state-level school choice programs, and the second attempts to ban so-called "radical indoctrination" in K-12 education.
The school choice order directs the secretary of education to issue guidance on how states can use federal formula funds to fund "K-12 educational choice initiatives." The order also contains provisions to expand school choice opportunities for low-income families, military families, and those eligible for Bureau of Indian Education schools.
"When our public education system fails such a large segment of society, it hinders our national competitiveness and devastates families and communities," the order reads. "For this reason, more than a dozen States have enacted universal K-12 scholarship programs, allowing families—rather than the government—to choose the best educational setting for their children."
The second order denies federal funding to K-12 schools that engage in "illegal and discriminatory treatment and indoctrination in K-12 schools, including based on gender ideology and discriminatory equity ideology." Under examples of this "discriminatory ideology," the order lists teaching like "members of one race, color, sex, or national origin are morally or inherently superior to members of another race, color, sex, or national origin," or that "an individual, by virtue of the individual's race, color, sex, or national origin, is inherently racist, sexist, or oppressive, whether consciously or unconsciously." The order also reinstates the 1776 Commission, a group dedicated to promoting "patriotic education."
While Trump's school-choice executive order primarily works to allow states to use federal funds to expand school-choice programs, his order against Critical Race Theory attempts to reshape the ideological tenor of many public school curricula. Governments generally have wide latitude to direct curriculum decisions in public schools, but there's reason to be cautious of orders like this. Many "divisive concepts" measures, like this executive order, are "so vague that they arguably forbid teaching about slavery or racism at all, even uncontroversial and anodyne statements of historical fact," warns the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression (FIRE), a First Amendment group.
However, it's almost certain that the "radical indoctrination" executive order is constitutional. While similar laws have generally not been upheld when they've been applied to universities, laws like Florida's STOP WOKE Act have been allowed to go forward in their applications for K-12 schools. Public university professors have full First Amendment rights, but public K-12 teachers face much stricter limits on academic freedom.
"Imprinting anti-American, subversive, harmful, and false ideologies on our Nation's children not only violates longstanding anti-discrimination civil rights law in many cases, but usurps basic parental authority," reads the order. "Demanding acquiescence to 'White Privilege' or 'unconscious bias,' actually promotes racial discrimination and undermines national unity."
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
First they claimed that CRT didn’t exist. Now they’re mad that Trump is banning this nonexistent thing.
Same with the porn in schools.
I never noticed Playboy nor Hustler school libraries when I went to school.
National Geographic had a government granted monopoly back then.
NTTAWWT.
I did, but I don't think it was the school who put them there.
He must be having another one of those fever dreams Reason is so fond of proclaiming.
Note FIRE pulling a JFree, "We might have to defend teachers and admins who stop teaching Snow White in school!"
If schools can't teach white kids that they're guilty, as a race, for things other white people that they likely aren't even related to did, how is anyone supposed to learn about or teach Slavery or racism as anodyne historical fact?
The Snow White fallacy was Lying Jeffy, not J(ew)Free, but yeah.
Dunno if FIRE have said anything on this order yet. The quote was pulled from a blog post they posted back in 2021.
First they claimed that CRT didn’t exist. Now they’re mad that Trump is banning this nonexistent thing.
It's one of the classic ways people talk past one another.
What parents are complaining about is things like dividing kids up by race and pitting the resulting groups against one another, or teaching that all bad things in history result from Whiteness.
Certain conservative activists, like Chris Rufo, decided to 'name the enemy' by calling this "Critical Race Theory" (he was really clear about his strategy to subsume all 'wokeness' under this heading).
The trouble is that Critical Race Theory is an actual thing that doesn't have much to do with the current K-12 education curricula.
So then parents trying to say "stop pitting different racial groups against one another and teaching that it's bad to be white" are short handing it as "stop Critical Race Theory in K-12," to which the response becomes "silly stupid parents, no one's teaching Critical Race Theory at the K-12 level," and everyone goes back to screaming at one another.
"The trouble is that Critical Race Theory is an actual thing that doesn't have much to do with the current K-12 education curricula."
-
CRT did make it into teachers' colleges so what came of that was critical race pedagogy in primary education. Not everywhere, but enough that people noticed.
Meh - I personally think CRT is a bit of red herring. Race activism among educators is the real thing, and while race activism and CRT have common ancestry, CRT is not what led to race activism in the schools.
But that’s what CRT is. No one was teaching CRT as a “topic”. They were *doing* CRT. If you’re teaching “equity” as a goal, you’re doing CRT. And any number of other critical theories depending on which part of the spectrum you’re trying to unoppress.
The DEI electronic learning modules at my work only make sense if the fringe of critical constructivism and post structuralism are taken as a given. But they’re not going to explain what that is. It’s just : “micro aggressions exist and you have to watch anything and everything you say so as not to cause any. If you have any questions, please consult out HR DEI experts and they’ll guide you to the proper way to debase yourself this week.”
They were *doing* CRT. If you’re teaching “equity” as a goal, you’re doing CRT.
No, you're not. You're doing race activism. If you're analyzing laws from the perspective of how those laws impact people by race, you're doing CRT, which is a subset of race activism unrelated to the educational system.
What other theoretical basis does race activism have now?
Multiculturalism.
Dollars to donuts it’s the mostly the same theory being applied to immigrants instead of resident BIPOC.
CRT is an “academic and scholarly movement”. This is their own descriptor in any sort summation of what it is. CRT is activism.
CRT is activism.
Correct. Like I said.
Except you said it was unrelated to the educational system.
From Delgado in the book Critical Race Theory.
“The critical race theory (CRT) movement is a collection of activists and scholars engaged in studying and transforming the relationship among race, racism, and power. The movement considers many of the same issues that conventional civil rights and ethnic studies discourses take up but places them in a broader perspective that includes economics, history, setting, group and self-interest, and emotions and the unconscious. Unlike traditional civil rights discourse, which stresses incrementalism and step-by-step progress, critical race theory questions the very foundations of the liberal order, including equality theory, legal reasoning, Enlightenment rationalism, and neutral principles of constitutional law.”
How is a movement of academics and scholars unrelated to education? I mean I guess if wanted to split hairs you can say pedagogy *soecifically* was more Freire’s beat. But it mostly comes from the same inspiration, uses the same formula of marxification, reaches the same conclusions, and is hardly mutually exclusive.
I thought the whole point was to get the federal government out of education? I guess not.
So until you win the war you need to cede every battlefield to the enemy? That way won't win you the war.
How is this anything but good? It's not narrowing what schools can teach, it's getting the US government out of sponsoring indoctrination. Schools can teach what they like, with their own money.
Perhaps Reason might report on another study performed by a Marxist education institution about how hard it is to defend themselves from parents who complain about male strippers in thongs teaching in the classroom with baby oil and giant rubber dildo sculptures.
SEL was one of the most destructive things to ever hit schools.
The only thing keeping them from their full destructive potential is having a bunch of older and/or oppositional teachers who don’t teach the SEL lessons “right”.
If they manage to streamline the pedagogical eduction to “proper” SEL teaching pipeline it’s just going to be the daily rage against straight white capitalist men self pity and radicalization hour.
My wife refuses to teach them. She just writes the SEL subject they’re supposed talking about on the board and turns it into a study hall.
The regenerative teaching stuff is absolutely destructive as well.
"Narrows What Schools Can Teach"
Funny that there is an issue with things like *checks text*:
teaching like "members of one race, color, sex, or national origin are morally or inherently superior to members of another race, color, sex, or national origin,"
"Trump says we arent allowed to be race realists!! Wahhh!"
"But if we can't teach about racial, nationalist superiority, how is anyone supposed to learn about the Nazis?!" - FIRE
For those having difficulties parsing an English sentance:
There is a difference between teach something and teaching about something.
For those having difficulties parsing an English sentance:
There is a difference between teach something and teaching about something.
Tell it to FIRE, they're the ones who are worried that people aren't going to be able to teach *about* racism.
"We're not teaching them how to kill Jews, that would be crazy! We're teaching them *about* how to kill Jews!" - con_fuse9
Seriously, do you dumb fucks think it's 2019 and 6 yr. olds are still baffled by your retarded "with vs. of" handwaving and your "lab leak theory is racist" bullshit?
I had a short-lived stint as a history teacher. I had to get into arguments with parents when I did my Rise of Islam unit. "I'm not teaching Islam to your kids, I'm just teaching them about Mohammad AS A HISTORICAL FIGURE." Never was much fun.
It isn't getting the feds out of anything. It is changing the focus of what fed money does. Which will only serve to increase the support of R's for federal funding of education in the new 'Department of Stuff We Want the Federal Government to Support Instead of that Marxist Shit the D's Support'
They're similarly disallowed from teaching religious doctrine as fact.
A teacher who advocated for the alleged benefits of Aryanism would probably get in a fair amount of trouble.
Would you want your child's Earth Sciences teacher to be a Flat- or Young- Earther?
I want schools run by local individual school boards the way they used to be before thing were consolidated up into districts, state, and now feds. If one school wants to teach that the Cookie Monster is the source of all evil in the world and the next one over wants to worship the Cookie Monster, then what the duck does the Prez have to do with anything.
So JFree is pro-prayer in public schools. Bold stance for a progressive nowadays.
Are you saying Rs want to educate by teaching reading writing and arithmetic? Instead of indoctrinate with CRT, DEI, and SEL?
The fucking horror.
Wait. Your real concern is the Free Palestine bullshit goes away.
Except under current SCOTUS precedent he can't outright cancel the grants. That would require... an act of Congress. Better to condition them on sanity then if they are to be used at all.
Better to condition them on sanity then if they are to be used at all.
That is just a different way of saying - Might as well support fed funding - and make sure it's for this not that.
Gotta leave the indoctrination to the churches, that's their job.
Parents aren't taxed to pay for the churches, and then forced to send their kids to the churches, unless they can pay an additional fee not to send their kids to the churches.
There should not be any federally funded schools within a State, except military service academies.
"are so vague that they arguably forbid teaching about slavery or racism at all, even uncontroversial and anodyne statements of historical fact."
Politely disagree with FIRE on this one. In the context of schools who are currently actively teaching critical race theory-biased curricula, moving the needle towards a less biased curriculum would not trigger abandonment of uncontroversial statements of historical fact. Although it might be ideal for schools to not teach any opinions at all and just teach facts and skills, until the culture wars and divisiveness are toned down quite a bit it's not possible.
And by the way, "imprinting" is not possible. If only schools WERE that effective at teaching, then it might be more important to make sure they were imprinting useful skills and knowledge, but alas ...
"are so vague that they arguably forbid teaching about slavery or racism at all, even uncontroversial and anodyne statements of historical fact."
I'll be impolite and just call this bullshit.
Sounds good to me. Better would be to eliminate the Dept. of Education and get the federal government out of education entirely.
Hard to see how this isn't the main plank of an actual libertarian party. Or an actual libertarian website. Too bad we have neither.
Better would be to eliminate the Dept. of Education and get the federal government out of education entirely.
^
And already the folks at NYT are wringing their hands about loss of local control over education, while said local control was one of the greatest threats to the country a few short weeks ago.
Of course. But POTUS doesn't have that power.
No. Which is why this sounds good to me. It seems to be within executive discretion.
Trump is a fascist for pushing parental wishes over teachers wishes. How dare he.
Common Trump W
Hey Trumpypoo, you need to get your Party to put some legislation on your desk, or everything you're doing will be undone by the next Democratic administration.
You've still got 3 years, 9 months, 7 days left of this nightmare, Sarckles... maybe... if no President Vance.
"Trump Expands School Choice, Narrows What Schools Can Teach"
Truth in headlines:
Trump Expands School Choice, Narrows What Federally Funded Schools Can Teach
No, no, no. Whole realms of cognition were snuffed out by this EO. For Reason and their cohort it's already "Don't Say Gay 2.0: Don't Even Think It!". They are all more retarded now because of Trump.
The EO attempting to control curriculum content, etc. is most assuredly NOT constitutional, because it is Congress that sets the standards for expenditures. The standards for distribution of federal funds to the states are set in law and regulations, neither of which can be overridden by a simple EO.
Calm down buddy. Democrats did it first so it's ok.
You. Are. A. Retard.
It is the standard response to anyone who says Trump is breaking the law or violating the Constitution.
Standard retarded strawman*
FTFY
What else do the voices tell you?
Hey, fucknuts. You never answer me.
1. How come when "the Democrats did it first", you were absolutely fine with it, but if Trump does it, you think it's a problem?
2. How the fuck can you imply hypocrisy in others, while displaying such blatant hypocrisy yourself?
Speaking of retarded strawmen.
I thought you didn’t come here anymore.
Fucking retard, aside from getting "strawman" wrong as per usual, your shitty dodge isn't going to work.
So how come when "the Democrats did it first", you were absolutely fine with it, but if Trump does it, you think it's a problem?
I'd ask if you still beat your wife, but I can't imagine any woman marrying you.
Unless you're arguing that congressional delegation of authority to the executive branch is unconstitutional, I'm afraid you're wrong. Because congress already delegated this authority and a whole lot more to the President.
Note - I think those delegations should be unconstitutional (or at least a whole lot harder) but under current precedents, they are not even remotely controversial.
Note - I think those delegations should be unconstitutional (or at least a whole lot harder) but under current precedents, they are not even remotely controversial.
I've said it before and I'll say it again, the Constitution needs a non-delegation amendment.
The DoEd has significant latitude of the conditions on the grants. What they can't actually do is change the conditions mid-stream. So this only applies to grants that are renewed or created this year, and won't actually go into effect till next school year at the earliest, and maybe not till the year after.
Anything that constrains academic freedom is not eliminating "wokism". It's just replacing left-wing wokism with right-wing wokism. If that's what parents want, that's probably ok, but it seems like left-wing wokism will be banned, in the sense that only right-wing wokism can be federally funded.
If that is the case, then I'm a lot happier with the right-wing version of wokism (don't teach these controversial things in public schools) than the left-wing version (do teach these controversial things in schools).
Private schools are cool because they filter the students that enter by their parents ability to pay. The token support by the government allows a little kick back in $$$ but not enough to allow the poor to attend.
Also, it is not a coincidence that some of the most racially divided places are churches. So church run schools should be nice and safe for the little snowflakes.
Public education at its finest, folks.
Better to have everyone together and equally stupid than allow them to voluntarily separate and maximize their respective potentials on their own. Go ahead con_fuse9, explain to us all the how and why you think a school full of black kids and educators cannot self-educate up to the level of their white peers. I'm sure it will be as enlightening as anything from Fredrick Douglass, Abe Lincoln, or Clarence Thomas.
You ignorant, racist fuck.
Private schools are cool because they filter the students that enter by their parents ability to pay.
Some do, some don't. Just like the public schools. Or were you not aware that not everyone goes to Beverly Hills High?
So church run schools should be nice and safe for the little snowflakes.
Funny, the Catholic school my daughter goes to is pretty diverse. Where are you getting this exactly?
Cool. Then stop taking federal funds. Problem solved.
My district does not take federal funds, and is not surprisingly one of the most desirable districts in the state.
Defining a curriculum that must be taught constrains academic freedom. Not being able to teach Intelligent Design is a constraint on academic freedom. The questions are: is there proper authority being exercised and what are the academic merits of the subjects in question. The leap in logic that Trump's criteria prohibiting teaching racial guilt means that you cannot teach about slavery and segregation is blatant fear mongering.
The Feds should get out of education entirely. I'd like to see Trump actually follow through on eradicating the DOE (or both DOEs for that matter).
Just send him the bill, I'm sure he'd sign it.
"Trump signed two executive orders expanding federal funding of school choice while banning "radical indoctrination" in federally funded schools."
No taxpayer's money should go to any school, public or private, and I'm sure the private and charter schools are not hotbeds of radical Marxist failed theories unlike their public school opposites.
Many "divisive concepts" measures, like this executive order, are "so vague that they arguably forbid teaching about slavery or racism at all, even uncontroversial and anodyne statements of historical fact," warns the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression (FIRE), a First Amendment group.
Are you saying you would argue that it forbids the teaching of slavery and/or racism?
Once again, FIRE is not your friend. They, like the ACLU, will intentionally and willfully misinterpret things in order to serve their own ends.
We've already seen the ATF dishonestly retitling DEI hires to keep them on staff and the Air Force dialing back it's recognition of MLK day, Black History Month, Pride Month, etc. and blaming their actions on Trump's EO. FIRE is openly committing to the same. If they have to prevent children from learning about slavery in order to get or make the case against *Trump*, they're already committing to it.
While obviously a stunt to portray ending DEI in the military as somehow racist, I do wonder why it's important for the Air Force to celebrate MLK day, Black History Month, and Pride Month, in the first place. How does doing so increase mission readiness at all?
Yes, FIRE is engaging in some awful leaps of logic and paranoia here.
Disband the Dept of Ed!
What is divisive about teaching about slavery or Jim Crow laws? Where's the division? Are there a lot of people promoting a return to those things? I'm pretty sure almost everyone agrees those were bad things. These are concepts that unite most people. Anyone who isn't willfully misinterpreting things knows exactly what the divisive concepts and ideologies are.
It's Jim Eagle now.
Libertarians for Cumpolsory Taxpayer Funded Marxist Indoctrination!
Emma is so far out of her depth on anything non-FAFSA related, its pathetic
She's pretty terrible with anything FAFSA-related as well. She never even gives lip service to the libertarian position that the federal government shouldn't be giving out student aid or loans. Instead every article relating to FAFSA talked about how sad it is that the government isn't making it even easier for students to get money from the government.
anyone is free to open a school and teach what they want.
Is CRT better or worse than Texas wackos trying to push textbooks into saying that Black people were "invited" to America to work instead of they were taken forcibly by the slave trade ? Or teaching that Moses was a Founding Father of the Constitution ? Or bible-based education in public schools in general ?
You picked a bad day to pretend schools are doing a pretty darn good job
JUST TWO DAYS AGO
American education facing an undeclared emergency with some scores reaching 30-year lows — school choice now a moral imperative
By Tommy Schultz
Published Jan. 29, 2025, 5:44 p.m. ET
I am a teacher, it is even worse than that reports.
TRUMP IS RIGHT ,UTTERLY RIGHT
All the more reason to eliminate the Department of Education. Then there won't be these pesky national exams making U.S. education look bad!!!
This all adds more evidence to support a conclusion I've reached about the GOP - Their strategy to implement their policies is pretty simple.
Step 1: Tell people that government can't do anything well.
Step 2: Get elected and then make sure that government doesn't anything well.
Step 3: Tell people that the solution is to give power to
megacorporationsthe free market instead.And, at the same time they are doing that, they also follow a contradictory playbook on cultural issues:
Step 1: Tell people that people with
differentbad moral values threatentheir hegemony overAmerican culture.Step 2: Point to cases where
a conservative Christianan average American isbeing made to obey the same laws as everyone elsebeing persecuted for sticking to their own values rather than the valuesof equality and pluralism expressed in the Constitutionof the liberal elite.Step 3: Tell people that the solution to this problem is for government to enforce
conservative Christianproper American values on everyone.Now it's time to get the "Union of States" completely out-of Commie-Indoctrination camps for kids....
Congress?