Hegseth on Defense
Plus: Who's on deck for the next round of confirmation hearings, Trump wants to create a second IRS, Cuba is no longer doing terrorism, and more...

Confirmation hearings for President-elect Donald Trump's cabinet picks kicked off Tuesday with a feisty showdown between Pete Hegseth and Democrats on the Senate Armed Services Committee.
Hegseth, a veteran and Fox News talking head, is an unorthodox pick to lead the Pentagon. He argued that's exactly what the Defense Department (which I am obliged to remind you has still never passed an audit) needs. "It's time to give someone with dust on his boots the helm," Hegseth told the committee in his opening remarks. "A change agent."
Democrats zeroed in on the question of whether Hegseth needed to get his own life in order first. Allegations of marital affairs, heavy drinking, and sexual assault were aired repeatedly by Democrats on the panel. The most firey exchange came from Sen. Tim Kaine (D–Va.), who used those personal issues (breaking oaths, being intoxicated on the job) to ask, effectively, whether Hegseth would be fit for duty.
Toughest moment so far for Pete Hegseth:
Senator Tim Kaine grilling him on his personal conduct. pic.twitter.com/qZOPWb92Fv
— Yashar Ali ???? (@yashar) January 14, 2025
As in the clip above, Hegseth refused to give a straight answer about whether his personal conduct should be disqualifying for a potential Defense Secretary. The most serious allegation against him—the sexual assault claim, which stems from an incident in 2017—ended with no criminal charges being filed and an undisclosed settlement being paid to the woman involved.
Hegseth seems to have done a good enough job of playing defense. Sen. Joni Ernst (R–Iowa), widely seen as the swing vote on the committee, said after the hearing that she would support his nomination. That ought to get Hegseth's appointment to the Senate floor.
You are reading Reason Roundup, our daily, morning newsletter.
Want articles just like this in your inbox every morning? Subscribe to Reason Roundup. It's free and you can unsubscribe any time.
Who's next? Sen. Marco Rubio (R–Fla.), Trump's pick to be secretary of state, and Pam Bondi, Trump's second choice to be attorney general, are both set for confirmation hearings today.
Rubio figures to have a relatively easy path to confirmation—though you can certainly expect Democrats to gleefully pick apart his one-time personal feud with Trump, which culminated with Rubio suggesting that Trump was not well endowed. On the stuff that actually matters, Rubio is likely to face questions about whether he can effectively conduct diplomacy on Trump's behalf, despite having more interventionist impulses than the president-elect.
Bondi is a prosecutor, lobbyist, and former Florida attorney general. Her confirmation hearing will likely focus on Trump's plans for sweeping changes at the Justice Department and whether Bondi would use her position to help Trump target his political opponents.
A second IRS. In a post on Truth Social, Trump announced plans to issue an emergency declaration allowing him to create a new "external revenue service" to administer the collection of tariffs and other duties.
That entity already exists: Tariffs are collected and processed by U.S. Customs and Border Protection. Those taxes are not paid by some external entity but by the American-based importers who bring goods into the country.
Still, Trump's apparent plan to use an emergency declaration to create a new federal entity that will be tasked with extracting more tax dollars from Americans seems notable—in large part because I'm old enough to remember when Trump was promising to abolish federal agencies rather than create new ones.
Cuba's not doing terrorism anymore, so that's nice.
President Joe Biden notified Congress on Tuesday that he planned to remove Cuba from the list of countries that the U.S. regards as state sponsors of terrorism. The announcement was part of a deal—brokered by the Catholic Church, interestingly enough—that will see Cuba release several political prisoners within the next week, The New York Times reported, citing unnamed federal officials familiar with the terms of the deal.
Cuba's pending removal would leave just three countries on the list of state sponsors of terrorism: North Korea, Iran, and Syria. The list might soon have a fourth member: Cuba. As the Associated Press notes, the incoming Trump administration is likely to block Biden's action or simply add the island nation back to the exclusive terrorism club.
This is all pretty silly. Cuba isn't any more of a threat to America this week than it was last month—by which I mean it's not a threat at all—and it won't suddenly be a bigger threat two weeks from now.
Scenes from Washington, D.C.: Good luck doing much of anything in the nation's capital on Monday (and parts of Sunday and Tuesday), when Donald Trump is scheduled to take the oath of office for the second time.
NEW: DC street closures announced for upcoming Trump inauguration. These closures will run from Sunday, January 19, through January 21 #wmata @nbcwashington pic.twitter.com/v03h9F9fQV
— Adam Tuss (@AdamTuss) January 13, 2025
Mayor Muriel Bowser encourages those who need to enter the special inauguration zone—my term, not hers—to use the Metro. But, of course, the Metro stops in the middle of downtown will be closed from Sunday night through Tuesday morning too.
QUICK HITS
- The death toll in the Los Angeles wildfires climbed to 25, as firefighters continued battling the blazes. With severe winds expected to hit the region on Wednesday, some experts are warning that "fire tornados" could be spawned—as if all this hasn't been terrifying enough already.
- A few dozen workers are defending the Getty Museum from flames that once got within six feet of the facility and its world-renowned collection of art and antiquities.
- Prices rose 0.4 percent in December, as the annualized inflation rate ticked upward to 2.9 percent.
- Federal aid to California in the wake of the fires might be tied to a debt limit increase, Speaker of the House Mike Johnson (R–La.) told reporters.
- The House of Representatives passed a bill blocking federal funding to public schools that allow transgender students to play on girls' sports teams. Two Democrats from Texas voted for it.
- South Korean President Yoon Suk Yeol was arrested after police scaled walls and cut through barbed wire to get to him. Yoon was impeached by the country's parliament after declaring martial law and ordering military officials to detain and shoot lawmakers, but he remains in office for now.
- Will Trump follow through on his promise to free Ross Ulbricht on his first day in office?
- The federal bureaucracy creates 23 new rules for every bill Congress passes into law.
- Donald Trump's doppelgänger is a Pakistani pudding vendor:
Pakistan has its own Donald Trump
Locals love taking selfies with Salem Bagga, a singing pudding vendor. They believe the man looks exactly like the future U.S. President Trump.
Bagga has capitalized on this resemblance and turned it into a brand, naming his rice pudding,… pic.twitter.com/t8ICZzeZFu
— NEXTA (@nexta_tv) January 14, 2025
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Pakistan has its own Donald Trump
Hopefully he's not in Britain.
Wouldn't let him in. He looks too "white".
"It's time to give someone with dust on his boots the helm," Hegseth told the committee in his opening remarks. "A change agent."
The Pentagon is going to need to enlist the help of the intelligence community to nip this problem in the bud.
Democrats zeroed in on the question of whether Hegseth needed to get his own life in order first.
Does he even know any trans people of color???
Perhaps if he goes to the airport and steals a random chicks clothes he would be concidered a top pick
Funny thing about that, it wasn't random. He somehow knew which bags had the things he wanted. If it was random, it would be 50:50 he would have grabbed some dudes bag.
Look, if you're going to steal luggage you don't steal the Samsonite bag or the Swiss Army one.
Yeah, it's probably pretty easy to spot the bag that's likely to have some nice women's clothes in it.
And he was only caught because he was wearing the contents. If he'd opened one and found men's clothing, he'd have thrown everything out or given it to Goodwill.
He somehow knew which bags had the things he wanted.
This is what I'm particularly curious about. How the fuck did he know to grab the suitcases of women, and not just any women but one who was even a high-end fashion designer? The whole situation is as creepy, demonic, and off-putting as Mr. Puppy Play looks.
"Woman's" intuition?
He said if you vote for me I will pardon Ross. Hey bohem did you vote for Trump or were you with the big L children that booed and heckled him?
Reluctantly and strategically.
Wow, serving justice based on what he gets in return. What a guy.
Rubio figures to have a relatively easy path to confirmation...
Even with those ears? Seriously, take a look at them.
Small hands are a negative in a job that is all about shaking hands.
mme. dillinger said his superpower will be hearing all the whispers
As in the clip above, Hegseth refused to give a straight answer about whether his personal conduct should be disqualifying for a potential Defense Secretary. The most serious allegation against him—the sexual assault claim, which stems from an incident in 2017—ended with no criminal charges being filed and an undisclosed settlement being paid to the woman involved.
You should have followed this with the clip of the senator calling out his own colleagues for being drunks and cheating on their spouses.
Also Hirono sounded drunk as shit.
What a bunch of clowns from Hirono to Warren to Duckworthless.
Hegseth refused to
give a straight answertake the baitKaine sounded unhinged ranting about wedding vows and the oath of office. The language of wedding vows is supposed to be romantic, it is not a binding contract. Then he got really inappropriate, accusing Hegseth of betraying his 7 year-old daughter.
Hirono (who was slurring her speech) asked him to commit to resigning his post if he takes a drink during his tenure.
The Democrats looked like assholes and Hegseth was supposed to be one of the easier picks to derail.
Kaine talking about his kid was wrong. Especially since he helped his own antifa shit kid just a small fine for his actions which included vandalism and violence.
You get yourself a job before sundown, or we're shipping you off to military school with that goddam Finklestein shit kid! Son of a bitch!
Classic.
Having two drunks, a stolen valor and a pervert accuse the candidate of drinking, stealing valor and being a pervert, doesn't seem to be as effective as they thought.
The same as having sarc talk about principles.
And ideas. Don’t forget Sarc’s precious ideas.
Classic leftist projection on center stage.
wedding vows ... is not a binding contract
Eggcellent
Or a suicide pact?
Kaine seemed to have no problem with Clinton being President despite rampant cheating. Seemed to like Mr. Harris in spite of his infidelity and credible accusations of abuse.
Wonder why those were OK? Why were they (D)ifferent?
JFK? FDR? Hypocrite?
Hmm, what is the Venn diagram of hypocrites and Democrats?
(And are we allowed to refer to Venn diagrams now?)
Yes, provided that you are unburdened by what has been.
"The Democrats looked like assholes"
Because they are assholes.
I unfortunately have to put up with Kaine since I live in Virginia. He is just as scummy and lacking in character as Schiff, Schumer, and rest of that sorry group.
It matters so much to Kaine that he complained with Harris' husband who forced his nanny to get an abortion. Oh, wasn't he also a running mate of someone with a cheating husband?
Yes, he was the running mate of someone with a philandering husband who should’ve been tried and convicted for rape and sexual assault and only got off because the media was on his side and he was a Democrat.
Imagine for a second if a Senate Republican tried Kaine's questions with a female Democrat nominee.
Holy hell, the media would be all over it, calling the Republican all sorts of things while defending the nominee, even if the Republican senator was completely right.
What is this "right" you mentioned?
Right and wrong are highly (D)ebatable.
https://x.com/greg_price11/status/1879225164011123178
LOL! After that, it’ll be difficult not to confirm Hegseth. Maybe this series of confirmations will be more entertaining than I originally thought.
Yeah. That's the clip. Couldn't remember which senator it was. Thanks.
Hegseth knocked it out of the park (Same as Bondi is doing). He keep his cool while they screeched and looked like fools. Kaine crossing lines about his daughter is ok for Reason.
It was Hegseth vs a bunch of Karens
Bondi vs Schiff is an all time classic.
If the wind changes again LA might get fire sharknados, then we will be in real trouble
The only thing worse in LA is Republicans (or moderate Democrats).
ps. Sorry I did not see your comment before I posted about sharknados below.
Will the sharks have lasers?
Yes. Fire resistant lasers. Harbingers of death unseen before by mankind.
Are you saying people will be driving around LA with sharks in their trunks?
Still, Trump's apparent plan to use an emergency declaration to create a new federal entity that will be tasked with extracting more tax dollars from Americans seems notable—in large part because I'm old enough to remember when Trump was promising to abolish federal agencies rather than create new ones.
Then your colleagues spent the last 2 years praising the president who created two terrible ones that just spend and create government regulations.
And as sarc always reminds us, democrats did it first.
At least this one is to retrieve money.
Still, I think we've had enough misuse of emergency powers in the last 5 years. If he wants the ERS, ask congress to create it.
It actually already exists. This is just his usual bloviating to get media attention on a policy he wants to focus on.
Technically Congress has ti create actual departments. So this would be an EO that directs an existing one to focus on this. Ie an ERS czar.
Agreed
to err is human
to ERS is Trumpian.
To TDS is Brixian
I hope that "S" stands for "sea lion."
I vote for "shit head".
Ouch, man! Now you're making me miss Nardz.
No, asshole, it stands for "syndrome", as in mental deficiencies.
Oh, OK. What about the "e" "v" and "o" then?
Gee, you can't even read: "T" "D" "S", shitbag.
Fuck off and die.
Then your colleagues spent the last 2 years praising the president who created two terrible ones that just spend and create government regulations.
No shit. tReason has never criticized Democrats. It's just praise, praise, praise, as I point out in every article where they criticize Democrats.
Your usual strawman, I see.
Dumb troll is dumb.
as I point out in every article where they criticize Democrats.
Argumentum ad nauseum.
So broken.
Didn't he say i needed new material just yesterday? Seems like he was projecting again. And admits to it here.
You guys lie ad nauseum claiming that Reason only praises Democrats, and I'm "broken" for pointing out your lies whenever there's an article that criticizes them. Got it.
Pour Sarc.
Ideas!
Careful now. If you mock him too much, you’ll get on his naughty list and he’ll claim he’s muted you.
Then if you really try he will never mute you again.
His humiliation fetish.
"I'm sorry I made you hit me!"
Is being appointed ambassador better or worse than being muted?
Sometimes better, sometimes worse.
'Reason has never criticized Democrats'
"What is 'The single stupid reply Sarc is guaranteed to post every day'?"
It’s Sarc’s daily strawman.
Daily Double strawman?
Tell you what. You guys stop claiming that Reason praises Democrats and never criticizes them, and I'll quit pointing out how you're all a bunch of shameless, lying, Trumptard shills on that specific subject. Deal?
As soon as you stop suffering from TDS and posting constant strawman arguments here all the fucking time.
Why would we make a deal with a shameless drunken liar like you, over your inappropriate and dishonest trolling material.
Here's the only deal that you will get from us: GFY you shitty troll.
The guy who regularly accuses me of raping my own child is accusing me of inappropriate trolling? Wow.
Marginalizing what you did by exaggerating what others claim is not going to work with this crowd. You have openly admitted that you touched your daughter inappropriately. A father grabbing his teenage daughter by her legs when she is in bed is pretty far over the line. Calling you out on it was within her rights.
I wonder if Jesse bookmarked what I actually said. Doubt it. The truth would ruin the narrative.
And if he did bookmark it you’d complain about it.
Goddamn you’re pathetic.
He did, you twit. You’d still deny it even with the link and your actual words quoted.
I have never once accused you of raping your own child, you demented, lying fuck.
Every single time I have just reposted your own words without alteration.
Like this:
"CPS said it was reported that I was “Laying hands on my child in a concerning way.”
Did you or did you not post that sentence?
I don't think so because CPS never followed up on the report. I was giving an example of a mandatory reporter abusing their power by calling CPS for me trying to get my non-teenage daughter out of bed by dragging her feet out of it and onto the floor. You cherry picked what you wanted from that, ignored the context, and accused me of incest. One of the many reasons why I consider you to be the worst human I've ever interacted with in my life. The magnitude of despicability required to take an example of abuse of power and then turn it into an accusation of child-rape is beyond my comprehension. I really don't understand how someone can be like you, or like you. I just don't.
JFC, dude, "I don't think so"?
And now you are adding "non-teenage", which means what, 12? Did you confess or did she tell someone? Your story gets more vague instead of more specific which on the internetz, 100% means it was either a bullshit attempt to claim victimization or much more serious and you actually were confessing while trying to gain sympathy.
I really don't understand how someone can be like you, or like you. I just don't.
This is pure gaslighting. You are a gaslighting shitweasel. And unlike you, ML isn't a troll. He is knowledgeable and clearly believes what he writes. People like that are easy to get along with unless you are a shit-talking troll like you and Jeffy.
Can you cite people saying they NEVER criticize them?
I've seen rarely. Do not remember "never" but feel free to prove me wrong.
I think it stems from Reason pumping out 30+ articles on every little thing Trump does while writing up a token article or two about the demonstrably worse stuff the democrats do. So when people went to those articles to say "Hey, the other side is doing this way worse shit, why not write an article about that?" Sarc took that to mean those people think Reason doesn't write any articles about democrats ever.
Don’t you point that out, repeatedly, in every article, no matter the topic?
I could be thinking of someone else I suppose, since you’re hardly ever here.
QUICK HITS
The death toll in the Los Angeles wildfires climbed to 25, as firefighters continued battling the blazes.
Or as I like to say one BLM summer of love.
No mention of the carbon footprint of these fires.
Stop being an ableists. What about the footless fires?
But remember the National Guard helping enact nighttime curfews in the fire zone and road blocks to control who enters and leaves the fire zone, stuff that they literally do in any natural disaster deployment, us totes bad because they're coordinating with local law enforcement and helping also detain dirt bags who are using the fires to loot people who evacuated for their own safety.
President Joe Biden notified Congress on Tuesday that he planned to remove Cuba from the list of countries that the U.S. regards as state sponsors of terrorism.
He told Congress that the Bay of Pigs invasion that he ordered and that his son Beau unfortunately died in was a success and Fidel "Cornpop" Trudeau has been overthrown.
Did Joe ever tell you about the time he sailed on the Maine?
his Con-TikiTorch expedition... looking for inssurectionists
I think a countries ability to attack the US is not entirely indicative to its ability to sponsor terrorist, but Liz seems to be under a different impression.
Not Liz today.
Eric now it makes sense.
DC street closures announced for upcoming Trump inauguration. These closures will run from Sunday, January 19, through January 21...
Making sure to keep that crowd size down to a mockable level.
CONSPIRACY: CONFIRMED.
Do closure rules apply to people wearing pussy hats?
Amid a busy news day Monday, a familiar figure was named Chief Operating Officer of National Public Radio. Ryan Merkley, who directed the Aspen Institute’s Commission on Information Disorder and also appeared in the Twitter Files as Wikimedia’s liaison to “Industry Meetings” with federal law enforcement, was elevated to the job by NPR president/Titania McGrath clone Katherine Maher.
Merkley’s name figured in several high-profile efforts to control “disinformation” through aggressive content moderation. In 2021, the Aspen Institute created a Commission on Information Disorder, whose big-name participants included Katie Couric, “Prince Harry, the Duke of Sussex,” and DHS official Chris Krebs. Merkley was the Commission’s Director.
https://www.racket.news/p/head-of-infamous-information-disorder?utm_source=post-email-title&publication_id=1042&post_id=154822272&utm_campaign=email-post-title&isFreemail=true&r=gz4m7&triedRedirect=true&utm_medium=email
Tell me again why we fund NPR with taxpayer dollars?
Propaganda.
NPR is the type example of snooty elite government collusion. Violating the Constitution to shit on the peasantry while feeling superior.
Maher was also the head of Wikimedia when it went into full-blown Squealer mode as a propaganda tool for the left, so this is really just some in-group preference networking going on.
Just further evidence that there's no reason to take any of NPR's shit at face value. Maher is also notably tied to the Atlantic Council as a Nonresident Senior Fellow, as well as ties to numerous glowie-connected NGOs, making her even more insidious in the neoliberal international censorship program.
This is why you can’t have chicks in charge.
What if they have dicks?
“There are no chicks with dicks Johnny, just guys with tits!”
...some experts are warning that "fire tornados" could be spawned—as if all this hasn't been terrifying enough already.
Not much of experts if they're not slipping in some political causation.
I say we should name then fire trumpnadoes.
A few dozen workers are defending the Getty Museum from flames...
Do we count them as private firefighters, the most contemptible of first responders?
Ah, outpaced again. Was planning on making a similar snark!
Comparing them to the Rooftop Koreans is still on the table.
Well sure, if you don’t count a couple days ago.
WHO DID THAT ALREADY?
Well this is awkward for jeffsarc, shrike, and others.
Several pages of the 174-page long report, released Tuesday, deal directly with 18 U.S.C. § 2383, or, the Insurrection Act, and how nothing on Jan. 6 could have been construed to be an insurrection.
The thrust of Smith’s argument that Trump could not have been successfully prosecuted for insurrection under the act is the actual definition of insurrection, and the fact that his office would have had to provided evidence that such a thing occurred. “Generally speaking, an ‘[i]nsurrection is a rising against civil or political authority[] — the open and active opposition of a number of persons to the execution of law in a city or state,'” the report stated.
https://thefederalist.com/2025/01/15/jack-smiths-report-proves-the-media-were-always-lying-about-j6-insurrection/
They’ll find a way to continue the Democrat narrative no matter what while claiming they’re libertarians.
What's weird that even reason was screaming yesterday Smith had proof to find Trump guilty yet left this out. Then again, 174 pages deep and we know they didn't read it. So they repeated corporate media.
Sloppy Joe Lancaster needs to fired. Any take that Smith could have gotten a conviction for "insurrection" is pure propaganda. Along with the NYT, WaPo and NPR, Lancaster is happily lapping up pure propaganda by the Democrats.
Untested legal theories has never stopped Smith before. That's his entire career.
I failed to note it, but my blockquote is direct from page 66 of Smith's own report. He openly admitted it would be lawfare to which litigation would be the appropriate response.
Or tar and feathers?
Chemjeff, Moderation4ever, Buttplug hardest hit.
They called it an "insurrection" to activate laws that contain that word.
Just like Trump is calling immigration a national security threat to activate laws that will allow him to impose blanket tariffs (but that's ok because Democrats did it first).
More of the typical strawmen. Do you buy stock in farms that grow straw, Sarc?
Sarcasmic, pay attention here. ITL correctly identifies your fallacy here as a strawman. You deliberately misrepresent the argument to make it easier to attack. The argument presented is that 1/6 did not meet the definition of insurrection, which Smith acknowledges in his report. In this context, your initial sentence is demonstrably false. The next sentence is then a false analogy. It is also a stupid take and fails on its own, but that is irrelevant to the the original fallacy.
You tried and failed yesterday to accuse me of a strawman. You really need to stop using those words you clearly cannot comprehend the meaning of.
They called at an "insurrection" to activate Civil War era laws in an attempt to bar Trump from running for president again. Even though it wasn't an insurrection.
Trump is calling immigration a national security threat in an attempt to give him the power to put massive, blanket tariffs on our biggest trading partners. Even though immigration isn't a national security threat.
Both sides are dishonestly abusing language and the law for political purposes.
But it's ok when Trump does it. We all know why. Because Democrats did it first.
By the way, if I want ICP's opinion I'll go take a massive shit with the bathroom fan off and door closed.
You have apples and oranges here, Sarc, and you’re trying to claim they’re the same. One of these things is not like the other. And the other was created by the same people who tried to claim J6 was an insurrection.
Oh, and by the way, fuck you too, Sarc.
Well said.
Even though it wasn't an insurrection.
That is an amazing admission, I commend you for it. It doesn't change the false nature of your strawman.
Even though immigration isn't a national security threat.
I know of 2000 or so people who would disagree with you if they were still alive after a protest led by immigrants who had overstayed their visas on 9/11/2001.
Both sides are dishonestly abusing language and the law for political purposes.
Democrats did it first, last, and will do it again tomorrow. It is not remotely comparable on "both sides".
Did you just equate immigration to 9/11 while accusing me of making a strawman? Seriously?
Did you just equate immigration to 9/11
You do understand that the perpetuators of the 9/11 attacks were all immigrants, don't you? So I didn't "equate" anything. I identified a strong causal link.
What you seem to think is a strawman in no way misrepresents your argument that, "immigration isn't a national security threat." It is, in fact, the opposite. It is the most compelling evidence available that immigration is without question a national security issue.
Seriously?
Yes. You really struggle with critical thinking. You cannot just emote away other people's arguments in this forum. Perhaps you should spend more time on Reddit.
You're bringing up 9/11 and accusing me of emoting?
Yes. You claimed that immigration is not a national security threat. I introduced a compelling counterfactual to that claim. That is not emoting, that is honest argumentation. You are the one ignoring the role of immigration leading up to 9/11.
The US needs control of its border. The US needs the opportunity to vet those who enter. National security is one of the few functions of the federal government that is unquestionably constitutional. Therefore, immigration is a national security issue and unmonitored immigration is a national threat that must be addressed by the Executive.
You introduced something that happened over two decades ago by people who are dead, and that proves that that illegal washing dishes is a terrorist. Not only that, but José is so dangerous that we need to slap protective tariffs on all goods coming in from our biggest trading partners. Your impeccable logic convinced me. I'll be sure to vote for Trump when he runs for a third term.
You introduced something that happened over two decades ago by people who are dead, and that proves that that illegal washing dishes is a terrorist.
Emoting.
Not only that, but José is so dangerous that we need to slap protective tariffs on all goods coming in from our biggest trading partners.
Emoting.
Your impeccable logic convinced me. I'll be sure to vote for Trump when he runs for a third term.
Emoting.
Got you pegged! You failed to present a single salient counterpoint and relied exclusively on absurd insinuation. We are exactly 2 weeks removed from the most recent successful terrorist attack, yes, by a citizen, but in support of the exact same enemy, Islamic jihadists, who have continuously attacked us over the last 2 decades.
Why don't you just put me back on mute?
Why don't you just put me back on mute?
Good idea. Your lies and deliberate misinterpretations of what I said reminded my why your comments are better left unread.
Ask sarc about his magic immigration system that doesn't involve ever having government interact with immigrants and they all magically get jobs, cause no crimes, and bear no costs. All without ever vetting them through any government agency for criminal history and such.
No thank you. I would rather argue with a bear in the trunk of my car.
What else do the voices in your head say? Because I certainly didn't say what you're asking me to defend.
Because I certainly didn't say what you're asking me to defend.
The ignorance on display by posting this in a thread where you refuse to defend what you actually said is staggering. That is the thing about being a trolling shitweasel. It never really matters what others write about what you say. You were never going to honestly defend any of it.
Dissemble. Deflect. Distract.
https://www.socratic-method.com/quote-meanings-and-interpretations/abraham-lincoln-how-many-legs-does-a-dog-have-if-you-call-his-tail-a-leg-four-saying-that-a-tail-is-a-leg-doesnt-make-it-a-leg
In the famous words of Abraham Lincoln, "How many legs does a dog have if you call his tail a leg? Four. Saying that a tail is a leg doesn't make it a leg." At first glance, this quote may seem lighthearted or merely an intellectual play on words. However, upon deeper analysis, it reveals a profound insight into the nature of truth and perception. Lincoln's quote serves as a reminder that labels and words do not change the essence of something and that reality should not be manipulated or distorted to fit one's preferences.
Who could have thought we would ever reach the day when describing the Socratic method would require a trigger warning?
Actually, lots of people foresaw this and warned us about it over and over.
Socrates? One of them dead white males?
The Socratic method is how white supremacy interrogates.
That was in a slide in an anti-racist training I had to take although it seems to have been dropped in other slides I see.
Socrates is the OG sea lion.
'And only one for birthday presents, you know. There's glory for you!'
'I don't know what you mean by "glory",' Alice said.
Humpty Dumpty smiled contemptuously. 'Of course you don't — till I tell you. I meant "there's a nice knock-down argument for you!"'
'But "glory" doesn't mean "a nice knock-down argument",' Alice objected.
'When I use a word,' Humpty Dumpty said, in rather a scornful tone, 'it means just what I choose it to mean — neither more nor less.'
'The question is,' said Alice, 'whether you can make words mean so many different things.'
'The question is,' said Humpty Dumpty, 'which is to be master — that's all.'
'Impenetrability! That's what I say!'
""They called it an "insurrection" to activate laws that contain that word.""
So not insurrection.
"They called it an "insurrection" to activate laws that contain that word."
In every other situation, that'd be called "lying".
"Just like Trump is calling immigration a national security threat to activate laws that will allow him to impose blanket tariffs"
Can you, at least, bitch and moan ACCURATELY? Immigration has never been used as a justification for his tariffs.
Immigration has never been used as a justification for his tariffs.
He is on record saying that as soon as he's in office he's going to declare immigration from Canada and Mexico to be a security threat worthy of taking them out of most-favored-nation status and slapping blanket tariffs on all goods coming in from those countries.
So you're either ignorant or lying. I'll go with lying.
Feel free to link to him saying that.
Sorry, but your word ain't sufficient.
You mean this threat?
Newsweek:
Donald Trump's Canada Threat Is Working
In December, amid Trump's threats to slap a 25 percent tariff on Canadian goods, Canada's federal government announced a $1.3 billion plan to enhance border safety and its immigration systems.
The strategy incorporates advanced technology, expanded law enforcement resources and improved cross-border cooperation with the U.S. It is designed to combat illegal drug trafficking, boost border inspections and streamline immigration procedures.
Data from U.S. Customs and Border Protection shows a dramatic surge in migrant encounters along the northern border. Agents recorded more than 198,000 encounters during the 2024 fiscal year—marking an increase of more than sevenfold compared to 2021 figures.
And making sure who is and isn't coming into your country and insuring they are not threats or foreign agents from hostile nations is basically the very definition of national security.
Prices rose 0.4 percent in December, as the annualized inflation rate ticked upward to 2.9 percent.
Last gasp before Trump's tariffs bring it to heel!
PPI which leads CPI raised at 3x normal rates under Biden. Largely due to energy costs as he sought to reduce expansion and regulatory costs.
https://www.zerohedge.com/personal-finance/small-business-confidence-soars-6-year-high-surge-energy-prices-sends-ppi-higher
This will take years to fix due to the required process in rule making.
And somehow, during that time, Sarc will claim the residual inflation is due entirely to the Trump tariffs.
So will comms major Boehm.
Federal aid to California in the wake of the fires might be tied to a debt limit increase...
The No Consequences to Our Actions Act.
https://x.com/VigilantFox/status/1879015777602327007
CNN Panelist Squirms as Scott Jennings Exposes Who’s Really Fueling Division Over LA Wildfires
John Avlon never saw this coming.
AVLON: “I think also in this environment right now, where immediately there’s disinformation flowing through social media networks that cleaves down partisan lines, that is stopping our ability to be united. And we should not just accept that as inevitable. That is weakening our ability to unite as a nation and as cities.”
@ScottJenningsKY
: “Let me answer your criticism by asking you a question. Do you think it was uniting or dividing while in the midst of these fires for the Democrats to go to Sacramento and, in an emergency session, vote to appropriate $50 million to ‘Trump-proof’ California, to sue the Trump administration, which hasn’t even taken office yet? Do you think that was a good priority and a good time to do that, or no? Was that dividing, was that divisive, or was that uniting?”
AVLON: (Gives up) “I’m not going to go take that, you know, bait because I don’t know the details of that particular [story].”
I read that as "squirts" and man, I'm real disappointed.
As always, it's (D)ifferent when they do it.
They always run that unity-criticism-unity dialectic as a deflection when they're looking like incompetent idiots.
Here’s the setup: a retired University of Missouri professor, Karen Piper, thought it was a good idea to declare Woods’ misfortune as “karma calling.” Cue the backlash. People across the political spectrum, including the university itself, weren’t having it. Piper ended up walking back her statement, calling the situation in California “heartbreaking” and clarifying that she doesn’t wish anyone harm.
Enter Angela Belcamino, who decided to call for a little, well, humanity. “I’m not a fan of James Woods at all, but being happy his house burnt down isn’t the answer. Be better,” she posted. Reasonable, right? Not to Keith Olbermann.
He swooped in, reprimanding Belcamino for her stance and making the case that conservatives, Woods included, don’t need sympathy but rather “psychological battery.”
This is the attitude that lost the election. They will not compromise they will not convert they will not be human. They must be defeated – and any chance to bruise or batter them psychologically must be exploited
— Keith Olbermann (@KeithOlbermann) January 8, 2025
But Belcamino wasn’t about to let that slide. She clapped back with a level-headed reality check, arguing that this kind of rhetoric is precisely what cost Democrats the 2024 election. She reminded Olbermann—and everyone else tuning in—that losing a shred of humanity in the name of political warfare only deepens the divide. Her parting shot? A warning that “doubling down on this kind of rhetoric will cost the Democrats again in 2028.”
https://redrightdaily.com/social-media-post-from-former-sports-host-raises-eyebrows/?utm_source=tpi&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=TPI01142025BR1
Notable how Olbermann sounds like both an abusive spouse and an crusader for marxism in that single statement.
both an abusive spouse and an crusader for marxism
In my experience is 100% redundant. The language of Marxism is the language of the enabled abuser. FFS, it was certainly true of Marx himself.
https://pjnewsletter.com/la-mayor-karen-bass
The mayor’s foreign excursion – her fifth international trip this year alone (surprise, surprise) – directly violated a campaign promise she made to voters just before taking office.
“Not only would I of course live here, but I also would not travel internationally — the only places I would go would be DC, Sacramento, San Francisco and New York, in relation to LA,” Bass pledged during her campaign. That promise helped her narrowly defeat Rick Caruso, who had secured the endorsement of the city’s firefighters. Remember this the next time Democrats talk about keeping their word.
Instead of keeping her promise, however, Bass has embarked on a worldwide tour while in office: three trips to France for Olympic planning (because apparently Zoom doesn’t exist), another to Mexico for a presidential inauguration, and now this African adventure – all while her city faces unprecedented crisis.
Who paid for those trips?
Unclear, but the Ghana trip was repeatedly called "taxpayer funded" in media reports.
Like, cash money paid, or thousands of homes burned paid?
i'm pretty sure her not being "on the job" probably saved more homes and lives than if she were there directing things
Acronym needs work.
...a bill blocking federal funding to public schools that allow transgender students to play on girls' sports teams. Two Democrats from Texas voted for it. Two Democrats from Texas voted for it.
DINO's getting in on the nature healing.
South Korean President Yoon Suk Yeol was arrested after police scaled walls and cut through barbed wire to get to him.
Put him in the Squid Game(s)!
Will Trump follow through on his promise to free Ross Ulbricht on his first day in office?
It's literally the only reason I voted for him, so I'm guessing no.
His corrupt predecessor's serial abuse of the pardon option is going to give the whole thing a bad name, which will be Trump's excuse.
“Democrats did it first, so that makes it ok.”
- Sarcasmic
What's funny is claiming the democrats did it first is an admission they are the leaders of corruption.
I know. What’s also funny is that I posted this as snark three minutes before Sarc posted the exact same comment just below. I guess life imitates satire.
The federal bureaucracy creates 23 new rules for every bill Congress passes into law.
The only good side to omnibus bills, I guess.
Trump has a habit of creating more government. In his last tenure as President, he created Space Force. Now he is promising the BER. The idea is to make government smaller and leaner not to increase it with agencies duplicating work already being done.
Democrats did it first, that makes it ok.
Life imitates satire (see my comment above, 3 minutes before Sarc).
Ideas!
Well if they were not so corrupt maybe they would do it second for a change.
Lol. This has to be parody. You've defended ACA, IRA expansion, and every government program ever written about here.
Defense is actually a responsibility of the federal government unlike the myriad of growth you've supported here.
You realize that Space Force is a real thing, and attempts to consolidate existing duplicated efforts among existing military branches, right? And provides focus on a threat domain that has been addressed through mostly ad hoc efforts.
I approve the consolidation of efforts but object to the creating a new branch of the military to effect that consolidation. The same way I fail to understand why every branch of the military has to has its own airforce.
I approve the consolidation of efforts but object to the creating a new branch of the military to effect that consolidation
That doesn't actually "create more government," unless it increases the number of overall billets, you moron.
The same way I fail to understand why every branch of the military has to has its own airforce.
Probably because carrier operations, for example, have a much different capability requirement and skill set than aerodrome operations, amphibious warfare, or close air support. And given the fact that the DoD's been increasingly a joint function since Goldwater-Nichols and manning drawdowns and force-shaping have been going on for decades, your complaint is largely a blinkered one that betrays the insincerity and ignorance of your complaint.
If you don't understand why every branch of the military has its own air force you're a moron who knows nothing about the military. I can list a variety of reasons. The Air Force has consistently, even since it's days as part of the Army, under invested or not been interested in, close air support. For example: the fucking commander of the 5th Air Force had to disobey direct orders from the Hap Arnold to build the B-25 strafers that proved to be one of the best aircraft for shutting down the Tokyo Express in the South Pacific, and were so successful that North American incorporated his modifications into future models of the B-25, making it one of the best, if not best medium bomber of the second world war. The USAF paid little to no attention to rotor wing aircrafts after splitting off from the Army and said if the Army wanted them, the Army can spend money on developing them. The USAF also didn't want to spend any money developing carrier based aircraft, which have entirely different requirements than ground based aircraft. In fact, the British have utilized a single Air Force for all its branches, which has historically resulted in inferior aircraft being acquired for especially the Royal Navy (famously, the Royal Navy was still utilizing canvas covered Biplanes as late as 1942 for both it's carrier based fighters and bombers and they ended up having to buy American carrier based fighters while they worked to develop their own. Additionally, as the Marine Corp is not a separate branch, but part of the Navy, and all Marine Aviators are thus classified as naval Aviators, the Marine Corp doesn't even enter into this discussion. Finally, on another note, Space Force isn't actually a separate branch, it's actually under USAF command, and thus is part of the USAF the same way that the Marines are part of the Navy and the USAF used to be part of the Army. The same relationship. So, no a new branch wasn't created, it was a consolidation into a new command under the USAF, and yes it has a different rank structure but the Marine Corp has a different rank structure than the Navy while being part of the fucking Navy (not a separate branch).
Space Force didn't "create more government," it took a bunch of existing missions within the Air Force and their associated billets, and just consolidated and re-named them as a branch of service under the Department of the Air Force.
If you weren't a Madison shitlib, you'd understand how military manning works, because their numbers are set by Congress.
Technically, like the Marine Corp, it's not a separate branch. But that's quibbling.
"In a post on Truth Social, Trump announced plans to issue an emergency declaration allowing him to create a new "external revenue service" to administer the collection of tariffs and other duties."
*sigh*
Do not confuse marketing with policy - - - - - - -
I wonder if the agents for the ERS going to be trained in firearms and urban combat like Biden's IRS agents.
It's hilarious watching lefties pretend they care about infidelity and heavy drinking, when their heroes like Slick Willie take advantage of interns and Kamala starts getting shitdaced at noon alnost every single day.
Meanwhile, the current SecDef Lloyd Austin disappeared and went completely off the radar for like an entire week, unreachable even by top White House staff, because he has a serious medical condition and tried to keep it hidden from everyone, and none of these jerkoffs gave a fuck.
There is no limit to how completely and totally full of shit these lefties are.
Completely undermining Hirono's "24/7" schtick.
I think drunken Hirono undermined her own schtick.
(And if not drunk then stroke-addled.)
Even Obama knows drinking can help solve problems.
Beer Summit 2009
some experts are warning that "fire tornados" could be spawned—as if all this hasn't been terrifying enough already.
Wait until they unleash the tornados with bees in their funnels and when they spin they shoot bees.
'The most firey exchange came from Sen. Tim Kaine (D–Va.), who used those personal issues (breaking oaths, being intoxicated on the job) to ask, effectively, whether Hegseth would be fit for duty.'
Worked for the Bidens (if we equate senile dementia to drunken incapacitation).
It was hard not to notice that democrats were all about historical personal behaviors, and republicans were about actual qualifications.
'The most serious allegation against him—the sexual assault claim, which stems from an incident in 2017—ended with no criminal charges being filed'
Well, then...
And 5 minutes of research by Liz would show Liz the claims are more laughable the Balsey Ford due to hotel videos police accessed.
Except that Boehm wrote the Roundup today.
That explains it.
Facial depth Eric never digs deep. Just what thr NYT says.
Needed to find one from 30 years ago to really stick it to him.
"Once in kindergarten Hegseth called a girl a doodoo-head!"
In a post on Truth Social, Trump announced plans to issue an emergency declaration allowing him to create a new "external revenue service" to administer the collection of tariffs and other duties.
Alternate headline:
"Most libertarian president ever vows to use emergency powers to create a new tax collection agency to collect new taxes he will create with emergency powers"
Quicktown Brix is a slimy pile of TDS-addled shit who should fuck off and die.
I'll take external if in exchange for internal.
Yeah, that works for me too.
That would be like giving the IRS a sex change operation.
'The announcement was part of a deal—brokered by the Catholic Church, interestingly enough'
Which Catholic Church? The one against abortion or the one against private property and free speech?
the one with the light-in-the-loafer priests?
https://www.ncronline.org/vatican/vatican-news/vatican-approves-document-allowing-gay-men-become-priests-italy#:~:text=A%20provisional%20document%20published%20by,the%20normal%20requirement%20of%20chastity.
That's going to be a shock to the 99% who are already gay. Finding a straight one would be the real challenge.
Going prog has done wonders for church attendance for numerous denominations so far.
Good job, Catholics. Chose the worst possible Pope.
Except that Pope isn’t put up to a general vote. It’s only the Cardinals who can vote.
Democrats are disgraceful at these hearings : stupid, mean, almost juvenille (Sen Warren)
'With severe winds expected to hit the region on Wednesday, some experts are warning that "fire tornados" could be spawned—as if all this hasn't been terrifying enough already.'
Meh. Wait for the fire shark-nados.
'A few dozen workers are defending the Getty Museum from flames that once got within six feet of the facility and its world-renowned collection of art and antiquities.'
How about putting Getty in charge of the LA fire department?
You mean Gavin Newsom? He is the heir to the ghetty fortune
'outh Korean President Yoon Suk Yeol was arrested after police scaled walls and cut through barbed wire to get to him. Yoon was impeached by the country's parliament after declaring martial law and ordering military officials to detain and shoot lawmakers, but he remains in office for now.'
I guess the walls closed in.
"Far-Left Protestors Disrupt Pete Hegseth's Confirmation Hearing"
Insurrection! Obstruction of an official proceeding! 5 years in federal prison for them. Or maybe shoot one of them in the face!
Seems odd that this only happens to Republican nominees. And how they never seem to get punished for doing so.
Odd.
1/6 was just a less noisy leftie protest of a confirmation hearing.
Hegseth's gross improprieties is not why he should be rejected. He's very unseemly, and likely to be tied up in investigations and courts for the duration of his tenure. But the real reason he should be rejected is that he's grossly unqualified to run a department the size of the DoD. Being a FOXNoos commentator is not qualification. Swearing fealty to the Trump is not a qualification. We need someone who is up to the task of running a department with a budget approaching one trillion and a workforce of over three million servicemen and employees. It is literally the largest government department that ever existed in all of human history.
Before he's confirmed we need to know what UNDERLINGS will actually be doing the job of the SecDef.
And Brandy goes right to the false Dnc narratives ignoring his 20 years of service. Lol.
"...He's very unseemly, and likely to be tied up in investigations and courts for the duration of his tenure..."
Translated from those whose only language is TDS (that would be brandyshit):
"He's likely to be the object of lawfare"
Fuck off and die, asshole.
""who is up to the task of running a department with a budget approaching one trillion "'
Curious where do you get experience running a company with that budget? And why is it a requirement for Hegseth and not anyone else? When was the last time the Pentagon passed an audit?
Brandyshit knows a Trump nominee when he sees one and is more than willing to invent all sorts of new (required) qualifications.
Long TDS will do that to steaming piles of shit.
The US government was intended to be a government of the people by the people and for the people. Just because it wandered off-mission a while back does not mean it is not worth the effort to return to it.
The idea that any intelligent and reasonably competent person could not hold any office in the government is an insult to all of us. That is literally the only reason to put up with bureaucracy.
Tied up in what investigation and what court, you stupid cvnt
It is literally the largest government department that ever existed in all of human history.
I will just drop this here:
Please continue to make a jackass of yourself.
Neo-Nazi frat boy Pete said that he would obey an unconstitutional order from Donnie to use the military against citizens if ordered to do so.
#retribution
invest in shin guards.
turd, the ass-clown of the commentariat, lies; it’s all he ever does. turd is a kiddie diddler, and a pathological liar, entirely too stupid to remember which lies he posted even minutes ago, and also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a liar.
If anything he posts isn’t a lie, it’s totally accidental.
turd lies; it’s what he does. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit.
No he didn't.
Why did Jimmy Carter have nazi symbols at his funeral shrike?
Yes, this. Why did Jimmy Carter have Nazi symbols at his funeral, Shrike? The floor of the National Cathedral, the funeral program.
So Nazi.
Well, Carter was quite fond of segregationists while governor of Democrat Georgia.
Man, you really do like to prove you’re the dumbest commenter here, Plugbitch.
You do realize that the infamous tattoo is actually a Jerusalem cross and appears on the floor of the National Cathedral, right, little bitch?
Therefore, you do realize it’s not a Nazi symbol, right, little bitch?
So why lie so blatantly, little bitch?
Well, turd, the ass-clown of the commentariat, lies; it’s all he ever does. turd is a kiddie diddler, and a pathological liar, entirely too stupid to remember which lies he posted even minutes ago, and also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a liar.
No, he didn't. He didn't answer loaded question with a simple "No." and Sen. Hirono made a bald-faced projection of her own opinion as the answer...
“Would you carry out such an order from President Trump?” she asked.
Hegseth began to respond: “Senator, I was in the Washington DC National Guard unit that was in Lafayette Square during those events carrying a riot shield on behalf of my country…”
The senator interrupted to repeat her question: “Would you carry out an order to shoot protesters in the legs as directed to by the president?”
Hegseth continued his response: “I saw 50 secret service agents get injured by rioters, trying to jump over the fence, set the church on fire and destroy it.”
Fatigued, Hirono took Hegseth’s non-answer as meaning he would follow the order: “You know what? That sounds to me that you will comply with such an order. You will shoot protesters in the leg.”
As with many things, Trumps words somehow get twisted...
In her questioning, Hirono referenced former Defense Secretary Mark Esper’s account in his 2022 memoir A Sacred Oath that during the protests surrounding the White House after George Floyd’s death when Trump allegedly asked: “Can’t you just shoot them? Just shoot them in the legs or something?”
[Doesn't sound like an order to me...more along the lines of Trumps "So I asked Bill a question that probably some of you are thinking of, if you're totally into that world, which I find to be very interesting. So, supposing we hit the body with a tremendous — whether it's ultraviolet or just very powerful light — and I think you said that that hasn't been checked, but you're going to test it."]
“The good news — this wasn’t a difficult decision,” Esper continued to write. “The bad news — I had to figure out a way to walk Trump back without creating the mess I was trying to avoid.”
But that's not how Hirono stated it. Hirono said: “In June of 2020, then-President Trump directed former Secretary of Defense Mark Esper to shoot protesters in the legs in downtown D.C. An order secretary Esper refused to comply with.”
>>This is all pretty silly.
ya it's a shame they rigged 2020 and you sat silent. the last four years have been silly.
" . . . blocking federal funding to public schools that allow transgender students to play on girls' sports teams."
Should be -
blocking federal funding to public schools that allow men to play on girls' sports teams.
^^ what are you proposing, Eric?
>>South Korean President Yoon Suk Yeol was arrested
when they told us in school the Korean War was perpetual nobody really understood.
>>when Donald Trump is scheduled to take the oath of office for the second time.
and it's a little delicious now because he'd be leaving not oathing but for the steal
>>whether ... personal conduct should be disqualifying for a potential Defense Secretary.
clearly you have an unstated opinion sorry it isn't shared by many ... the Harpy Brigade did their best to speak for #metoo but I think they're your only friends here
>>Good luck doing much of anything in the nation's capital on Monday (and parts of Sunday and Tuesday), when Donald Trump is scheduled to take the oath of office for the second time.
Inauguration Day has been scheduled for years idk what else you could have planned
He knows, he can't help being a little bitch, he's in a really bad mood because Sleepy Joe is out in five days. Almost the entire Reason staff will be bawling their eyes out.
It makes a difference. I had some work there during the stuff for Carter. Made it a pain in the ass. Then again, anyone who lives and works in the area is used to bs making it hell to move around that city.
>>Cuba's not doing terrorism anymore, so that's nice.
Cuba has a record of communist fetish.
Speaking of the inauguration, Obama has committed to being in attendance, but once his disgusting fat-assed wife isn't.
Something strange is going on, they sure do seem to be spending a lot of time away from each other. Is their marriage on the rocks? Was she aught porking that chef who "drowned"? Is Barack finally going to come out of the closet after all these years so he can go be with Larry Sinclair? You have to wonder.
>>Was she aught porking that chef who "drowned"?
was he?
Keep in mind that she's on record that their marriage wasn't on very good terms for about a decade because everything was being sacrificed in the interest of Barack's political ambitions. If things really are on the rocks, it's probably because he's spent the last 8 years acting as a shadow president instead of actually retiring.
The media keep desperately trying to draft Michelle to run for president, and she keeps having to say she doesn't want to get within a mile of that shit.
When he was first running it was rumored the marriage was always fake, just a political tool.
It was almost certainly for political purposes. Obama's known based on his dating history to actually prefer white women. Being a black man in Chicago, he probably realized a mixed-race marriage wasn't going to fly there if he wanted to move up the political ladder, and so he started courting Michelle right about then.
As the duly elected president, it is a duty of the Senators to confirm all of Trump's nominees. It is also on the House and Senate to work to enact all of Trump's polices. Those who voted for him deserve nothing less.
I know this is meant to be sarcasm, but if you didn't get the separation of powers ass-backwards, it would be true.
Not sarcasm. I want this for two reasons. 1) I do believe that voters should get the polices that they voted for. 2) I think Trump's administration will be absolutely awful and his voters need to see what they actually got.
We have a pattern where Republicans run on awful polices, then when they are in power they are stymied by Democrats. Thus the voters think that the Republicans are not nearly as bad as they actually are and keep voting for them, even though it is the Democrats that are actually giving the voters what they want. I think Democrats should back off and let the Republicans do as they wish, let the voters see the Republicans for who they really are.
LOL, your whole team's getting what they want in LA right about now, shitlib.
If we get 4 more years of what we got in the 3 years pre-COVID Trump admin, I think it will be just fine.
Trump was quite constrained during the first term. But those sane people are not going to be part of his administration.
Trump will be much more effective in the next four years than he would have been in the last four because your team fucked up so bad.
This is the dems worst nightmare. It is glorious to see.
I give you Newt Gingrich's Republican Congress as the counterweight to Hillarycare and pushing Bill Clinton to help reduce deficit spending.
Breaking news: the FDA has just banned the use of Red Dye #3. Companies have until 2027 to comply.
I assume they're doing this now mostly because they really didn't want RFK Jr. to get the credit for doing it himself.
Must be really bad stuff if it's OK for the next two years.
Two years to slow the spread.
Rule making is a very slow process. They started a long time ago and the rule was very close to being published before the election. Kennedy was not a factor.
"The Silver Star, which is awarded to soldiers to recognize gallantry in action against enemies of the United States, was presented to Hegseth at the conclusion of the day's hearing."
https://babylonbee.com/news/pete-hegseth-awarded-silver-star-for-enduring-roomful-of-hysterical-women