Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
    • Reason TV
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • Free Media
    • The Reason Interview
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • Freed Up
    • The Soho Forum Debates
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Log In

Create new account

Social Security

The IRS Is Required To Protect Kids From Identity Theft. They're Not Complying.

One in four kids will be the victim of identity theft or fraud. Here's how the government is making it worse.

Emma Camp | 12.16.2024 4:10 PM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
Child in shadow | Illustration: Lex Villena; ID 585881 © Raycan | Dreamstime.com
(Illustration: Lex Villena; ID 585881 © Raycan | Dreamstime.com)

Children are surprisingly frequent victims of identity theft—around 25 percent of them will experience identity fraud or theft by the time they reach adulthood. The consequences of bad credit caused by fraud are both steep and difficult to reverse. Thankfully, the government is required to alert child victims of identity theft. However, it is failing to meet these obligations, leaving easy paths for identity theft open.

The IRS is legally required to inform parents if their child's identity is being used to commit tax fraud. But according to an article in The Dispatch* by Shoshana Weissmann, digital director for the free market R Street Institute, the IRS has refused to do so because the kids in question don't have active tax accounts.

Kids in foster care are also particularly vulnerable to identity theft. In an attempt to remedy this, federal law requires states to run credit checks on foster kids over the age of 14, but most eligible children have not received these checks. "Even those who received any or all reports received little help understanding them," Weissmann notes. "And few children facing identity fraud receive any help resolving it."

The Social Security Administration (SSA) doesn't make things much better. Since most possible Social Security numbers have already been given out, a criminal who makes up a number has better than even odds that it is already in use or about to be assigned to someone else. Instead of taking steps to fix this vulnerability, Weissmann writes that the SSA doesn't check whether a number has been used in fraud before assigning it—leaving newborns saddled with bad credit histories from birth.

The stakes of this negligence are high. "More than half of minors who were victims of identity theft report being denied access to credit at least once because of it, and some deal with the consequences for a decade or more," Weissmann writes. "Some have even acquired a lifelong criminal record for an offense committed by the thief that stole their identity."

Weissmann notes that reforms are fairly obvious. "Congress, for example, can and should require the SSA to check SSNs before issuing them, and to make sure the agency does not not [sic] issue numbers with a record of fraud," she writes. "The IRS also needs to be reminded, with a bit more forcefulness, that it's legally obligated to alert parents when their children's identities have been stolen….Another option is to lock minors' credit files at the time SSNs are issued, or at least offer the option."

The trouble is that the government is hardly inclined to implement these changes. In the meantime, millions of American kids risk devastating—and preventable—damage to their credit. 

*CLARIFICATION: This article has been amended to include the name of the publication where Weissmann's article appeared. 

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Amazon Warehouses Benefit Local Economies, Study Finds

Emma Camp was an associate editor at Reason.

Social SecurityFraudChildrenChildren's RightsIRSTaxpayers
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (13)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Longtobefree   2 years ago

    Think of the fun (and chaos) when social security gone broke, fails, and all those social security number become meaningless.
    Credit reporting agencies, the IRS, every bank and company with employees, insurance companies, the whole complex madness; useless.

    1. Rossami   2 years ago

      Social Security going broke doesn't make the numbers meaningless or the make the identity theft risk go away. The only thing that could make the risk go away would be to (retroactively) hold the government to the promise it made when SS was rolled out - that it would never be used as a national ID number.

  2. Don't look at me!   2 years ago

    Congress, for example, can and should require the SSA to check SSNs before issuing them, and to make sure the agency does not not [sic] issue numbers with a record of fraud

    How could this not already be a thing?

    1. Vernon Depner   2 years ago

      DEI

  3. Eeyore   2 years ago

    Such a stupid broken system. It was broken before children were assigned numbers at birth.

    1. SIV   2 years ago

      I got a SS card/number at age 15 for my second job. The first one paid in cash but the second one required clock-punching, tax withholding and all the other shit that goes with a successful established business with dozens of employees

  4. JesseAz (mean girl ambassador)   2 years ago

    Guess what population is a large source of identity theft...

    1. Eeyore   2 years ago

      Does it rhyme with people who eat cats?

    2. SIV   2 years ago

      Deadbeat, bankrupt parents of children who haven't had a chance to fuck up their own credit.

    3. Vernon Depner   2 years ago

      My SSN was once used by a Mexican guy working for a landscaping company. The only reason I found out was that I applied for unemployment and was told "I" was still working. Took a couple of months to straighten out so I could collect my benefits.

  5. AT   2 years ago

    In this Libertarian article, Emma laments that the "I'm from the government and I'm here to help" angle of the IRS and SSA should do a better job.

    As opposed to not existing.

    1. VinniUSMC   2 years ago

      If only it was the right people in charge. -Leftists

  6. John McAuley   2 years ago

    In the future, SSNs will be assigned to human embryos with US-documented conception. The question for legislation will then be, at what week of gestation does such a citizen become a taxable and creditable entity?

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

Nobody Likes Red Tape, Not Even Mamdani

Meagan O'Rourke | 7.22.2026 1:31 PM

Trump's New DOJ Nominee Wants To Ban Online Porn and Prosecute Big Tech

Elizabeth Nolan Brown | 7.22.2026 1:09 PM

American Public Schools Lost 1.4 Million Students Since COVID. Their Budgets Grew by 34 Percent Anyway.

Tosin Akintola | 7.22.2026 12:09 PM

Capitol Police Anticipated Drone Plot Against UFC a Month Before It Was Uncovered

Matthew Petti | 7.22.2026 11:38 AM

Jailing Netanyahu

Liz Wolfe | 7.22.2026 9:30 AM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS Add Reason to Google

© 2026 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Reason's July 4 Special!

For America's 250th, Get 2 Years of Reason for $17.76

Celebrate your independence with a subscription to Reason magazine, your most trusted source of honest, insightful news and analysis.

Subscribe to Reason