Review: Bullet Vending Machines Debut in U.S. Grocery Stores
The company claims its machines are more effective than store shelves at preventing shoplifters or underage purchases.

American Rounds has rolled out vending machines in a half-dozen grocery stores in the South, with plans to expand later in 2024. The machines are not for lottery tickets or gumballs, but for bullets.
I trekked to a Fresh Value grocery store in Pell City, Alabama, to try one out. Shoppers choose from the available stock on a giant touch screen. Selection is limited to common gauges and calibers, with more variety for handguns than for long guns. I grabbed a box of bullets for my .38 special revolver. But for the 1936 16-gauge shotgun passed down from my grandfather, I was out of luck: Only 12- and 20-gauge shells were on offer.
Federal law puts the same age limits for legal purchase of ammunition as for guns: 18 for rifle and shotgun shells, 21 for handgun bullets. American Rounds' machines scan your ID and verify you with AI facial recognition software, a process like setting up Face ID on an iPhone. (A company spokesman tells Reason that it uses "facial mapping" to match people to their IDs, and that "information is never shared, stored, or sold.")
While gun control advocates may recoil at bullets in readily accessible vending machines, the company claims its machines are more effective than store shelves at preventing shoplifters or underage purchases. In fact, the time my bullets were most likely to be stolen was when I left them in the car to go back into the store to buy candy for the trip home.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
American Rounds' machines scan your ID and verify you with AI facial recognition software...
This isn't the delivery mechanism I expected Skynet would be using to spit bullets at humanity.
This is *exactly* the delivery mechanism I would expect in a few years to be revealed to be a front for social engineering efforts by Flowers By Irene.
Like they practically coordinated the thing to the Patriot Front outfits.
What Joe Lancaster got wrong about modern centerfire handgun/rifle cartridges.
Do the vending machines sell bullets for say muzzleloaders or those that reload -or- do the vending machines sell loaded cartridges?
A loaded (centerfire handgun/rifle) cartridge also includes the case, powder, and primer in addition to the bullet.
A loaded shotgun shell will have different components such as the hull, base, primer, powder, and projectile components that can vary depending on if it is shot or a slug.
Perfectly pithy.
That really stuck out like a sore thumb. I know what non-gun people mean when they say "bullet", but I have never heard anyone who has a gun say he was buying "bullets" unless he was a reloader. Maybe it's a regional thing.
I understand the headline needs to be short. “Loaded Firearms Cartridges Vending Machines…” is too long.
I think “Ammo Vending Machines…” would have been better.
As you know, a clip ≠ a magazine.
He had a good name, right in front of him as he was buying his ammo: "American Rounds".
It's a not-really-secret fact that Reason 'editors' don't write their own headlines. The URL suggests that Joe went with "American Rounds" as the headline and it may've been changed by someone, or something, else.
They won’t get a bulletzer prize for the mistake.
That's nice. Did the editors also do a global search and replace for "bullets"?
I have never heard anyone who has a gun say he was buying “bullets” unless he was a reloader. Maybe it’s a regional thing.
No. Actually, it’s a rather oblique cultural thing, arguably dog whistling. This is my point about Chase Oliver’s .38. Joe is a gun owner the way Chase Oliver or Kamala Harris or Joe Biden or Michael Moore are gun owners. Guns are like functioning movie props someone gifted them. Like BMW owners who consider themselves to be car guys.
Not really impugning them. Plenty of people like that around. Waylon Jennings, supposedly, owned “.410 rifle”. Everlast in his one big hit talks about a drug dealer thug/gangster who, apparently, carries a Colt .45. In ‘The Matrix’ Neo picks up an MP5 and, when firing, is depicted ejecting 5.56 cases.
Impossible to know everything. That’s why we normally put the safety rules up front.
Joe is incorrect. It isn’t like someone not being able to identify whether an AK underfolder is a Romanian WASR10 or a Yugo M70 from a photo. The bullet is just the projectile.
I'm not saying he's correct.
God created man, Samuel Colt, not John Dewey, made them equal.
If he was dispensed a box, it had “Cartridges” printed on it.
Go to say Cabelas, buy a box of bullets for a caliber firearm you own, and see how well that works in that firearm.
I’m not grilling him over something like, “He called it .38 caliber and it is really .357 caliber.”
This isn’t tomayto tomahto. At best, it is tomato tomatillo.
Meh. I enjoy being pedantic as much as anyone. But plenty of people who know better still call cartridges "bullets" sometimes. As long as it's clear what you're talking about, does it really matter?
Then they don’t know better or are retards that perhaps shouldn’t have unsupervised access to firearms. For his .38 Special to go bang, it needs more things than the bullet.
Even the NPR story headline did a better job than this:
https://www.npr.org/2024/07/11/nx-s1-5033748/ammunition-vending-machines-grocery-stores
The company that makes them argues it’s a safer way to sell ammo than online or off the shelf. But experts have raised concerns about increasing its availability in a country where gun violence is already widespread.
Experts... EXPERTS! NPR talked to... EXPERTS!
That is a fucking term that needs to be retired from Journolisming.
I didn’t read the article, just the headline. It is disappointing that NPR gets a 2A issue more technically correct than a Free Minds, Free Market (and JD Vance is Wrong) publication.
But they did still use “bullets” albeit for alliteration.
Joe gets a C (C-?) for covering the story and for owning firearms. NPR gets a D for getting it more correct but then following with fascist rhetoric from irrelevant authorities.
I’m not trying to be a dick to Joe, even wrote him a replacement headline, but this is going in the print edition and it would be correct if the words were correct.
Experts in what? Being concerned about things?
If you are writing for a magazine, then yeah you should use the correct terminology. I'm just saying it's not a terribly uncommon usage, even among people who do know that strictly speaking the bullet is only the projectile.
Other than antis, including politicians, I have heard “bullet” used instead of “cartridge” by just one person that owns guns in the past few years. She’s a dipshit but she’s also an OnlyFans model. OnlyFans plural. That’s not how I knew her but she has used that. She also referred to magazines as clips. Mensa isn’t calling her.
I’m in multiple forums where 2A stuff gets discussed, read user reviews for 2A products, watch 2A related content, and don’t recall seeing it any of those places.
It is a rare outlier for me to see it beyond “politician X on MSM outlet Y said…bullet…”. This would be just the second time out of potentially thousands, unless Reason falls under the MSM monicker than it would be just the once.
One of her DA/SA hammer guns scares her because of manually lowering the hammer after being in single action mode by holding the hammer, squeezing the trigger, then slowly dropping the hammer to rest. It has a decocker…
The "take peoples' dollars and give them bullets" business is not new to grocery stores in Chicago.
How much of a markup? How big of a box can I get? If the best I can get is a box of 50 for a 50% markup then I'll pass. I'll stick with buying 500 or more at a time.
"...information is never shared, saved or sold" until it is and we find out they pull a 23 and Me handing out DNA information to any law enforcement entity that asks no warrant needed. Hard pass.
23andMe? Try Liberty (Gun) Safes handing over the combinations of Jan. 6th protesters.
Like I said to Fist above, the machine looks like it should be wearing khaki pants and a hat.
Like I said to Fist above, the machine looks like it should be wearing khaki pants and a hat.
And delivering paperwork to a woman who's *checks Seattle Times* descended into conspiracy theory.
Oh, yeah. That cost them bigtime and is still costing them. Rhino Safes, who I recommend, came out with an immediate ad stating they would never turn over anything without a court order. Brilliant marketing on their part.
Federal law puts the same age limits for legal purchase of ammunition as for guns: 18 for rifle and shotgun shells, 21 for handgun bullets. American Rounds' machines scan your ID and verify you with AI facial recognition software, a process like setting up Face ID on an iPhone. (A company spokesman tells Reason that it uses "facial mapping" to match people to their IDs, and that "information is never shared, stored, or sold.")
But showing an ID to consume porn is both an insurmountable obstacle *and* de facto violation of free speech.
Don't even get me started on voting or dispensing a perfectly safe and 100% effective coathanger from a vending machine that may or may not result in a parking lot bleedout.
Let's create an environment where getting a biometric scan to exercise you 2A right becomes the norm.
I'll pass.
I am amazed you can afford 'bullets' and candy in the same trip.
I wanna see YouTube videos of progressives encountering these vending machines for the first time 😀
No, thanks. Nice try.
"Customer, please step up to the machine and scan your face. Your data will be confidential and we adhere to the highest privacy standards. We never share, store, or sell your information except that which is mandated by secretive govt back-doors into our third-party, closed-source software."
Even absent that nonsense, I can be annoyed and get over what was a sub $1 item getting stuck in a machine.
Not so forgiving if it's a $40 box or a $100+ bag getting jammed up inside.
Would that be a failure to feed or failure to eject?
Why is it limited to bullets? It should dispense firearms as well.
[deleted]