Federal Court Blocks Biden's Income-Based Student Loan Forgiveness Plan
The SAVE plan would have dramatically reduced the amount borrowers were required to pay back before receiving forgiveness—and cost taxpayers almost $500 billion over the next decade.

The Biden administration's attempt to remake the federal student loan program has experienced a major setback. On Thursday, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 8th Circuit blocked the SAVE plan, an income-driven repayment (IDR) plan that would have dramatically reduced the amount student loan borrowers were required to pay back before receiving forgiveness.
While a pair of federal judges struck down parts of the program in June, Thursday's decision completely blocks the program.
In 2022, Biden announced a plan to forgive up to $20,000 in federal student loans for borrowers earning less than $125,000 and couples earning less than $250,000. However, the plan was swiftly blocked in federal court and eventually halted by the Supreme Court.
But even if Biden couldn't enact blanket student loan forgiveness, many of his administration's other changes to the federal student loan program went unchanged. These reforms—most notable among them, the introduction of the SAVE plan—rapidly increased the amount of loan forgiveness offered to borrowers.
Under the REPAYE plan, the most popular IDR plan in use before Biden's changes, borrowers' monthly payments were set at 10 percent of their discretionary income, calculated as earnings above 150 percent of the federal poverty level. Borrowers then received forgiveness after 20 years of on-time payments (or 25 years for graduate borrowers).
Under the SAVE plan, borrowers were only required to pay 5 percent of their discretionary income, now defined as earnings above 225 percent of the poverty rate. Borrowers would only have to make 10 years of payments before forgiveness if the balance is less than $12,000. In all, these changes are estimated to have contributed $145 billion to the 2024 budget deficit alone.
So far, Republican-led states have mounted two separate lawsuits challenging the SAVE plan, arguing the plan is an illegal exercise of executive spending. In June, federal judges based in Kansas and Missouri released injunctions collectively blocking the Biden administration from forgiving more loans under the SAVE plan and slashing borrowers' monthly payments. On Thursday, the remaining provisions of the plan were also blocked by the 8th Circuit.
Following the ruling, Education Secretary Miguel Cardona said that the department would place all borrowers enrolled in the SAVE plan in an "interest-free forbearance while our Administration continues to vigorously defend the SAVE Plan in court."
For now, the future of the SAVE plan looks bleak—and for good reason. One analysis predicted that the plan would cost taxpayers almost $500 billion over the next decade.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Fuck Joe Biden
– federal court
lol
Winning.
The court says the plan is illegal.
The Biden administration says “OK, we'll just stop charging interest and collecting payments”.
And Trump is the insurrectionist?
How can the courts do this. I've been assured Joe recognizes the constitution.
Joe doesn't recognize his own face in the mirror - - - - - - - - -
He may still recognize children within sniffing distance.
Not without cue cards or a teleprompter.
The many videos showing Biden sniffing kids, groping kids, and kissing kids all seem to be Biden just being Biden without any instructions. Same for when Biden showered with his daughter, per her diary - that may have been him just doing his thing.
Oh, he was doing his Thing alright!
Especially in the shower………
That’s right. Biden’s daughter wrote in her diary how Biden showered with her.
He just wanted to make sure she was nice and clean. That's why he soaped her up, and rubbed her down all over.
But that would wash away the smell.
""I’ve been assured Joe recognizes the constitution.""
He did, and said he couldn't do this. He noted it was up to Congress to pass something. Pelosi backed him up.
Then he acted like he never said it.
To be fair, he probably doesn't remember saying it.
If the elimination of interest on the loans was the worst part of Biden's plan, I'd think he might not be as cognitively delayed as I thought.
I would support that if we're going to continue with student loans. The government should not be charging interest to citizens. If you borrow $20,000, you should pay back $20,000.
That only works if the government isn’t already on record as saying they are intentionally inflating the currency by 2 or 3 percent a year, and often by more than that accidentally.
And the loans aren't from the government, they're guaranteed by the government. What bank is going to loan money at 0 percent? The government (i.e. taxpayers) will have to pay the interest.
That's incorrect. The federal government started taking over student loans directly in 1992. Since 2007, all federal student loans are direct loans. Very few students take educational loans directly from banks anymore.
The government should not be charging interest to citizens.
The government shouldn't be lending money to citizens.
OK, I like this. But how many retarded Democrats will still see Biden as their hero, and nasty, orc republicans as the evil enemy that must be vanquished?
The ones with worthless degrees and huge debts because they’re retards, who are easily lead.
110%.
It will be reversed on standing.
Look, this an easy win for the Democrats.
Just have Brandon explain live on camera the pros and cons of student loan forgiveness, and how he thoughtfully concluded that it was the right thing to do for the country. They can arrange to have a dependable Team Blue lickspittle like George Stephanopoulos throw him a couple softball questions, in a quasi-interview format. Biden’ll knock it out of the park, guaranteed. What could go wrong?
Don’t quit buddy, Let’s Go Brandon!
I fail to see how I should pay for loans that adults took out to finance degrees in "studies" and other fake majors that would never allow them to make a living. When am I going to get government to shower me with money for the 60-70 hrs a week I've worked the last 30 yrs and am now seeing my 401k destroyed by Biden's inflation, spending and irresponsible monetary policy?
Hang on there, you will be getting a bigly, beautiful monthly Social Security check in just a few years.
Actually, they require direct deposit now - - - - - - - - - -
Wait, how is your 401(k) being “destroyed by Biden’s inflation”? Any normal 401(k) will be mostly stocks and bonds, neither of which is damaged (directly) by inflation.
If you had just invested in a Dow-tracking mutual fund — y’know, like any investment adviser with an IQ over 70 would have told you to do — you would have “doubled” your money in the last 5 years. Admitted the Trump/Biden inflation would have eroded that money by 20%+, but you’d still be way ahead.
Bonds are destroyed by inflation. People (and banks!) locked in long term bonds at 2% interest, only to see inflation shoot up to 8 or 9%. Who wants to buy that bond at face value then?
You're not paying for it.
Loan forgiveness is just another way to provide taxpayer funded ”education.” Note the quotes because it just allows institutions to continue to ramp up tuition to pay for more useless administrators, DEI and student services leeches, whom all vote heavy progressive, to churn out degrees that perpetuate more useless degrees (and brain dead voters) in those fields.
How will those majoring in DEI subjects repay the loans that they took out? The secret service doesn’t pay well.
Not very good at recruiting, either, it seems.
They'll get jobs as DEI officers at schools and businesses.
Are these loans "forgiven" or is the debt merely being shifted on to someone else?
If you loan someone money and then decide later not to ask for it back, the debt has not been "shifted"; it ceases to exist. Now, if you then proceed to spend the money as if you HAD been repaid, even though you don't have it, then you are taking on debt.
If the economy is roaring along like Biden claims then why does anyone need loan forgiveness? They should be getting rich with those fancy college degrees.
On the right track US judiciary; now keep going..... 🙂
Word on the street, Biden's going to resign.
Harris met with staffers to report the news.
But the FAFSA money is still flowing. Right Emma? Right Emma?!
Need more victims for the next (D) candidate/president to save.
Also need to maintain all the university admin and academic departments, vested in DEI, for further propaganda and student programing.
Well, it's official. Joe Biden will win the election, but Donald Trump will be the next president. So sayeth the MAGA Dowsing Rod.
https://boingboing.net/2024/07/19/newly-minted-dowsing-rod-expert-declares-trump-will-be-president-in-2025.html
My uncle was a whiz with dowsing rods. He never failed to find water when people were trying to locate a well. Probably because water was everywhere, if you drill deep enough.
There's lots of places where that isn't true. However, the dowsers' belief that there are "veins" of water everywhere is BS.
How many times does this need to be "blocked" before leakin' Joe's handlers understand the courts are no longer the lap-dogs of the left?
It's OK for the courts block these initiatives so long as they wait until after the election to do so.
Can't these judges have some consideration for a candidate's political needs?
The author seems to think that the biggest issue is the cost, not the blatant violation of constitutional separation of power. The wisdom of this program isn’t under consideration: it’s whether the executive can create its own tax policy- a legislative prerogative.
The problem with saying that it costs money, assumes that the loans will be paid back in full. That's not gonna happen.
It also assumes that the money will all be spent, whether or not it is paid back. Sadly, probably a good assumption.
This is excellent news and demonstrates how a healthy judiciary system can counteract federal overreach. The loan forgiveness proposed by Biden and his progressive backers is an excellent example of the hypocrisy of the Left, which speaks equity and inclusion but is more than happy to throw those values to the wayside when they can help their own.
I'm hopeful the courts will continue to contain federal overreach, whether it be from progressive Democrats or a nationalist MAGA.
Mute list: JesseAZ, sevo, Nardz, Red Rocks White Privilege
LOL @ Mute list.
The mute list is inspired from the Firefox extension uBlock origin, which blocks noxious content so as to improve the browsing experience. Since Reason’s libertarian ideals prevent it from banning posters, an alternative solution is to offer mute lists to which users can subscribe. Sharing my list is an intermediate solution I hope others might emulate while we wait for Reason to implement this feature. It does make the comments much more readable.
Mute list: JesseAZ, sevo, Nardz, Red Rocks White Privilege
So... how does one go about getting on the Mute list? Asking for a friend.
Democrats are blithering idiots.
Defending democracy and the Constitution would be a lot easier if the courts would stop interfering.....
Where is US Student Loan forgiveness in the Constitution?
Only Congress can dispose of federal property.
The federal government has property rights in the money that's owed to it.
Forgiving a federal debt is disposing of federal property.
So...if Biden wants to forgive these debts, he has to find a Congressional statute which empowers him to do so.
That's some awfully creative thinking there turning UNCONSTITUTIONAL loaning/banking into 'Territory' property. In fact it's so creative it's just downright complete BS.
The problem is how's one to ask the Administration to obey the US Constitution about a subject the US Constitution never allowed in the first place. Student loaning should've never existed in the first place.
So that makes it even *less* permissible for the President to surrender the money to the borrowers, retard. Of course, the question of Congressional power only comes up if Congress *has* attempted to authorize this particular loan forgiveness program. But if Congress *hasn’t* authorized it, then even if the loan program is legitimate, the President can’t dispose of the money, in fact he’s obliged to get in back.
It makes it a double violation of the US Constitution ... retard.
"only congress" doesn't have that authority so it cannot legally dispose of 'armed-theft' anymore than the president can.
I took out loans to pay for college. Not a huge amount, since I went to a junior college then transferred to a public university where I live. The loans were deferred during the pandemic and resumed last year. I make about $70K a year working in an office, and my minimum monthly payments are only $155. Is anyone supposed to believe I am unable to pay this, or shouldn't have to? If not me, then who? The taxpayers who didn't go to college? The ones who did, but already paid off their loans? Make it make sense.
And the least-common denominator in all of it is always the same ... Which [WE] mob will get to use the Gov-Guns and do some 'armed-theft' crimes to their own benefit.
It's a running repetition of history and socialist corrupt governing. It really doesn't matter if anyone thinks it'll work this time. It's government going criminal (working for criminal minds) by it's very socialist ideology.