At the Republican National Convention, War Is Peace
Trump’s supporters tried to sell “peace through strength”—and war for “generations to come.”

Rep. Mike Waltz (R–Fla.) is a fan of forever wars if there ever was one.
"Under President [Donald] Trump we had a president who defeated ISIS, broke Iran, stood with Israel, always stood with our allies, made China pay," Waltz bragged at the Republican National Convention on Wednesday night. "You didn't see any spy balloons under President Trump, did you? He deterred Russia. You know what he told [Russian leader Vladimir] Putin? You try anything, and I'll take the tops off the Kremlin."
And to round it all out, Waltz called President Joe Biden's military withdrawal from Afghanistan "a stain on our national conscience," promising instead that Trump brings "peace through America's strength."
That was the message of the RNC's third night. Although some speakers made nods to ending the "endless wars" or achieving "peace through strength," the convention was a relentless attack on any kind of military drawdown or diplomacy—or as former speaker of the house Newt Gingrich put it, "appeasement in the world."
Instead, speakers called for Americans to prepare for an endless struggle against a kaleidoscope of enemies, especially in the Middle East and Muslim world. The night began with a speech by Rep. Brian Mast (R–Fla.), a U.S. Army veteran who was wounded in Afghanistan and later volunteered for the Israeli military.
"Biden and [Vice President Kamala] Harris's weakness invites aggression and our enemies are on the march," he said. "Russia invaded Ukraine. Hamas attacked Israel. Iran is funding terror across the Middle East and the Chinese Community Party has Taiwan in their crosshairs."
How did Republicans reconcile this belligerent worldview with a message of peace? Vice presidential nominee J.D. Vance said that "we will send our kids to war only when we must, but as President Trump showed with the elimination of ISIS and so much more, when we punch, we will punch hard."
Former Trump administration official Richard Grenell similarly claimed a vote for Trump is "a vote for the strength and grace that will bring peace and prosperity back to you," because enemies would "dare not escalate" against him.
It's a new spin on a stale old sales pitch. By pretending that the problem is a lack of will rather than the real limits to American power, Republicans are offering to win without sacrifice. Like the Bush administration before them, the next Republican administration will learn that it cannot just "create our own reality" by wanting it hard enough.
Bizarrely, Grenell railed against exactly the kind of policies he implemented during the Trump administration. "We intervened in other countries' affairs and signed treaties that only benefited other nations" during past administrations, Grenell complained. "We spent too many years ignoring America's priorities."
Old habits die hard, apparently. During his tenure as U.S. Ambassador to Germany from 2018 to 2020, Grenell aggressively pushed his German hosts to stop doing business with Russia and Iran and made "unprecedented" interventions in German politics. His crowning diplomatic achievement was a Serbia-Kosovo peace agreement that included a random laundry list of U.S. demands, from recognizing Jerusalem as the capital of Israel to decriminalizing homosexuality.
Almost every foreign policy speaker also condemned the U.S. military withdrawal from Afghanistan. Some tried to argue that the problem was not the deal to withdraw, which Trump had initiated, but the way Biden implemented it. "President Trump orchestrated an orderly end to the Afghanistan war with no American killed in nearly two years. Biden ordered a chaotic panic-filled withdrawal that left 13 American troops and hundreds of Afghans dead," Gingrich said.
Other speakers didn't even pretend to want peace—and actually argued for new wars. Former acting Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) Director Thomas Homan promised that Trump would designate Latin American drug cartels as terrorist groups and "wipe [them] off the face of the earth." Many Republicans have made no secret of their desire to invade Mexico in order to expand the war on drugs.
U.S. Army veteran David Bellavia, meanwhile, promised the next Trump administration would seek vengeance against all of its foreign enemies for "generations" to come—in other words, endless war.
"Our enemies will know that American power is as decisive as it is overwhelming. And if you provoke the United States of America, we will hurt you," he thundered. "If you threaten citizens of the United States of America, we will hurt you for generations to come, so help me God."
The forever wars are dead. Long live the forever wars.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
It beats the shit outta Peace being War, doesn't it?
The best way to insure peace is to be prepared for war. Fuck you Petti. This is you second day in a row being a disingenuous dick who zero clue what the fuck you're talking about. We weren't prepared in 1941, how the fuck did that work out when it came to avoiding war you dumb fucker?
Meant as a standalone post.
Forgiven, still works anyway.
All the stupidest writers are earning their brown envelopes today.
Britschigi just posted an article saying that Trump supports zoning regulations, based on a statement by Trump in which he explicitly condemns zoning regulations. His take was literally the opposite of what Trump actually said.
Boehm's piece qualifies for full retard status, too.
Are we going to get 8 articles a day of adolescent snark when the democrat convention goes off, too?
They can't claim to be libertarian and post another voting article where they reluctantly vote Joe, so they are now down to these obvious misrepresentations to help Joe instead.
It might have been worse than that - Britches blamed Trump for Flop-Flipping, where he originally disagreed with Trump's take on the issue, but now, it's closer to what Christian wants as policy. But let's roast him for it anyway. Even though it should not ever be a matter for the president.
Honestly, if Britches had roasted him on wading into a policy topic that shouldn't be a presidential concern, I'd have a bit more respect.
It's flip-flopping when Republicans do it. When democrats do it, ''the facts changed.''
Or they “evolve”.
To be fair, they’ve been directed to stump for the Biden Administration, an impossible assignment. I guess their best efforts add up to the vast amounts of bullshit they’ve been power shoveling around here this week. I’d be pissed if I was the one paying for it.
Reason isn’t up to the task, and they’re not the only publication that’s fallen flat on their faces since DJT’s failed assassination attempt. It really is an embarrassment. I’m beginning to suspect their hearts aren’t into it.
Who can blame them?
+1. Need a like button!
"Under President [Donald] Trump we had a president who defeated ISIS, broke Iran, stood with Israel, always stood with our allies, made China pay,"
And he did it without starting any new actual shooting wars. Just through policy. Weird. (and not to give him too much credit, he did it with and through a lot of advisors, true) He did drop a bunch of cruise missles on Syria that one time, which a lot of us criticized.
The Biden is strong with this one. He's just ... Biden ... his time until the DNC, when he can write the same nonsense about Dems.
Like the Russian joke about the American who brags they have freedom of speech, because he can stand outside the White House and insult Ronald Reagan. The Russian says they, too, have freedom of speech; he, too, can stand outside the Kremlin and insult Ronald Reagan.
"speakers called for Americans to prepare for an endless struggle against a kaleidoscope of enemies"
Should we be unprepared? Is that the better option? What are we advocating for?
I think the military spending could be pared back A LOT. I think that most of our foreign 'forward' bases could be dismantled / abandoned / turned over to the host countries. (Planned and orderly, not like fleeing Kabul) I think we can and should expect the rest of the civilized world to be able to defend themselves and not lean on us so heavily. Great. What's the plan there?
The West needs to always be prepared for ensuring Peace through Strength. Otherwise, we will not have either. But it doesn't need to be, and shouldn't have to be, the USA carrying most of that burden on its own.
Remember when Reason was screaming that Trump started WW3 with Russia because of a dead Iranian terrorist?
Remember when Reason kept it's mouth shut and never once acknowledged Trump's peace deal between Serbia and Kosovo? Or the Abraham Accords? Or his successful negotiations with the Taliban, that Cheney and the House Democrats delayed and then Joe ended up fucking up?
Remember how the Democrat-sympathetic Reason writers spent most of 2017 telling us how Trump was going to start a nuclear war with North Korea and then got all grumpy when Kim and Trump held peace talks instead?
I member
Also when he didn't attack Syria hard enough.
Were the Abraham Accords the ones where he nearly, almost, delivered peace to the Middle East by convincing a couple of relatively strong Arab states to recognize Israel as a legit country?
Something that had eluded US presidents for 60 years? Or am I misremembering them?
You are correct. Done so through shared economic interest to cut through the hatred.
They criticized the mere fact that Trump was "sitting down with dictators".
Still beats the hell out of "bending over for dictators".
Reason who the fuck hired this dipshit to write? He’s dumber than Biden and more disingenuous than Joe Scarborough. Fuck, you guys are really scraping the bottom of the barrel with this fucking puerile, jejune morons writings.
His bio reads like an establishment global-homo superstar:
"Matthew Petti is an assistant editor at Reason and a proud New Jersey native. He has previously reported for the BBC (in Persian and English), The Intercept, The Daily Beast, New Lines magazine, Responsible Statecraft, Middle East Eye, and The National Interest, among other publications. Matthew covers U.S. national security policy and its interactions with American society and domestic politics.
In 2022, Matthew was awarded a Fulbright fellowship to research the ways in which Arab journalists interact with foreign media. Through the Fulbright program, he worked at a variety of newsrooms in Amman, including Jordan News and Radio al-Balad, where he hosted a program on Latin music. Previously, he was a Center for Arabic Study Abroad and Foreign Language Area Studies fellow in Amman.
Matthew graduated from Columbia University with a bachelor's degree in Middle Eastern, South Asian, and African Studies. He got his start in journalism as a features writer at the Columbia Daily Spectator.
He is literally advertising his March through institutions. A dyed in the wool liberal cosplaying as a libertarian. This is happening at CATO and other libertarian "think tanks" as well.
...
And you deny that?!!!!
I've been told that you should never go 'full retard', but here we are.
Instead, speakers called for Americans to prepare for an endless struggle against a kaleidoscope of enemies, especially in the Middle East and Muslim world.
Well, I mean, if you ever really want to end the “forever wars” we’re going to have to exterminate Islam. (And Communism.) There’s just no two ways about it.
Yea, OK – will they ever really be gone forever? Probably not. But they can be neutered to such a degree – like we did the Nazis – where they’ll be completely incapable of ever recovering in force ever again. And that’s what we should aim for. Kill them, and keep killing them, and keep killing them until they no longer present a threat to ANYONE on the planet.
The failing in this article is what I ALWAYS see coming from the sissy peacenik dove crowd – they don’t want to acknowledge evil. Because if they don’t acknowledge it, they don’t have to fight it. And fighting it is a moral (if not existential!) duty they want to avoid.
We all know this is true, even if many don’t want to admit it. What really blows my mind is pop culture when it comes to this. The people who write this stuff will be all, ‘omg no more endless war’ – but the stories they tell reveal the truth. They all know it AND acknowledge it. Like, zombie fiction. The ONLY way to survive is to kill all the zombies. Or else they WILL kill you. The alternative is a life on the run, cowering and hiding, and hoping they don’t find you.
Is that the kind of life you want? Or should we just quit pussyfooting around our distaste for war, and just go kill all the bad guys?
Well the Nazis just put on a katiffah and wave Palestinian flags and work in globalist governments im the EU.
I'm pretty convinced that the reason there's no depictions of Muhammed is because he totally had a Hitler stache.
In dealing with other states there are four possible stances: powerful and reasonable, weak and reasonable, powerful and belligerent, and weak and belligerent. The stance advocated for by the Republicans last night seemed closest to the first. It’s a stance that has been recognized for millennia by non-imbeciles as the most consistent with peace. Don’t look for wars, try to avoid them, and let any potential aggressor know war with you would be very costly. The sad truth is that Trump was perhaps the only imperfect and brief respite from the larger trend of getting weaker and more belligerent. Petti is clearly too stupid to understand this.
It would be like ReSon pretending to be for self defense but then saying you shouldn't buy weapons to promote your self defense.
The articles lately have been especially dumb. The details presented don't support their thesis and they label good/correct things as bad/wrong. It's bad when even an uninformed person can see the disconnect between the facts and conclusions presented in the same article
Sarc can't see through it. Neither can jeff.
Endless war Matthew?
https://www.globalresearch.ca/russiagate-2-0-donald-trump-has-opted-for-real-peace-negotiations-with-a-foreign-adversary/5862691
Real peace negotiations are an integral part of Trump’s election campaign.
Trump’s national security advisory team has prepared a balanced plan: if the Kiev regime does not enter into peace talks with Moscow, the U.S. would (under a Trump presidency) immediately suspend the flow of US weapons to Ukraine:
“Under the plan drawn up by [General Keith] Kellogg and Fred Fleitz, who both served as chiefs of staff in Trump’s National Security Council during his 2017-2021 presidency, there would be a ceasefire based on prevailing battle lines during peace talks, Fleitz said.
They have presented their strategy to Trump, and the Republican presidential candidate responded favorably”. (Reuters, June 23, 2024)
It is worth noting that this peace proposal — which is part of his election campaign — was formulated barely a few weeks prior to the failed attempt to assassinate Donald Trump in Pennsylvania.
I'm glad I don't give Reason any money for this dumpster fire of articles that we're seeing lately.
Is this clown legitimately retarded? Or on the Biden Campaign? Or both?
One of the worst cases of projecting your own biases into a story I've seen.