Virginia To Enact 'Cell Phone–Free Education' in Public Schools
The move "will significantly reduce the amount of time students can be on phones without parental supervision," according to Gov. Glenn Youngkin.

On Tuesday, Republican Gov. Glenn Youngkin signed an executive order mandating the introduction of "cell phone–free education" in Virginia public schools.
"The necessity of implementing cell phone–free education in Virginia's K-12 public schools is increasingly evident," Youngkin's order reads. "Parents, public health professionals, educators and other stakeholders across the Commonwealth are expressing concern over the alarming mental health crisis and chronic health conditions affecting adolescents, such as depression and anxiety, driven in part by extensive social media usage and widespread cell phone possession among children. Cell phone–free education will significantly reduce the amount of time students can be on phones without parental supervision."
Youngkin's directive orders state health and education bureaucrats to draft guidelines for schools, including a detailed definition of "cell phone–free education," model implementation plans, and alternatives for parents to contact their children when necessary during the school day.
"Creating a cell phone–free education environment in public schools is not only a prudent measure but an essential one to promote a healthier and more focused educational environment where every child is free to learn," the order reads.
Some critics have been suspicious of the widespread claims that phone use is the direct cause of increases in teen anxiety and depression. A much better case can be made that phones simply distract students, making teaching more difficult.
"One study from 2016 found that 97 percent of college students said that they sometimes use their phones during class for non-educational purposes," wrote psychologist and author Jonathan Haidt last year. "Nearly 60 percent of students said that they spend more than 10 percent of class time on their phones, mostly texting. Many studies show that students who use their phones during class learn less and get lower grades."
Youngkin's order is a better alternative to laws enacting sweeping bans on social media use by minors. While the precise changes to school policy are still unknown, the state government would do well to allow considerable flexibility, giving individual school districts and principals the ability to customize changes to best serve the needs of parents and students in their communities.
However, some skepticism might still be in order here. Virginia has enacted freedom-curbing anti-tech legislation in the past in the name of protecting children. For example, Youngkin signed a bill into law last year requiring age verification for porn website access in the state.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Kids don’t need cell phones, but the government has no business saying so.
They do have great legal and ethical leeway in regulating the conduct of public school students.
I'd agree with greater leeway but not necessarily great. It must still be connected to their educational mission (and the disruption thereof). I think there's a decent argument that's the case here, unlike some other recent school-related policy decisions that have made the news.
While the kids are incarcerated in public schools under compulsory education laws, it is the government's business.
Government schools only exist to create workers and soldiers; too bad there aren’t any jobs left for the poor bastards.
"One study from 2016 found that 97 percent of college students said that they sometimes use their phones during class for non-educational purposes."
"The same study found that 3 percent of college students are liars."
LOL
I see absolutely no reason for school kids or employees, in most circumstances, to be staring at their cellphones all day. Those that disagree should invest in their own charter schools that award bonus points for cool texts and reports on cute kitten videos. And ironic T shirts. Meanwhile they can all stay off my lawn. I don't find this stuff amusing anymore.
Will you be my bodyguard? I can be your long-lost pal.
Alright Al.
Because all issues are best addressed by a top-down mandate. What could possibly go wrong?
Government: “We need more computers in the classroom!”
Also Government: “We must ban students from referring to those powerful computers they carry around in their pocket all day!”
Unfortunately they tend to use those powerful computers for texting their friends instead of doing schoolwork.
We used to play Oil Tycoon on the TRS80s in my Junior High computer lab.
Just sayin'.
(Not that I disagree with you. Cell Phones are less "computers in your pocket" so much as "machines specifically designed to be distracting so they can show you targeted ads in your pocket.")
This is skibidi Ohio
Creating a cell phone–free education environment in public schools is not only a prudent measure but an essential one to promote a healthier and more focused educational environment where every child is free to learn
As much as I agree with the plan here, a much better way to achieve the above is to cease admitting kids who are uneducatable. And expel those that are disruptive.
That's still closing the gate after the horses are gone. The real solution is to stop subsidizing the reproduction of indigent unmarried women. They're the ones producing most of the ineducable, socially feral children disrupting the schools.
Get rid of public schools. Problem solved.
Even better: how about union-free education?
There should be no teacher’s union.
No educators should marry?
Only if they're sterilized first.
Contracting with all public employee unions should be outlawed.
I don’t think you need to point to any mental health aspects to justify this one. They’re an impediment to classroom education, period.
And I don’t really think government intervention would be necessary here – except for the fact that teachers obviously can’t be relied upon to do their jobs.
There’s a really simple solution here, and no reason for any classroom in any school to ignore it. Buy a collectibles storage box (something like this: https://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/B0BWS6Z255/reasonmagazinea-20/ put every student’s name on a cubby, and have the students turn the phone off and store it in the cubby until after class. Not quite the extent of an outright ban, and addresses the problem in the most minimally intrusive way.
And students found with a cell phone have the phone destroyed at a school assembly.
Haha, I like it!
Kids don't have some "right" to have distracting devices with them at school. Seems fine to me.
Who’s going to call 911 when school staff have to comply with internal regulations to engage in minor abuse?
I don’t know about high school, but when I taught math to a slightly older age group at a Junior College, my biggest competition came from smart phones. Kids texted, played video games, and on more than one occasion, I found kids cheating by texting pictures of their solved test problems to other kids during the test.