Why Are So Many People Eligible for Public Service Loan Forgiveness?
A recent case in the 4th Circuit Court of Appeals highlights just how bloated PSLF eligibility has become.

On Tuesday, a federal court dismissed a lawsuit against the Pennsylvania Higher Education Assistance Agency, made by a man who says he was given incorrect information that led him to not receive student debt cancelation under the Public Service Loan Forgiveness (PSLF) program.
While the lawsuit focuses on one person's grievance, the case highlights just how absurdly broad eligibility for the PSLF program has become. Intuition would imply that the program would only apply to a small number of truly public-service, poorly paid jobs, but as many as 25 percent of Americans actually qualify for the program, including many working for private employers.
According to the six-page opinion from the 4th Circuit Court of Appeals, Todd Berman took out two loans from the Department of Education. In order to qualify for PSLF, he had to work at a qualifying employer for 10 years. For four years, Berman served in the United States Army, a qualifying employer, but trouble arose when Berman changed jobs. He claims that he was repeatedly told that his new employer, Blue Cross Blue Shield of North Carolina—a private not-for-profit health insurance company—qualified for the program. However, in 2018, he was sent a letter informing him that his employer no longer qualified.
Following this notice, Berman consolidated his federal loans into private loans. The next year, however, he was informed that Blue Cross Blue Shield of North Carolina actually did qualify for the PSLF program. Unable to gain forgiveness with privately held loans, Berman sued.
After first having his case dismissed by a lower court, the 4th Circuit Court of Appeals again dismissed Berman's suit, arguing that the Pennsylvania Higher Education Assistance Agency was immune from the suit.
"If there is a villain in this story, it is the Department—not the Agency. Berman might have sought to challenge the Department's conclusion that Blue Cross Blue Shield of North Carolina was not a qualifying public service employee," Judge Toby J. Heytens wrote in the court's opinion. "But sovereign immunity always would have prevented Berman from suing the Department for money damages, and Berman may not evade that result by suing the Department's agent instead."
While the Pennsylvania Higher Education Assistance Agency should not have given Berman conflicting information, his case raises another question entirely. Why was a private health insurance company a qualifying public service employer to begin with?
According to the Education Department, the PSLF is meant to "ensure that all public servants can more easily access this targeted debt relief." However, if that were true, only a very limited number of poorly paid, altruistic service jobs—like becoming a public defender or social worker—would seem to qualify.
Instead, millions of Americans qualify for forgiveness under PSLF—many of whom work for employers that hardly seem to altruistically serve the public. University bureaucrats, prosecutors, and employees at most hospitals qualify for PSLF. Further, instead of focusing on specific jobs, as long as an employer qualifies, any person working for them can get PSLF, no matter how much money they earn or whether their job could legitimately be framed as serving the public.
But even if the PSLF program were significantly narrowed, it still wouldn't provide an unmitigated boost to jobs that truly serve the public—instead, providing loan forgiveness incentivizes colleges to raise prices for degrees that lead to PSLF-eligible jobs.
Ironically, even though PSLF eligibility is absurdly overbroad, the Education Department's own incompetence has kept many eligible borrowers from successfully gaining forgiveness under the program. In 2018, a report from the Government Accountability Office found that the program had incredibly high denial rates. However, after reforms, over 600,000 borrowers have received forgiveness as of last year—still a far cry from the nearly millions who are technically eligible.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Yesterday: Waaaaa, it's too hard to get taxpayer largesse!
Today: Waaaaa, it's too easy to get taxpayer largesse!
They justify maintaining some. Should have been no forgiveness. Let the non profit carry the expense. Most of these outfits are political activist groups anyways.
Well, no. Most aren’t. But there are a lot of hospitals. It makes sense why they would be considered public serving institutions. But during COVID the CDC asked them to stand down (even though they were way more ready to spin up testing than the CDC). So the government should either use them as public serving institutions or not, and adjust their PSLF appropriately.
And anyone has to wonder why making an honest living is getting so bloody hard. The ‘armed-theft’ criminal inmates are running the asylum and the grift will eventually drain all creation of human resources. The [Na]tional So[zi]alist conquered nation is well on its way.
Consider where the USA resources would be if communist china didn’t have an army of slaves working for us. Guess what? As soon as foreign markets drop the sinking USD that reality is going to hit home like no other.
Stupid is; is stupid does and conquering the USA for [Na]tional So[zi]al[ism] is about as stupid as it gets.
Part of the problem is so many people were getting conflicting and wrong information from the Department of Education and thence from university financial aid offices for so long. From my own standpoint as someone who paid off in 2022, the Biden DoE has been a huge improvement; their previous loan servicer, the state higher ed loans agency in Pennsylvania, who were appalling and had been sued nine ways to Sunday by everyone from disillusioned borrowers to state attorneys general, pulled out and the Biden Administration switched PSLF to the Missouri state loan servicer (the Missouri Higher Education Loan Authority) who at least for me were actually competent and responsive, and have been giving out information that's consistent and accurate. First time in my experience as a student loan borrower that's been the case. But obviously there's a huge mess to clean up from previous administrations. Quite honestly if any bank had run a program like the Bush, Obama and Trump administrations ran student loans, they'd have been shut down, for the stream of disinformation that fleeced borrowers was profitable for them. The federal government was even collecting 120 cents on the dollar of defaulted loans!
This isn't hard - there's so many people eligible because it's not a loan forgiveness program, it's a vote-buying scheme.
Do you know anything about PSLF? When it started? How long its been around? I think you would be surprised.
I think you’re full of shit. Handing out money is typical D vote buying; has been since FDR, at least.
Camp, what part of 'reluctantly and strategically' do you not understand?
Just. pay. your. bills.
Why is this so difficult?
Did we really need 500+ words from a hack garbage "jOurNaLiSt" like Emma - on a site called Reason, no less - to obfuscate why the first four words of this post should be anything less than 100% true and indisputable?
Capitalists understand incentives. To get doctors who otherwise wouldn't afford medical school to go to take out hundreds of thousands of student loans to finance it all....then agree to work in some inner city ER or whatever for 10yrs...PSLF was the only way it would make sense. Same for public defenders and the high cost of law school. Not everybody's daddy was a partner at some firm.
Same for other public service facing jobs. There are jobs and more importantly locations, where nobody wants to work. But the jobs need filled by skilled practitioners in their field. So how do you fill those positions?? You provide incentives. Making 120 payments on huge balances isn't a giveaway. It isn't buying votes. It was a promise made to people to get them to agree to work in needed public service jobs. If you don't like it, take it up with Congress.
It is a massive giveaway and a massive ploy to buy votes.
Just because you like that does not change what it is.
Summary; MORE "?public? 'armed-theft' jobs" needed!!!! There isn't enough 'armed-theft' criminals yet because some people still aren't living in a dumpster!!!!
Criminals everywhere preaching MORE careers in 'armed-theft'.
You belong in jail.
Gee, I wonder how we ever got MDs before the vote-buying schemes?
needed public service jobs
Oxymoron.
Windy: “then agree to work in some inner city ER or whatever for 10yrs…PSLF was the only way it would make sense.” Did you _read_ the article? Only a small portion of the PSLF expenditures go to doctors working in inner cities and rural areas, or any other job that’s public service and difficult to fill.
For instance, clerk at an insurance company is not a public service job, and it is easy to fill – if paid appropriately. Yet it was a PSLF job, allowing Blue Cross Blue Shield to hire recent college graduates for below market wages – because the government is deliberately losing money on student loans to subsidize many of the company’s employees. If a congressman voted to directly give tax money simply so a private company can cut their payroll, everyone would understand that they must have taken
bribescampaign contributions and paid the company back tenfold with taxpayers’ money. So they laundered the payback through PSLF.And they not only paid off their campaign contributors, but they bought votes from young people foolish enough to run up large college loans just to work for an insurance company.
The only loans that should possibly be considered for "forgiveness" are hard to fill medical providers for a 10 year commitment. Public servant get paid, they can pay their loans back.