Biden Announces New Plan To Forgive Student Debt in Cases of Financial 'Hardship'
The plan is the Biden administration's latest effort to enact large-scale student loan forgiveness.

On Thursday, the Biden administration announced a new plan to enact large-scale student loan forgiveness, this time by targeting borrowers experiencing financial "hardship."
Under the proposal, borrowers would be eligible for forgiveness if they meet certain criteria demonstrating financial hardship, such as their "total student loan balance and required payments relative to household income" and "high-cost burdens for essential expenses like healthcare or childcare," according to a Thursday press release. The goal of these standards is to identify students who are likely to default on their payments in the next two years.
The new proposal builds on rulemaking changes proposed in December, which seek to provide forgiveness to borrowers who saw their balances increase after not paying enough to cover interest and who have been paying for 20 or 25 years, among other groups.
It's unclear exactly how much these new changes will cost. But based on previous, smaller-scale student loan forgiveness measures, these changes are likely to cost taxpayers hundreds of billions of dollars. In the same press release announcing the new plan, Education Department officials bragged about approving $136.6 billion in student loan forgiveness through a series of forgiveness programs.
"The ideas we are outlining today will allow us to help struggling borrowers who are experiencing hardships in their lives, and they are part of President Biden's overall plan to give breathing room to as many student loan borrowers as possible," Under Secretary James Kvaal said in the press release. "It's an important part of the Biden-Harris Administration's permanent solutions to the problem of unaffordable loans."
Ironically, the Biden administration's "permanent solutions" to the student loan crisis will likely only end up making the problem worse. While supporters of the proposal say it would provide necessary relief for borrowers unlikely to pay their loans back, providing blanket forgiveness to those struggling to pay their loans back would likely end up incentivizing universities to hike prices and encouraging students to enroll in expensive programs.
If students know that they can have their loans forgiven as long they prove financial hardship, it will directly incentivize prospective borrowers to take on huge balances for dubiously valuable degrees. In turn, colleges can assure students that taking on tens—or even hundreds—of thousands of dollars in loans is a wise choice. After all, the government has promised to step in should repayment become burdensome.
While borrowers with too much loan debt deserve sympathy, the simplest—and least likely to backfire—solution to this problem is to allow student loans to be discharged in bankruptcy, not through sweeping, consequences-free forgiveness.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
The plan is the Biden administration’s latest effort to
enact large-scale student loan forgivenessbuy votes.Fixed that subheading.
You beat me to it.
Is it me, or are the Democrats more blatant about buying votes than they used to be?
If you go back over 100 years, this stuff could be pretty blatant. Buying voters with whiskey or gin used to be an actual thing. But FDR's whole platform was about giving people stuff they'd never had before, and he wasn't really disguising it.
I'd say it comes and goes based on the cultural impact of shame. Modern culture really is down on using shame to correct behavior and there's a lot of shameless activity and shameless liars out there, so nobody cares about how blatant they are.
It is hilarious to watch crooked joe biden pretend to be upset about a political prisoner in russia dying.....
I'm confident when his political Jan. 6th prisoners die in prison he will be equally as upset.
Two months ago I bought a nice new pickup truck with a top trim level and a diesel engine (just a few thou over $100K) because I know gasoline engines pollute the environment and will ultimately cause all of us that don't live in Colorado to drown as the polar ice caps melt and the ocean rises. But the payments have started, and I am beginning to experience "financial hardship" in making the notes.
And besides that, my wife wants a new SUV with the platinum trim level ($85K+). If miss any of my pickup payments because I'm having to pay for the two $14,000 Super Bowl tickets I bought, the bank won't loan me any money to buy her a new SUV, and she's gonna cut me off, for sure. Then I will be in "financial hardship" and also permanently in erectile "hardship". How do I apply for pRresident Brandon's loan forgiveness program? I really need to get that new SUV.
They really think that they can do anything they want.
Vote Buybacks!
Strange that the courts have told Biden he can't do this but Rule By Fiat is ok I guess if your not Trump. Ignoring the courts was a sign of a dictator and a threat to democracy we have been told.
So if you studied a STEM major and got a decent paying job, fuck you.
I studied STEM. I didn't get a decent paid job.
Part of the problem is that companies much prefer foreign STEM majors who make less and can be controlled like serfs.
Then you didn't learn much. Studying STEM is not enough. Are you one of those people who thinks a participation trophy is enough?
That's nonsense. Talented STEM workers are in constant demand at high salaries.
That's not been my experience.
What is "STEM" but a stupid slogan the liberal art govt "grifter" class talks about to get more tax dollars for programs them enrich themselves.
IF you want a job in a technical field..it is engineering/computer science degrees or technician degrees. It is not biology, chemistry, geology or physics. BS degrees in the physical sciences and biological sciences are close to worthless (lab tech jobs maybe at the university working for slave wages). I went down the same path with a BS in Chemistry and after a few years went back to school for an MBA and a job in marketing.
I am sorry you had this experience, you are not alone. Colleges should not even teach science at an undergraduate level...
Agree. I studied Chemistry in the late 70’s, with the intention of majoring in it and working as a chemist. My room mate at the time was studying engineering and I gradually started looking at and liking what he was studying better than Chemistry. So I switched to and ended up graduating with a mechanical engineering degree. I’m so glad I did, as I have had a long, fulfilling career, my skills have been in demand, and I’ve been well-compensated. When you look back on your life, you realize there were a few key turning points that really shaped it.
More detail. What is your degree? What is the degree program?
ONLY REPUBLICANS IGNORE THE CONSTITUTION!
You can't really say the programs cost anything, because the money isn't being paid back now.
Obviously some money is lost, but if you aren't even paying the interest off, that balance is never getting paid off. I'm in my 50s and still have student loans. At the current rate, I'll have it paid off by 2037.
And I owe only a fraction of some people.
Sounds like you made some exceptionally poor choices and seem quite selfish to demand others bail you out.
Why not just put student loans back with banks with NO federal protections for the banks? That would resolve shit pretty quickly.
I had substantial student debt when I graduated, not like people do now, but pretty close to my starting engineering salary. It was due in 10 years and I paid it all off in 5. I lived in a cheap apartment with a roommate, and drove an old beater car until I was out of debt.
You don’t sound like you’re in the demographic that Biden’s party is pandering to.
I took one year of student loans in 1989 for a community College with no plan or degree program. I just took some classes that sounded like something I'd enjoy.
After one year I had a GPA that couldn't be expressed in numbers on the left side of the decimal point. It took me at least a decade to pay them off working at a blue collar job.
I made bad choices and I paid for them. Why shouldn't you?
"high-cost burdens for essential expenses like healthcare or childcare,"
Misinformation! Everyone knows that healthcare hasn't been expensive since the passage of Obamacare!
I love how nobody seems to want to look at how premiums have grown since Obamacare as opposed to before.
There's a better way.
How about letting them self-identify when they default?
I like the final idea best. If somebody is in bad enough shape to go through bankruptcy, they should be able to declare student loans as dischargeable debt. Before 2005, they could. But not since then. I went through BK in 2017 and was able to discharge all my debts EXCEPT the student loans. Unfortunately, there's no way Congress is going to reverse this again.
Wouldn't that make bankruptcy much more attractive? New graduate with a low paying job and without a pot to piss in, runs up about $10,000 in credit card or car loan debt, and then declares bankruptcy and has her $100,000 student loan wiped out. Bankruptcy when young and starting out would become far more attractive than it is when one is more established in a career, with a house, with obligations.
I've posted this before, but I'll say it again:
1. Get the government out of the student lending business (both making the loans, as is the case now, and guaranteeing them)
2. Allow the private lenders to deny student loan applications for degrees if they do not believe the borrower will earn enough to allow him/her to re-pay the loan
3. Allow the private lenders to price the loans (i.e. set interest rates) based on repayment risk. If this means $40k in student loans for STEM degrees has a lower interest rate than $40k in student loans for [Fill in the blank] Studies degrees so be it.
4. Indemnify the private lenders against any "disparate impact" lawsuits that lawyers and borrowers may dream up because of Items 2 and 3, with the plaintiffs paying any and all legal expenses incurred by the private lenders, if they do attempt to sue
and you might get me to agree to allowing student loans be discharged via bankruptcy; however, as long as the taxpayer, who did not take out the loan and had no decision in its approval, is on the hook for the loan, NO!
You borrowed the money. You signed the loan contract. You need to repay the loan.
+1
Subsidized, government-backed student loans have only made college more expensive as the schools mop up the revenue stream.
#1 is obvious. Of course it ain't gonna happen. #2 and #3 will naturally follow l.
Some guidelines for making all loans bankruptable are reasonable. If you make $50k and owe $30k student loans, then suck it up. If you make $50k and oar $250k, then bankruptcy may be appropriate. The current bankruptcy courts exist to the decisions as to where to draw the line.
I disagree that "#2 and #3 will naturally follow 1".
The government has a long history of placing restrictions on the private sector.
The fact that I my health insurance provider is required to include in my policy, and for which I am required to pay via increased premiums, things I do not need or want covered, and minimum wage laws are just two examples.
The government could impose restrictions that no student loan application be denied, or place such a high bar on the ability of the private lender to deny that it is effectively a ban on denying student loans.
The government could impose restrictions on the pricing, such as requiring the private lenders to take into account only the current credit history and income, and ignore the future prospective income the area studied would pay, or the 'drop out rate' of certain majors. This would result in higher interest rates for everyone.
Some guidelines for making all loans bankruptable are reasonable.
When the taxpayer who did not take out the loan is made responsible for paying for it, no guideline for making the loan "bankruptable" is reasonable.
The only guarantee in federal guaranteed student loans is that you'll never be allowed to bankrupt out of one.
Quit saying "forgive" student debt. The debt isn't forgiven, it's fobbed off on future taxpayers to repay, unconstitutionally.
The entire administration either belongs in prison or at the business end of a firing squad.
When one takes out a loan, they are agreeing,in a contract, to repay the money with interest. The administration has no legal authority to cancel that contract.
The administration has had no legal authority to do a lot of things. Just like Obama’s. Everyone needs to accept that a) democrats are lawless totalitarians, and b) our only salvation is to dispose of them and their party.
Biden Announces New Plan To Forgive Student Debt in Cases of Financial 'Hardship'
The Angry Hippopotamus Announces He Will No Longer Pay Taxes Because He Doesn't Want To
Both plan are equally legal. That is to say, not at all.
Sounds like universities are providing false valuations of their service to get loans acquired to pay for their services,
Might be time for lawsuits.
Remember that day the people amended the US Constitution authorizing the national government to provide and forgive student loans?
Yeah; me neither
F'En [Na]tional So[zi]alist[s] building Indoctrination Camps from gov-gun stolen $ of its working citizens.
Meanwhile, the universities dance away with the hundreds of billions of dollars they collected in loan-bloated tuition.
Yeah..funny how the "media" never mentions this...the media/non profit/govt/academic complex is the real threat to America not Putin...
Dead on arrival, like everything else this corrupt administration tries.
If a significant number of able-bodied, college educated people cannot make enough of a living to afford to make their student loan payments even under the current terms of income sensitive repayment, which requires hardly any money at all, what does that say about the state of our economy? He can't have it both ways. Either the economy is great, in which case hardly anybody should need government help, or the economy sucks and large numbers of people are under financial duress.
Good point. All our problems seem to be from the "well" intentioned government and central bank initiatives don't they?
The DOJ should sue all the colleges which overcharged the kids and provided little career services for fraud. But you know they won't because many of them and their friends/tribe enriched themselves on student loan debt. F the colleges..
Biden Announces New Plan To Forgive Student Debt
Is he going to pay for that out of the millions in bribes he received from foreign governments and oligarchs?
Democrats are saving "Democracy" by utterly destroying it.