Homeschooling Parents Are No Threat to Their Kids
Stricter regulation of homeschooling families will just lead to harassment from government.
Homeschooling is surging, as parents want more agency over their child's education. An estimated 4.7 percent of kids are now homeschooled, up from 2.8 percent in 2019, the most recent year reported by federal data. But with public school enrollment down by nearly 1.3 million students compared to pre-pandemic levels, some are taking notice and calling for more oversight.
The Washington Post editorial board recently made that case, arguing, "It's not the average home-schooler policymakers should be worried about—it's the child who is left far, far behind." In their view, "where there's no oversight, there's no guarantee that children will learn skills considered foundational in public education and essential to adult life."
While more level-headed than many attacks on homeschoolers (Harvard Law School professor Elizabeth Bartholet's call for a presumptive ban comes to mind), the editorial misses the mark.
Homeschool regulations vary across states, ranging from mandating subjects such as math and reading to demonstrating academic achievement on annual tests. New York has some of the most stringent laws, requiring parents to file quarterly reports, maintain hourly attendance logs, and submit annual instructional plans to their local school district, according to the Home School Legal Defense Association.
Michigan, which has few regulatory hurdles for homeschoolers, is in the national spotlight as an example of homeschooling supposedly run amok.
Critics point to the bone-chilling case of Roman Lopez, an 11-year-old boy who was locked in closets, beaten with extension cords, and eventually poisoned with table salts. They claim his father and stepmother, Jordan and Lindsay Piper—who each pleaded no contest to second-degree murder for Roman's death—took advantage of lax homeschooling laws to hide their abuse from authorities.
Likewise, the cases of Jerry and Tamal Flore and Tammy and Joel Brown have Michigan policy makers calling for more oversight. The two couples allegedly adopted dozens of children in a moneymaking scheme that involved "prolonged, routine and systemic mental and physical abuse," said Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel. According to her, homeschooling gave the Flore family cover to hide the abuse. "There has to be some sort of monitoring so that those children also benefit from those protections," she says.
In response to the charges, state Rep. Matt Koleszar (D–Plymouth) pleaded for action: "Michigan is one of only 11 states that doesn't count or register homeschooled children, and abusive parents are taking advantage of that to avoid being found out. It's time to support all Michigan students and change that. Michigan cannot allow this loophole to continue."
These stories are horrifying, and registration requirements might seem like a reasonable step to protect kids from abuse. But it's unlikely any amount of regulations would have prevented these tragedies. In fact, they'd likely cause hardships for the vast majority of homeschool families who do right by their kids.
For starters, the Pipers were reported to child protective services (CPS) by Lindsay's sister, Chanel Campbell, who suspected abuse in 2016. Despite multiple inquiries by Campbell, there were no records of CPS investigations into the matter, according to The Washington Post.
For their part, the Flore and Brown families adopted or fostered nearly 30 children dating back to 2007, a highly regulated process that's overseen by the Michigan Department of Health & Human Services (MDHHS). In a bizarre twist, one of the defendants (Joel Brown) actually worked for MDHHS and allegedly used his expertise as a child advocate to hide the couples' actions.
As it turns out, these stories aren't about homeschooling at all; the only common thread is incompetent government. All three families were already on the authorities' radar, and for years MDHHS couldn't detect an alleged child abuser within its own cubicles.
In fact, The Washington Post's Peter Jamison admits, "The few studies conducted in recent years have not shown that home-schooled children are at significantly greater risk of mistreatment than those who attend public, private or charter schools."
In other words, there's no evidence that homeschool abuse is even a problem to begin with.
While homeschool regulations might not protect kids from abuse, they do increase administrative burdens, infringe on curricular choices, and subject families to harassment by government officials.
In a particularly egregious case, a public school in New York reported a grandmother to CPS after she was a day late with the mandated paperwork. It's easy to see why many homeschool families are skeptical of any government oversight, even if it's just notification requirements.
Instead of worrying about homeschoolers, policy makers should figure out why millions of students are leaving public schools in the first place.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
where there's no oversight, there's no guarantee that children will learn skills considered foundational in public education and essential to adult life
I'll just ask, why do we need universal education?
Maybe some clarity between "universal education" and "compulsory state-mandated universal education" is in order but, that said (reposted):
What I used to think: The largest threat to humankind going forward was a man-made virus.
What I now think: The largest threat to humankind going forward is a tie between a man-made virus and mass regression that “forgets” the last 50-100 yrs. of human medicine, epidemiology, biology, physics…
"Afrochemistry" to the rescue!
My thoughts on reading that line were that it's not exactly as though the state provided education is really kicking ass on that front either.
Yet again I ask, how could no government be much worse?
To keep teachers union members employed. Most wouldn't qualify as private school teachers. They'd have to do real work.
Studies show that on average students in public and private school score about the same on standardized tests, and home school kids are at a significantly lower average in high school level reading, math, and science. Public schools needs a revolution and to go back to 3 R types of classes and less indoctrination.
Government schools need to be closed and the buildings sold off.
This article doesn't agree with you at all.
https://universe.byu.edu/2024/01/22/homeschooled-students-may-be-more-prepared-for-college-than-public-school-students/
Studies shoe the exact opposite of that--they show that home- and private-schooled students do better overall than public schooled students. Do your research!
They’d have to do real work.
"I've worked in the private sector. They expect results." - Ray Stantz
Yet again, the original Ghostbusters provides the go to quote.
Because we don't a bunch of fucking dumbasses running around milking the system because they can't find a job because they can't even read or write, let alone do complex math or read instructions. I doubt many of these parents can teach even high school level science or math. That's why after about elementary level stuff these home school kids start falling way behind other students. But keep on with "I got mine, fuck the rest of them kids"
I’m not responsible for other people’s kids.
Yeah, public schools have such a better record.
At least show some citations which run contrary to what other studies show. And try not to use WaPo or NYT or Salon.
End Welfare and universal suffrage.
Address the actual question.
We already have kids who can't read, write or do basic math who have high school diplomas. Those who manage the grades to get into college find themselves redoing most of what they were supposed to learn in government schools because they lack the basics to build upon. How could we possibly do worse without government schools?
Why do we need a system that can be milked?
The only problem with that analysis, In Canis, is that your central premise (that home schooled kids start falling behind other students after elementary school) is completely contradicted by the facts. Home schooled students do as well or better on every objective measure of academic achievement.
Are you kidding? You know the dumb-ass kid at your local fast food store who can't make change if the computers go down? You can bet s/he wasn't homeschooled. My four homeschooled sons now have 7 degrees between them, one a PhD; I believe they would disagree with you.
Counting change back is one of those things old Boomers find impressive. I can do it because I had to learn at my first locksmithing job. The shop didn't have a cash register, just a cash drawer. When I would Count back to Boomers they would go off about how kids today can't count change back and inevitably tell me a story about going to McDonald's and how they can't manage without the machines telling them how much to give back.
I really don't get why it's such a big deal for them. My generation Gen X doesn't get impressed by it, neither do the younger generations. It's just the Boomers.
Dude...elementary teachers are basically babysitters. A degree in education is a fucking joke. My kids elementary teachers were all woman who were not very smart. One told me she wasn't good at "math."
Go back to a headmaster and small schools. And the teachers need a real degree like math, hard science, even history. And they have to have a minimum SAT Math and English score.
Great citation you have for that claim
My son's high school wasn't teaching high school level math, either. The certified math teacher could not even do algebra.
re: "why do we need universal education?"
A reasonable question that probably has many different answers. My answer is that I have a vested interest in you becoming a productive member of society instead of becoming a mugger threatening me and my family. I have a belief (mostly but not perfectly supported by evidence) that some minimum level of education will increase the probability that you will become that productive member and not the mugger. The free-rider problem makes it difficult to rely on purely private educational efforts. Universal education is one (though by no means the only) way to solve the free-rider problem.
If parents don't care about education their kids won't be educated no matter how much time they spend at school. It starts at home. That's why we still have uneducated people. Their parents didn't value education.
Now that changes when you're shitting the 8 to 10K a year for private schooling. Those parents care and keep an eye on where their money is going.
Your "if parents don't care" line is too absolute a statement. Many kids succeed despite their parents. A subset of them (and I think an important subset) can benefit from an independent channel to gain their education. They are the ones that public education was originally intended to benefit - and who libraries still benefit.
But it's also true that parents valuing education is one of the strongest predictors of academic and even life success.
Change "many" to "a few" and you're not wrong.
I've got a brother and a sister who teach at a school with a moderate number of aboriginals as students. Also my son works part time at a state run after school educational program. Mostly aboriginal kids.
Aboriginals have a high percentage of totally useless parents. Many are being raised by grandparents who aren't any more interested in education at the white man schools than their kids are.
It's a sad state of affairs and the number of aboriginal kids who are serious about learning are few and far between. For the aboriginal parents and grandparents the white man's schools are free day care and little else.
So that everyone has a reasonable basis on which to evaluate what is going on in the world around them. Freedom doesn't work when people don't know why something that's going on shouldn't be. CF the warfare/welfare state, indoctrination in the guise of education, etc. etc.
While you are quite correct in your basic point why should we assume the government is whom we trust with insuring people are informed and knowledgeable? Ignorance is what the two party system requires to continue. More ignorance is what the current set up wants.
It really depends on what kind of society we want to live in. Compulsory education is a hallmark of healthy, wealthy societies. You want to know that the surgeon working on you understands what he is doing. Even if it is isn't as life-critical, we want everyone participating in society to be competent. People from all over the world send their kids to America to study because we have some of the best institutions in the world. The teachers at those institutions must come from somewhere, and most are graduates of American public schools.
I don't know whether you're just trolling or whether your own critical thinking skills aren't developed enough to see the correlation between an educated population and a competitive workforce.
Private schools are an option, homeschooling (as my wife and I did with our two daughters) is another. But there must be a baseline for those who can't or won't. And that should not be a low baseline.
We home schooled all the way up- from 1st grade through high school. One kid is a senior in college, the other is studying to earn her second masters degree. They are smart kids, and my wife was a good teacher. The experiences I had with other families in the same situation made me wish there were more stringent standards. There are some absolute morons who are not preparing their kids to function well in society.
It really depends on what kind of society we want to live in.
A free one. And liberty precludes compulsory education.
But more to the point, what kind of society I want, and the moral and constitutional authority to use government to achieve it are two different things...and both preclude compulsory education.
Your example of the surgeon is pretty silly. Sure, government schools will insure he knows that mitochondria are the powerhouse of the cell but not how to cut someone open and sew them back up without killing them. That is learned in college and during their internship.
Odds are good even if the future surgeon graduated High School as Valadictorium the college will have him spend a year learning the things government schools were supposed to teach him so he can manage the actual college level material. This theoretical surgeon of yours could be functionally illiterate and innumerate graduating High School and the college will provide a real education to make sure he is made capable of learning the material he needs to graduate med school. They have a reputation to maintain.
Given the polling data that our intellectual elites seem to really hate individual freedom, at least in the non elite classes, and have high trust in government, these tales of abuse are merely am excuse to prevent parents from sequestered their children from the state and the baleful influence of state educators.
Join the class struggle, comrades! Down with the elites, kulaks and wreckers!
I sincetely don't think the demographic of people who think it is a good idea to for the government to ration things like gasoline, meat, and unnecessary air travel are the "kulaks" in this scenario.
Anybody promoting communism on reason.com is either being sarcastic or trolling, so don't be a dumbass and fall for it.
Proof?
Well Chinny Chin Chin is one of Shrike's socks, so there's definitely some trolling going on.
Well, maybe my sarcasm detector was not functioning then.
I'd rather refute what I see as bad takes then rake a chance that someone think they are accurate.
You know, I've never seen any polls of how many of those elites are willing to incur responsibility for the consequences of the choices they see fit to impose on others. Strange.
"Stricter regulation of homeschooling families will just lead to harassment from government."
Government doing what government does best. And progressively more of it.
And the Teacher's Union camel sticks it's nose under the tent.
Chop that fucking nose off.
How many homeschooled girls have been raped by boys in the girls' bathroom?
(asking for a friend in VA)
In foster homes? Many.
Government regulated and monitored foster homes.
Maybe in your state. Where I live they're barely monitored.
But they’re probably supposed to be. But bureaucracy is well known for its incompetence.
Again, government fails to protect kids who are in government care. Why pay taxes for a total lack of services?
Parents have a right to harm their children without interference from the government. /jeffy
That really does depend on what you mean by harm. Forcing toilet training on a child is acceptable to most parents, but long term causes a lot of the mental issues that are leading to kids picking weird pronouns and getting their sex junk cut off. Hell, raping the kid could cause less damage, depending on the specifics of the rape. At the very least not a lot of rape victims get their sex junk cut off.
Children should be raped only with the approval of their parents, with the advice of child care professionals. /jeffy
where there’s no oversight, there’s no guarantee that children will learn skills considered foundational in public education and essential to adult life
In other words, like Chicago public schools.
If your parents don't care about your education odds are good you won't get an education even if you attend a government school.
Yep, it's parents responsibility. Schools whether private or public provide the info, but if parents don't push their kids (or you're lucky and genetically produced a nerd) then they will fail, doesn't matter if it's the best school or worst. However, lots of inner city schools are so fucking dangerous that the kids are just trying to not get stabbed, puts getting a D on your test in perspective. But, that isn't most schools, but trolls here in the comments are too fucking stupid to not use as the "average school"
Yes, everyone is stupid, except you.
Fuck off.
It has to be the parents responsibility because the schools have zero incentive to prepare kids for anything. They get paid no matter what. Again, why pay for a system that continues to fail.
As for your "In the ghetto" lament why should I care? People need to want to change, you can't force them to change.
Or DC, or Baltimore, or Philadelphia, etc.
In other words, like
Chicagomost public schools.FTFY.
Gee, the people who want to expose your kids to the sexualy bizarre are pointing to a few outlying cases of physical and psychological abuse as a reason to keep an eye on your kids.
Fuck them. My wife went to public school all the while her piece of shit father physically and emotuonally abused her. No teachers caught on and got involved. From what I've seen of the world teachers almost never manage to determine a kid is being abused at home and if they do they typically do nothing.
But if that kid wants an abortion or a sex change the fucking teachers will jump on that shit.
the fucking teachers
Good choice of words.
I like "fuck" and all of its variants. When I get mad it becomes a comma in my sentances.
I don’t believe most teachers (outside of special needs and juvie programs) actually want to be social workers and psychologists. It’s the politicized unions, commie pedagogical schools, and grifting governments pushing that shit.
Teachers mostly get dragged into this role because of parents who don’t give a fuck. While Simultaneously, the administrations are making it impossible to actually fail kids, discipline them, or remove trouble students from ruining the classes for everyone else. Or in the case of Baltimore County, they begin to officially problematize the whiteness of teachers. Which is why my wife bailed from there the second her contract was up.
School choice is great. Anything to break the monopoly is good. But not everyone can homeschool kids. Private schools are almost totally controlled by the state anyway. Many are woker than the public ones, because AWFLs. And defunding public education as a plank (outside of maybe the federal level) is political suicide. I get the principle, but I think it’s ultimately pie in the sky and arguably undermines the fight that we should be having to bring some measure of standards, fiscal sanity, meritocracy and decommunizing back to the public school system.
Hanging a child in the basement upside down and randomly beating them with a garden hose would be better than what government schools do to kids. I don't see how parents can manage to do worse.
>>"where there's no oversight, there's no guarantee that children will learn skills considered foundational in public education and essential to adult life."
is Public School the "oversight" in this ridiculous assertion?
I think it should be read as "There's no guarantee children will be properly indoctrinated to the requirements of government education and essential to progressive dogma."
definite improvement
If my tax dollars are being used to homeschool other people's kids, then I want some say in how those tax dollars are being spent.
Funny how people didn't give a shit how their tax dollars were being spent when the government schools were screwing our kids up and not preparing them for real life.
Now that we are talking about funds following the kids all these asshats come out of the woodwork worried about how their taxes are being used.
Instead let's just shut down the schools and sell the buildings. Then let people keep their property tax money and other tax monies to use on raising their kids. Then you'd have nothing to bitch about.
Homeschooling Parents Are No Threat to Their Kids
But they are a threat to the state's control of their kids and, more importantly, to the state's ability to indoctrinate their kids into good little statist foot soldiers and activists.
Right. Ya know like all those Adults who aren't sleeping in jail cells. They might up and get hurt somewhere. 🙂
It's truly amazing the creative amount of *excuses* the criminal tyrants can come up with to STEAL others freedom and wealth.
Homeschooling done right can be just fine. The problem is when you have children who are far behind their peers in reading, writing, math, and other topics. That does hurt them badly.
While parents have wide latitude in how the raise their kids, I do not believe that parents have a right to hurt their children, and raising them uneducated hurts them.
Show us your evidence that home schooled children are more likely to be behind grade level than public school students.
I never said that they are more likely. I said that home schooling fails the children when they do fall behind.
So do public schools, in massive numbers, so what's your point?
Well, get thy butt to the inner cities and start preaching the value of education. They are the ones who don't value education and don't push their kids to do well. Instead they push their kids in sports and bullying a geek to do their homework hoping their crotch droppings will make the NFL and the big money.then when their uneducated kid doesn't get the scholarship or the offer to go pro they bitch about how the white man is keeping them down.
Far behind their peers - in Baltimore?
My days point. I have a young man who has assisted me this past summer siding my house, mowing the lawn, and now snowblowing my driveway and sidewalk. He is 13 years old. He shows up on time, has full access to the house and garage He is homeschooled, along with his younger 8 brothers and sisters (at least those old enough for it). Did the measuring and math with no issues. Quite a capable young man. He wants an engineering job but doesn't want to go to college. I told him he should go to school and I would help him. The whole family are model kids. Just an anecdote but I have not seen a negative example of any home schooled child.
There is no problem for the government to solve. First, the State, in a free nations, should not be controlling private education (e.g., Catholic school, pagan secular school, Jewish school, Wiccan school, homeschool). Second, research shows no connection between the degree of state control over homeschooling and achievement scores and abuse/neglect. See peer-reviewed study https://www.nheri.org/academic-achievement-and-demographic-traits-of-homeschool-students-a-nationwide-study-2010/ and https://www.nheri.org/degree-of-homeschool-regulation-no-relationship-to-homeschool-child-abuse/ and
In their view, "where there's no oversight, there's no guarantee that children will learn skills considered foundational in public education and essential to adult life."
Foundational according to whom, and on what basis?
Let's not forget the fact that the public education is churning out graduates at astonishing rates who can't read/comprehend, do anything more than grade school math, think critically, engage in public speaking, problem solve, or perform basic life skills.
How about you eat a massive dick.
lol. Eat a huge box of dicks, WAPO. They’re not learning those things in school. In fact, in government schools, they learn more about how to avoid adult life than what is essential about it. And last I heard, wokeness is not “foundational in public education”, but destructive of it.
You have no right to our kids.
-John R. Lott
-Public Schooling, Indoctrination, and Totalitarianism
https://crimeresearch.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/Lott-Public-Schooling-JPEv107S.pdf