Milei Wants Argentina To Take Back the Falkland Islands
The government says it's about sovereignty. It might be about oil, too.

Argentine President Javier Milei announced his intentions to restore Argentina's sovereignty over the Falkland Islands, adding new fuel to a decadeslong territorial conflict.
Argentina's Ministry of Foreign Affairs said in a statement last week that the country would reaffirm its "lawful and indefeasible sovereignty rights over the Falkland Islands, South Georgia, and the South Sandwich Islands and their adjacent maritime areas," saying that the United Kingdom has forcefully invaded the islands for more than 190 years.
Located near the southern tip of Argentina, the Falkland Islands have long been the subject of a territorial dispute between the United Kingdom and Argentina. Currently classified as a British Overseas Territory, the islands are technically self-governing, with foreign affairs and defense matters handled by the British government. The majority of the islands' 3,000 inhabitants are of British descent, and English is the primary language.
Argentina, however, disputes British claims, arguing that it inherited the islands from the Spanish crown in the early 1800s. During his electoral campaign, Milei vowed to "exhaust all diplomatic channels so that the [Falkland Islands] become Argentine again."
"We have to see how we are going to get them back. It is clear that the war option is not a solution. We had a war, which we lost. Now we have to make every effort to recover the islands through diplomatic channels," Milei said during a televised address last November.
Last week, Milei took a step forward by requesting the resumption of bilateral negotiations with the U.K. "to find a solution to this sovereignty dispute, in accordance with the provisions of the relevant resolutions of the United Nations General Assembly." And on Wednesday, the Argentine Foreign Ministry appointed a new secretary of the Falklands, South Atlantic, and Antarctica to lead the negotiations.
The conflict traces back to 1765, when the British claimed and settled the uninhabited islands, only to be expelled by the Spanish a few years later. In 1820, a newly independent Argentina asserted sovereignty over the Falklands. Since then, the islands' sovereignty has been disputed by the two countries.
The most significant escalation occurred in 1982, when Argentina's military invaded the islands, leading to a war with the United Kingdom. Although the U.K. emerged victorious, nearly 1,000 lives were lost and diplomatic ties between the two countries were temporarily severed. In 2009, the Falkland Islands established a new constitution, which "enhanced local democracy, internal self-government and enshrines the right of self-determination."
Argentina's interest in the islands may appear primarily historical—after all, even the Argentine Constitution explicitly declares that "the recovery of said territories and the full exercise of sovereignty" remains "a permanent and non-renounceable objective of the Argentine people." But a closer look shows that there may be additional interests at play.
Before the war, the archipelago was at risk of economic collapse. Since then, its revenues have increased by 500 percent. Its GDP per capita in 2022 was as high as that of Norway, Switzerland, or Monaco.
Currently, the driver of the islands' GDP is the thriving fishing industry. But the discovery of significant oil reserves in nearby deep-sea regions holds the promise for a substantial economic transformation in the near future. Declassified British government documents show that the U.K. has historically been interested in exploiting the oil around the islands.
The British government has responded to Milei's comments by declaring the Falkland Islands' sovereignty "non-negotiable," reiterating that the issue "has been settled for some time and will not change."
The residents of the Falkland Islands expressed their desire to maintain their affiliation with the United Kingdom. In a 2013 referendum, 99.8 percent of islanders voted to remain a British territory. "We will live in freedom under the government of our choice," said Mark Pollard, speaker of the Legislative Assembly of the Falkland Islands.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Galtieri once tried taking the Malvinas. Once.
Read the following report to learn how a single-mom with 3 kids was able to generate $89,844 of annual Qs income working in her spare time online from her home without selling...
For More Visit Here....> http://Www.Smartcareer1.com
But Milei is explicitly saying that this is diplomatic, not military. He's not doing anything that all of his predecessors (i.e., democratically elected Argentinian presidents) have done.
I meant "have not done", not "have done".
It's still ridiculous to bring up. It's never going to happen except by war since their claim sucks and the people who live their (a) don't want it and (b) aren't related to Argentinians. Anything feeding their ridiculous fantasy is both a mistake in and of itself and increases the chances of a future war.
The fantasy needs no feeding and would not be weakened if Milei failed to reclaim the Falklands, but anything failing to yield to it would be a serious political self-inflicted wound for an Argentinian president. Just as Milei was accused of being against Argentina during the campaign (see for example https://www.baenegocios.com/politica/Javier-Milei-sobre-Malvinas-No-se-puede-desconocer-a-los-que-viven-en-las-islas-20230913-0050.html ; hopefully machine translation will be good enough if necessary), he would be accused of being against Argentina and also of failing to comply with his constitutional duty of trying to get the Falklands by diplomatic means; this is how the first temporary provision is generally understood in Argentina, and Milei’s government actually was quoting the Argentine constitution (see e.g. https://larepublica.pe/mundo/argentina/2024/01/03/gobierno-de-javier-milei-reafirma-sus-derechos-sobre-las-islas-malvinas-y-pide-negociar-al-reino-unido-conflicto-de-las-islas-malvinas-ministerio-de-relaciones-101964 ).
(side note: To give you an idea of the extent of the fantasy, all buses in the city of Buenos Aires (yes, ordinary public transportation) have a big image of the Falklands on the side, alongside a leyend that says the Falklands belong to Argentina. There are thematic drawings on walls on the streets, for example there is one close to my office, and when I go to work I always see among others one of a woman depicted as the mother of an Argentinian soldier saying “the true mothers of the fatherland”; things like that are pretty common.).
As for the chances of a future war, they are and will remain negligible, as the idea of war is alien to Argentina’s political landscape. However, *if* that were a consideration, failing to reclaim the Falklands would only strengthen the (in that case louder) voices who would accuse Milei of (of course) failing to reclaim the Falklands and violating the Constitution. This would probably increase the already high chances of a next president who actually wants the Falklands back (Milei might or might not; I don’t know as he would say the same regardless), and is passionate about it (Milei certainly is not). For that reason, I would say the chances of future Argentinian military aggression would be marginally higher if Milei were to refrain from reclaiming them. Nevertheless, they would remain negligible (it will never happen anyway).
Interesting. So it's just a cultural touchstone for Argentine politicians, just like all Republicans now have to repeat the MAGA mantra that the 2020 election was "stolen", but don't have to do anything about it.
It was a desperation ploy then. Isn't Milei too early to use desperation ploys?
It’s about Harriers! Harriers are cool!
edit: Oh, and Bersa products tend to suck.
Do the world a favor and suck off a bersa.
Or a bear. I hear they can be found in trunks.
Classy as always. Your mom must be proud of you.
sarcasmic 11 hours ago
Classy as always. Your mom must be proud of you.
Remember this come from someone who claimed to have fucked another commenters mother. Then he turns around and pretends other people lack class.
But as we know there is not one single standard he judges others by that he applies to himself or his allies. Not one.
And they still work 1,000 years later, as we saw in the "Battlefield Earth" documentary.
I'm talking about cheap clones of German pistols made with inferior materials.
The Falklands never really were Argentinian territory, and any legitimacy of Argentina's claim was settled by force of arms in 1982.
It is rather sad to see Milei go in this direction after his domestic reforms got scotched by his opponents in the legislature.
At the same time, after Ukraine and Israel and maxing out credit in anticipation of Taiwan/China, I'm fresh out of even I.O.U.s on fucks to give.
Wake me up if Joe promises to "end" some British/Argentine oil infrastructure and/or decides to start throwing money at ethno-nationalists on one side or the other.
Again, I am disappointed by a foreign leader who seemed to be a bona fide libertarian look to cause an international crisis because he is stymied on his domestic policies. It is disheartening.
Amen Mickey Rat!
"The residents of the Falkland Islands expressed their desire to maintain their affiliation with the United Kingdom. In a 2013 referendum, 99.8 percent of islanders voted to remain a British territory."
Holy Titty-Fucking Jesus Christ, WHAT has crawled up the ass of Javier Milei?!?! Trumpism, by which which we are entitled to say "ONLY the votes of MY Sacred Tribe truly-REALLY matter?!?!" (All others are fraudulent!)
Trumpism has infected the world! For that, may He (Government Almighty and "Team R" Be Praised!) BURN IN HELL!!!
Can a South American Banana Republic leader be a "bona fide libertarian?"
He’s sure better than what we have.
So then THIS is why we need to re-erect Der TrumpfenFarter-Fuhrer, so that He can declare WAR against Canada and Denmark, to get Canada and Greenland back to the USA, their Rightful owners?
I think you are onto something - the cult runs deep. The Trump Fraus here at reason.com have allowed the man to live in their heads rent-free for far too long.
Yeah, it’s certainly not the people who have been using the entire apparatus of the state for eight years to destroy him who are obsessed,
This is not an international crisis. He's talking about diplomacy. He's explicitly ruling out force (not that he would have to). He's not doing anything his predecessors haven't done, since Argentina became a democracy in 1983.
There is nothing to have diplomacy about. The population of the Falklands do not want to be ruled by Argentina, period. Who can blame them, given Argentina's political history? Argentina does not have a valid claim. There is nothing worthwhile to negotiate.
Of course there is nothing to negotiate when it comes to sovereignty. As I mentioned in the other post, it is pointless diplomacy (but not pointless at a domestic level). All democratic Argentine governments do this. Some of them do it with apparent anger towards the UK (e.g., Kirchneristas) – but still not remotely a threat of war -, and others just because it has to be done in order not to give their opponents yet another weak spot to attack (e.g., probably Macri or Milei, though of course that goes for the leaders only; among the officials, some might be convinced that diplomacy might get them something).
By the way, the constitution of Argentina is frequently interpreted as giving mandate to the administration to pursue the matter through diplomatic means (see the poorly worded first temporary provision after the 1994 amendment). At any rate, it would be a self-inflicted wound for Milei not to insist on diplomatic efforts, even if they obviously will never succeed, and even if that is also obvious to him.
If he really wants to fix the currency of Argentina, he should put the country on the British Pound sterling.
He cannot do that. He would want to do it with the US dollar, though. But he cannot do that, either.
*sigh* Goddamnit [adds one more fuck to the tab]
OK, it's a campaign promise and he ruled out war. Are we sure clear this isn't the Argentine version of "OMG, can you believe the Trump tried to normalize relations with the Norks and Russians?!?!" or "I'm going to build a bridge and make the Brits pay for it?"
It's a really popular idea among the Argentinian population. I imagine that he's paying lip service to an idea that's been a patriotic sentiment for ~ 50 years or more.
That's what I'm thinking. I like to think he's not going to actually start another Falklands war.
He certainly will not start a war; not only because he said "We have to see how we are going to get them back. It is clear that the war option is not a solution. We had a war, which we lost. Now we have to make every effort to recover the islands through diplomatic channels" or because he probably doesn't want them but has to do this not to be accused of being against Argentina by his political opponents (or for failing to comply with a constitutional mandate, etc. ), but the idea of war is completely alien to Argentina's political landscape.
Sounds a lot like Xi wanting to "reunite" with Taiwan to me.
But why does it sound like that to you?
It does not sound remotely like that to me. There is no threat. The chances of an attack are zero in practice (sure, you could say 1 in a billion or whatever). War is alien to Argentinian politics. Milei made it clear this was not about force. No politician in Argentina seriously thinks otherwise (and I never heard any non-politician suggesting that, either; I can't rule out loonies, but other than that, no one thinks of war here). Milei could not seriously have refrained from reclaiming the Falklands without facing significant backlash at home. This is part of ordinary Argentine politics, with zero intent of any sort of military action, zero threat, and a specific statement that there is and there will not be any room for military force.
It may be a popular idea, but it is also a very bad idea, that will not come out in Argentina's favor unless they can invade and make it stick. That might be possible given the current fecklessness of the British political class.
No one is talking about war. It's about pointless but also bloodless diplomatic means.
Right. Milei’s going to build a
wallbridge and he's going to make theMexicansBrits pay for it.It's a Rohrschach. If he doesn't commit funds or boots on the ground, the only reason you'd hate it is because you hate Argentina and/or think the government should be doing other things that are more concrete and objectively intrusive to Argentinians.
That, and what the Argentinian constitution says. If he failed to claim sovereignty, he'd be attacked by his opponents, and would gain nothing. This is merely business as usual in Argentina; no elected president has failed to reclaim the Falklands.
Well, they've all failed to "reclaim the Falklands"... They have not failed to "lay claim" to the Falklands.
Wasn't a surprise. I wasn't sure what the promise to the military junta supporting types was in his coalition. Now I know
If only he’d promised to make everyone wear masks.
Just taking something by force does nothing to settle the legitimacy of anyone's claims.
Make Argentina Great Again.
I think you'd have to go back to the late 19th or very early 20th century to find an Argentina that was "great."
Why does the Argentine Navy have glass-bottomed boats? So they can look at the Argentine Air Force,
Even if you concede that Argentina may have an arguable case for sovereignty over the Falklands (which I don't), once they invaded and lost, AFAIC that's that.
FWIW while mainland Spain supported the Argies in the Falklands War, the residents of the Canary Islands, and the two North African enclaves of Ceuta and Melilla supported the British, for obvious reasons.
Unless they invade again and win.
This is a great example to me as to why 'property in land' is never permanent. Why land taxes are really a user fee. And why you should never get involved in a land war in Asia.
As someone who has lived there and has heard the rhetoric, they don't have a valid claim. It's a popular claim, but not a valid one.
Basically, on the one hand, they refuse the British claim to the islands, despite treaties, because the treaties were formed prior to their (Argentina's) independence. Which would seem to at least strongly imply that, historically, they have never belonged to Argentina, but they don't see it. Also, colonialism bad!
On the other hand, they are claiming the Falklands (Malvinas) as their own territory, simply because they're kinda nearby*. Even though the people who live there don't want to be ruled by Argentina and are perfectly happy with their own current arrangement, and have even voted in referendum to confirm this sentiment. But Argentina doesn't care, they want to impose themselves on a distant group of foreigners because they're bigger. Sounds a lot like (neo-)colonialism to me!
*By nearby, I mean 5x further away from them than the completely separate nations of Cuba or the Bahamas are from the US mainland.
*By nearby, I mean 5x further away from them than the completely separate nations of Cuba or the Bahamas are from the US mainland.
OTOH, it's practically right next door to the UK. /jk
Proximity is not the basis of the UK's claim to the Falklands, is it?
Armed forces are irrelevant, as no one is talking about or considering war.
Honey, if you're not considering war then you're not doing diplomacy.
Diplomacy exists to prevent war - if there's no danger of war then no one cares what you want so there's no diplomacy. If you don't have the stick to back up your words no one cares about your words.
'One negotiates with equals or near equals'
Diplomacy exists because humans tend to negotiate with each other for different reasons, not just to prevent war. For example, one reason is trade advantages. Another is law enforcement and capture of runaway criminals, and so on.
But that aside, there clearly is no military threat. Milei is explicitly saying so, and also Argentina has no means to carry out any serious military action, and also the whole idea of war is not part of the Argentinian political landscape.
However, as I have been pointing out, it would be a serious political self-inflicted wound for an Argentinian president not to reclaim the Falklands. It's pointless diplomacy in terms of foreign relations, but not pointless in terms of the domestic audience.
That's not "diplomacy". That's talking to the hand...
"Don't Falk with me, Argentina."
The 1982 War happened my Senior year of High School. In my Drafting class we had an English exchange student. I was there with him when he found out that his older brother was killed when HMS Sheffield was sunk.
Is there a point to this story?
Fuck the Argentinians, and fuck the Brits.
Leave it to the people of the Falklands to decide.
They have decided and they want to be British. There is no Spanish speaking population there, all the people are English speaking and more or less loyal to the UK.
There's one dude there that speaks Spanish, but he took it as a correspondence course . . .
The Brits living in the Falklands want to stay British. Dog bites man. News at 11.
"Leave it to the people of the Falklands to decide."
PLEASE be hot and bothered enough to read the article before "sharing" your ill-informed opinion!
"The residents of the Falkland Islands expressed their desire to maintain their affiliation with the United Kingdom. In a 2013 referendum, 99.8 percent of islanders voted to remain a British territory. "We will live in freedom under the government of our choice," said Mark Pollard, speaker of the Legislative Assembly of the Falkland Islands."
CONCLUDING-SUMMARY-FUCKING-PARAGRAPH of the article, troglodyte ignoramus!!! Does "democracy" mean ANYTHING to you? Or is shit ONLY about the DicktatorShit of the self-righteous tribalists? WTF tribe do YOU belong to, anyway, besides the Tribe of the Smug and Self-Righteous Ones?
I think this is the first thing I strongly disagree with Milei on. I'm hoping that it's mostly a ploy to stir up some patriotic fervor so he can get more of his reforms enacted with more popular support.
That is likely so. A Banana Republic politician like Milei only has a short time to get the population riled up into patriotic fervor to delay his being thrown on the scrap heap of South American "leaders."
Let’s wait until he starts taking opponents off the ballot before we call them a banana republic.
The opponents won't just be taken off the ballot - they will be shot.
Would you like to bet on that?
I wonder if the Falklands residents' choice will change as the UK continues to cripple its own economy and abrogate civil rights while Milei works to strengthen Argentina's. Of what use are those oil reserves if the UK uses its sovereignty to forbid drilling under their 'net zero' crusade?
Austerity + Brexit crippled the economy of the UK and Milei will end up on the scrapheap of other Banana Republic leaders.
Like Biden?
Milei is the child of Berlusconi. He must use lots of hair dye. And his vulgar girlfriend has quite big tits too.
Biden tends to like his girls to be around 8 years old.
“I’ve known Jeff for fifteen years. Terrific guy. He’s a lot of fun to be with. It is even said that he likes beautiful women as much as I do, and many of them are on the younger side.” - Donald Trump speaking about his old pal Jeffrey Epstein in 2002
Quote
Got any more fake quotes?
I here the protocols of the elders of Zion are lit!
"Be Best" - Melania Trump
https://nymag.com/nymetro/news/people/n_7912/
When asked directly (on camera--would you like the link?) about his "terrific guy" quote in July 2019, Trump didn't deny having said it, but he did say that everyone in Palm Beach knew Jeffrey Epstein, and that Trump was "not a fan".
But you go on believin' the lie...
Falkands, for the most part, aren't *ruled* by the UK. They're an effectively independent 'possession'. They just latch on to the UK's coattails for some big-world stuff.
The UK could go deeeeeeeeeep in the hole before anyone in the Falklands would even notice - except for the Argentina thing.
The Falklands are only nominally governed by the UK, so as long as the UK continues to provide for their defence, I doubt the Falklands will take much notice of UK domestic politics.
In any case, the UK's "net zero" crusade appears to be more significant to whatever Alt-right US website you got those talking points from than to anyone in the UK. Were you reading a post from 2019?
Do try to keep up, old sport: Prime Minister Rishi Sunak backtracked on the UK's "net zero" pledge in September 2023.
The US has a legitimate claim to the Falklands.
Who has ever needed a legitimate claim? Prince Harry thought France belonged to him.
EXETER
From him, and thus he greets your Majesty:
He wills you, in the name of God almighty,
That you divest yourself and lay apart
The borrowed glories that, by gift of heaven,
By law of nature and of nations, ’longs
To him and to his heirs—namely, the crown
And all wide-stretchèd honors that pertain
By custom and the ordinance of times
Unto the crown of France. That you may know
’Tis no sinister nor no awkward claim
Picked from the wormholes of long-vanished days
Nor from the dust of old oblivion raked,
He sends you this most memorable line,
He offers a paper.
In every branch truly demonstrative,
Willing you overlook this pedigree,
And when you find him evenly derived
From his most famed of famous ancestors,
Edward the Third, he bids you then resign
Your crown and kingdom, indirectly held
From him, the native and true challenger.
KING OF FRANCE Or else what follows?
EXETER
Bloody constraint, for if you hide the crown
Even in your hearts, there will he rake for it.
Therefore in fierce tempest is he coming,
In thunder and in earthquake like a Jove,
That, if requiring fail, he will compel,
And bids you, in the bowels of the Lord,
Deliver up the crown and to take mercy
On the poor souls for whom this hungry war
Opens his vasty jaws, and on your head
Turning the widows’ tears, the orphans’ cries,
The dead men’s blood, the privèd maidens’
groans,
For husbands, fathers, and betrothèd lovers
That shall be swallowed in this controversy.
This is his claim, his threat’ning, and my message—
These Argentines who want to "take back" the Falklands are the equivalent those Americans who are still fighting the Civil War in their heads.
Maybe more like the War of 1812.
Are there Americans who are still fighting the War of 1812 in their heads? That would take more education and intelligence than the average Merican could muster ...
Let's not forget that the Argentines are good at polo!
"The White House burned, burned, and we are the ones that did it"
The War of 1812 from The Arrogant Worms.
These Argentines who want to “take back” the Falklands are the equivalent those Americans who are still fighting the Civil War in their heads.
Whose retarded sock are you?
SPB2, my guess.
Worse - at least the Confederacy was at one time part of the United States.
Falklands were never part of Argentina. Spain *might* have had an extremely tenuous claim to them but it would have been basically destroyed by the British occupation of the islands. In international law, you don't have sovereignty over anything you can't exercise sovereignty over and the Argentines have never been able to exercise sovereignty over those islands.
This could get messi.
lols
When the Argentines start calling the population of the Falklands “colonizers” leftists will be all for them.
They've been doing that for 40+ years.
The Falklands is as likely to get handed over to the Argentines as Gibraltar is to get gifted to the Spanish.
The Brit’s are busy scrapping their military. Do they have much else to grab?
Well, they could always pussy-grab in The Sacred Steps of Der TrumpfenFarter-Fuhrer... Spermy Daniels is ALWAYS open to have HER pussy grabbed!!! "Behold Spermy Daniels, Our Queen, in a glaze of Vaseline! What a scene, what an obscene scene!!
(The Brits will be allowed to grab Her Sacred Pussy... Just ass soon ass they acknowledge that Trump's Erections Were Stolen, and NO sooner!!!)
Have you seen the tits on Milei's vulgar girlfriend? And his hair dye? What is it about men like these?
You’re so goofy you must work here.
Milei may be wearing a wig. He can get a blonde one if he wants to be more like Trump. He already has his Melania.
You must write for reason.
Which hack are you?
I thought that Milei was Elton John when I first saw his photo!
He needs Orange Bronzer, and THEN he'll be a TRUE Bronze Age Bronzer-Bro!!!
Pussy?
The Brits currently have two gasoline powered air craft carriers that can carry 50 aircraft each. I don’t know if they had much more than that in 1982 but the British Navy ain’t what it used to be. I’d hope the Argies wouldn’t be dumb enough to put them to the test because I can’t imagine their military has really improved since 1982. The generals who were calling the shots (literally) back then likely had more access to the purse than recent leaders.
Wars are hard and test a country's military and political systems to their limits. They’re an unforgiving environment for sloppiness, apathy, disorganization, and dysfunction.
Argentina does not stand a chance.
No one is talking about military action (and also, Argentina essentially has no functioning military to speak of).
Any Trump supporter will tell you that "Spics can't fight!"
That is improbable (any?), but I'm not sure why you would say that, anyway. But surely many armed forces in South America can or could fight, regardless of what some or any Trump supporters might say.
In particular, the armed forces of 1982 Argentina were a serious force. They lost, but it was no walk in the park. Those 1982 forces would easily defeat present-day Argentina's armed forces, even if they were 42 years older.
At any rate, talk of war is just alien to Argentina's politics. The idea that this is about war is very mistaken.
I think their military is from 1982.
They didn't have *any* aircraft carriers in 1982.
Milei seems determined and destined to fail on as many fronts as he can arrange.
What's with shitty politicians and those strange things atop their heads?
Does Milei have small hands?
I have no idea. People are too busy staring at that silly thing he puts on his head to notice much of anything else.
This is actually a way of not failing in one front: the front of reclaiming the Falklands. Failure to do so would be a serious headache domestically, as his opponents would accuse him of being pro-UK, anti-Argentina, and of failing a purported (debatable) constitutional mandate of trying to get the Falklands via non-violent means.
Looks like current oil discoveries that sound large are still not economic. They are looking for investors for the biggest find, the Sea Lion field. Maybe some Reason commenters might be interested in that.
I'd bet you could find some Trump supporters who might want to invest in oil exploration in 2024? It's expensive, speculative and the future is bright!
So how long until Reason starts calling Milei "literally Hitler"?
He seems very close to Trump, yet they like one guy and loathe the other.
It is Milei's hair!
Times really are hard in Argentina. That is why the porn site "Latin Leche" gets so many young straight Argentine men to perform on camera for money by consenting to sucking the cameraman's cock and getting fucked by him.
When Milei finishes adjusting his wig he is going after the gays and the "Latin Leche" guys will be toast, straight or not.
Sounds like Democratic Senator staffer material. Or Democratic Senator stuffer material.
I immediately thought of Senator Larry Craig.
Then Dennis Hastert came to mind. Then Mark Foley. Perverted right-wingers abound ...
Let's not leave out pedo-enabler "Gym" Jordan ...
It seems off that an Island in the southern hemisphere is ruled by a Island in the northern hemisphere. Personally, I feel that the Falkland Islands should be independent from both the UK and Argentina.
Independence is probably the best solution for disputed territory in most cases. The governments of countries are way too large and way to disinterested in their citizens. The breakup of large countries into smaller more local countries is a step in the right direction.
The Falklands are to any practical degree independent from the UK. Its basically, to them, a place to get a passport from.
They’re self-governing.
'Independence' would mean an invasion and conquering by the Argentines.
Not necessarily. The Falklanders can be independent by simply choosing to break off from the U.K.
Which they could do any time they wanted to, but have never appeared to want.
Something about the 2013 referendum not quite clear to you? The result was 99.8% in favor of remaining a British Overseas Territory (on a 92% turnout).
I'm curious why he thinks Argentina has any claim to South Georgia or the South Sandwich Islands?
I do not know whether he thinks so – or, if so, why -, but he is a president of Argentina, and failure to claim sovereignty over all of those islands would be a problem domestically. He is already weak as it is.
Btw, the claim is in the Argentinian constitution (see first temporary provision http://www.biblioteca.jus.gov.ar/Argentina-Constitution.pdf ). All presidents of Argentina must claim them or face significant attacks from their opponents, and even from people who generally are not opponents, but would be on this front.
I'm also curious why Reason thinks this guy is a libertarian? Crackdown on protests, dreams of imperial expansion...
1) Preventing protestors from breaking the law is a far cry from a "crackdown", and 2) Argentina always claimed the Falkland Islands prior to Milei. As Angra Mainyu points out, it's literally in their constitution. If Milei "dreams of imperial expansion", then he's doing a terrible job considering he won't do it through war.
You either are incapable of separating fact from falsehood, or you're blatantly lying. Either way, you have a lot to learn.
>Argentine President Javier Milei announced his intentions to restore Argentina's sovereignty over the Falkland Islands, adding new fuel to a decadeslong territorial conflict.
1. Argentina never had sovereignty over these islands.
2. The territorial conflict is waaaaaaaaaaaay more than 'decades long'. Like, a couple centuries now.