Chris Christie Tried To Break Trump's Hold on the GOP. It Didn't Work.
The former New Jersey governor was the only candidate in the Republican primary field with the courage to attack former President Donald Trump.

"I'd rather lose by telling the truth than lie in order to win," former New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie told a New Hampshire crowd Wednesday evening as he announced the suspension of his presidential bid. He has not, as of yet, endorsed another candidate.
Whether by truth or by lies, Christie never had much of a chance at winning this Republican primary (outside of New Hampshire, where he'd spent most of his time and money, Christie was polling in the low single-digits). Even so, Christie deserves praise for being the lone candidate in the race with the courage to directly challenge the Republican frontrunner, former President Donald Trump.
"There is no bigger issue in this race than Donald Trump," Christie said at the Republican debate in December, before calling Trump a "bully" and a "dictator" who Christie said was "unfit" for another term as president.
He was also the only candidate willing to point out that Trump's trade wars accomplished nothing. His defense of parents' rights and trans rights at the last debate was rooted in the belief that, in his words, "Republicans believe in less government, not more, and less involvement with government, not more involvement in people's lives." Mark it down, because that may be the last time in this presidential cycle you'll hear a Republican make that sort of argument.
Christie struck what may be his most brutally truthful blow on Wednesday just moments before ending his campaign. A hot mic caught Christie predicting that former South Carolina Gov. Nikki Haley would "get smoked" despite a recent rise in the polls in New Hampshire (where she's spent gobs of money and stands to benefit from the ability of Democrats to cross over and vote in the GOP primary).
Don't get me wrong: Christie has always been a bullshitter. His political career depended more on his blustery personality than his policy accomplishments—and his track record as governor was far from libertarian. That stuff about how Republicans should believe in less government? He didn't exactly practice that approach when it came to, say, drug policy. And when Christie criticizes others for giving undue fealty to Trump, he's also indicting his own past self.
But during what's likely the final act of his political career, Christie made a seemingly sincere effort to correct some, though not all, of his past mistakes. And he was the rare Republican in the race who seemed interested in actually winning the nomination—as opposed to playing for second place and hoping prosecutors, the 14th Amendment, or the actuarial tables will prevent Trump from becoming the GOP nominee.
And he seemed to be having fun—which is more than can be said for most Americans stuck on this nightmare blunt rotation of an election cycle.
"This is the great thing about this country," he said after a pointed criticism of Trump drew boos from the crowd at the GOP debate in August. "Booing is allowed, but it doesn't change the truth."
Telling the truth is allowed too, believe it or not, but it didn't change the course of the race for Christie—or, in all likelihood, for the Republican Party.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
It wasn't a bad idea, but Chris Christie's plan was hampered by tying it to.... Chris Christie.
>The former New Jersey governor was the only candidate in the Republican primary field with the courage to attack former President Donald Trump.
Half the GOP is attacking Trump Boehm. JFC, this isn't 'courage' - its just pandering.
Also, if you like Christie - maybe you should have written an article or two about why he'd be a good candidate? Instead you just tell us over and over why we shouldn't vote for Trump - and DeSantis.
Now its too little, too late.
The most important political argument to someone who strategically voted for Joe Biden is to attack trump. Policies don't matter. Arguments don't matter. Attacking trump matters.
The conventional wisdom on the center-right is that a candidate needed to constantly bring up Trump's shenanigans, and that would break his hold on the GOP electorate.
Well, Christie took that challenge, and completely flopped. Will the center-right take any kind of lesson from this, other than Haley needs to go after Trump MOAR HARDUR? Nope, they sure won't. That's why they aren't running the GOP anymore, because these people live in just as much of a fantasy world as the left. They're too prideful to admit that they don't have a fucking clue how to actually talk to GOP voters and convince them to go along with whatever the Democrats want, anything to keep the peace and "move the ball forward."
They still don't fucking get that GOP voters want someone who at least acts like he gives a damn about them, and points out the reality that the left hates their guts, and wants to see them broke, dead, their children raped and brainwashed, and they think it's funny. Trump may be a self-serving carny, but at least he understands what drives these people now, and it's sheer frustration with the center-right's perpetual quest to let progressivism happen, but at 40 mph instead of 100 mph.
No, it's not about policy, and their policies and ideas suck monkey ass anyway, especially Haley's. It's about the culture war, and if they're going to have the balls to fight it.
Well, Christie took that challenge, and completely flopped. Will the center-right take any kind of lesson from this, other than Haley needs to go after Trump MOAR HARDUR? Nope, they sure won’t. That’s why they aren’t running the GOP anymore, because these people live in just as much of a fantasy world as the left. They’re too prideful to admit that they don’t have a fucking clue how to actually talk to GOP voters and convince them to go along with whatever the Democrats want, anything to keep the peace and “move the ball forward.”
I mean, one of the big problems is that it was Chris Christie who employed this strategy. He's a deeply unpopular figure, with fewer defenders than even Lindsay Graham and Rudy Giuliani. For all I know, a charismatic candidate who came out hard against Trump might have had significantly more success. Vivek is the strongest pro-Trump candidate among the rest of the field, and he is not polling second.
For all I know, a charismatic candidate who came out hard against Trump might have had significantly more success.
Who, though? I'm not being facetious here, I'm legitimately asking. Because just having charisma isn't really what does it.
Vivek and DeSantis are polling lower because GOP voters don't really want a Trump lite version when the real thing is already running.
I don’t know. I haven’t seen what a truly charismatic Republican looks like in a long time. Even Trump scores really low for me. I’m not the most politically aware person out there but I can’t name one.
If I go back, George W at least rated as someone I wouldn’t mind sitting and having a beer with. I think that’s a low bar, and I’m quite annoyed by Bush’s whole worldview but he had a personality and a comfortable cadence of speaking. Politicians in general tend to sound like people giving speeches rather than people who are trying to talk, and I dislike speeches. Vivek probably scores the highest for me out of 2024 candidates.
He’s not exactly a politician, but one guy I do find pretty charismatic is Clarence Thomas. Even when I think he’s wrong I respect what he has to say. But there’s not many politicians out there with his learning, broad knowledge base, and temperament.
I don’t know. I haven’t seen what a truly charismatic Republican looks like in a long time. Even Trump scores really low for me. I’m not the most politically aware person out there but I can’t name one.
That's my point though--if it was all about charisma, Trump never would have sniffed the nomination in the first place. He got the attention of GOP voters because he wasn't afraid to sling mud at the Choco Messiah and the Hollywood idiots that they despised, and zeroed in on one of the biggest issues they actually cared about, which was locking down the border and limiting immigration. These issues all remain relevant to the vast majority of GOP voters, and they aren't going to cleave to an establishment Republican no matter how charismatic they may be.
In fact, the media praising a Republican is actually a giant red flag to them now, indicating that the politician being praised is ultimately going to knife them in the back, like McCain, Cheney, and Romney.
One of the bigger problems is that voters on the Right are a bit tired of seeing Republicans spending WAY more energy attacking Republicans and far less attacking Democrats.
Did Trump attack his 2016 opponents? Yup. But unlike McCain and Romney, he ALSO went after the Dem candidate hard.
Will Christie go after Biden? I had doubts.
I'll add - also for years rolling over when Democrats attacked. Republicans tried to play by rules. Democrats didn't. McCain, Romney, Bush, just let the media and democrats run the show.
People, for better or worse, people like Trump because he plays the same game as the democrats.
Finally we are seeing more people like Vivek and DeSantis and others starting to do it. Probably in 2028, they will be a good option.
Christie was never a heavy favorite only because he was never a favorite.
He didnt lose by slim margins, but by large margins.
He managed to waist his opportunity.
Why bring the bacon when you are the bacon?
If I was a cannibal I'd probably say his cheeks look delicious, based upon what people say about pig's heads being yummy and human tasting like pig. And his fat head of course.
Yikes. You know you said that out loud?
This is a parody article right?
Seriously, we’re crying for Chris Christie? Give me a break, I can’t remember anything he ever stood for. I was Tulsi, now I’m Vivek, the opposite of Christie.
Chris Christie Tried To Break Trump's Hold on the GOP. It Didn't Work.
Trump doesn't have a "hold on the GOP", he's simply the least awful among the different choices.
The whole reason he won in the first place was who he was running against, and how pandering the media and party were to her made it all the worse.
Who else do you vote for? Because I'll vote Trump over absolutely ANY Democrat I've seen, considering the party has swung hard to progressive racists who have painted people like me as the personification of evil.
Doesn't mean I'm a Trumper. But I'll take a guy who actually addressed issues like H1B abuse or promised to reduce the regulatory state over a progressive who literally hates me any day.
I can't be alone in this. Anyone opposed to the massive growth in government would be insane to vote D, especially if there's a chance Congress could be controlled by Democrats at the same time. That's the only hold Trump has on the vast majority the party.
"...I can’t be alone in this..."
You're not, but there's a whole raft of people who focus on personality rather than ANY actions.
Simply, they want a daddy-figure as POTUS, and if s/he ruins the economy or takes away your freedoms, well, so be it.
Right, Brandyshit (and many other TDS-addled shits)?
You're not alone
"There is no bigger issue in this race than Donald Trump," Christie said
This has been the Establishment's back-up plan all along.
Ever since Hillary Clinton announced her candidacy in 2015 to lukewarm support by Democrat voters and open loathing by Moderate and Republican voters - that was when the DNC/GOP aristocracy realized it had a big, big problem that wouldn't be solved by "it's her turn." For as much hemming and hawing as they do about Trump, what has always terrified the DC elites more is an actual maverick getting into office - specifically, in 2016, Ted Cruz or Bernie Sanders - both of who, are unafraid to take strong and committed positions (even knowing it would cost them support from moderates), would turn over the apple cart and be a strong and respected leader towards a brazenly Conservative or Socialist direction. Either one of them winning would be the worst thing possible for the DNC/GOP. Because it would critically disrupt their status quo - which they aimed to preserve at all costs.
And coming hot off eight years of Americans more pissed than they've ever been because of the sheer misery Obama heaped on this nation via his clear and systematic attempts to destroy this nation from within - we were ready for a Ted or a Bernie.
So, the DNC/GOP tapped an old resource, and played their Trump card.
Think about it. The guy was a lifelong liberal Democrat (whose entire family had to be reminded to switch parties at the last minute), New York aristocrat, besties with the Clintons, and a career-long beneficiary of the DC graft. He pretended to be an outsider candidate, but has been playing in that swamp to the benefit of his businesses for years. He'd talked about running before (back in the late 80s, if memory serves) and he owed favors all over Washington. And, while I won't outright call him a professional conman (even though I do kinda think that), I think he played large swaths of the right by pandering to everything they ever wanted to hear. It was as if a leftist had said, "If I want to impersonate someone on the right using all the leftist stereotypes I believe about them..." And that's precisely what he did, pandering shamelessly to the right's nationalism and utter frustration with political correctness and biased media and the handling of Mexico, China, and the Middle East - and yea, maybe even a smidge of outright racism. And large swaths of the right, desperate for a champion, gobbled it up and asked for more.
So he gave it to them, pied pipering a schism between Populists (aka MAGA) and Conservatives. And to this day, that's still working brilliantly for them. MAGA still lashes out explosively at those they regard as even slightly critical of Trump, immediately branding them #NeverTrump (a movement they don't seem to realize failed completely in its singular goal) - I swear they hate them more than they do Leftists. And I defy anyone to give an example of where Trump/MAGA goes after Leftists harder than they do Conservatives (esp. Liz Cheney - one of the most tried and tested Conservatives we still had, who clearly saw through Trump's scam).
The only thing the Establishment underestimated is just how much this country - both left and right - hates Hillary Clinton with every fiber of their being. So, surprise, Trump won.
But, no matter - he was always under DNC/GOP control, they're masterclass at kabuki theater, and when life hands lemons make lemonade. So, that's what they did.
I defy anyone to tell me how Trump was any different from Obama, but for (alleged) policy direction. He was smug, he was petty, he was thin-skinned, he was vindictive, he fomented partisan hatred, he constantly played this "us vs them" game (and played the victim every time), he made it clear that he was only representing the half of America that liked him while the rest could go to hell, and he believed himself (or at least acted like) a benevolent dictator that would just ignore the Legislature - the branch closest to We The People - and do whatever the heck he wanted with a phone and a pen.
That's just another Obama.
And look where we are now. More divided than we ever have been before; the left openly practicing Marxism because they know they can get away with it; and the right basically impotent to do anything about it anymore - too busy squabbling among themselves or (worse) acting just like leftists.
And for the cherry on top - it was like Trump specifically calculated his term to leave no lasting mark. And succeeded (with the exception of RBG's unexpected death). The guy accomplished nothing. Like he spent four years doing things that, on their face, would get cheers and adulation from his supporters - but in reality all he did was set up a meatball on a tee to be slammed into the nosebleed section by the Democrats once he was ousted (which is what they immediately did). Kind of like if he were a lifelong liberal Democrat who conveniently flipped parties after he spent his entire career living in the swamp and currying and now owing political favor because it's the only way he knew how to do business.
And now the DNC/GOP has got the same problem again with President Elder Abuse actually being worse than Obama's misery, with nothing but cackling lady venn diagrams or Xi's pet Newsom as an alternative. So, it's back to Trump. All day every day Trump.
Anything and everything Trump is kabuki theater. It is the single biggest and greatest, "LOOK! SQUIRREL!" distraction in the history of this nation. Because when he's the "biggest issue" - all the other DNC/GOP machinations and self-serving corruption blur into the background. It's why they won't let go of J6, or sue him in half a dozen states. If you're all-eyes-on-Trump, you're not watching everything else.
And that's the idea.
Tell me that SOB isn't a Democrat. I dare you to really think about it candidly and objectively, and then say that with a straight face. Everything - EVERYTHING - he says and does serves them and works to the DNC/GOP Establishment's benefit, while simultaneously devastating the American Right. There's no way that's not on purpose and by design.
if you can't admit that, then you're nothing but a Useful Idiot serving the DNC/GOP aristocracy.
Trump's vote count kept climbing.
You're wrong.
That's why a senile old man who's spent half his term on vacation is the president, right?
I wasn't the one who called Trump a puppet.
Puppets don't increase their popularity the second time.
Election "fortification", John Roberts' cowardice, and standing are why Biden is the president.
Sure they do. Especially in a society that venerates sequels, prequels, reboots, remakes, and retellings as entertainment.
I will give Trump credit for that. He's certainly an entertaining carnival barker. It's undoubtedly why people keep going back to his circus.
Don't know if you are paying attention to the entertainment industry, but we hit diminishing returns awhile ago.
Not in the kabuki theaters.
And a couple of hundred thousand emergency votes stashed in boxes in Pennsylvania. Even Fox News knew better than to call the state for Trump, despite his insurmountable lead.
So he gave it to them, pied pipering a schism between Populists (aka MAGA) and Conservatives.
The latter were hardly conservatives. The Populists, going back to the Tea Party insurgency--Sarah Palin's convention speech, and the explosive reaction to it from the GOP voters, is arguably the cultural watershed--were ALWAYS the ones wanting to actually conserve the nation's long-established culture and sense of identity.
The "Conservatives"--really, the neocons and their acolytes--tried to slow down the left's agenda, not stop it in its tracks, especially after the excesses of the New Left made the Democrats unpalatable to them. They've even admitted as such, going back to Buckley. Their goal was simply to stand athwart history and yell "Stop!"--but that's the extent to which they'd put any effort into it. They wouldn't actually do shit, and would happily job out every single time if it meant maintaining political amiability. They've been terrified of the populist wing of the GOP going back to Goldwater, who was considered quite radical in his stances at the time. When Reagan threw his hat in the ring, they back Ford, then Bush or Anderson, only got on board with Reagan after he wiped out Mondale in 1984, had to head off another populist insurgency in 1992, and completely checked out of the culture war altogether after MTV bragged about getting Clinton elected that year.
This fight has been going on in the party ever since 1960.
What finally caused the break was the GOPe convincing Jeb to run in 2016, and immediately posturing him as the favorite. It’s absolutely no fucking accident at all that Trump declared his candidacy the very next day–he knew damn well that was going to piss off the GOP base, and all he had to do was portray Jeb as the avatar for everything those voters had come to despise about the coastal wing of the GOP. These people weren’t conservatives, they were liberals who liked tax cuts and defense spending for foreign wars, and that was it–much like the California “conservatives” buying land in places like Eagle, Idaho; Phoenix, Arizona; Broomfield, Colorado; or Reno, Nevada.
It's a much simpler explanation that the Democrat party has moved so far to the left that it makes a 90's Democrat like Trump seem like a conservative Republican.
There is no place left in the Democrat party for that style of Democrat.
Gay Organization President Arrested For Child Sex Crimes
Sean Gravells, the former president of the British Columbia group North Peace Pride Society, was arrested for numerous child sex crime offenses.
According to CBC, the 39-year-old was arrested for the sexual touching of a person under the age of 16, sexual interference of a person under the age of 16, possession of child pornography, and importing and distributing child pornography.
The North Peace Pride Society posted a statement on Facebook reading, "We want to clarify that the society itself is not implicated in any charges; these are isolated to the individual."
The now-deleted biography for Sean Gravells on the North Peace Pride Society website appears to state he was involved in the group since 2017 and he became vice president in 2018. According to reports, the now-deleted biography also said he was the board president of the organization since 2018.
- Russia Today
Perhaps we can elect him Mayor of Seattle.
I'm surprised it wasn't that deviant troon Johnathan Yaniv. That dude loves his cheese pizza.
Good riddance.
The realignment will continue on without him.
We are headed toward Italy's Cold War model-- one small-D democratic party (Italy's "Christian Democrats") that stayed in power because the opposition vote was dominated by an anti-small-D-democratic party (Italy's Communist Party). Unfortunately for Italy, without competition from a viable "loyal opposition," Christian Democrat politicians became more corrupt and ineffective.
(2) In America's future, those who believe in a small-D democratic America under the rule of law will have to abandon the Trump-infected GOP and fight with the far Left for control of the Democratic Party.
If I wanted to "break Trump's hold on the GOP" Chris Christie would be the last person I'd send in as my point man.
Oh, btw, I think we need some style guide clarifications on phrases that I see a lot in the media, including here: “Trump’s ‘Hold’ on the GOP”.
So what does that mean? Do we mean Trump’s hold on the legal organization of the Republican Party, or do we mean Trump’s hold on [republican] voters?
Because it seems to me what we’re really seeing, but not describing is the latter, not the former. Because Trump does not seem to have any hold whatsoever on the “legal corporation” known as The GOP. Over the last couple of decades, The legal corporation known as The GOP has sent us Mitt Romneys and John McCains and Chris Christies and Nikki Haleys and various other David French-esque conservatives.
What I think is worth exploring… for instance, would be Biden’s “hold” on the DNC, ie Biden’s hold on not only the legal corporation known as the DNC, but center-left voters as well. Because by any reasonable metric, Biden has one of the strangest holds on both the party and their base that I think we’ve ever seen.
Over the last couple of decades, The legal corporation known as The GOP has sent us Mitt Romneys and John McCains and Chris Christies and Nikki Haleys and various other David French-esque conservatives.
Like I noted above, that same corporate leadership was also pushing Ford, Anderson, and the Bushes, and others like Nixon, Nelson Rockefeller, Jack Kemp, and Bob Dole, rather than Goldwater, Reagan, Buchanan, or independent populists like Perot. In fact, Reagan actually accumulated more votes in the 1968 primary than Nixon did, but Nixon cultivated more delegates, so he became the nominee.
The only thing Christie can break through on is thick ice on a pond on the coldest night of the year.
Wait so what is Christie's 'truth' here? That Trump is a "bully" and "dictator"? Sounds more like childish name-calling than proclaiming a truth.
Christie now has more time to focus on his passion of dressing in just a bra and panties, having young boys sit in his lap while he reads them stories.
"Nikki Haley would "get smoked" despite a recent rise in the polls in New Hampshire (where she's spent gobs of money and stands to benefit from the ability of Democrats to cross over and vote in the GOP primary)."
Registered Democrats can't vote in the NH GOP primary. Undeclared voters can ask for a Republican ballot.
>>The former New Jersey governor was the only candidate in the Republican primary field with the courage to attack former President Donald Trump.
your views of the Monster Who Ate New Jersey differ from mine.
"Chris Christie Tried To Break Trump's Hold on the GOP."
Eric is desperate for a candidate he can ‘reluctantly’ vote for and not have to begin apologizing for as soon as s/he’s sworn in.
His TDS means that’s about anyone but Trump, even if they have to prop him/her up to take the vows.
Give Eric a nice warm daddy-figure any day!
"Courage to attack Trump?" Since when? What was he risking? He shows more courage when he attacks a pie. Oh woe is Chris, now he'll be assaulted with book deals, news gigs, even appointments by Democrats.