It's Official: 2023 Was the Hottest Year on Record
And 2024 could be even warmer.

The European Union's Copernicus Climate Change Service (C3S) reports that 2023 was the hottest year in the instrumental temperature record. That's in part because global temperatures were boosted by the El Niño phenomenon in which the eastern Pacific Ocean surface temperature periodically surges higher.
So how hot was 2023? C3S notes:
- 2023 had a global average temperature of 14.98°C, 0.17°C higher than the previous highest annual value in 2016
- 2023 was 0.60°C warmer than the 1991-2020 average and 1.48°C warmer than the 1850-1900 pre-industrial level
- It is likely that a 12-month period ending in January or February 2024 will exceed 1.5°C above the pre-industrial level
- 2023 marks the first time on record that every day within a year has exceeded 1°C above the 1850-1900 pre-industrial level. Close to 50% of days were more then [sic] 1.5°C warmer than the 1850-1900 level, and two days in November were, for the first time, more than 2°C warmer.

The 2015 Paris Climate Agreement aims to hold "the increase in the global average temperature to well below 2 °C above pre-industrial levels and pursuing efforts to limit the temperature increase to 1.5 °C above pre-industrial levels." The global average temperature in 2023 was just below the 1.5 degrees Celsius threshold.
"Not only is 2023 the warmest year on record, it is also the first year with all days over 1°C warmer than the pre-industrial period. Temperatures during 2023 likely exceed those of any period in at least the last 100,000 years," noted Samantha Burgess, deputy director of C3S, in a press release.
The satellite temperature series run by climatologists Roy Spencer and John Christy at the University of Alabama in Huntsville (UAH) also basically concurs, reporting that 2023 is the hottest year in its 45-year record.

"The 2023 annual average global [lower tropospheric temperature] anomaly was +0.51 deg. C above the 1991-2020 mean, easily making 2023 the warmest of the 45-year satellite record. The next-warmest year was +0.39 deg. C in 2016," notes Spencer.
The C3S report observed that atmospheric greenhouse gas concentrations reached the highest levels ever recorded, 419 parts per million for carbon dioxide and 1902 parts per billion for methane. UAH's Christy cautiously concedes that the "background climate-trend is about +0.1 °C per decade and could represent the warming effect of the extra greenhouse gases that are being added to the atmosphere as human development progresses."
What comes next?
"We expect the strong El Nino in the Pacific to impact the global temperature through 2024. For this reason we are forecasting 2024 to be another record breaking year, with the possibility of temporarily exceeding 1.5C for the first time," observed U.K. Met Office climate scientist Nick Dunstone in the Bournemouth Daily Echo.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
I still struggle to buy this line. We had a mild winter and the summer wasn't particularly warm. This claim has the whiff of selecting data sources that confirm their desires.
Of course it is. The AGW movement is so serially discredited that the status quo is complete disbelief of all claims in that direction until proven otherwise by non beleovers.
Exactly, and Ron is just another AGW sucker crying wolf. Their credibility isn't zero, it's negative. My reflexive thoughts are the opposite of whatever they say, and usually further reports in the next few days bear it out.
I get paid more than $120 to $130 every hour for working on the web. I found out about this Q activity 3 months prior and subsequent to joining this I have earned effectively $15k from this without having internet working abilities Copy underneath site to..
Check It—>>> http://Www.Smartcareer1.com
Have you considered switching to a more intellectually demanding career in farmed salmon sea lice denial ?
You’re not good at this.
Mostly warming at night. Explained by continued urbanization and urban encroachment near recording sites.
And before the usual clowns scream out 50 years of satellite data... even the NYT stated they combined the satellite data with ground data to achieve this headline.
https://www.nytimes.com/2024/01/09/climate/2023-warmest-year-record.html
Ah. That's something along the lines of what I assumed was happening. More measurement points in places that would help their ends and deactivated ones where it wouldn't. I was under the impression that this is pure satellite data that should be able to properly capture global and regional fluctuations. Even in that sense, I can see a number of things that could cause false spikes to appear and know these "scientists" aren't inclined towards smoothing out the data
I suppose that compared with the satellite data from the 1930s it is much warmer today than then.
10 degrees warmer than preindustrial satellite data from the 1800's.
Turns out "ever" means "the last 50 years, if we get to pick the data."
What ever became of the data base of the Nazi Warlock Ice Moon climate wobblers?
We're still waiting for you to read the Berkeley temperature report the Kochs commissioned.
60 stations are all it takes globally
https://andthentheresphysics.wordpress.com/2018/08/18/you-only-need-about-60-surface-stations/?wref=tp
Most likely you are conflating what happens in an El Nino year in your area with global temperature changes. Here in CO, an El Nino (and this year is a huge one because it follows 3 years of a La Nina) year usually results in lots of winter snow and spring rains, mild winters, and cooler springs and summers. La Nina's tend to result in dry drought conditions and hotter summers. Other places in the US are very different because of jet stream tendencies and latitude.
Globally, El Nino's result in massive heat transfer from the ocean to the atmosphere. Which would tend to be fully reversed in La Nina years. With human caused changes in atmosphere, the odds (and the last 30 years of data) indicate that the ENSO cycle will ratchet upwards. El Nino's will produce temp spikes (like 2023 and likely 2024) and La Nina's will merely create plateaus while they last.
With human caused changes in atmosphere…
Just fucking stop. Shit like this makes it impossible to take you seriously. First, you blubbered about a little sniffle, and now, you’re bitching about possibly having to dress in layers. Pull up your big boy pants and get the fuck on with your life.
We are combusting hundreds of millions of years of sequestered carbon and putting it into the atmosphere over the course of a century or two.
Just because you want to deny reality doesn't mean reality is what you choose to believe.
Which saved the planet because CO2 levels were getting dangerously low and plants were in danger of dying off.
It's complete bullshit that uses careful language to avoid acknowledging that the 1930s were much warmer than anything recent.
Don't worry the climate scientists went back and changed the data from the 39s
And the records broken last July were set in the 1890s.
Gott mitt Loons
I live in SC, spring was chilly and summer was very mild, didn’t hit 100 a single time that I know of and wasn’t even in the 90s that much. And it looked to me like with a few hot exceptions most of the world was the same way. I guess it's like the miracle of Bidenomic, those of us on the ground are too stupid to recognize what a fantastic economy we have right now and were too stupid to realize how incredibly hot it was last summer.
What else don't you know?
We have been coming out of an ice age for a few 10s of 1000s of years. I’m sure very many have been the ‘warmest on record’ when the record only spans those years.
How could they not?
And are you aware that over the last 50 years, summers have become COOLER in much of the USA?
.
How can Global Warming make it cooler? Simple. It's the extra clouds present on a warmer earth. (See: Clausius-Clapeyron equation for water).
.
And in the UK in the last 50 years, over 95% of its "global warming" has happened in Winter (<5% in summer).
Yes, this is how water stabilizes the earth’s temperature. Heat generates clouds that block sunlight. On a global millennial scale earth’s temperature stays in a ‘narrow’ window.
There were prolific errors in the early days of the "Climate Change" hysteria; NASA even abandoned hundreds of temperature reporting sites due to defects, urban warming, and sheer fraud. However, that isn't the way to counter the hysteria.
YES, the globe IS warming! It has been warming for 20,000 years, since the end of the last Ice Age. We should be happy about the trend, which causes far less damage and death than the mile-high glaciers that invaded North America.
NO MATTER what humans might do, it's going to get warmer for the next century. NO MATTER what humans do, it going to get a LOT colder over the next hundred centuries. If you want to understand why, simply review the long-term data reported on the Wikipedia "Global Warming" page: it was a lot hotter long before humans even existed. End of story.
"Not only is 2023 the warmest year on record, it is also the first year with all days over 1°C warmer than the pre-industrial period.
Either this is absolute bullshit, or someone needs to unpack it for me to make it make sense. Literally every day was 1 Celsius or warmer compared to, what, the 1850-1900 mean? There was not a cool day anywhere? That sounds rather doubtful.
And I'm still skeptical that we actually have accurate global temperature data from the 1880s, when there were far fewer weather stations, the records aren't as reliable, and they weren't spread across the global. Are we comparing global temperatures today to mostly-European mean temperatures from the 1870s?
Supposedly this is all based on satellite data. To make it make sense I'd expect to hear about a region that had dramatically high temperatures that offset other regions that had stable or lower temps. I know el nino is mentioned, but that's more excuse than explanation. Like most climate hysteria, they make extreme claims and do little to nothing to substantiate it
Too self-referential to bother yawning.
VVhat, no link to your angry-vveather-gods scam site?
Wait, what?
They had satellites in 1850?
Yup. This is why the American Civil War was fought.
Did the southerners send blacks into space in those satellites to drop messages with parachutes after reading the thermometer?
Reconstruction involved crashing each satellite named after a confederate into the atmosphere to burn up.
So Nikki Haley was right?
Posted above. Even NYT is saying this result was from combining satellite data and ground data.
Because if they didn't selecting those weather stations in the middle of parking lots would be for naught.
Thermometers at the time were also at best accurate to a half degree.
That's false.
Museums are full of 18th century thermometers that read to a tenth- how do you think the maximum density temperature of water was discovered.
You're comparing apples and oranges. Air thermometers measuring weather which differs by the minute are entirely different from measuring water whose temperature is under very stable control in a laboratory.
Are your apples orange colored or has apple jack palsey driven you climate blind?
To answer that you should look in a mirror.
They have pictures of the official recording sites and their equipment retard. The data also shows variances for collection times.
Are you just a full on acolyte of the cult?
Yes. It is a complete NPC.
Who, pray, are "they"?
I believe the claim is for the average global temperature for each day. So any given place can have a cooler day, as long as the average of earth is up 1C. As for the accuracy of measurements, I can't vouch for that.
Even the method of data collection has changed. Now sites collect and average temp at minute time scales. So a site in a desert will get constance variance of a site collecting Temps even during gusts of wind. This causes a change in average temp collection compared to long settle times of mercury thermometers collected at once an hour. Instantaneous changes get collected now whereas prior was a temporal average.
A study a decade or so back showed this can vary recorded Temps by more than a degree or so when using comparative methods.
Mad as a hatter- must be the mercury talking as he shouts across his porch.
Either this is absolute bullshit, or someone needs to unpack it for me to make it make sense. Literally every day was 1 Celsius or warmer compared to, what, the 1850-1900 mean? There was not a cool day anywhere? That sounds rather doubtful.
Temperatures today are 1 degree warmer than The Little Ice Age, which doesn't exist, which followed The Medieval Warming Period, which also doesn't exist because those weren't provably global phenomenon and the climate never fluctuated until Henry Ford invented the assembly line and this sort of thing just isn't discussed in polite company except by science deniers.
Government bureaucracy fakes it, Bailey believes it, that settles it!
It is a known fact.
"Not only is 2023 the warmest year on record, it is also the first year with all days over 1°C warmer than the pre-industrial period. Temperatures during 2023 likely exceed those of any period in at least the last 100,000 years," noted Samantha Burgess, deputy director of C3S, in a press release.
I'm going to call bullshit on this one. As soon as glaciers retreat to their Medieval Warm Period and Roman Warm Period heights in the mountains, then maybe she'll have a point. But, right now, it's all hyperbole shit.
Hottest year of the last 100,000 years, my ass.
https://climatechangedispatch.com/roman-warm-period-3-6f-warmer-than-today-new-study/
That would also be a time period calculated to conveniently ignore the last interglacial period, when there were large hardwood forests near Oulu, Finland.
Oh no! It would be a catastrophe if wheat grew in Siberia!
Plus the other thing you're not allowed to think:
warmer weather helps humanity prosper.
The worst years ever have been the coldest years.
Civilization and agriculture have flourished when it's warmer.
Except when they do not, and the anecdotoid population crashes.
Let the countdown begin !
"Except when they do not" is a valid qualifier if it has ever not. Warmer weather has always helped humanity prosper. There are no documented exceptions in the entirety of the historical record. And, contrary to the hysterical claims above, the historical record includes times warmer than 2023.
Hey, we have tree rings, Ms. Burgess.
https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn22040-tree-rings-suggest-roman-world-was-warmer-than-thought/
Hey, climate scientists have climate data Ms.Troll
Give it a try- you can see a lot just by observing
https://www.realclimate.org/index.php/data-sources/
Dude, (and I'm a guy, dude) I've worked with this stuff for a very long time, so I'm just going to cast quite a bit of shade on your little climate cult.
Our opinions don’t count. We are not anointed, and are in fact heretical heathens. So PE would have us cast out.
When did you lose your faith in the 1st law of thermodynamics?
When did any leftist ever believe in any science other than Lysenko or Fauci?
The gargling noise is strong in this one
Has nothing to do with measuring global climate. Energy enters and escapes the atmosphere all the time.
This is proof youre an unscientific moron.
When was the last time you got paid for publishing a coherent sentence ?
So you're a Roman Warm Period denialist, PE?
You can post a link to a page of links all you want. It doesn't make the data from the 19th century any more complete or reliable.
And why are we comparing to the late 19th century, which was an unusually cool period in recent human history?
Because it lets them have hysterics and push for more communism.
He tried using gish gallop as a form of scientific debate. His link doesn’t prove any argument.
Maybe you can say that the past 2000 years or so has been the warmest. It is worth noting that most of the last 100,000 years was a glacial period of the ice age we are currently still in. It's not like temps were stable for millennia and now all of a sudden they are changing.
Yep. I wouldn't even claim warmest of the past 1,000 years, just the past 600 or so. Not quite as dramatic. Climate on this planet has never bee, is not, and never will be stable or static. There's only been a handful of glaciation periods, about 605 million years of Earth's 4.6 billion years of existence, with the last one starting about 34 million years ago. For most of its history, Earth hasn't even had polar ice caps. The Arctic ice cap is estimated to be at most 4 million years old. The Antarctic ice is much older though, starting between 60 and 45 million years ago, and accelerating in growth about 34 million years ago.
Oh, and did I mention that it took CO2 levels falling to 600 ppm to make this grow faster. We're only at 420 ppm currently.
Plus those pre-industrial satellites weren't quite as high up in the stratosphere.
"We expect the strong El Nino in the Pacific to impact the global temperature through 2024. For this reason we are forecasting 2024 to be another record breaking year, with the possibility of temporarily exceeding 1.5C for the first time," observed U.K. Met Office climate scientist Nick Dunstone in the Bournemouth Daily Echo.
"With the possibility of temporarily exceeding..."
I need to repeat this: "With the possibility of temporarily exceeding..."
The Science!™ has spoken. JFC.
Even science has to contend with probability.
IT WAS HOTTEST IN NORTHERN CANADA! JUST LOOK AT THAT SHADE OF RED!
And this should be what is reported if the data actually supports the general hysteric claim. They should be saying that warming in region x drove most of the increases because that is how climate actually works. It doesn't help that the whole field of climate science has so thoroughly discredited themselves for decades and at best deserve heavy skepticism
The satellite temperature series run by climatologists Roy Spencer and John Christy at the University of Alabama in Huntsville...
Well sure Alabama is going to say it was hot.
Well sure, Spencer used to be the highest profile advocate of global cooling in the nation, but then he found out he'd got the math wrong, and changed his mind.
Not much danger of that in these parts.
Actually, Dr. Roy Spencer frequently points out that the long term warming trend from the satellite measurements is a pretty constant 0.14 degree per decade, compared to the IPCC model predictions of 0.23 to 0.45 degrees per decade. The models are running two to three times hotter than reality, which is where they get all those apocalyptic predictions.
Here for the comments.
What else is there at this point.
Marxist propaganda in a Libertarian magazine skinsuit
Like a Joe Dirt trench coat?
There's no easy way to say this, Ron.
You're a retard.
You post this nonsense over and over again, no matter how obviously wrong it is.
You actually put this forth--
2023 marks the first time on record that every day within a year has exceeded 1°C above the 1850-1900 pre-industrial level. Close to 50% of days were more then [sic] 1.5°C warmer than the 1850-1900 level, and two days in November were, for the first time, more than 2°C warmer.
--knowing there is literally no way it could possibly be true.
Ron, no matter what they tell you, we do not have a wholly accurate temperature record for a date even as close as 1970. And 1850 is just not even on the table.
The people telling you these things are not your friends, Ron. They don't like you, they'll never like you. They're making fun of you, Ron, because you can't understand even the simplest thing.
And it's just mean.
That bastard in the jacket--the one always pursuing attention from 'the youth' is laughing his ass off behind your back.
Stop. Algernon's dead.
Well once again "libertarian" Ron appeals to (dubious) authority to back up his previous articles that appealed to other (dubious) authority. His last screed about plummeting longevity relied on data from, wait for it, the CDC an outfit that has done nothing except lie for at least the last 3 years and arguably throughout it's entire existence. And I realize that I'm talking about weather not climate here but in 2023 my travels took me as far south as Arkansas and Alabama and as far north as Wisconsin and Minnesota and everywhere in between and I doubt that you could find a single person that believes that 2023 was the hottest ever. Yes Ron is a useful idiot. Actually not even useful because nobody can take him seriously.
It isn't even "nonsense" as much as straight up lies. Complete bullshit. Utter balderdash. Full-bore untruths. Perjury in the first degree.
I see your 2024 resolution list is lacking.
Here's the data set you’ve spent your lifetime dodging:
https://www.realclimate.org/index.php/data-sources/
It’s safe to bet you’ll deny next year's data too.
bet the fucking house, bro. they're telling us 8 degrees and multiple inches of snow on Monday ... in Dallas, Texas
They told us to bet on amplification of polar vortex waves last year.
How much money did you make?
You do realize the difference between climate and weather, eh? And that climate has not, is not, and never will be stable nor static?
I can tell geology is not your strong suit. You seem more into propaganda.
Your ground state is as stable as your ignorance is static.
Dude, you sound more like a YEC than anything else, with a religious devotion to the climate catastrophe cult.
There is no difference between climate and weather.
'Climate' is a picture of the general weather of a given area over time.
The people who tell you that the two are different gave you that lie first--to see if you were stupid enough to believe it.
I can count on one hand the number of years that it's been too hot for snow in January/February since I moved to Dallas 25 years ago.
Amplified polar vortex my ass.
Check out PU’s hot take on this at his blog.
It sure is pissed off that we don't tow its lion on this topic. Fucking NPCs.
So we are actually going to hell?
That's what the General Secretary of the UN says, and as he was President of the Socialist international , he ought to know.
Not really, people continue to move to warmer climates, because people prefer warmer weather. It's the opposite of a crisis, it's a boon.
You dumbass.
Last year, there was snow at the bottom of Cajon Pass, near Devore. I know because I saw it.
Who are these Copernicus climate people anyway?
Experts with deep data and scrupulous review.
You don't wan't to go there.
So here: https://essd.copernicus.org/articles/15/1675/2023/
So the winter storms in California last year were a hoax?
They were as real and relevant as a snowball fight on the Senate floor.
Meanwhile , back in the real world, as curated at The Climate Wars:
https://vvattsupwiththat.blogspot.com/2023/04/on-beach-double-digit-ocean-heat.html
Gulf Stream temperatures were too gonzo to ignore.
Repetitive links to the same discredited propaganda sites are not helping your argument.
Cooler heads will prevail.
It's "official" only if you trust measurement systems that have already been shown to be inadequate to the task. The only scientifically valid answer is to the climate question "we still don't know" and "we can not yet exclude the null hypothesis".
Roy Spencer should hand you his Heartland Institute Evangelical Climate Scientist of the year award, for adducing the theory that there is no such thing as climate is an act of denial above and beyond the call of duty.
The local climate score stands at
Ignoramus 3
Ignorabimus 5
What comes next?
Denialists will spin harder.
No opinions will change.
JFree will continue to be free with his delusions and excuses for others' delusions.
What comes next? A cooling trend, just as it did after the hot years in the 1890s, the 1930s, and the 1970s. The hot years of the 2010s spilled over a little into the 2020s, because it's a 44-year cycle (on top of the 11-year solar cycle). Just my theory though.
Just tie an onion to your belt and you should be fine.
Caliente Ecuador
Government of Ecuador has officially declared the existence of an internal armed conflict in the country.
This measure, announced by President Noboa, recognizes the seriousness of the situation facing the nation.
As part of this declaration, the president has considered criminal gangs as terrorist organizations.
Probably caused by climate change. People get madder when it's hot.
Last year my toilet froze. Never had that happen.
The Texas deep freeze of 2023 was scrubbed from the record.
Anything inconvenient to their "facts" is scrubbed from the record.
Ironically. All those graphs show it never started until 1980 EXACTLY WHEN the ‘environmentalist’ mob was born.
So one either has to conclude the ‘environmentalists’ and their catalytic converters are the problem or the propaganda is feeding itself because only a naive imbecile would buy that the Industrial Revolution never started until 1980.
What are you talking about? Gore's a buffoon and Gretta is ugly. That proves warming is a leftist scam!
Oceanographer Wally Broecker introduced the term 'global warming ' in 1975, one hundred and sixteen years after physicist John Tyndall explained it to Prince Albert and Queen Victoria:
"Now if, as the above experiments indicate the chief influence be exercised by the aqueous vapour, every variation of this constituent must produce a change of climate.
Similar remarks would apply to the carbonic acid diffused through the air, while an almost inappreciable admixture of any of the hydrocarbon vapours would produce great effects on the terrestrial rays and produce corresponding changes of climate."
--JOHN TYNDALL FRS: 'On the absorption and radiation of heat by gases and vapours'
It was the hottest year “ever” — but only if “ever” means “going back all the way to 1973 when we started satellite modeling,” and not “comparing actual surface temperatures in the same locations,” in which case it was only in the top 15 hottest years since 1892, when temperature records started with any accuracy. Which still is barely a fraction of human history, much less the existence of homo sapiens or life on the planet.
Said who, where , and when ?
"Cite" is a shorter way to say that.
Number of times China is mentioned in this article: 0.
Meaning nobody should take any of this seriously. Nobody should take ANY environmental claim seriously unless somewhere in the first three paragraphs they're pointing out how the Chinese are the single worst polluters - by a HUGE margin - on the entire planet, make no effort to curb it, and that Western society (which are already the greenest countries on Earth) seems oddly hesitant to point that fact out as they demand onerous and oppressive regulations on their own people instead of saying anything even slightly negative about Western society's worst enemy.
And that goes double for the World Wrestling Federation and the Patagonian Empire.
It is about money and behavior control. The bandits make the rules and the idiots worship them for it. Some even create blogs attempting to fortify these things.
At least we stopped America warming!
China is already Communist, so they're good.
If we do the whole Animatrix blot out the sun thing, we can make 2024 the COLDEST year on record.
Why not start right away?
I would be more inclined to accept global climate warming change if I saw more snowflakes melting. Instead, they just get louder and more extreme.
We expect the strong El Nino in the Pacific to impact the global temperature through 2024. For this reason we are forecasting 2024 to be another record breaking year,
Of note: The El Nino phenomenon of "The Hottest Year On Record" produced an exceedingly mediocre hurricane season, a hurricane season that, if climatologists and meteorologist could predict as being "The Hottest Year On Record" would presumably predict as being more active rather than predicting it as being less active than it was.
It's almost as though the left butt cheek of climate "science" has no idea what the right butt cheek of climate "science" is farting out and vice versa.
"It's Official: 2023 Was the Hottest Year on Record"
And nothing happened.
As one who has lived in Pittsburgh for 4 decades, I turned the AC in my bedroom window on just one day and just one night this past summer, which was the least I've ever used the AC (as I typically use it about a dozen of the hottest and most humid days and nights each summer).
I'm about to purchase a new furnace for my home, and I refuse to get one with central AC, as I strongly prefer opening windows and letting cross ventilation cool the house naturally at night.
I AM EL NINO!!!!!
https://i.giphy.com/Bp6DhC2oJF2wM.webp
The assertion is that global average temperature will very soon exceed 1.5°C above the 1850-1900 baseline.
Okay, take that as read. Ignoring, among other things, any justification except for RDE (Rectal Databank Extraction) as to why 1.5 is so important, or how it is possible to know the pre-industrial temperature within one tenth of a degree.
This raises a seemingly obvious question: what would be the global average temperature if 2023 GHG concentration is held to the preindustrial average, everything else remaining as it is?
Warmenists do not have an answer to that question.
Which means they have no bloody idea what the delta is. Unless they are climate deniers, and insist global average temperature would have remained entirely static over the last 150 years.
Ronald, don't you think it makes a big difference WHEN the warming happens? Don't you think the fact that much of the US in the last 50 years has seen a COOLING OF THE SUMMERS is important?
Thank God! I'm freezing my ass off here.
The problem with stories like this is “on record.” “On record” is maybe 100-150 years, but the Earth is 3 BILLION years old. Saying it’s the “hottest day” in 100 years is like say it was the hottest temp since 3 milliseconds ago.
Damn you and your arithmetics!
Why does Reason leave the science to a non-science guy??
Why does Reason shill for the climate alarmists??
Is Bailey so poorly informed he does not know we are still a degree cooler than the peak warming 7000 years ago??
Repeating the lies of the left is what Reason used to stand against!
Often resulting in heated debates.
Hard to do when they are polar opposites.
Every day last year they stamped their feet and clenched their fists with more force than they did on every day of the year just 10 years ago.