Anti-Woke Classroom Rules Threaten Florida's School Choice Achievements
School choice is supposed to prevent politicians from pushing their ideas into the classroom.

Any discussion of Florida's education system is incomplete without mentioning this: Nearly 50 percent of the state's K-12 students attend a school other than the one in their neighborhood or geographically closest to them. That's about 1.6 million students, according to 2021–22 data from Step Up For Students, a nonprofit that encourages school choice and funds scholarships for Florida students.
School choice in Florida doesn't just mean attending private schools (which over 170,000 students do), attending publicly funded but privately operated charter schools (which over 360,000 students do), or homeschooling (which over 150,000 students do). The state has a strong open enrollment system, mandated by law, that gives parents wide permission to shift their children to other public schools to take advantage of academic, athletic, or extracurricular opportunities they can't get from their otherwise-assigned public school. Over 262,000 K-12 students in Florida take advantage of this opportunity to simply attend a different public school, and over 250,000 other students participate in specialty or magnet programs within the public school system.
Educational freedom is going to expand even more in the state thanks to House Bill 1, which was signed in March. The bill established universal Education Savings Accounts (ESAs) that parents can use to fund alternative schooling choices. Florida's ESAs allow parents to withdraw a child from the public schooling system and get a deposit of about $8,700 from the state in a special account used for education. That money represents the state's per-pupil spending on that child, allowing parents to direct that money to pay for private school tuition, tutoring, online learning costs, and other select education-related needs. Florida had already been permitting special ESAs for students with special education needs; H.B. 1 expands the program's scope to all families. As of early October, Florida is the sixth state offering universal ESAs (the others being Arizona, Arkansas, Iowa, Utah, and West Virginia).
At the start of the school year, an estimated 407,000 students were enrolled in the state's two ESA programs or one of two other tax-credit scholarship programs. Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis bragged about the scope of participation in Florida's school choice options, saying in August, "I am proud of the work we have done so far, but we're far from done—we will continue to empower parents and expand opportunities so that our students receive the best possible education."
***
DeSantis and state Republicans' overall support for school choice makes for a sharp contrast with their one-size-fits-all approach to teaching race, gender, and sexuality.
"Parents….should be protected from schools using classroom instruction to sexualize their kids as young as 5 years old," DeSantis said in March 2022, when he signed H.B. 1557, the Parental Rights in Education bill, into law. Colloquially known as the "Don't Say Gay" law, it forbids any classroom instruction on sexual orientation or gender identity for students from kindergarten through third grade. That part of the law is what DeSantis and H.B. 1557 defenders want to draw the most attention to, and it probably seems eminently reasonable to many people. But another part of the law forbids any classroom instruction "in a manner that is not age-appropriate or developmentally appropriate for students in accordance with state standards" in all grades—giving the state's Board of Education wide latitude to decide what can and cannot be discussed in every classroom.
In April 2023, the board did exactly what the law's critics feared: It banned all classroom instruction on sexual orientation or gender identity across all grades unless it was required as part of state education standards or as part of a health instruction class that parents could opt their students out of. A follow-up bill, H.B. 1069, passed in May, expanded the reach of H.B. 1557 to charter schools—schools that were explicitly created as alternatives to traditional public schools. Parents who want their children taught about these topics would need to turn either to private schools or to homeschooling.
Florida's education standards did call for classroom instruction on sexual orientation and gender identity in high school psychology classes, where they're clearly relevant topics. But in July, the state's Department of Education removed those standards, seemingly forbidding high school psychology teachers from teaching the subjects. In August, the College Board, the nonprofit that helps coordinate programs and test students for Advanced Placement (A.P.) classes, warned that Florida students might not get college credit for A.P. psychology classes if these subjects were removed from the state's curriculum, noting that these topics had been part of the class for 30 years.
Immediately after that warning was issued, Florida Education Commissioner Manny Díaz Jr. sent a letter to the College Board assuring that the class "can be taught in its entirety in a manner that is age and developmentally appropriate and the course remains listed in our course catalog." This seems to have satisfied the College Board. "We hope that Florida teachers are able to teach the full course, including content on gender and sexual orientation, without fear of punishment in the upcoming school year," a spokesperson says.
The state's Department of Education has put out guidance to school districts that the law doesn't require schools to remove library books. But H.B. 1069 creates a legal framework for parents to demand books be removed from schools that mandates schools comply first and then investigate the objection. In October, the Florida Freedom to Read Project calculated there had been at least 4,000 unique attempts in the state to remove books from state schools since October 2021.
These dynamics, while being presented by politicians and conservative proponents as supporting "parents' rights" to decide how their children are educated, in reality give a small group of people wide authority to attempt to censor educational materials regardless of the desires of local parents and students.
"School choice is a way to sidestep the politics of the classroom altogether," Reason Foundation's Christian Barnard notes. But Florida reminds us that even in a strong school choice system, there's still a risk of politicians pushing their ideas into the classroom.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
I applaud Reason's bold efforts in keeping Florida from filling up with those fleeing blue state oppression.
At random intervals, please publish a bit if truth.
Stop taxpayer funding of education.
Priorities and pragmatics, Chumby. Priorities and pragmatism.
Scott's rather clearly, if not obliquely, indicated opposition either way. While Scott can be kicked in the gonads until he learns that people who can't consent to being sexualized shouldn't be sexualized by authority figures who can before, during, or after we defund education, if we wait for the during, or after Scott may never get kicked in the gonads until he learns that people who can't consent to being sexualized shouldn't be sexualized by authority figures who can.
That’s easy. Make Democrats an endangered species and that can happen. Along with most of your wish list.
How much are Marxist democrat oppressor lives worth to you? More than your natural rights? More than your freedom?
American rights > democrat lives
You realize the leftist death squads (ANTIFA and BLM types) use the same logic when explaining why it's OK to bash your skull in with a brick.
These aren't contradictory points. The state still is the authority on curriculum. That it chooses to be agnostic on where students are doesn't change that.
Fundamentally charters and private schools determine how to teach, not what you teach. They stull have to meet basic state based determination of subjects. They can teach subjects more quickly, but they can't ignore state requirements.
In South Dakota home schoolers have booklets for each grade level that have the required material for grade level in them and all you need to do is pass the test at the end of the book to have covered the required material. There are no bans on what else can be taught. Florida wants to dictate what cannot be taught as well. That is not a good policy and it will bite them on the butt.
What happens when a less conservative majority takes control and adds religion to the list of what cannot be taught? Oh the moaning that shall rise from the conservatives about schools meddling blah blah blah.
That was the state of education already.
It was not very long ago that the progs were taking legal action to prevent student religious clubs from using school resources at all.
This has already happened.
Ah, pity the poor oppressed Christian in a nation where the vast majority claim to at least believe in a higher power in line with Christianity or a sect of the cross cult. We're every US president has claimed belief in your God and all the basic details. Where even the democrats who try to keep religion out of government go to church regularly. A nation where the Ten Commandments set behind the Supreme Court justices in their chamber. Where you can count on one hand the number of non abrahamic faith members that have been in the house and senate.
Yes. Your faith us so oppressed in America.
In california the state government is SUING local school districts that do not force tranny training onto the kids.
And in the south Christians are trying everything to keep after school Satan clubs from competing with their after school Christian clubs.
I'm waiting for Shachford's essay on his pro-KKK curriculum stance or why Hamas needs to be part of school or you're a monster.
Moment defiant Boston Mayor Michelle Wu arrives to host her no-whites holiday party despite criticism the 'electeds of color' party is divisive: Unrepentant city leader says she's honored to be part of the group
Boston Mayor Michelle Wu, held a holiday party for 'electeds of color'
Wu's office mistakenly sent the invitation to all 13 members of the city council, and then had to retract the invites sent to white people
Wu defended the gathering and was all smiles outside the event
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12862493/michelle-wu-electeds-color-boston-holiday-party.html
I can't wait for the "Whites Only" drinking fountains.
This was already discussed yesterday.
Some of us have lives and don't participate in every single conversation.
You were in the thread dumbfuck. You posted many times.
Stop acting like a retard.
Must have been the voices in your head again. You really should take medication for that.
You going to post a link or take back your lie? Doing neither is confirmation that you're a liar, as usual.
He's posted a zillion links before to your previous zillion denials, and you have continued denying what everyone could see. Why do you suddenly complain now of the opposite? I thought you said you had a life outside the comments.
He said it was yesterday so it shouldn't be hard to find. The fact that the guy with bookmarks going back at least five years can't provide a link says he's a liar.
But you've made it abundantly clear that telling lies about members of your tribe is terrible, but you defend liars who are part of your tribe. Like you're doing right now.
Some of us have lives and don’t participate in every single conversation.
And yet you continue with this petty argument.
I am for Reason's take about removing the hand of government from the classroom. However, why is it always in the context the stopping wokeness is bad but government schools enforcing wokeness is good?
Yes, where is the concern over one-size-fits-nobody when it comes to pushing wokeness? Is it only a concern when fighting wokeness?
There is that Shackford is an LGBT activist before he is an journalist or a libertarian.
With government run schools you get government mandated idiocy from public employee unions paying bribes to elected reps. Trying to change policies when your goal is elimination is rearranging deck chairs on the Titanic at its worst. To continue the annology we want the boat to sink. Who gives a shot about the chairs.
The elephantitis in the livingroom.
I ask this below: Why is one government official pushing ideas in the classroom better or worse than another?
[Narrator voice] Florida's anti-woke policies didn't actually threaten school choice for anyone who didn't want to sexualize children, but that wouldn't stop Scott from trying to sabotage school choice himself and blame anti-woke policies because he really wants educators to be able to sexualize children...[/Narrator voice]
^^ sometimes you make posting too easy for me.
Here's my standard reply to every idiot pushing woke bullshit.
It used to be dogma that African tribal female genital mutilation was the scourge of the earth, an unimaginable evil.
It used to be dogma that homosexuality was genetically determined, not a choice, not something that could be reversed. This was the basis for banning gay conversion therapy.
It used to be dogma that chemical castration was too evil for even voluntary use by convicted rapists and pedophiles.
Now it's dogma that it is woke teachers' duty to "encourage" their kindergarten kids to want to change their gender with puberty blockers, chemical castration, and gender mutilation surgery, all without the parents' knowledge. Washington and California have actually made it illegal child abuse for parents to stop their children's "gender affirmation" surgery and will take their children away.
It used to be dogma that women needed their own sports leagues and events, with equal support as men's leagues and events.
Now it's dogma that third-rate male athletes can identify as women and enter and dominate women's events.
Why do so many drag queens feel the need to read to kids especially? I have never heard of any strippers demanding performances with kids, or straight women dressed like drag queens.
One of the interesting things I heard about the FGM thing. Is that along with the horrific kinds, they also forbid the ceremonial nicking kind. Where no actually long term damage is done. Which kind of undermines arguments that the current fad should be allowed.
It used to be dogma that homosexuality was genetically determined, not a choice, not something that could be reversed. This was the basis for banning gay conversion therapy.
I don't disagree with the motivation, but this is a bit of an anachronistic retcon. It was (conveniently selectively) deemed "genetically determined" specifically to link gay marriage to miscegenation and to conflate (gay white men) "victims" with (straight black women) victims; or people who chose to be victims with people who were victimized regardless of any choice they did or didn't make.
In much the same manner there is friction between the LGB and Ts now, there was friction between the LGs and Bs as to dishonestly avoid negative legal discrimination *and* attain positive legal discrimination using "The Science!" Ls and Gs had to have genetic traits, which couldn't be discriminated against, which impelled behavior, which also couldn't be discriminated against. A narrative to which Bs, who could/would switch back and forth, were an inconvenient truth (much like detransitioners in turn).
They specifically alienated the Bisexual community because in order to avoid the negative legal discrimination while gaining positive legal discrimination, the argument or "The Science!" was that it was a genetic firmament that (later) conferred behavior, "The Facts!" for which bisexual people switching back and forth represented an inconvenient truth.
The basis for banning conversion therapy was simply to further exploit/abuse positive legal discrimination and fuck with Christians and the legions of "Christian Nationalist Conservatives" (a.k.a. normies) who believed in fringe political concepts like, regardless of genetics, people are responsible for their own actions and society can't simply abide or afford people who are irresponsible because of their genetics.
I'm open to suggestions on rewording that, but you're mostly quibbling. They've changed their dogma, that's all that matters.
I don't think he is quibbling though.
The issue of whether homosexuality is biologically hardwired or chosen/learned hasn't been resolved. If anything, it's more up in the air now than it was 10-20 years ago when homosexuality was considered innate. And mc is correct in pointing out how that issue is manipulated based on convenience and to gain victim identity power.
But that's exactly my point. The dogma changes to suit the propaganda.
The point at which dogma diverges from reality being critical. Genetics is largely individually fixed, behavior is not, never the twain shall meet. People with MS don't just act like they have MS because their genetics commands they act that way to any more than people who are genetically black act black because their genetics tell them to. Well before we "genetics dictate behavior" we had largely discarded the notion as a domain or category error. Yes, if you have a genetic disease or condition, you act as though that condition afflicts or applies to you but, absent the condition, independent of any change in genetics, you can/do/will cease the behavior. There is no marriage gene or drive a Ford pickup gene or own a poodle and decorate interiors gene and there never was.
And, closer to the point, there's no political strife over whether genetics or something else dictates marriages, driving Ford pickups, owning poodles, or interior decorating.
I don't believe sexual preference to be either biologically hard-wired or chosen. "Learned" isn't quite the right concept either, but closer to what I think. I think it — and a great number of our other preferences — are an unconscious and unplanned result of interaction between environment (including culture) and innate ("hard-wired") reward/punishment reactions.
Nobody seems to think this is even controversial when it comes to most of our other preferences, or even to subsets of these particular preferences. Say you're heterosexual; that doesn't explain why, within your sex of preference, you're romantically attracted to this individual and not that one. I mean, homosexual or heterosexual doesn't narrow the field that much! There are still so many people of one or the other sex you might or might not be attracted to — yet the fascinating question of why doesn't seem to be leading to acrimony or even controversy. Nobody's getting hot and bothered over whether one's preference for a black- or brown-haired mate is a choice or a matter of genetics.
They’ve changed their dogma, that’s all that matters.
If you believe their dogma is the only thing that matters.
It was the point I was making in my comment. You are free -- free! -- to make your own point in your own comment.
Bi now, Gay Later.
If you want to keep your kid out of the woke crap then home school. Nuff said.
The problem here is trying to mandate what people who chose to get their kids out are able to teach their kids.
Why is it any of your business if someone wants to start a school focused on gender ideology and all that crap? As long as they meet the education requirements for math, science, history and language what's the problem?
Why am I paying for it and get no choice? If you don't want strangers dictating your kids' curriculum, then don't insist strangers pay for your kids' curriculum.
"It used to be dogma that homosexuality was genetically determined, not a choice, not something that could be reversed. This was the basis for banning gay conversion therapy."
It still is, when it is convenient to whatever argument is being pushed at the moment. It is not, when it is inconvenient. Do not hope for internal consistancy from social progressives, every argument made is for the needs of the moment. The Left has no history.
Lol.
What the fuck is this article? DEI and race based indoctrination has never lead to student success.
Get out of here with this shit Scott.
Or sex based indoctrination.
If you're right then let the market prove it. Parents whe send their kids to the liberal sex obsessed schools will find out their kids will never be able to leave the house and get real jobs. Very soon word gets around that those schools don't graduate successful kids and only the really dedicated leftists will send their kids there. They will produce the next generation of high heel wearing ditch diggers.
"Those people" will never be ditch diggers.
They will get multi-million dollar federal grants from their buddies to prove ditches are racist and need to be eliminated.
Just a note, Being a Woman is definitionally being physically uncoordinated and NOT being a ditch digger. At least if the Nike ad is any indication.
DeSantis and state Republicans' overall support for school choice makes for a sharp contrast with their one-size-fits-all approach to teaching race, gender, and sexuality.
Logic fail of zealotry magnitude.
Imagine, the zealous defense of grooming grade school (and younger) children in the classroom. What a hill for these sick dipshits to die on.
So don't send your kids to those schools. Send them to the ones that spend half the time teaching about bronze aged superstitions and how to appease an angry God.
If it isn't any of the lefts business how you raise your kids then why is it your business how they raise theirs?
Because they expect me to pay for it.
And cross cultists expect taxpayers to pay for their religious schools in these money follows the kids schemes. So what.
Or, and try to follow along, people want to send their kids to parochial schools because they get a better education DESPITE the religious overtones.
Of course we can’t expect anti-religionists to understand that.
A better education than a government run school... wow, way to reach for the stars.
A wolverine in a cardboard box would be better than some government run schools.
Exactly my point. Your religious schools get to pick and chose students, don't take retards at all and since parents have to pay money to do the religious school they care about the child's education so you don't get the troublemakers government schools get.
With all the advantages to the religious school allnyou can claim is "better" than the government cesspool filled with horrible students of parents who don't care and all the retards.
How about showing something meaningful. How many go on to get STEM degrees and work in those fields? How many are actually prepared for their first year of college?
Mind you, that's if being taught that Genesis is fact while evolution and the big bang are Satanic lies contributes to going into STEM fields.
I couldnt agree more.
End all public education and let the parents choose what kind of education they want for their kids. Glad you agree.
So don’t send your kids to those schools. Send them to the ones that spend half the time teaching about bronze aged superstitions and how to appease an angry God
That’s a fine false choice you’ve provided. Congratulations on making Shack seem to be arguing in good faith by comparison.
Scott Shackford is a threat to pre pubescent boys in his vicinity.
Story does not justify its clickbait headline.
Damn this is a low quality article Scott.
"DeSantis and state Republicans' overall support for school choice makes for a sharp contrast with their one-size-fits-all approach to teaching race, gender, and sexuality."
You're saying it's a one-size-fits-all approach. Then you describe the program.
"it forbids any classroom instruction on sexual orientation or gender identity for students from kindergarten through third grade. "
How is that one-size-fits-all? It's literally one approach for young children and a different approach for older children. It's the exact fucking opposite of one-size-fits-all. Jeez, do better.
I suspect Shackford's objection is less "one size fits all" than his preferred ideological viewpoint is no longer being pushed in Florida schools. The one size fits all argumnet is a red herring.
"Colloquially known as the "Don't Say Gay" law,..." by moronic ideologues.
" In April 2023, the board did exactly what the law's critics feared: It banned all classroom instruction on sexual orientation or gender identity across all grades unless it was required as part of state education standards or as part of a health instruction class that parents could opt their students out of."
So what the legislature decided was that, on a controversial subject, the teachers could not go off the state curriculum. This is bad, why?
"n August, the College Board, the nonprofit that helps coordinate programs and test students for Advanced Placement (A.P.) classes, warned that Florida students might not get college credit for A.P. psychology classes if these subjects were removed from the state's curriculum,..."
Which is a national monopoly, which has made some very questionable curriculum decisions of late.
"...noting that these topics had been part of the class for 30 years."
Are these topics being approached in the same way they were 30 years ago?
Thirty years ago the vocabulary for talking about these topics did not even exist.
Are these topics being approached in the same way they were 30 years ago?
Specifically not. Again:
One of Prof. Bailey's "Dangerous Ideas" for which he previously got in trouble? MtF trans persons aren't acting out of any sort of inherent biological female imperative but are either extreme homosexuals or autogynophiles.
School choice is supposed to prevent politicians from pushing their ideas into the classroom.
Why is one government official pushing his ideas in the classroom worse than another one?
At least one is ostensibly elected by the people and accountable... the other is protected by an ironclad Union agreement.
Get rid of public schools. problem solved.
seconded. nuke it from space.
School choice is supposed to prevent politicians from pushing their ideas into the classroom.
There is no such thing as a public school independent from the influence and ideology of the government that funds it.
This is not a sudden change where the government just now started pushing ideas into the classroom lol. The entire curriculum is decided by government, pushed and forced onto the local schools by government.
approach to teaching race, gender, and sexuality.
What's the argument in favor of teaching these subjects to children, who would otherwise be oblivious and indifferent to such things but for said teaching?
Or, make it even simpler. What's the argument in favor of telling children, "There is no Santa, your parents are liars, and you should feel bad about yourself for believing otherwise." An unlikely hypothetical, perhaps - but the point is: why thrust that on a child? What goal are you trying to accomplish by doing something like that?
Well, let's remember that according to the article, these topics were being removed from the *highschool* curriculum in the form of an AP Psychology class. So we are not talking 6-year-olds here.
And I don't think most children are as ignorant and innocent as you may think they are.
“There is no Santa, your parents are liars, and you should feel bad about yourself for believing otherwise.”
Let's leave out the moral judgment part for a moment. Should a highschool class in psychology discuss concepts related to gender and sexual orientation as they are understood in the field, even if the parents don't personally agree with them?
If parents wish their children to remain in ignorance about the field of psychology and how it treats the concepts of gender and sexual orientation, they can refuse to permit their children from taking the AP Psychology class.
But if the parents permit their children to take the AP Psychology class, they shouldn't also be permitted to dictate the curriculum of that class.
instead of having a giant tug of war over what hte government should be forcing onto the kids, let every parent choose for themselves what school and content they want their kids to have. it's that easy.
Cross Cultists don't want their kids to be taught evolution in Biology classes. They want the book of Genesis taught. Why wouldn't they want to meddle in psychology classes too? I'm surprised they let any history that isn't in their Bible be taught.
Why would you have a problem with that?
And, to be clear, Christians (and most religious people who have creationism views) don't want Evolutionary Theory to be taught - as is just a different version of creationism that has no more or less established or reasonable basis for being accepted. That's a far cry different from teaching Biological Evolution, which very few people have a problem with. I'm giving you the benefit of the doubt that you meant the former rather than the latter, as the two terms are commonly mixed-up.
Evolution is maybe one day in any high school biology class and it is presented alone with natural selection, mutation, and genetic drift. It is hardly such a contentious issue that politicans and interest groups make it out to be. In earth science, radio dating is taught along with how solar systems form and the earth's formation billions of years ago. Again this isn't contentious. There really isn't an issue here.
Having "gender theorists" roaming schools to find new recruits and grooming is another matter.
And I don’t think most children are as ignorant and innocent as you may think they are.
Even if they're not, that doesn't answer the question. What’s the argument in favor of teaching these subjects to children? Why does any school-age person need to be versed by anyone other than their parents/guardians (if they so choose) on these subjects? These are sociology subjects that have nothing to do with a core K-12 education that's supposed to be focused primarily on achieving measurable degrees of comprehension in literacy, mathematics, basic sciences, history/religion, art/music, physical education, and information technology.
Instead, these subjects are being neglected in favor of sociological subjects which have zero educational benefit or utility until the undergraduate level.
Why? Why do that? What's the argument for it?
Let’s leave out the moral judgment part for a moment.
There is no moral judgment part to that. If a school decided to make it part of their curriculum to teach their students that Santa isn't real, that parents who say otherwise are liars, and that they should feel bad about themselves for having believed them - what's the argument in favor of that?
Would it help if I gave it a academic sounding name, like Critical Holiday Theory? Could you argue in favor of it then?
Should a highschool class in psychology discuss concepts related to gender and sexual orientation as they are understood in the field, even if the parents don’t personally agree with them?
Sure. And there also be a class discussing Christianity's role in American history and society, which primarily studies the Bible. Hey, even better, how about firearm safety and marksmanship classes. And why should it be limited to AP classes? We'll just incorporate them into social studies and PE respectively.
I mean, if anyone ever offered up that kind of consistency, they'd have a reasonable argument. But again, the question is why we would find such curriculum necessary enough to make an argument in its favor, especially at the expense of actual core education.
I think you're confused on the qge group being discussed. If you haven't told your kid the facts about Santa before high school you've got problems.
K-12. What’s the argument in favor of teaching these subjects to them? What's the argument in favor of telling a student that what their parents say is false, and what they think about themselves for believing what they do is something for which they should be apologetic?
What goal are you trying to accomplish in thrusting these subjects on anyone that fits within that range?
And don't try to skirt the issue. Such intellectual cowardice is pathetic. And revealing.
If you support this garbage, then support it. Full-throat. Make the argument.
No matter what is taught in a government one size fits all school there will be contradictions with what some parents want taught. There always have been and there likely will always be. Flat earthers don't want globes in schools. Young earth creationists don't want evolution, natural selection and basic genetics taught in schools. I suspect there are some wackos who want Pi taught as 3 because how could a perfect God create a universe where squaring the circle creates a number with no end. Muslims will be upset if the history of the crusades is taught making them out to be the villains. Those of Turkish blood will be angered if the Greek genocide is taught as existing at all. Athiests are going to be upset if Christianity is taught as anything other than another mythology. The American Civil War can't be taught at all without pissing someone off.
If we are to have government intrusions in education then there will be people who get pissed off. I'd say pissing off those who drag their superstitions into the debate are ok to piss off because you will never make them happy.
No matter how human sexuality is handled in government education the monotheist superstitious will be angry. Since no one can ever make them happy why bother trying? They are clearly a dying breed as the abortion rights laws being passed in the supposed Bible belt states show. That kind of extremism simply isn't popular anymore.
Leftist propaganda disguised as an article.
“Don’t say gay” is a leftist dog whistle.
Getting sexual topics out of early education is a great idea.
Desantis has been an excellent Governor.
Too bad he got no traction as a presidential candidate
He got no traction because new ideas in the GOP are bottlenecked by the impaction of Trump. The party needs a strong laxative to push him out of the way.
He got no traction because new ideas in the GOP are bottlenecked by the impaction of Trump.
The favorable interpretation is that you confused Trump with TDS. The unfavorable interpretation is that you aren't much more intelligent, principled, or coherent than chemjeff or sarcasmic.
DeSantis took office openly supporting Trump's wall. Probably his single greatest political play in office (so far) was sending illegal immigrants to MV. His stance on Trannies in schools is little different than Trump's stance on Trannies in the military. If he's hindered by any impaction, it's because he's got to pull people like Mitt Romney, Nikki Haley, and Chris Christie, and their constituents, in line behind him.
Nobody who isn't a self-fellating drunk like sarcasmic would reasonably try and pass off this latter argument to anyone with a half-functioning brain.
School choice is supposed to prevent politicians from pushing their ideas into the classroom.
What? Where is that in the rule book?
I'm confused as to why Liberatarians are against this law. I'm just fine with math and reading taught in schools, they rest they discuss over dinner or read about on the Internet.
It's a law being passed to create more government regulation. Next question.
And my more do you mean recalibrating existing laws? Because anything else is a lie to serve pedos and marxists as their agenda is pushed as curriculum.
What a propaganda BS piece.
The acts very first few sentences.....
An act relating to parental rights in education;2
amending s. 1001.42, F.S.; requiring ****district school****3
boards to adopt procedures that comport with certain4
provisions of law for *****notifying a student's parent***** of5
specified information; requiring such procedures to6
reinforce the fundamental right of parents to make7
decisions regarding the upbringing and control of8
their children in a specified manner
From the article -- "School choice is a way to sidestep the politics of the classroom altogether," Reason Foundation's Christian Barnard notes. But Florida reminds us that even in a strong school choice system, there's still a risk of politicians pushing their ideas into the classroom.
I certainly agree with this, but sadly it doesn't stop there. Nanny state parents using gov't mechanisms are just as big of a threat (or bigger) than the gov't at times. My in-laws live in Brevard County, Fla. Parents in that district have led the charge to get books banned/removed. And unlike often, it isn't righty parents. It's lefty ones. I used the link to look which books had been removed -- Brevard had something like 80 books removed. All of them were challenged by lefties because they talked about stuff like Thanksgiving or religion.
So we've got teachers, school boards and parents all getting involved in this stupidity.
"It banned all classroom instruction on sexual orientation or gender identity across all grades unless it was required as part of state education standards or as part of a health instruction class that parents could opt their students out of."
"Parents who want their children taught about these topics would need to turn either to private schools or to homeschooling."
Let me get this straight. Parents who are that determined that their kids learn that there is something called homosexualité and that gender comes in 57 flavors... can't just mention it themselves? Without private schools or homeschooling? It would take a whole 5 minutes.
You nailed it. the folks wanting to invade schools with this have an agenda and grooming and pedos are a prime reason.
What does race, gender or sexuality have to do with public education Scott? I get Scott is gay and this whole "I couldn't be myself" in school is a thing with him but honestly no one cares what your sexual preference is. For youngsters coming into puberty, it isn't the school/govt's business what a person decides. As for gender, so called gender dysphoria is a mental illness and should not be normalized and pushed by govt in schools.
Just stop it Scott...schools are not the place to recruit and push an agenda.
WE lost school choice through pols but it is also how we got it back
You say "School choice is supposed to prevent politicians from pushing their ideas into the classroom." but do you not remember
School Choice - Betsy DeVos
betsydevos.com
https://betsydevos.com › Issues
Every student should be able to choose from every educational option. No student in America should be denied opportunities to learn based on where they live
Really, I think sometimes what you don't like is 'political' and what you do like is "someone who isn't really a politician" whatever that
means 🙂
Aidan Maese-Czeropski is no longer employed by the U.S. Senate,” the Maryland Democrat’s office said in a statement to NBC News on Saturday, which was first obtained by Politico. “We will have no further comment on this personnel matter.”
On Friday, The Daily Caller, a conservative news outlet, published what it said was video showing a congressional staffer having “sex with an unknown man in the Senate hearing room.” It added that the video was shared “in a private group for gay men in politics.”
Just another day in the postmodern cultural marxist nation we live in right?