The Great Medicaid Unwinding
The ongoing rollback of Medicaid is a rare step to reverse the “ratcheting growth” of our social safety net.

A "great unwinding" is very much underway in Medicaid programs nationwide, representing the most notable reversal of a government expansion since the welfare reforms of the 1990s.
From March 2020 to March 2023, Medicaid enrollment soared by more than 22 million people, a surge even larger than the Medicaid expansions brought on by the Affordable Care Act (ACA). This was primarily due to "continuous coverage" provisions in the coronavirus response that prevented states from conducting routine eligibility reviews—what bureaucrats call the redetermination process—which would ordinarily remove recipients who no longer qualify based on the objective, pre-established standards of need. At its recent peak, Medicaid covered almost 95 million Americans, a far cry from the original intent of protecting the most vulnerable.
This expansion of Medicaid was never meant to be permanent. Yet, in the context of a growing acceptance among Americans of broader welfare coverage and the popularity of prior Medicaid expansions—since 2014, 40 states and the District of Columbia have expanded under ACA provisions—it seemed like a plausible scenario, especially if you're familiar with the work of economist Robert Higgs.
In 1987's "Crisis and Leviathan," Higgs showed how government expands during crises but often fails to retract fully once the crisis passes, leading to an ever larger state. The pandemic-era growth of Medicaid risked becoming a textbook case of this "ratchet effect," potentially transforming temporary relief measures into permanent entitlements.
A few months have passed since most states restarted redeterminations in June and July. While it's still early—the unwinding is expected to take 12 to 14 months—the data that's come in already defies the Higgsian prediction: 10.6 million people have been removed from Medicaid, an unprecedented number and orders of magnitude greater than any previous episode in its history. Barring major policy changes, we can expect most, if not all, of the pandemic-era growth in our largest safety-net program to be rolled back in the coming months.
Although this might be the first you're hearing of it, and some mainstream reports frame the process as "chaos," this development is, broadly speaking, worth celebrating. First, many of the estimated 18 million ineligible recipients already have employer-sponsored insurance or are eligible for alternate sources of health insurance. While states will inevitably make mistakes in carrying out tens of millions of redeterminations, safeguards are in place to re-enroll and retroactively cover eligible recipients who fall through the cracks.
Second, the cost of having those 18 million ineligible people on Medicaid is around $80 billion per year. It's an end to a subsidy that primarily benefits insurance companies who currently receive monthly membership fees for ineligible recipients who incur little or no health care costs, or who use employer-sponsored insurance when they do.
Third and more importantly, we should celebrate the economic progress of millions of Americans who are no longer eligible for Medicaid because they earn more than their state's eligibility limit. The unwinding, therefore, is not just about cost savings. It represents the preservation of our long-held commitment to a safety net designed for those in genuine need, rather than a blanket provision that benefits politically connected industries.
As my colleagues Kofi Ampaabeng, Liam Sigaud, and I found, expanding Medicaid to more people crowds out the care available to those already enrolled. There is good reason to believe the unwinding will improve access to care for the most vulnerable enrollees, especially in areas where Medicaid providers are in chronically short supply.
It's easy to dismiss the great unwinding as merely an end to temporary policies in response to a crisis that's long passed. Yet, as you remove your shoes in an airport this holiday season, you'll be vividly reminded of how "temporary" policies can permanently shape our society. Thus, the great unwinding of Medicaid is something to be thankful for, even a few years overdue.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Social safety net = wealth redistribution
More like income redistribution because they take money before it is turned into stuff.
Wealth redistribution is when the government takes actual stuff. Nationalizing companies, appropriating land and giving it to farmers, things like that.
Sweden vs Venezuela.
When people talk about "redistributing the wealth" they don't mean taxes and money. They mean tearing down the rich by taking away what they own.
It's funny you think government takes land and gives it to farmers when in reality it's been illegally taking land and hoarding it (hut,hum; federal land?).
^Bingo .... The "Social safety net" of living off of others by the gov-'guns' tool. More commonly known as having a career as an armed-theft robber.
I Am Earning $81,100 so Far this year working 0nline and I am a full time college student and just working for 3 to 4 hours a day I've made such great m0ney.I am Genuinely thankful to and my administrator, It's' really user friendly and I'm just so happY that I found out about thisI worked Here ══════►►► http://Www.Smartcareer1.com
"Raise your hand if your medicaid plan would cover illegal immigrants"
A great way to identify active traitors.
We know there is no cost to illegal immigrants. The imaginary benefits we gain are worth waaaaaaaaaay more.
Lower crime rate overall too, since they are mostly peaceful illegal immigrants, and bring down the population average crime rate.
Delicious food trucks improve our lives, just don’t park it here.
Maybe a few of them could open hospital trucks.
You should be thankful they are here. Now go get a second job to pay for their shit.
Covid freebies disappearing = "shitty economy" in the polls.
Coincidence?
Not a chance. It can't be just the Cheesy-Poof Price Index.
Go kill yourself you Soros worshipping, global Marxist, pedophilic faggot.
Funny how you think 'armed-theft' = an economy. I'm curious though how you think resources are going to get made or distributed with 'guns'. Slavery?
Pluggo’s
Economic
National
Index
System
It is in the infancy.
Covid? Your hero Obama expanded medicaid retard.
Conservatives and libertarians have it backwards. Medicaid is the last safety net program that should be cut, because it funds life-saving aid to the poor. Medicare and Social Security are far worse, because they train everyone to expect a handout whether they need it or not.
I think the point was 95 million people didn't get their life's saved by medicaid and that's pretty clear since if I remember correctly there's already a law that requires the healthcare industry to save a dying life even if they have no financial means to save themselves.
And that's how it should be. There's no justification for using gov-guns against others to pay your life saving bills when you drive a brand new car and live in an over-sized house. The law should require HONORABLE intention to actually pay the bill. Not criminal intention of getting away with as much robbery as possible.
It’s much cheaper to subsidize basic preventative care (checkups for example) for poor people and prescribe some cheap statins than to wait until they go to the emergency room and then pay for their triple bypass operation.
Oh. It is just statins. Glad we can remove transition surgeries from medicaid.
We have 95 million poor people?
I'd peg that as a ton of BS propaganda.
Are these 95-million ( 1/2 the adult population ) poor people so poor they can't even pay their own basic preventative care bills and if they're that poor they should be getting their basic care within prison walls not freebee passes for armed-theft.
Pure BS propaganda.
Chicken McNuggets, scratch off tickets, Rikoloff, and smokes are a higher priority for them so you should pick up a side hustle to pay for their medical bills.
It would be even cheaper to put the poor people in work camps, complete with medical staff (ideally, the docs and nurses who got their degrees through DEI).
There is very little good evidence that preventative care reduces illness or mortality. Another basket of bullshit.
Why should I pay for your triple bypass operation? If you're so poor, why are you so obese? Maybe if EBT was only for rice and beans, and not McD's, then perhaps we could talk about that bypass. Otherwise, seems like your problem not mine.
Stations are decidedly not for everyone, as my recent rhabdomyolysis can attest.
Anywho, if there has been a scaling back of "the social safety net," I'm sure not seeing it as a cashier dealing with all the people with health care cards buying all manner of groceries, OTC meds, and even adult pads and household cleaning supplies, while I wait for a delayed payment from my company's useless, half-assed disability firm and get behind on rent and utilities!
Yep, Chumby's right. I'm needing a side hustle to pay for all the "free shit" people are getting!
I've thought about participating in paid clinical trials if there are any with my existing prescriptions and regimens. If I'm going to be spending so much money and time on my own co-pays for treatment and Doctor visits, I might as well do something useful for science and get pay or reimbursement for it.
Oh, and the Medicare health cards are on top of the EBT/SNAP, WIC, utility subsidies, and Earned Income Tax Credit checks everybody gets while this single, responsible, Childfree By Choice person pays for it all!
This shit ain't "unwound" yet. Oh! Happy Day when it does!
🙂
AutoCorrect made "Statins" read like "Stations". The first is what meant to say were not for everyone.
"This was primarily due to "continuous coverage" provisions in the coronavirus response that prevented states from conducting routine eligibility reviews—what bureaucrats call the redetermination process—which would ordinarily remove recipients who no longer qualify based on the objective, pre-established standards of need."
Never let a good crisis go to waste. If necessary, invent a crisis and then use it.
I notice the headline changed; you realized you crossed the line from clickbait to downright offensive?
Really disgusting article, even for you guys. Also this won't save any money, everyone who was kicked off of Medicaid doesn't magically stop needing healthcare, except now they'll just be showing up at emergency rooms.
This will not save any money, but saving money isn't really the point of kicking folks off of Medicaid, cruelty is the point.
So kicking people off of Medicaid who are not eligible for Medicaid is cruel? Seems like removing the freeloaders who are cheating the system would be a good thing. If you want to change the eligibility that Congress defined for the program, okay maybe you can talk about Congress being cruel. But at this point, simply auditing the books for people who are not eligible is not cruel.
So why don’t you support measures to make health care more available and less expensive? These would include:
* Abolishing prescription laws, making everything OTC,
*Ending “The War On (Some) Drugs,
*Making the FDA an advisory agency at most instead of a suppressor of innovation,
*Abolishing requirements for “Certificates Of Need” for hospital construction and additions,
*Allowing advertisement of medical prices to make all medical prices transparent as a fast-food menu,
And
*Getting third-party financing out of health care entirely, so that medical prices operate like cell phone prices and continuously go down with increased supply and innovation.
And to reply to your handle: Fuck Totalitarians!
“Getting third-party financing out of health care entirely, so that medical prices operate like cell phone prices and continuously go down with increased supply and innovation.”
+1000000…. It’s amazing how the more talk about “less expensive” politics does the MORE expensive it just gets. There was a time when a local doctor came to the door for the price of a pizza. Now that same doctor takes the whole F’En house.
How stupid do this gov-gun worshipers have to be to not see the reality of this. Everything the government has taken control of is of the most expensive markets (by a baffling 10x margin or better). The ignorance it takes to think government is going to make anything “less expensive” is stupidity at its finest.
Course the criminal (armed-theft) lobbyist does actually get their sh*t “less expensive”. They don’t pay sh*t. They just lobby for armed-theft of everyone else like the criminals they are.
Undeniable FACT - 'guns' don't make sh*t and the only tool in governments toolbox is 'guns' of force.
words words words
And to reply to you, personally: fuck libertarians.
Words mean things.
So Fuck Postmodern Totalitarians!
Yeah... Preventing robbers from doing armed-theft is so cruel!!! /s
Grow the F'Up.