New U.S.-China Climate Deal: Same as the Old Deals
China pledges again to do exactly what it was going to do anyway.

For years U.S.-China climate negotiations have been much like the running gag in the Rocky and Bullwinkle cartoon where Bullwinkle says "Hey Rocky, watch me pull a rabbit out of my hat." To which Rocky responds, "But that trick never works." Bullwinkle gamely replies, "This time for sure!"
The just-released Sunnylands Statement on Enhancing Cooperation to Address the Climate Crisis is the latest effort by the Biden administration's equivalent of Bullwinkle, Climate Envoy John Kerry, to pull off the trick of getting China to collaborate with the U.S. on climate change. The Sunnylands Statement follows earlier efforts by Kerry to obtain Chinese commitments on climate change in 2014 and 2015 when he was secretary of state during the Obama administration.
The new statement declares, "The United States and China recognize that the climate crisis has increasingly affected countries around the world." Consequently, both countries pledge that they "intend to sufficiently accelerate renewable energy deployment in their respective economies through 2030 from 2020 levels so as to accelerate the substitution for coal, oil and gas generation, and thereby anticipate post-peaking meaningful absolute power sector emission reduction."
"Anticipate post-peaking meaningful absolute power sector emission reduction"? In fact, China has not yet peaked in its power sector carbon dioxide emissions, nor has it done so with respect to its economy's overall emissions.
On the other hand, U.S. power sector carbon dioxide emissions have been "post-peak" for 15 years. U.S. power sector emissions peaked in 2007 at 2,422 million metric tons and are now down to 1,539 million metric tons. As of 2022, the switch from coal to less-carbon-intensive natural gas for electricity generation accounts for two-thirds of the drop in U.S. power sector emissions, whereas one-third results from increased generation from wind and solar power.

In contrast, Chinese power sector emissions have more than doubled from 2,230 million metric tons in 2007 to 4,695 million metric tons now. A significant proportion of this increase is the result of rising coal-powered generation since 2016, which is expected to reach a record high this year. In other words, China's power sector is certainly not yet "post-peak."

This divergence between American and Chinese emissions trends should not be a surprise. After all, the same John Kerry who negotiated the new Sunnylands statement also negotiated for the Obama administration the 2014 U.S.-China Joint Announcement on Climate Change. Nine years ago, China frankly stated that, for its economy as a whole, it "intends to achieve the peaking of CO2 emissions around 2030." Since 2014, China's overall carbon dioxide emissions have continued to increase, rising from about 10,000 million metric tons to a projected 11,470 million metric tons this year. No peaking yet. In contrast, the U.S. economy's overall carbon dioxide emissions peaked in 2007 at around 6,000 metric tons and is forecasted to be 4,971 metric tons this year, a 17 percent drop.
A year later, the two countries issued the 2015 U.S.-China Joint Presidential Statement on Climate Change. In that statement, the U.S. pledged to "reduce CO2 emissions from the power sector to 32% below 2005 levels by 2030." As of 2022, those emissions are 36 percent below their 2005 levels, eight years ahead of the U.S.'s promised schedule.
In the 2015 statement, China merely committed that it "will lower carbon dioxide emissions per unit of GDP by 60% to 65% from the 2005 level by 2030." As of 2020, China's carbon dioxide emissions per unit of gross domestic product have actually fallen from 0.9 kg to 0.5 kg per unit of GDP, a 45 percent reduction since 2005. In comparison, U.S. emissions have fallen from 0.4 kg to 0.2 kg of carbon dioxide per unit of GDP, a 50 percent drop. It is worth noting that the U.S. produces more than twice as much value per unit of carbon dioxide emissions than does China.
In the Sunnylands statement, both China and the U.S. vow to "accelerate" numerous "concrete actions, including practical and tangible collaborative programs." Maybe this time for sure, but past experience suggests that the gag is on us.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
If you believe climate change is a problem, you are free to eliminate the net carbon emissions from your life. Climate Tsar John Kerry (D) hasn’t, but that shouldn’t stop you if you are serious about this.
In today's actual climate policy news, one of the hackers trying to screw up the process for pay has been sentenced for stealing mountains e-mails and data
https://vvattsupwiththat.blogspot.com/2023/11/remember-climategate.html
weird, all of the loudest people on the subject have extremely high carbon emissions with no plans on ever reducing them.
Its just justifying their communist desires through their pseudo religion
They are reducing carbon emissions by making sure the plebes are too poor to buy fossil fuels. If you were worthy of burning fossil fuels you would be flying in your personal jets too and screaming at the plebes to be poorer.
If the marxists pushing this shit, Bailey included, cannot be bothered to act as if it's a crisis then I won't either.
I'm making over $7k a month working component time. I saved hearing other people inform me how lots cash they could make online so I decided to look at it. Well, it turned into all proper and has definitely modified my life.
This is what I do ══════►►► http://Www.Smartcareer1.com
Madness.
When will it end?
https://twitter.com/FromKulak/status/1725251807017099393?t=-t3Ruy41gpvipJ4JrYQpVg&s=19
I cannot Emphasize enough: the Globalists aren't sending their best
these movements, secret societies, obscure political networks, they had their heyday in the 1910s-50s
Now the last fail children of the Rothschilds and old money just whine and rearrange chairs on the Titanic
[Link]
Deleted and moved to avoid being misleading. The next post is not the link from above, but a completely separate post.
https://twitter.com/DylanByers/status/1725245540982808856?t=TpzphR8Dop_qHkdiRzfncw&s=19
NEW: The Economist’s annual “World Ahead” guide identifies Donald Trump as the biggest global danger of 2024.
“[I]n the 38 years that we have published this guide, no single person has ever eclipsed our analysis as much as Donald Trump eclipses 2024.”
[Link]
Translation: we’re scared we’re gonna get caught!
The Economist’s annual “World Ahead” guide identifies Donald Trump as the biggest global danger of 2024.
It's a shame they couldn't find a menacing picture of him anywhere to put on the cover.
In contrast, the U.S. economy's overall carbon dioxide emissions peaked in 2007 at around 6,000 metric tons and is forecasted to be 4,971 metric tons this year, a 17 percent drop.
I'll bet you all these calculations are wildly wrong. Probably based on presumptions on top of averages of averaged averages, greenwashing numbers accepted as fact... you know, John Kerry type of shit.
Ha!
The proper laugh is at the poor translators. Was this originally Chinese, and poorly translated, or is this the original English, and what the heck would you get from translating the Chinese back into English?
Still garbage.
The real question....
What climate change has really occurred?
What political change has really occurred?
And the obvious answer that the Nazi-Empire growth is the only effect going on around a BS imaginary/deceptive cause.
Since you ask, here is the answer:
https://vvattsupwiththat.blogspot.com/2023/11/climate-of-here.html
Funny. Your BS shows 5-degree’s difference per 10-years whereas all the other BS only says 1.8 change per 80-years. BS on top of BS on top of BS.
But lets play your pretend BS game. How the F do you suppose gov-'guns' are going to change it? Haven't they already been trying and according to your own BS it just gets worse. STUPID is doing the exact same thing over and over and over again and expecting a different result.
China is no doubt laughing their asses off as the West neuters themselves. They don’t believe in climate change, and you can see that in their actions.
Remember the ‘climate bomb’ they used to hold the West hostage?
Probably not, but it seems to me that China uses this nut balls Western belief as leverage to get everything they want for a promise to maybe think about doing something in a few decades.
Try reading before you comment-
As Bailey notes , Xi has a realistic cadre of climate advisors:
"As of 2020, China's carbon dioxide emissions per unit of gross domestic product have actually fallen from 0.9 kg to 0.5 kg per unit of GDP, a 45 percent reduction since 2005. "
What that means is their gdp grew, not that total emissions fell.
"As of 2020, China’s carbon dioxide emissions per unit of gross domestic product..."
Do you have any other magical ratios that dont matter in the real world? How many Schrute-bucks to unicorn-farts is China making? What about the wing-dings to metric tons of unobtanium mined?
Because just so you know, these ratios are all equally relevant to the "end of the world" scenario models that climate scientists use.
Look at the satellite channel on Google maps : China has increased its forest cover by 15% .
Treaties, once approved by the senate, are above the Constitution. Thus our federal government gets the power to regulate carbon by way of a treaty with a nation no one expects to complane. Constitutional limits on government circumvented.
^BINGO... How the oppressed world shares it's communist ideology to the USA. Once upon a time the USA was exceptional.