Republicans Blow Another Opportunity At the Ballot Box
Abortion and the shadow of Donald Trump hobble GOP prospects.

Leave it to Republicans to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory. With an unpopular Democratic president in the White House and that president's party torn by the difficult decision over whether to back victims of murderous terrorism, the GOP still managed to take a thumping in off-year elections. Stumbling once again over the issues of abortion, former President Donald Trump, and a general gloss of nuttiness, GOP candidates can't get out of their own way.
Across the country, Republicans who saw victory within reach turned in generally underwhelming performances Tuesday. As in last year's mid-term elections, they struggled in the shadow of the U.S. Supreme Court's Dobbs decision overturning Roe v. Wade and making abortion a political issue once again. Like a dog finally catching a car, they found themselves burdened by their achievement.
You are reading The Rattler from J.D. Tuccille and Reason. Get more of J.D.'s commentary on government overreach and threats to everyday liberty.
Hung-Up on Abortion, Again
"Republican challenger Daniel Cameron's bet failed to produce gains in rural counties," the Louisville Courier-Journal reported of the Trump-backed candidate's failure to unseat the Democratic incumbent in Kentucky, which gave 62 percent of its vote to the GOP presidential candidate in 2020. "The results also showed the GOP nominee's own political baggage — whether his strict anti-abortion views or his role in the Breonna Taylor case — sunk him in urban centers and suburban areas."
"Youngkin is a relatively popular, middle-of-the-road politician, who probably could have succeeded in flipping the Senate, had it not been for the abortion issue," Olusoji Akomolafe, chairman of Norfolk State University's political science department, told the Richmond Times-Dispatch after GOP Governor Glenn Younkin not only failed in his effort to take the state Senate but also lost the House.
Ohio voters cut to the chase and embedded reproductive rights in the state constitution with a higher percentage of the vote—56 percent—than the 53 percent who cast their votes for Donald Trump in 2020 (they also voted to legalize marijuana, making it a good night for personal freedom).
"A year after an expected 'red wave' turned into a ripple, conservatives' election messaging in 2023 sought to adjust to emerging realities," Rick Klein of ABC News noted in the aftermath. "Election Day 2023 instead continued a losing streak for conservatives on abortion-related issues that began virtually the moment the Supreme Court tossed out Roe v. Wade last year – extending through states that are blue, red and decidedly purple."
Democrats "handed Republicans another drubbing with their twin issue set of abortion rights and fear and loathing of the MAGAGOP," observed The Wall Street Journal's editorial board. "Republicans have a brand perception problem."
Blown Opportunity
This is remarkable given that mid-term and off-year elections are often referenda on the party in power, and President Joe Biden has been wildly unpopular for over two years; the FiveThirtyEight average of polls currently has the president's approval at 38.6 percent and disapproval at 55.7 percent.
Simultaneously, high-profile Democrats publicly battle over whether to back Israel in its fight against Hamas after the terrorist organization's bloody October 7 attack on that country; party progressives favor the Palestinian cause. Polls find growing support in the public at large for the lone majority-Jewish state.
Yet that didn't translate into greater ballot-box support for the GOP.
True, Republicans point to evidence that Trump can beat Biden in a hypothetical rematch in the 2024 presidential election. In a much-publicized The New York Times/Siena poll, "President Biden is trailing Donald J. Trump in five of the six most important battleground states one year before the 2024 election."
Hobbled By Trump
But that reflects how weak Biden is rather than any real strength for the likely Republican candidate. The FiveThirtyEight polling average has Trump consistently underwater, with his favorable rating currently at 40.9 percent and his unfavorable at 54.9 percent. It's possible that the former president could beat the current one because almost anybody could.
The Times/Siena poll shows Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis and former South Carolina Gov. Nikki Haley also besting Joe Biden in swing states, with Nikki Haley winning all six.
A subsequent Marquette poll has Trump narrowly losing to Biden in Wisconsin, which went for Biden in 2020. But both DeSantis and Haley beat the incumbent—DeSantis by two points and Haley by nine.
"Mr. Biden and Mr. Trump are both deeply — and similarly — unpopular," Shane Goldmacher of The New York Times commented about his paper's polling results. "But voters who overwhelmingly said the nation was on the wrong track are taking out their frustrations on the president."
In fact, polls continuously find deep concerns about the prospects of a Biden-Trump rematch, with overwhelming numbers opposed to the idea. If forced to pick between them, voters may select the less unpopular option. But that's a risky strategy when there's an opportunity to run candidates and messages that don't alienate much of the electorate.
Glimmers of Hope for the GOP
Aside from Cameron's loss in the Kentucky gubernatorial race, the GOP did well in that state, sweeping down-ballot races. The Virginia vote delivered Democrats the narrowest of majorities in the House and a slimmed majority in the Senate. In both cases, better candidates and less-extreme messaging on abortion might well have made a difference for Republicans with a public that overwhelmingly (69 percent according to Gallup) thinks the procedure should be available at least through the first trimester.
Perhaps the vote in Ohio shows the way forward. There, marijuana legalization passed with significant GOP support—much of it from those who count themselves as supporters of the former president.
"To the extent there's a Trump brand, I think it's more of a 'don't trust the government, leave me alone,' than the traditional social conservatives," Doug Berman, executive director of the Drug Enforcement and Policy Center at Ohio State University, told the Cincinnati Enquirer.
That's the kind of message that could play well with a national electorate that doesn't like the incumbent president and is ready for something different, but is put off by the more control-freakish aspects of the GOP. If Republicans can embrace their "leave me alone" mojo and leave the unpopular former president in the past, they just might improve their odds of defeating the even less-popular current White House resident and his party.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
I also want to be left the fuck alone. But instead we have this oppressive government that wants to be my mother.
But at least now you know the tune to sing to the long march through fixed elections, "It's the GOPs fault for opposing the murder of babies, not capitalizing on other opportunities, and allowing Trump to run and win."
15 yrs. from now, when one DNC candidate wins over the other with 98% of the vote, "It's the GOPs fault for opposing the murder of babies, not capitalizing on other opportunities, and allowing Trump to run and win."
I... I don't really want to sing that tune, though.
I AM Making a Good Salary from Home $6580-$7065/week , which is amazing, under a year ago I was jobless in a horrible economy. I thank God every day I was blessed with these instructions and now it’s my duty to pay it forward and share it with Everyone. go to home media tech tab for more detail reinforce your heart.
This Website--------------> https://bitcoindollar346.blogspot.com
15 yrs. from now, when one DNC candidate wins over the other with 98% of the vote, “It’s the GOPs fault for opposing the murder of babies, not capitalizing on other opportunities, and allowing Trump to run and win.”
15 years from now? Fuck, they already do that shit in Chicago. Somehow it's Trump's fault when one Democrat wins over another for mayor.
Great article, Mike. I appreciate your work, I’m now creating over $35,900 dollars each month simply by doing a simple job online! I do know You currently making a lot of greenbacks online from $28,900 dollars, its simple online operating jobs.
.
.
Just open the link—————————————>>> http://Www.SalaryOption1.Com
super
You will be assigned to camp number seventeen.
Naa. It’s cuz the elections were stolen really. Didn't you hear about the pipe leak?
2016 stolen or 2020 stolen?
Yes, a good point.
The 2016 election was claimed to be stolen by Russians. The evidence never materialized and now the only ones that still believe it was stolen are partisans steeped in confirmation bias.
2020: same except switch out Russians for dems.
It was claimed by Hillary and her minions including the trash MSM.
That's fair. MSM support of the claims in 2016 but not in 2020 is another difference.
Except that in 2020, the evidence was overwhelming.
It was just that the establishments, of both parties, needed to have Trump removed, so no one would look, seriously at it.
When you show them up, as Trump did, you become dangerous.
Next election if Trump is in the running I will vote for him and all the democrats I can for the rest of the federal offices, better a knife in the chest than the back.
You can't just give up on abortion if you have any principles whatsoever and believe that hundreds of thousands of babies are being murdered every year.
Or even that you can't have a coherent notion of an individual, personal responsibility, or bodily autonomy if there's an 8, 20, or 36+ week lag on any decisions up to and including the death/killing of other individuals and their logically most innocent.
The idiocy of it is something that could only be dreamed up by psycho/sociopathic egomaniacs who generally don't take responsibility for their own actions and generally believe society exists to support them in that position.
To the point that entire discussion or concept is completely backwards to the point that we generally expect massive, multi-national corporations where "the left hand doesn't know what the right is doing" to give everyone, invariably, two weeks notice before terminating employment, except in the most heinous of circumstances. However, we cannot expect a woman to know what's going on with her own uterus, under which she claims uniquely divine rights of privacy and bodily autonomy, on even remotely the same time frame.
You can’t just give up on abortion if you have any principles whatsoever and believe that hundreds of thousands of babies are being murdered every year.
I can respect choosing your hill to die on. It has been my chosen voting strategy so I can't criticize.
Still playing devil's advocate, one could argue that more babies could be saved if republicans tempered their stance to more publicly acceptable limits where they won elections. As a conflicted pro-life non-republican that strongly prefers r's to d's, I wish they would.
Rephrasing that would be: Given the actually possible alternatives of a 15 week ban with the R's in control vs. a 39 week ban with the D's in control, you need to pick the lesser of two possible evils. Demanding a 0 week ban simply is not going to happen, and guarantees a long period of D ascendancy. Just like the Massachusetts voters who wouldn't vote for Scott Brown "because he's not conservative enough", all they did way insure a win by Elizatbeth "Liawatha" Warren.
Time to get real folks.
Ignoring, of course, that Youngkin has been promoting a 15 week ban in Virginia, not an absolute ban. The media doesn't report that and labels R as extremists for their 15 week ban and D as the party of freedom for their unlimited access.
Yes, the media are complicit, agreed, but it doesn't take too much effort on the part of voters with any degree of real interest and openmindedness (as opposed to knee-jerk voting) to find and read the position paper / website of the candidates.
But even at that, the R’s just need to make more noise about what their actual legislative plans are and shout louder than the media can drown out. It won’t be easy, but it could be done.
But the reason why the media is able to still spin narratives even in the face of 15 week allowances, is that Repubs’ brand is so terrible that no one trusts them on this issue.
Look at Florida, imposes a 15 week ban, and then after Repubs win elections and fully takeover, they move that down to 6 weeks. Then many explain how they will slowly decrease until they can get a ban passed through.
Look at the Ohio Repubs who immediately signed on to a declaration that they will do all they can to circumvent the will of the people in passing the amendment to enshrine abortion allowance.
The problem is no one trusts the GOP on this issue. Even if a GOP rep truly believes is allowing abortion up to 15 weeks (or whatever limit number), the societal belief will be that it’s just subterfuge until a more restrictive ban can be put into place.
The irony for Dems with this issue is that Repubs could benefit in the future as most states enshrine the right to abortion within their laws, it will inevitably take this issue off the political chess board. An issue that has been one of or the most powerful poltical weapons Dems have had against Repubs.
You just can't be trusted, if you think murdering babies, at any time, is wrong.
Only the trustworthy want to see the slaughter of the innocents.
^^Religious Zealot who wants his religion forced on everyone. Can't figure out that people who don't follow his religion think 15-week fetuses have no souls and fewer brain waves than tadpoles.
But then the Republicans fear they will lose the precious Christian fanatic vote. Whatever will they do if the die hard Christian fanatics who think the 20th century was a bad idea stop voting Republican?
That’s about it. It took around 5 years after Roe in the USA for abortion to shake out as a Democrat vs. Republican issue, and since it has, it’d be extremely difficult for either party to shake itself loose from support of either side; it took a while for the Democrats to purge the last of their antis, but that was accomplished by the turn of the century. Anti-abortionists are going to go somewhere, and it’s not like they’re such a small faction that they’d be relegated to some minor 3rd or 4th party.
Then keep losing. It is why Rs are getting shellacked in swing states. It is why there was no red wave last time around. Apparently, There aren’t as many people with the principle that conception confers full legal protection on something that couldn’t biologically function outside of a womb. What ever you think of it, it is the Liberal equivalent of 2A. And a lot of republicans and libertarians (outside of Mississippi) I’ve talked to about it are essentially fine with the status quo, as well.
So politically, maybe not the best thing to do a frontal attack on right after you got Roe vs. Wade overturned and virtually every liberals blood’s up about it? Take the Win you got with Dobbs. Stay on the defensive. Let the nuttiest of the progressives out themselves as the Eugenicists they are. Let the moderate ones realize their rights haven’t been taken away by the lack of Roe.
Then do what they do and takes things piecemeal. Concentrate on cutting federal and state funding. And work your way up to a council of elders who grills women on why they had a miscarriage and whether or not they’re legally liable. Or whatever your end game is.
The political lesson seems to be going full frontal on abortion any time soon, you’re gonna lose. Fortification or no.
I think seeking help from government is a waste of resources. Try setting up non profit charitable organizations that help pregnant women who are broke and have been dumped by the sperm donor by paying for prenatal care, a healthy lifestyle, the delivery of the child and helping them arrange a adoption. Telling an 19 year old girl she is evil for aborting isn't the recipie fo saving lives. An abortion is cheep. Carrying to term is extremely costly and the uninsured hospital bill for delivery will bankrupt couples who have a good financial position.
Money talks. Bullshit walks.
So Dems have given up ballot harvesting and stopped resisting all vote integrity measures? Thought not, fuck off with this until they do you leftist hack.
Perhaps an anti-Trump stance and demanding a 100% abortion rate would fortify GOP victories.
You forgot curated vote counting.
Mandatory ballot harvesting.
Agree 100%. The GOP should leave abortion as a local issue and stop trying to make it a federal one. Unfortunately, candidates feel the need to say that they are personally pro-life and that is scary for the pro-choice voter. They need to stop talking about their personal views and just say that it's a state issue and leave it at that.
Isn't it a States issue now after the Supreme Court got rid of Roe? I thought the Democrats were wanting it to be a Federal issue not the GOP.
I could be wrong though.
Leaving Trump and Trumpers behind would be most unfortunate for us, inasmuch as, no matter how wilfully blind HyR bloggers are to the fact, he's the most libertarian politician in the country with a mass following. And although radical libertarians will always object, as they will to anyone, it was moderate libertarians who got him elected before and will again. Now because of his "legal" persecution, he has even more sympathy from those who experience or sense government in the USA as a malign entity.
The Druham report shows just how corrupted our federal law enforcement establishment has become.
Keep in mind, Donald Trump has shown us what will happen if we ever manage to elect a real Libertarian as President. You couldn't pay me enough to be the first Libertarian President. I say let Trump deal with the swamp, both parties, the media and after the place is drained and malaria free then let's work on a Libertarian presence in federal government.
Seriously, how could the Republicans "leave the unpopular former president in the past"? While there are many ways that could happen, including nobody else's assuming his mantle after another term of him as president, the likeliest way would be for the GOP to become more authoritarian. For instance by neocons reasserting primacy.
When you actually fucking quote someone, "To the extent there's a Trump brand, I think it's more of a 'don't trust the government, leave me alone,' than the traditional social conservatives," how can you not take that hint? How can you pretend to not see that? Why is this not considered by you a good development among "conservatives" or Republicans?
“Don’t trust the government, leave me alone” is not sufficient for being a libertarian. It is merely paranoid and misanthropic.
Libertarian is a respect for individual liberty. It’s right there in the name. A principled libertarianism understands that there is a time and place for government as an institution to defend individual liberty and punish those who violate the NAP. A principled libertarianism understands that liberty, properly understood, is not a zero-sum game – if migrants cross the border (onto public land) and get hired by a willing employer, it doesn’t mean anyone’s job was taken away from anyone else or that anyone’s liberty was necessarily stolen. That is completely contrary to Trumpist conservatism.
There ought to be an element of skepticism of any institution with great power within any self-respecting libertarian, because any institution with great power has within it a greater capacity to violate the NAP. It’s when that skepticism crosses the line into paranoia and conspiracy theories that it becomes a problem.
I’d trust a bear in a trunk far more than the Biden (D) government.
So when you hear someone say, "Leave me alone," you mentally add what s/he's not saying, "Fuck everyone else"? I think that reflects on your own misanthropy. Why assume the worst of others?
If the ONLY thing I hear is "leave me alone", AND I don't hear anything else about, say, voluntary cooperation to solve social problems, or a defense of the individual liberty of others, or the recognition of the necessity of some level of civic institutions to protect liberty, then no I don't think "...and fuck everyone else" is an unfair conclusion.
Look at the comments on any article that has to do with welfare, or immigration. You will not find many, if any, comments expressing concern or compassion for their plight or suffering.
It's a good start. Ending dependence has to be the first step. After that we can work on the good stuff.
Why are republicans blowing so many elections?
Because they're too busy blowing each other.
Jim Jordan is busily blowing Mitt Romney while Mitch McConnel is busily blowing Jim Jordan....it's sorta like a daisy chain. They're all busy blowing each other.
Clever...
To be a member, ask a member.
Perhaps explains why those are so adept at lip service.
No exceptions for rape and incest will lose just about every time, everywhere. That is just stupid. Sure it is a tiny number of all abortions, but it paints the GOP into a corner.
In a perfect world there would never be abortion, but we do not live in a perfect world.
And again, a misrepresentation. Youngkin's proposal of 15 weeks included exceptions.
Yeahs. If lefty shits didn't lie, they wouldn't opost.
Layered misrepresentation stemming from my point above.
That is, Title IX and #believeallwomen has shown us that there is unequivocal brutal, heinous *rape* and there is something closer to buyer's remorse or a bad date "rape". Given all the other dishonesty surrounding the issue, it seems exceedingly likely that the number of women who get *raped* and then wait 8, 10, 15, or 20 or more weeks is exceptionally smaller and the number of other cases, where a *rape* begins to look more like a "rape" and thus an *abortion* would be more like "a murder of convenience", is larger.
If the sexes are equal and the morning after pill is the same as an anti-retroviral pill, then the 8-20+ weeks argument is bullshit. You can shut up and take the plan B pill the morning after the way a man would take his anti-retrovirals the morning after.
In *your* perfect world, maybe... but in *my* perfect world, it's a discussion to be had between a woman and her physician, just like every other medical procedure, and none of our business.
"Ohio voters cut to the chase and embedded reproductive rights in the state constitution ... (they also voted to legalize marijuana, making it a good night for personal freedom)."
Did I miss something or did the libertarian position always consider murdering babies as "personal freedom"?
When I’m waiting in long bread lines, knocking off citizens in front of me falls under “personal freedom.”
Prior to the Mises Caucus takeover, the LP platform was pro-choice.
"Recognizing that abortion is a sensitive issue and that people can hold good-faith views on all sides, we believe that government should be kept out of the matter, leaving the question to each person for their conscientious consideration."
It is a complete violation of the NAP, to kill an unborn child.
Killing someone is as aggressive as you can get.
Agreed.
The problem. Is the cure is far worse than the disease. Imagine how you would insure no woman managed to murder her baby. Considering the multitude of options to simply miscarry because of some substance abuse or something bought on the internet from another country the regulatory burden would be more oppressive than the worst the Democrats desire.
The fight needs to be done differently. Either seek private sector solutions to decrease the number of abortions drastically or seek social solutions so women who abort find themselves under social pressures so high that other women would not want to suffer the same.
You need to change the playing field before you can change the game.
"...the shadow of Donald Trump..."
Stuff your TDS up your ass, steaming pile of shit.
Thumbs up x 1000
Remember when some idiot Team Blue politician would say some idiotic thing like "defund the police!" or "let's implement a Green New Deal by banning cows!" or "let's implement Modern Monetary Theory (aka Magic Money Theory)!" ? And the right-wing commenters here would not hesitate to say "lol look how crazy The Left is!" And Republican politicians would run entire election campaigns on a platform of "Look how crazy The Entire Democratic Party is" (based on just the words of idiots like AOC)? And they would win elections that way?
Well, this is what happens when Democrats do the same thing to Republicans, this time when it's idiot Republicans not just saying idiotic things about abortion, but doing idiotic things about abortion, like passing almost complete bans with no exceptions.
So out of curiosity what have the so called"moderate" Republicans been doing to help other Republicans get elected? I saw Trump campaigning for literally dozens of candidates the last few election cycles and providing endorsements but I barely see the so called "moderate" Republicans do anything more than the bare minimum. Did the RNC work for voter turnout? Not that I could see. Did the RNC run ads in support of Republican candidates? Again didn't see it. Maybe if the establishment Republicans actually supported GOP candidates the GOP candidates might fare better?
Yeah. For quite some time here in IL, since at least Obama's Congressional election, save a couple odd personalities, the GOP has largely been controlled opposition. Such seems to be the case for lots of moderate Republicans at the Federal level.
Let's face it boys and girls, enough of the country agrees with the fascists to let them claim victory in all future elections.
Hunker down and hope they come for you last.
Yep. Normal people are now out numbered by people on the dole. They control education, entertainment, media, & government. We're fucked.
Why bother to campaign effectively, when you can just claim your votes were stolen? When you can claim the election was rigged? They're literally telling voters that their vote doesn't mean anything because fraud will erase it, and then they blame fraud for not winning the election they put zero effort into.
It's called a self-fulfilling prophecy.
You left off the book deal at the end of the whole affair where you get to tell people "What Happened".
Elections are like law and sausage. Don't look too close or you may not be able to stomach them anymore. Al Gore was the first to break that rule and elections have been questionable ever since.
More Democrat lies. It was amazing how many television and radio ads I heard claiming that the Republicans were going to take away the "right" to an abortion. I live in Pennsylvania. Almost all of those ads were from out of State organizations. My favorite one was the ACLU ad where the first thing that they said was that they didn't back any candidate, while praising the Democrat candidate for their views on abortion and excoriating the Republican candidate for wanting to ban abortion. I thought some of the Reason writers were moonlighting for these groups. One simple question. Who's financing this?
I AM Making a Good Salary from Home $6580-$7065/week , which is amazing, under a year ago I was jobless in a horrible economy. I thank God every day I was blessed with these instructions and now it’s my duty to pay it forward and share it with Everyone. go to home media tech tab for more detail reinforce your heart.
This Website--------------> https://bitcoindollar346.blogspot.com
the only people "hung up on abortion" are the baby murderers.
>>the GOP still managed to take a thumping in off-year elections
the war inside GOP will end when the swamp boomers stop resisting.
A chicken in every pot. A coat hanger in every vagina.
Dont confuse the symptom with the disease.
The Republicans have been snatching defeat from the jaws of victory since the 70s. This isn't a post Trump issue. Trump and his supporters don't have anything to do with what the Republican Party is doing.
Trump and his supporters are a result of the actions of the Republican Party. There are a lot of Republicans that hate being a member of a party that needs a 12 step program to deal with its addiction to losing. They are the reason Trump is relevant.
If Libertarians could stop letting the perfect be the enemy of the good they would get behind Trump and let him be the nuke that will sear the swamp into a plate of radioactive glass so we have a shot at building our government back as the founders envisioned it instead of the monster it has become.
Jews could've helpedd elect Hitler on the same premise. Hitler speeches oozed altruism and dripped Christian National Socialism just like the Gee Oh Pee. The platforms are a lot alike. Conservative is nazi (https://bit.ly/47hu8Nt)
Yeah, I don't think the Orange Goblin is the only or even the main problem. The party of Death Count DeSantis, the Smarmy Swami, Sir Oinx-a-Lot, etc. is hardly one that wants to leave you alone.
Himmler was a nobody before Herbert Hoover bullied German pharma into funding Hitler in June 1931.
Too many people benefit from the unproductive gifter public sector giant running DC and many States. Kill the Fed and the whole thing collapses..allow the continued money printing and deficit spending and just like the corrupt crime infested crony cities like Chicago, the GOP has no chance. The MIC, Educational Academic Complex, Healthcare Complex and so on enrich more and more people, yes they are unproductive and only lead to more debt....but if you are school teacher or federal worker..why risk the GOP when the degenerate Dems pay your salary.
I would like Reason's abortion crowd to also come out for a new type of state constitutional amendment. The freedom from child payment for men who father kids out of wedlock. If a woman can get a "get out of jail" card when knocked up, why can't a man also get a post birth "get out of jail" (child support) if the chick he knocked up decided to have the kid and they are not married. I am it a woman can control her "body" why should a man be held accountable for a kid when he didn't want one...but the woman he knocked up did?
About time...no more child support unless married.
I think we could manage a compromise like that. If women can get off the hook for an "accidental" pregnancy then men must have the same option. To have it any other way is simply unfair.
Also I suspect those proud independent women who don't need no man will flip out and fight such a compromise tooth and nail because when it come down to brass tacks they aren't all that independent or proud.
Taxes should fund no prostate treatments. This could thin out the girl-bulliers too.
It's almost impossible to get money from most of the broke brain-damaged near do wells that don't wear a condom. Anyone who really doesn't want a child doesn't trust women and wears a condom. This reduces the chance of impregnating someone by at least 90%. 95% if they wear the condom properly.
These polls announcing the Second Coming of Trump... aren't they the ones that guesstimated Hillary was a shoo-in back in 2016?
I suppose that it’s fair game for political commentators to comment on current political news, but this article comes perilously close to cheerleading for the Republican Party. While the GOP may have blown an opportunity to regain power, it would not have been any kind of opportunity for people who would prefer a return to liberty in the USA any more now than at previous times when the Republican Party has had control of all three branches of the Federal Government. And the Democrats backing Israel in its on-again-off-again war with Islamic Terrorism (TM) shouldn’t even be a thing. No matter how bad the Democrats are at governing, they always manage to make the world a worse place while they have the weight to throw around, even temporarily. I find nothing whatever to cheer about in the political news recently. Meanwhile political strife is increasing and nothing has been settled at any time in the last thirty years here.