Vivek Ramaswamy Knows That Republicans Who Embrace Cancel Culture Are Fools
"We don't quash this with censorship because that creates a worse underbelly," said Ramaswamy.

The Republican presidential candidates who participated in Wednesday's debate spent significant time bashing pro-Palestinian student activists and threatening their free speech rights.
The only notable exception was Vivek Ramaswamy, who criticized students for taking the side of Hamas over Israel but clarified that he would not restrict their right to do so.
"We don't quash this with censorship because that creates a worse underbelly," said Ramaswamy. "We quell it through leadership by calling it out."
To that end, Ramaswamy specifically called out rivals Nikki Haley and Ron DeSantis for their willingness to punish offensive speech. DeSantis recently gave the order to shut down National Students for Justice in Palestine on two Florida campuses, a move that the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression called "dangerous—and unconstitutional."
Ramaswamy has previously warned conservatives against wielding cancel culture against anti-Israel voices; he opposed the professional blacklisting of Harvard students who had signed an odious petition laying all blame for Hamas' terrorist attacks on Israel itself, asserting that "it's not productive for companies to blacklist kids for being members of student groups that make dumb political statements on campus."
The other candidates—DeSantis, Haley, Tim Scott, and Chris Christie—took the opposite view. Each of them vowed to root out antisemitic speech on campus by deporting the students who make such utterances.
"To all the students on visas who are encouraging Jewish genocide, I would deport you," said Scott.
DeSantis sounded every bit like a progressive student himself, cynically weaponizing feelings of discomfort against the First Amendment.
"Their kids do not feel safe," said DeSantis, referring to the children of Jewish parents.
Haley agreed, saying that "no person should ever feel in danger."
College administrators and law enforcement officers already have sufficient authority to respond to legitimate threats of violence against all students. But they do not have the right to curtail offensive speech about Israel, no matter how ill-conceived the underlying views may be. In any case, giving authority figures more power to eliminate controversial speech would be a disaster for conservatives, since bureaucrats on campuses and in the federal government often have progressive leanings.
Ramaswamy cautioned that conservatives who challenge school board leaders or express vaccine skepticism could lose their free speech rights under such a paradigm. He was correct to do so. It is not enough to oppose cancel culture only when your own side is under siege.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
A master debater?
"I spoke to him in the men's restroom. We had a loo chat."
“it’s not productive for companies to blacklist kids for being members of student groups that make dumb political statements on campus.”
Is it productive to allow kids (“kids,” lol) to grow up thinking that their actions don’t and won’t have consequences; that they’ll never be in a position where they might want something from someone someday who denies it to them because they pissed that person off somehow?
Which, by the way, is very distinct from a pissed off mob pressuring someone else to take retributive action against someone for something they said, which they can’t take themselves. Which is actual Cancel Culture.
This is something that the Social Media Oversharing generation just doesn’t understand. I mean, come on Vivek – if you come out of a job interview, and then exit the building and jump on TikTok to film yourself (or get yourself filmed) calling your new boss’ wife a fat ugly whore, do you really think you’re going to be signing New Hire paperwork the next day?
Be real.
You're advocating for an Entitlement Mentality, Vivek. Have your cake, kids - and eat it too. This is yet another clear example of how everyone can tell you're a leftist plant. A pathetic Donald knock-off, echoing his same promise to be Barack Obama for the Right.
He never said anything about actions not having consequences, only that using State authority to censor speech sets a bad precedent.
he opposed the professional blacklisting of Harvard students who had signed an odious petition laying all blame for Hamas' terrorist attacks on Israel itself, asserting that "it's not productive for companies to blacklist kids for being members of student groups that make dumb political statements on campus."
This is not state censorship.
I don't know if you've ever hired anyone, but I look at their Facebook, IG, LinkedIn, etc. prior to a job offer.
Businesses rescinding opportunities to new hires who insult them or their values isn't "the state."
And if you're talking about Florida, that's different. NSJP is a homegrown terrorist organization actively advocating for violent jihad and providing people the means in which to engage in it.
And Florida colleges aren't the only place they've been run out of as a result.
Well, I guess this is progress. At least we now admit cancel culture exists.
Yes.
I don't want to buy a product from a company that promotes active hatred of me = cancel culture.
I don't want to hire someone who has a vile public reputation that might harm the credibility of my company by association = cancel culture.
Demanding someone be fired because they don't actively support the latest progressive trend = just being polite or consequence culture.
Where did he say that your first two examples equal cancel culture?
Whose new sock are you? Are you the article author, or just one of the trolls I have greyed out?
Because you post a strawman and I point it out that makes me a sock? Why not just answer the question instead of ad hominem attacks?
Because you’re obviously not asking the question in good faith.
We’re talking about a long history of media and trolls here, including previous articles here on Reason.
I don’t know who “he” is in your original question — you mean the article author? or Ramaswamy? — but I have been berated, here, with the exact phrase “That’s just being polite” and seen others get the “it’s not cancel culture, it’s consequence culture” line.
Everyone here knows what I’m talking about. Especially Diane.
ITS NOT HAPPENING AND ITS GOOD THAT IT IS!!1111!!
The Left is pivoting from “Cancel Culture isn’t real” to “So what we do it? Free association!”.
They muddy the waters by conflating private sector with government actors, hiding behind “Muh Private Company” while calling for Federal speech codes.
Every time I think "telling bohem to kill himself may be harsh, he writes again and in fact I am proven correct"
People saying that jews have the right to exists have been killed.
Jewish students have been forced into hiding.
You are defending this as free speech. Kill yourself.
My libritarian approch is if killing Jew/jew supporters is okay during this version then so is killing hamas/hamas supporters. We can all agree that a level playing field is best
Hello far-left, meet far-right at the intersection of speech-is-violence-and-must-be-limited and people-that-disagree-with-us-don't-deserve-to-live.
Funny how "men are not women" and "gas the jews" are the same to you. What's happening here is not cancel culture but freedom of association exercised. There is no dredging up old, obscure statements to create a pressure campaign to punish currently but people seeing who these scum are and choosing not to associate with them.
Funny how “men are not women” and “gas the jews” are the same to you.
Legally, they are the same to me: speech, which I believe is rightly a guaranteed freedom. Is that funny?
I'm addressing the statements: "You are defending this as free speech" and "if killing Jew/jew supporters is okay during this version then so is killing hamas/hamas supporters." These statements go way beyond cancel culture.
1. Nobody is restricting their right to 'talk about' Hamas
2. Others are just choosing to not associate with them any more.
3. Its not 'cancel culture' - its 'consequences culture'.
4. Make your enemies live up to their own ideals.
Also Soave - the people screaming support for murder are out there murdering Americans who are using their free speech rights to oppose them.
I think a little 'cancel culture' is appropriate here. If Ramaswamy doesn't get that, then maybe he's not the candidate I thought he was.
These silly revolts (cancel culture) will continue until the [Na]tional So[zi]alism in the USA is destroyed. History has shown this over and over again. It was the very falling of the Union of Soviet *Socialist* Republics (USSR). Socialism doesn’t work and that’s where the ‘business’ that needs to get taken care of is.
Consider this. How many of these nut-jobs would be part of the cancel culture if ?free-be? Commie-Education/Indoctrination wasn't a thing? The socialism has literally paid for these bored (keyword) aggressions-for-fun halls of self-important grandstanding episodes. Students don't get a feeling of self-important from work so all the bored time is used just to stir up things (doesn't really matter what) for their self-importance needs.
Never-mind those who remember being actually indoctrinated by the Commie-Education system itself into creating a cancel culture, "Out yell everyone else for gov-guns to make a difference." Why the nation paid to indoctrinate a cancel culture. Welcome to the consequences of Communism and Socialism.
Why doesn't he run for President of Yale?
The problem is the left doesn't follow that rule. They are fine with cancelling.
So we must be too. Until the left cries uncle and agrees to stop cancelling people, we must too.
Sorry, they are their rules. And the rules MUST be the same for both sides.
Tit-for-tat game theory suggests we forgive the first offense, then return cut-for-cut.
The Left has shown its completely fine with Cancel Culture, and lying about it even beng a thing.
Its long time to cut back, and make them feel their own philosophy.
Cancel culture, information suppression, government surveillance of disapproved viewpoints ... all of these malignancies have rotted out the core of both major parties. Whenever they speak now, they sound as frightening as Elmer Gantry.
It seems likely that that rush of authoritarianism and panic in their messaging may be a key factor in increasing popular repudiation of the two parties.
Ramaswamy's defense of free speech was refreshing.
Some of his policies are delhightful.
I don’t have any beef with him.
I'm making $90 an hour working from home. I never imagined that it was honest to goodness yet my closest companion is earning 16,000 US dollars a month by working on the connection, that was truly astounding for me, she prescribed for me to attempt it simply.
Everybody must try this job now by just using this website... http://www.Payathome9.com