'The Town Without Zoning' Elects a Pro-Zoning Town Government
Pro-zoning candidates in Caroline, New York, won the elections for town supervisor and three seats on the town board.

Following a contentious three-year fight, it appears that those supporting the imposition of a zoning code in the currently unzoned, rural, upstate community of Caroline, New York, have secured enough elected offices to get zoning done.
Incumbent pro-zoning Town Supervisor Mark Witmer, a Democrat, defeated anti-zoning challenger Tonya VanCamp, running on the independent Connecting Caroline ticket, with 53 percent of the vote.
Pro-zoning incumbent Democrats Kate Kelley-Mackenzie, Tim Murray, and Michele Brown also won their races for the three town board seats for which elections were held, defeating anti-zoning candidates Meghan Slatoff-Burke, Kathryn Mix, and small business owner Shari Conover. Anti-zoning incumbent town board member Carl Snow was not up for reelection.
As Reason covered in a lengthy story back in March, Caroline's fight over whether to adopt a zoning code began in early 2020, when the town board adopted a building moratorium in response to a proposed Dollar General development.
The moratorium successfully killed the Dollar General project. It also kicked off an intense debate about what would come next.
Slow-growth residents of the town (many of whom are current or retired faculty and staff from nearby Cornell University) argued that a comprehensive zoning code was necessary to stop future suburban sprawl from taking over the town.
On the other side were many of Caroline's business owners and farmers, who liked the freedom afforded by the town's lack of zoning and saw the proposed code as a threat to their ability to make productive use of their land.
"People are going to lose their freedoms on their properties," anti-zoning wedding venue owner John Morse told Reason earlier this year.
Since 2021, the town government dominated by pro-zoning members has been at work producing a draft zoning code littered with restrictions on residential construction and commercial development.
In response, anti-zoning residents started a grassroots resistance effort—hosting rallies, writing op-eds, posting yard signs reading "Grandma Hates Zoning" and "Zoning Kills Dreams," and eventually running a slate of anti-zoning candidates.
The town's zoning board, created to draft a zoning code, finished its work in March 2023. The decision on whether to adopt the code was then in the hands of the town board.
A persistent demand of Caroline's anti-zoners was to put off any final decision on a zoning code until after the 2023 municipal elections. Those elections have now happened, and pro-zoning forces won a close but commanding victory.
That likely means Caroline will soon follow the example of most other communities in the country by adopting a zoning code.
While the town is becoming more typical, it's also bucking a trend.
Across the country, communities are increasingly looking for ways to loosen their zoning codes to allow more housing and businesses. A collection of Yes In My Backyard (YIMBY) candidates looking to liberalize zoning restrictions won their races in neighboring Ithaca.
"So much of what's in this code is stuff other cities are trying to get rid of," said Nolan Gray, the author of the anti-zoning book Arbitrary Lines: How Zoning Broke the American City and How to Fix It, at a rally in Caroline in November 2022.
Soon enough, Caroline might adopt a zoning code. And soon after that, they might be looking for ways to roll it back.
Rent Free is a weekly newsletter from Christian Britschgi on urbanism and the fight for less regulation, more housing, more property rights, and more freedom in America's cities.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Something something the problem with democracy is a bunch of idiots can vote to get rid of it.
So... allowing unrestricted immigration does have downsides?
It is like they are living in the Twilight Zone.
Demand a recount!!!
Is there a certification process they can interfere with?
"Democracy is the theory that the common people know what they want, and deserve to get it good and hard."
H. L. Mencken
They got colonized by left-wing Cornell professors.
People wanting zoning so they can be like other cities don't understand what they are asking for. Reminds me of that story in the Bible, when Israel wanted a king, and Saul told them exactly what they would get if they had a king. They still wanted a king so they could be like other nations. Their highly decentralized and light handed government wasn't good enough. They wanted a Strong Man who would send their sons to war and take their daughters for himself. Gosh, we haven't changed much have we?
Slow-growth residents of the town (many of whom are current or retired faculty and staff from nearby Cornell University) argued that a comprehensive zoning code was necessary to stop future suburban sprawl from taking over the town.
I think they absolutely understand what they're asking for.
Minor correction, it was Samuel who warned them and Saul was the king they got.
Not wanting growth in your town is just like zoning , restrictions on land use.
"People are going to lose their freedoms on their properties," anti-zoning wedding venue owner John Morse told Reason earlier this year.
I wonder who will be targeted first?
I can't make up my mind about this story until you tell us the skin colors of everyone involved.
Slow-growth residents of the town (many of whom are current or retired faculty and staff from nearby Cornell University) argued that a comprehensive zoning code was necessary to stop future suburban sprawl from taking over the town.
White people.
faculty and staff from nearby Cornell University
Are you sure?
In this case it’s not about race, it’s about strip malls. I live nearby, not guessing.
I quit working at shop to work online and with a little effort I easily bring in around $45 to 85 per/h. (W)Without any doubt, this is the pay easiest and most financially rewarding job I’ve ever had. I actually started 6 months ago and this has totally
changed my life…………> > > > > > http://Www.Smartcareer1.com
asdasd
Why didn't they just setup HOA'S?
Far too much worshiping 'guns' (gov-guns) around here.
So set up zones in the good parts of town where retired professors can't live.
Simple.
Having zoning also means you know what you 'can' do with your property.
Certainly excessive and restrictive zoning is problematic, however, having an 'industrial' zone or 'retail' zone means these types of businesses are allowed 'by right'
Local to me is a town with 'no zoning' which is fine, but it effectively means that anything and everything is a question, no property you can buy is assured to be ok to build your factory
Be careful what you wish for
We have zoning because we want it
Because I am willing to give up a piece of my property rights to assure that a lead smelting plant is not built across the street from me.
Problem is you didn't give up your property rights to just your neighborhood. You gave them up to the entire city council. You're opinions will be diluted by politicians (bribes) and those clear across town. With an HOA you'd actually keep far more control.
Every single time you read about abuse, no flying flags, no political signs, wrong color door, it is a HOA
HOA do not allow you any control, they are abusive
Oh, and since you signed up for them[or more properly a previous owner signed up for them] it is a contractual obligation, with virtually no limitation unlike zoning.
Wait a minute. You said you wanted more control. Now you're complaining that an HOA (your direct neighbors) are too controlling and abusive?
Seems the argument here is nothing but "government" is good enough to regulate your property. Well hey; maybe you should move into an government employee HOA. Or maybe you already are a government employee and just want to call all the shots on your neighbors properties without having to buy them or agree to their concerns.
The real purpose for 'government' taking partial property ownership ---> unjust/unbalanced control without having to pay for it.
The entire town of Caroline only has 3000 people. Everyone knows everyone else, it’s mostly farmland and wood lot. HOA? Only if cows can join it too.