Gavin Newsom's Visit to China Demonstrated the California Governor's Lack of Statesmanship
Instead of looking like a future president, Newsom comes off as just another small man in a big office.

During a speech in January, Gov. Gavin Newsom declared that "In our finest hours, California has always been freedom's force multiplier, protecting liberty from a rising tide of oppression taking root in statehouses, weaknesses masquerading as strength, small men in big offices."
The talk sounded statesmanlike, but statesmanship is not about spouting words in a manner reminiscent of John F. Kennedy Jr. As a piece in the Art of Manliness summarized, a true statesman "does not make his countrymen's hearts soar and burn with empty promises; he keeps his word and does what he says he will do." He or she builds consensus by convincing the public of "the soundness of his philosophy."
The most glaring problem with Newsom's words is that they are self-evidently not so, plus he's not convincing anyone of anything with his cram-down approach to climate policy. Historically, California has indeed been a place that beckoned people from across the world—a blank slate where people regardless of their background could build a prosperous life.
Yet our government knows little else beyond stifling regulation and punitive taxation. Across the globe, people tend to flee more oppressive places (even if they have great scenery and weather) for freer locales. In 2022, 817,000 Californians left for other states—a net loss of 342,000 residents. We're losing the equivalent of the population of Anaheim every year—and there are few signs that the exodus is slowing.
I regularly document the problems and loss of freedom here. But Newsom's hypocritical words jumped out after watching the press coverage of his tour last week of communist China. A true statesman isn't afraid to speak truth to power. Yet Newsom received well-deserved brickbats for meeting with China's President Xi Jinping and not mentioning that country's well-documented human-rights abuses.
The U.S. State Department details the following Chinese policies toward the minority Uyghur population: "Documented human rights abuses include coercive population control methods, forced labor, arbitrary detention in internment camps, torture, physical and sexual abuse, mass surveillance, family separation and repression of cultural and religious expression."
Instead of even gently raising those freedom issues, Newsom posed with Xi, toured an electric-vehicle factory and talked about climate change. The latter is legitimate. "The world's most populous country processes the vast majority of rare metals needed for electric car batteries," CalMatters reported. If human-caused emissions are the root of a warming climate, then China and India—the source of most of those emissions—need to be part of the discussion.
But they needn't be the only points of discussion. When asked about his refusal to tackle the human rights issue, Newsom gave reporters a typically glib response: "I can't be everything to everybody at every moment of every minute of every day." Newsweek also quoted a Human Rights Watch official who said this strategy abetted Chinese efforts to downplay the human rights matter.
Newsom's comments from January were an obvious attempt to needle conservative states about their policies regarding abortion and LGBTQ rights. Newsom keeps playing this "I'm not running, but I'm ready" game as he gallivants around the country and world holding events typically held by candidates. He's even planning a debate with Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis, who is running for president. The purpose of that debate is anyone's guess.
It's nothing new for governors to parade on the international stage, whether or not they are running for president. Former Gov. Jerry Brown went to China in 2017 to give a keynote address at an energy conference and made this overwrought pronouncement: "Nothing is more difficult. Nothing is more important. … We're talking about turning around the whole of modernity."
Newsom should at least try to make these meetings as substantive as possible. Instead, he's just serving as a prop for a tyranny because, like Brown, he apparently believes that climate change poses such an existential crisis that nothing else really matters.
When asked about critics who complain that he's in China when major problems such as homelessness are festering at home, Newsom gave an answer worthy of a fanatic rather than a statesman: "Our soil is becoming aridified because of climate change!" He insists that he's still focused on California problems, but the latest news reports—e.g., huge delays in his homeless housing proposals—suggest otherwise.
Not that Republicans have gotten this statesmanship thing down, either. Donald Trump's narcissism is the opposite of statesmanship (and he lavished praise on various despots). Perhaps I'm spoiled, because I came of age politically with the ascendancy of Ronald Reagan. I remember his words to Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev at the Brandenburg Gate: "Tear down this wall."
That's more moving than Newsom's words from China: "Addressing climate change can be the bridge we've been missing." Then again, former Gov. Reagan was a statesman and current Gov. Newsom seems like the latest in a long line of "small men in big offices."
This column was first published in The Orange County Register.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
I don't think the quote about Trump is appropriate here. Those quotes were clearly flattery. Flattery in an attempt to manipulate is a tactic as old as time. However, Trump did that when he was in a position to actually manipulate and negotiate. Newsom has not power or position on the international stage. He's the equivalent of a high school debate team giving a presentation to a school board, and so it means little to nothing.
It’s another bullshit Reason article where they have to take a dig at Trump. Even when he isn’t relevant to the subject.
Im making over $13k a month working part time. I kept hearing other people tell me how much money they can make online so I decided to look into it. Well, it was all true and has totally changed my life. This is what I do.
This Website➤---------------➤ https://www.dailypro7.com
Plus:
https://babylonbee.com/news/california-proposes-another-minimum-wage-increase-so-people-can-afford-products-made-more-expensive-by-previous-minimum-wage-increase
I thought Babylon Bee was a satire site.
Newsome reminds me of the Greg Stillson character in The Dead Zone
Stillson was the pol who used a toddler as a shield during an assassination attempt.
Modern democrats would hail Stillson as brag for using a toddler as a human shield. And cheer if the child were shot.
When being so scolded, assholes like Xi need to rattle off the abuses assholes like Newsom visit upon Americans.
"Documented human rights abuses include coercive population control methods, forced labor, arbitrary detention in internment camps, torture, physical and sexual abuse, mass surveillance, family separation and repression of cultural and religious expression."
It would have been pretty ironic for Xi to call out Newsome for all of that, it's true.
Talk about saying the quiet part out loud.
Indeed. I say that's what they're doing too, but I mean it as a bad thing...
In 2022, 817,000 Californians left for other states
We need a wall.
I'm thinking we can go along the Texas, New Mexico, and Arizona borders with Mexico, and take a sharp right at Yuma and start heading north. Follow along west of Nevada, then wrap around the top under Oregon and go all the way to the coast.
Maybe we could just give California back to Mexico?
Do you think they would take it?
I mean, that's literally true, but California hasn't had a "finest hour" since at least 1996.
2003, when we recalled Gray Davis for being a douche.
It's been downhill at rapidly increasing speed for 15 years, though. People look to the state now and assume everyone has Hollywood politics or, increasingly, Bay Area politics. Even Democrats in Southern California find SF Progressives vile (but they'd vote D if the devil himself was running as a democrat, so it doesn't matter) and they've got the state so gerrymandered there's no opposition to their shite.
15 years? California started its decline in the late 80s.
You missed the “Rapidly increasing” part. There’s a big difference between a slow decline at the end of the 20th century and massive progressive takeover in the 20teens.
Once the Democrats got the governor’s mansion as well as a supermajority (they always had a Republican minority strong enough to force some compromise in the 80s and 90s) it went from too much annoying liberal bullshit to full blown progressive nightmare.
Once Brown was out it got worse, too. That fucker was a genuine old school Liberal, but would check the legislature some times. Newsome has no moral compass, and his philosophy is pure Newsomeism. He let the progressives have anything they want because he knows his donors are all Silicon Valley billionaires and riding the progressive wave out of San Francisco bought him his power.
I cant' speak for the whole state, but from what I saw, L.A. actually improved significantly in the first 8-10 years I lived in the area; admittedly, moving here in August of 1992 might have put my point of reference at a particularly low point.
I don't see any meaningful case to dispute the idea that the City, County, and State in general have mostly regressed since around 2004 or maybe 2008, and has been accelerating into its plunge the longer there's a one-party system puts unchallenged power into the hands of people like Newsom and his allies.
The regression is so thorough that L.A. in general might actually be in worse shape than it was in the early 1990s, except with an occasionally useful transit system. Homelessness in particular is worse in almost every part of town (except for the neighborhood the Mayor's house is in) now than it was on skid row and "south Los Angeles" in 1992, and that's after a number of years in which reducing it has supposedly been the "top priority" of multiple L.A. Mayors, and Governor Newsom. There may be some hope for a tiny bit of improvement in a few more years since at least the County authorities, and possibly the city as well have started to at least listen to actual experts who are advocating for ideas other than just "housing first" and acknowledging that the bulk of the "permanent" homeless have severe mental health and addiction issues which can't be solved by just giving them a free hotel room.
Got to cleanse California the democrats.
Nah. That was surprisingly above California's average in the 21st Century, but not a "finest hour".
It's a sad thing that California couldn't even get it together to recall Newsom for breaking his own brain-dead COVID rules.
-jcr
This is an article.
Ha!
"It's not a 'great replacement'"
2002: With Demographic replacement, we can achieve permanent, Democratic supermajorities.
Real head scratcher there. What could working class people possibly object to in the Democrat agenda?
Keep in mind that libertarianism is pretty fringe.
Yeah, "fringe" doesn't scare me. "Bipartisan support" scares me.
The dems are all in on drag queens dancing to children, gay porn for kindergartners, child castration and other tranny nonsense and she thinks the GOP is fringe. These people are rabid.
On his return, he claimed he 'now wanted to keep the momentum going'.
Not even the Chron dealt with the visit as other than grandstanding and hoping for attention. Seems he got noticed by 6 or 8 people, plus his family.
So, we're waiting new news
A photo of two communists shaking hands?
None of the current list of contenders comes over as statesmen/women, whether Dem or GOP. The one advantage Trump and Biden have over the rest is that you don’t need to stretch your imagination beyond breaking point to visualise them as the president even if you disliked either (or both).
And one was miles better than the other.
Thanks for this good article
Not that Republicans have gotten this statesmanship thing down, either. Donald Trump's narcissism is the opposite of statesmanship (and he lavished praise on various despots).
Who started repairing divisions between the West and North Korea?
Grow the fuck up.
Did anyone see the speech he gave at the DMZ? Contrasting the benefits of modern, western capitalism in a vibrant Korea to the south with a place that literally cannot feed itself or keep the lights on in the north.
Of course not. Instead the media was all about Trump throwing fish flakes in a koi pond, also manipulated to make him look bad.
Apparently the sum of Donald Trump's foreign policy and global negotiation technique is "but mean tweets about Megan Rapinoe!"
MSM Lefty propaganda consumed by Sheeple for DNC / Deep State.
Easier to breathe with your head in the sand.
And who waited to invade Ukraine, or to attack Israel, until Trump was out of office? There are advantages to being perceived as crazy and unpredictable.
There are advantages to being perceived as crazy and unpredictable.
and to not being a paid bitch of foreign interests
Speaking of statesmanship, I guess Time Magazine has written a scathing article about Zalensky whom they formerly gave "[Object] of the Year", and also formerly treated like Winston Churchill. I haven't read the article myself, but I'm listening to one of my favorite foreign policy podcasts and they're discussing it in detail.
Time also basically admitted that the Ukraine offensive was an unmitigated failiure.
In addition, there was another article in The Economist from Zaluzhny who said they could win this war if the West would just give Ukraine a new Army.
Reminds me of Hugo Chavez and his best pal in the US back in the day:
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/amp/wbna30271562
I’m pretty sure Sean Penn was his boyfriend. Certainly Penn was sweetly relating Chavez.
Newsome was only there to see if he could get the ChiCom political money that Obama and Biden have been enjoying.
Pretty much. We’ve got to out all these people like Newsom in prison.
Newsom has that money (second hand). The tech giants who benefit directly from China’s human rights abuses (including getting iPhone parts made by Uighars in forced labor factories) are the bulk of Newsom’s donor base.
The reason Gavin won’t call out Xi over an ongoing and organized genocide, not because he’s afraid to anger China (although he may well be), but because he’s afraid to hurt Apple’s bottom line since that cash faucet almost directly funds a sizeable part of his current position and any future hopes. Just like he’s got to be careful about how actively he supports the SAG/WGA strikes, since Reid Hoffman (CEO of Netflix, who they’re striking against) provided around 98% of the funding for the SuperPac that opposed the recall.
Not to mention that it’d be a little awkward for a Governor who recently spent two years trying to emulate Chinese violations of basic human rights in the effort to allegedly “stop the spread” or “flatten the curve” to call out Chinese leaders to their face over those same abuses.
I'm sure he still had dinner with the biggest lobbyists in the best restaurants on his trip though.
Yeah, but they only discussed “the weather”, don’t you know?
“I wish I could clap my hands and they’d kill my political enemies like this Winnie the Pooh motherfucker can” - Gavin
Nothing wrong with getting along with China. Far better to treat it as a competitor than as an adversary.
Amen! SEEMS so simple.
Isn't California where they rounded up all the Japs and put them into concentration camps (1942)? Maybe Newsom is just too young. Or stupid.
California is one of the states where the US Federal government did that. There were also some German and Italian-American citizens interned in the camps as well, but people with those backgrounds were also more likely to not be first- or second-generation of their families to be in the USA, and there may have been other factors at play in setting the criteria of who did or didn't get rounded up (the KKK was almost as powerful a constituency in FDR's Democrat Party as the Teachers Unions are in the Obama/Biden era).
Newsom wasn't wrong that there have been times when California was synonymous with freedom and opportunity. He's straight-up delusional if he thinks that any of those times have happened on his watch. Even ignoring the "lockdowns" and 19 months of school closures, just the number of laws he's had to sign repeals for after the courts ruled them unconstitutional, and the percentage of portions of his "signature" gun control initiative (Prop 62) which have been overturned and/or suspended by courts, including the 9th Circuit which normally rubber stamps any bit of leftist nonsense that washes up on their shores should be as clear as a SF foghorn that there's been times when CA was free, and there's been times when Newsom's Dems ran the state, and that those times have not overlapped by a day.
I am making over $20 k a month working part time. I am a full time college student and just working for 3 to 4 hrs a day. Everybody must try this home online job now by just using this
Following Website———->> https://workscoin1.pages.dev/