Homeschooling Has Increased by Over 50 Percent Since 2018
In some states, homeschooling has climbed by over 100 percent.

Homeschooling has ballooned since the advent of the pandemic, growing by more than 100 percent in some states, according to new data from The Washington Post. While the number of children being homeschooled has declined slightly from its pandemic-era peak, the growth in the educational option has proven stable—and dramatic.
The Post collected data from 32 states, as well as the District of Columbia, and 7,000 school districts—a dataset comprising around two-thirds of the nation's schoolchildren.
Nationally, since the 2017-2018 school year, homeschooling has increased by 51 percent—while private schooling has only increased by 7 percent. Based on the available data, the Post estimated that there are now between 1.9 and 2.7 million homeschooled children in the United States.
But many states and districts saw truly staggering growth in their homeschooling population. Notably, many of these places had schools that were closed the longest during the pandemic. D.C. and New York both saw homeschooling increases of more than 100 percent, while California saw an increase of 78 percent. In Brooklyn, homeschooling in the borough's school districts saw increases that ranged from 197 percent to a whopping 492 percent (though the total number of homeschoolers remained under 1,000 students per district.)
This growth has helped transform homeschooling into a racially and ideologically diverse movement. According to data analyzed by the Post, homeschooled students were three-quarters white in 2019. By summer 2023, less than half were white. Homeschool parents are now roughly evenly split between conservatives and liberals, while those homeschooling before the pandemic overwhelmingly identified as Republicans.
Such a rapid growth in the number and diversity of homeschooling families indicates that more and more American parents are dissatisfied with their children's education in traditional public schools—and deciding to take matters into their own hands.
"Families who choose homeschooling less for ideological reasons and more for matters of circumstance and what meets the needs of their child in the present moment will help change our conception of what it means to be a home-schooler," Robert Kunzman, a professor at Indiana University's School of Education and director of the International Center for Home Education Research, told the Post.
However, not everyone is so excited about these changes.
"Policymakers should think, 'Wow — this is a lot of kids,'" Elizabeth Bartholet, an emeritus professor at Harvard Law School told the Post "We should worry about whether they're learning anything."
"I can tell you right now: Many of these parents don't have any understanding of education," added one school board member. "The price will be very big to us, and to society. But that won't show up for a few years."
While it's reasonable to want every child to get a solid education, fear of under-regulation in homeschooling makes a key faulty assumption: that children are somehow guaranteed to receive an education if they attend local public schools, or that low-performing public schools are held accountable for failing their pupils.
While allowing homeschooling carries a risk that some parents will educationally neglect their children, what often goes under-considered is that a shockingly high percentage of public schools are just as neglectful as subpar homeschool parents.
According to the National Assessment of Educational Progress Test, also called the Nation's Report Card, only 32 percent of fourth graders could read at a "proficient" or higher level. Thirty-nine percent landed in the lowest score category "below basic." In math, 35 percent of fourth graders scored proficient or higher.
The lows are even lower for some districts. At 23 Baltimore public schools, not a single student scored at grade level on a recent state math test. Forty percent of high schools in the city had no math-proficient students.
While data around the academic performance of homeschooled kids has obvious reliability issues, existing standardized testing data tends to show significantly higher performance among homeschooled students.
While all children deserve a comprehensive education, sending a child to public schools is hardly a guarantee this will happen. It's good news that more parents are taking their children's educational futures into their own hands, and public school advocates' fears about educational neglect are overblown and misdirected.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Good. That's some "school choice" I like.
Great article, Mike. I appreciate your work, I’m now creating over $35,900 dollars each month simply by doing a simple job online! I do know You currently making a lot of greenbacks online from $28,900 dollars, its simple online operating jobs.
.
.
Just open the link———————————>>> http://Www.Pay.Salary49.Com
The only purpose of home schooling is to turn kids into gun-toting, fundamentalist Christian, racist MAGAs who believe cave men rode dinosaurs.
Just ask the commentariat at the Post site, and Rev. Kirkland.
Great news.
-jcr
Totally off topic but I'm way too late for the roundup thread today:
Pfizer is literally banking on people getting boosters forever. Remember when this was a dangerous conspiracy theory that would get you banned from comments online?
https://simulationcommander.substack.com/p/a-quick-word-from-our-sponsors-at
Albert Bourla, Pfizer CEO:
Finally, by the end of this year, we expect additional clarification on the expected trends for global vaccination and treatment rates. We believe the rates we see this fall will provide a solid foundation for future expectations. We have come through the period of fear that defined the early days of COVID, where everybody wanted to be vaccinated very quickly. In fact, we are right now in the middle of COVID fatigue where everyone wants to forget about the disease, and we are experiencing a peak of anti-vaccination rhetoric. Therefore, we believe those who are getting vaccines and medicines in the current environment are people who believe in the value of protection and treatment and will continue this behavior in the years to come.
good to know I'm helping the statistics even though I bent over backwards to not be one.
I'm octa-unvaccinated! RAWR!
Two decades to flatten the curve.
If this damned war would just kick off, we could do it quicker......
Of course they are. Revenues, profits, and cash-flow for Pfizer doubled from 2019 to 2021. Covid vax shots and targeted antivirals made up 54% of their company's total business in 2022. I had to send a Dem friend of mine a link to the Pfizer website showing their SEC filings which included that breakdown to get her to believe that any drug company had actually made any money at all on the whole exercise; that really leaves me wondering how many people still think that their shots were really free just because they didn't pay at the point of service, and how many don't realize what a cash cow the whole virus has been for an industry that somehow went from being the epitome of greed to being all that is good and pure in the world.
Just because you didn't get charged at the place where you got the jab doesn't mean that "big pharma" didn't get paid for your dose.
No homeschool science curriculum is complete without the sophisticated offerings of the CO2 Coalition:
https://vvattsupwiththat.blogspot.com/2023/11/attack-of-user-friendly-anime-molecules.html
mme dillinger called me mon cheri and I was all nope ... mon chere and then we both were all hey what of the Romantic languages and all their gender-specific terming? how are the languages surviving a non-binary world?
anyone know?
This (reality) is/has been the stupid sticky wicket that I’ve pointed out about this issue for a while now.
English, which is overwhelmingly non-gendered, has been the lingua franca for at least a Century, two if you count from the height of the British Empire and it was already a long, long-developed coherent system before then. The idea that you can just, “I declare gender not to exist.” is an exceedingly contemporary, arrogant, and stupid (a.k.a. Coastal Elite) idea.
Same thing with the “both genders are equal” idiocy. 10,000 yrs. of boys going to the fields and/or war, 10,000 yrs. of women dying during childbirth and you think a couple decades of burning bras, complaining that you only get paid $0.77/$1, and that the thermostat isn’t set to your liking is going to change anything? GTFO with your teen-girl-fad thinking.
>>the thermostat isn’t set to your liking
she wins every time with "you want me to put on more clothes?"
I've actually never heard about women complaining to other people about the thermostat in their homes. It's always Mimi Bobeck from The Drew Carey show complaining about the temperature settings in the office because corporate overlords are always known for putting people's dangly bits ahead of profits. To wit: Yes, Mimi, dress appropriately for a 70-degree office and shut the hell up.
With Spanish, there was a movement to use "latinx" instead of "latino" and "latina".
It remains very unpopular in the Hispanic community.
That's because "latinx" was a world created by progressive, woke English-speaking whites for Spanish. Of course, those who actually speak Spanish rejected it wholesale.
Hey. The masters get to decide what the slaves are called.
It was the brain child of white progressive "Intersectional Feminists" more specifically. Pontificating on behalf of (and in the place of) those who are "oppressed" categorically for being "black and brown" has become the "White Chicks' Burden"
The venn diagram between those who still insist on using "latinx", those who are excited about Juneteenth being made a US Federal Holiday, and those who are currently wearing at least 2 items of clothing from Lululemon and have paid at least $6 for something "pumpkin spice" in the last 18 hours probably involves at least an 85% overlap between the three circles.
I suppose that counts as an attempt yes
They need to accept it if they don’t want to be branded as the Hispanic face of white supremacy.
Dang. We already got a "yellow face of white supremacy". Oh hell...I recall we got a "black face of white supremacy"...was that Ben Carson or who? And now a latino one?
Man, that "white supremacy" club sure is diverse.
And now a latino one?
I would suggest that George Zimmerman was the original latino face of white supremacy but that's right around the time I went color blind.
and on-topic, huzzah. close the conformity factories.
This plus the fact that fewer parents want to send their kids to college--either due to the cost or, because these places are marxist seminaries--makes for a positive development. The current educational system needs to be subverted, dismantled, and destroyed.
Higher education is clearly headed for collapse, but it's such a behemoth that it will take time to hit the ground. The demise of public primary and secondary education is a longer-term project.
"Policymakers should think, 'Wow — this is a lot of kids,'" Elizabeth Bartholet, an emeritus professor at Harvard Law School told the Post "We should worry about whether they're learning anything."
No, you should worry that people are catching on to your schemes of indoctrination and you will soon be out of a job.
She's a blithering idiot, most kids aren't learning anything in public schools.
There was no one in my second grade class who couldn't read.
Nor in mine, but that was in 1956.
UTLA had billboards up in the poorer parts of town proclaiming how the teachers unions were "fighting for student safety" from a virus which probably every parent in those parts of town now knows full well was something their kids barely noticed having.
How would any parent trust those schools to teach critical thinking or actual science after such a protracted and patently dishonest display of virtue signalling around something which ultimately set most of their students even farther behind that a LAUSD education is statistically likely to in the first place.
What does this article have to do with how terrible Ron Desantis is? Come on Reason, it’s been at least 24 hours.
He's terrible. He cuts down trees, he skips and jumps, He likes to press wild flowers. He puts on women's clothing
And hangs around in bars.
That'll have to do ya.
Soooo, Emma (Mrs Orr?) I think in this summary we’ve kinda, y’ know lowered the expectations of Homeschooling to a mean that Public Schooling has lowered itself to. The study in the WaPo (demagoguery thrives in darkness) seems to talk about data points in numbers and cities but not quality. What we should also report on is not just the diversity of Homeshooling options in many of these markets but the graduation rates and high quality . Let’s paint a complete picture. See Mr Corey DeAngelis for data points!
But the decisive point for the newspapers (esp WaPo) and the lawmakers is that DC (where my daughter went to school) is utter sht. In money spent per pupil is it 2nd highest in the Country (just behind NY) the District of Columbia ($24,535) and it is utter sht.
Anyone else on here familiar with the DC sht that passes for education , at almost $25 000 per student ???
However, not everyone is so excited about these changes.
"Policymakers should think, 'Wow — this is a lot of kids,'" Elizabeth Bartholet, an emeritus professor at Harvard Law School told the Post "We should worry about whether they're learning anything.
You misspelled "union stooges"
"I can tell you right now: Many of these parents don't have any understanding of education," added one school board member. "The price will be very big to us, and to society. But that won't show up for a few years."
Lol now go visit baltimore
One of the more repulsive comments I've heard this year. Truly smarmy concern trolling. ugh.
I have been taking courses my whole life and Thomas Sowell is dead on about teachers: "When you select the poorest quality college students to be public school teachers, give them iron-clad tenure, a captive audience, and pay them according to seniority rather than performance, why should the results be surprising?"
And that's it, folks. That's it.
That honestly was an issue for a long time. Teachers have never really made a lot of money, but the profession 30-40 years ago clearly would have benefitted from having teachers that were graduates in a specific field of discipline, not education. Yeah, you still need to know how to do lesson plans and all the administrative stuff, but from middle school onwards, having someone with, say, a master's in math would be far better than someone who got an education degree with a math minor. Elementary school is more generalized, but even then you don't really need to know anything much more complicated than basic algebra, how to write an essay, have a general knowledge of history and literature, and everyday scientific principles.
Teachers have never really made a lot of money, but the profession 30-40 years ago clearly would have benefitted from having teachers that were graduates in a specific field of discipline, not education. Yeah, you still need to know how to do lesson plans and all the administrative stuff, but from middle school onwards, having someone with, say, a master’s in math would be far better than someone who got an education degree with a math minor.
Growing up the son of a HS Math teacher (who has/had an M.S. in Mathematics) I can affirm every word second hand from someone who has watched both public education and women in STEM progress the way it has through her 40 yr. career.
We will know that Separation of Education and State has won out when people in communities bulldoze Gummint Skoolz and salt the Earth beneath them and Truant Officers are tracked down worldwide and brought to justice for their pivotal role in destroying independent thought in countless young minds.
I stopped understanding the model of modern education. It so happens that I have many acquaintances with children, so I can judge from a large number of cases. There are public schools that focus on the weakest students and give nothing to those who really want and can study. There are schools (usually private) where the academic load in high school exceeds the norm. My son studied in a similar program and was forced to seek help from professional writers - https://www.writing-expert.com/custom-assignment.html This is the only time he managed to complete all the essays on time. Is this necessary? I believe that if parents have the time and desire to educate their child, then they should use this chance.
Avoid the unionized government indoctrination institutions.