Don't Make the Same COVID Mistakes Again
It's vital to recognize the many unforeseen consequences of school closures, business lockdowns, and mask mandates.

A recent AP fact-check article declared as "false" claims by "conspiracy theorists" that mask mandates and other COVID-era policies are coming back. "With COVID-19 hospitalizations steadily inching up in the U.S. since early July, some on social media are falsely claiming that federal employees were told that…pandemic-era restrictions will start returning this fall," it explained.
While there are few things I disdain more than conspiratorialists, one need not be given to complex theories about the Trilateral Commission and "dark-money" billionaires to recognize this possibility is not far-fetched. I've noticed people wearing masks again in airports. "Already, some U.S. schools and businesses have started bringing back mask mandates," NBC News reported last week.
I've watched enough major events unfold in my life to know the pattern. People spread some possible news prematurely, fail to get the details right—and then the media corrects them. Then, sure enough, something similar to what they predicted unfolds in coming months.
COVID cases are increasing again and the pandemic was a serious deal. We should—as individuals, businesses, and governments—learn the right lessons from the previous attempt to protect public health rather than repeat the past policies. That's obviously hard to do in a nation that's as polarized as ever.
Because of our system of federalism, we can try to compare the outcomes in states that enacted different policies. Our states vary so much in population size and density that it's hard to draw too many conclusions between, say, rural Wyoming and urban New Jersey, but a 2022 Wall Street Journal article focused on Florida, which re-opened quickly, and California, which imposed strict lockdown rules:
"The study ranks Florida 28th in mortality, in the middle off the pack and about the same as California, which ranks 27th…But Florida ranks third for the least education loss and 13th in economic performance. California ranks 47th overall because its shutdowns crushed the economy (40th) and in-person school (50th)," per the Journal's take on research from the National Bureau of Economic Research.
Subsequent data shows Florida with a higher death rate, but one more recent study argues that it compares favorably with California when adjusted by age and demographic information. Another study shows that Sweden, with its largely hands-off approach, fared better than other Scandinavian countries.
If you want your head to spin, however, you can find studies that conform to whatever your preconceived notions may be. A Politico study found that states with stringent lockdown rules suffered the lowest rate of deaths and hospitalizations, but the worst economic and educational results. But another study suggested that lockdown states also fared decently on the economic front, comparatively speaking. So much for trusting the "science."
Rather than fighting over the competing research, some of which no doubt is driven by ideological presuppositions, we should try to minimize every type of damage if another pandemic variant rears its ugly head. It's vital to recognize the many unforeseen consequences of the lockdowns themselves.
For instance, the federal National Institute for Mental Health found, tragically, that youth suicide rates rose significantly during the pandemic. Those rates also rose for adults, although by a lesser degree. Human beings are social creatures and locking us in our homes certainly takes its toll on our mental health.
In terms of education, California's school kids—especially poor and minority students—suffered grievous educational setbacks because of the stay-at-home orders. It didn't help that teachers' unions, who are focused on protecting the interest of school workers rather than students, fought efforts to re-open classroom learning. The state's private and charter schools did fairly well in adapting to distance learning—but the public schools, not so much.
"Two out of 3 California students did not meet state math standards and more than half did not meet English standards on state assessments taken in the spring, reflecting sizable drops in performance compared with the year before the pandemic," according to a Los Angeles Times report. "The test results are even more devastating for Black, Latino, low-income and other historically underserved students." Think of the long-term costs here.
It's harder to measure economic devastation, but anecdotally I see that most restaurants, bars, and businesses that I frequented before the shutdowns in downtown Sacramento are now permanently shuttered. The nation's absurd level of inflation is at least partially connected to the supply chain disruptions caused by the lockdowns (and the "free" stimulus dollars). Even some government agencies—note the recent $5.1-billion transit bailout—took a hit.
Then there's the toll on our freedoms. Just as the 9/11 terrorist attacks permanently changed our airline travel, the vast executive powers grabbed by governors have permanently eroded our property rights. At any time, and with little oversight, Gov. Gavin Newsom can become a czar and shut down your business or forbid the eviction of non-paying tenants. Our system of checks and balances is just one bad pandemic outbreak away from suspension. And all for healthcare results that, at best, up for debate.
No wonder so many Americans still have PTSD (Post Traumatic Stress Disorder) and assume the worst following every report of a COVID spike.
This column was first published in The Orange County Register.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
The bastard in the picture belongs in jail.
Cry more snowflakes.
Go suck more authoritarian dick.
I'm making $90 an hour working from home. I never imagined that it was honest to goodness yet my closest companion is earning 16,000 US dollars a month by working on the connection, that was truly astounding for me, she prescribed for me to attempt it simply. Everybody must try this job now by just using this website... http://www.Payathome7.com
Giving up your rights to own the cons is a radical stance to take.
Dont worry, as a prog he is absolutely certain if the govt gets power to make other people do what HE wants, they will almost certainly never abuse that power against him.
He will be the first lined up on the wall. Just like the defend the police socialist in Minnesota getting jacked and nearly killed over the policies she pushed. Fuck em all.
I’am making over $200 an hour working online with 2 kids at home. I never thought I’d be able to do it but my best friend earns over 18k a month doing this and she convinced me to try. The potential with this is endless .And best thing is..It’s so Easy..Copy below website to check it………….
———————————————-➤ http://Www.Coins71.Com
So do you. And you will be the one crying very soon if you and your fellow travelers don’t stop.
Fuck off and die, steaming pile of lefty shit.
Only if his cell mate is Birx.
Why is this even an issue? Deaths and hospitalizations are at an all time low for the August/Sept peak. In fact, these current "peak" numbers are lower or equivalent to every spring/summer low point of 2020, 2021, & 2022.
New recovered vs newly infected graph is almost in perfect synch => herd immunity is firmly established, etc.
The only science where this sort of talk makes sense is in the realm of Political Science.
If it saves just one life!
Think of the children!
Why won't you morally panic and give up your rights?!?
/JFree/
This isn't an issue outside California. That's what Greenhut is writing about. And as usual attempting to turn CA panic/stupidity into national panic/stupidity via top-down mass media narratives.
You're right this has nothing to do with science and everything to do with politics. And specifically the politics of stupid people in places that prefer to elect incompetents but that unfortunately also have an outsized control of top-down mass media.
"This isn’t an issue outside California."
Right, because no universities outside California are already pushing mask mandates and ridiculous COVID hysteria.
Alternatively, as usual, JFear is spouting off confidently about shit that just ain't so.
My guess is – you’re from California. Spreading the fear via mass media.
Let the record show that once again, JFear has demonstrated himself as a bloviating moron who can't be bothered to factcheck whatever random bullshit pops into his head.
Let's note that Robby Soave (not a Californian) was writing about University of Michigan's COVID crazy just the other day:
https://reason.com/2023/09/05/university-of-michigan-covid-rules-exile-positive-cases/
So once again, JFear earnestly believes shit that he made up in his imagination, and thinks that is evidence. And once again we can point and laugh as he embarrasses himself.
Pretty sure that the masking mandate for third graders at Rosemary Hill ES in Montgomery County, MD isn't a made up story.
Fuck off you useless thrall.
My guess is – you’re from California. Spreading the fear via mass media.
You are only off by about 3000 miles, you retarted simp.
He knows you've got him. He's just being a coward about it.
Oh DC? Nothing like top-down mass media driven stupid people surrounded by incompetents there.
You're such a whiney, disingenuous, jealous little girl with the political intelligence of scrapple.
So, keep digging is apparently your motto?
Don't repeat? Heck, I feel the motherfuckers who acted like maniacs promoting mandates and shutdowns should all face accountability and even justice of some kind for the lasting damage they've done. Didn't Reason pretty much support the insanity? I was disappointed with how it handled masks and vaccines. It didn't challenge the narrative.
The masking fiasco alone should be enough to clean out the shit that infests epidemiology since they're the group who pushed it hardest. Doctors let their egos get in the way of common sense also playing their part in the hysteria.
There are people who still want to mask CHILDREN. I people posting pictures of themselves postpartum....in a mask. How is this remotely healthy? Here in Quebec, you have to wear an amulet in a hospital and yet spikes still occur. It's like logic is completely fucking gone.
Sweden, as I've said from the day they chose to follow actual established science in 2020, were always going to be better off in the long run because they were doing one thing none of the geniuses here in North America refused to do. They calculated the TRADE OFFS. They flat-out said they were looking out for overall public health. In the process, they avoided fracturing the civil order.
Only one given to the mass hysterics thought this to be 'crazy'. Now who's crazy now?
The experts of North America. That's who. And we all know who they are.
From the gang at McGill U and U of T to Tam to Fauci to Birx to Collins to that deranged moron Feigl-Ding to Topol to Wen and all the other TV Dinner Experts who applauded dumbass restrictions curfews and passports. Resign and then go fuck yourselves.
Hey, Rufus! How you doing?
Imagine a mask being the worst thing in your life.
Touch grass.
Imagine giving up your rights for literally nothing and sucking government cock by choice...
A lot of dudes really enjoy sucking cocks: Block Insane Yomomma, Palin's Buttplug, raspberrydinners, and half the guys on the Resdon staff, just to name a few.
Imagine simping for the govt forcing you to do provably unnecessary things, because they said so, on a libertarian site.
When they govt comes by and tells you "hop on one foot, and put on this goofy hat" because Fauci says it definitely helps, you just gonna get to hopping?
I bet you were one of those "Australia's COVID camps were no big deal! Geez, imagine being in a fun little colony where you have a nice comfy bed, a bunch of cool neighbors, and food delivered to your little cubicle daily, GOSH, imagine thinking that is horrible!"
“… on a libertarian site.”
Cite please.
Wait, are you claiming that Reason isn’t a libertarian site?
That seems very off brand for you.
Not any more it isn't. Soros owns it now.
“Australia’s COVID camps were no big deal! Geez, imagine being in a fun little colony where you have a nice comfy bed, a bunch of cool neighbors, and food delivered to your little cubicle daily, GOSH, imagine thinking that is horrible!”
"It's like summer camp for adults! 'Member summer camp?"
Most of these fuckwits are pretty much in a state of perpetual childhood anyway.
Imagine forcing this shit on people, just to have them finally turn on you, and give you what been coming to your Marxist ass for a very long time.
Be afraid Shitlunches, be very afraid.
Imagine thinking a mask will keep you from getting sick.
Touch grass.
Hi jeff!
Imaging something like shitlunches having to make a decision for itself.
Imagine taking pride in being as disingenuous as you are. Aaron Rupar would be proud.
“Didn’t Reason pretty much support the insanity?”
No, they didn’t.
The voted ‘strategically’ for the people who did. As did you.
Lockdowns and school closures were all initiated when the bad orange man was President, so they're his policy. Jen Psaki told me so, and WaPo's "fact checker" confirmed it, so that's settled because they wouldn't lie for partisan advantage...
Also, Fauci always opposed closing anything, just ask him. Anyone who says they had to deplatform Dr Battacharya and the rest of the signers of Great Barrington for "spreading misinformation" must be lying since apparently that Declaration was exactly in line with what all the official "experts" at the time were pushing at the time (unless those same experts are lying now).
Some tepidly supported it- ENB argued that we should pressure people to voluntarily mask so that government would not need to mandate.
Sullum repeatedly scolded folks like Rand Paul for "overplaying" science that criticized mask-wearing. He also spent week after week trying to interpret the latest science so that he could suggest that potentially, maybe, some of the more drastic interventions were not supportable by science.
Soave supported Mask Mandates, writing that DeSantis deserved criticism for prohibiting mask mandates in state-run schools.
Welch wrote repeatedly against school closures, and periodically wrote that mask-mandates for kids was harmful.
To my knowledge not a single Reasonista took the position that it is morally wrong to force people to protect "the public" by taking a vaccine, wearing a talismask, or staying home. At best they tepidly explained that the science didn't support it (Sullum, Welch), and at worst they actively promoted the notion that individuals have a moral responsibility to protect others from a natural pathogen (Soave, ENB).
So yes, Reason supported the insanity. Because insanity was the constant dickering over The Science!(tm) when Reason should have been standing up and shouting "Science be damned, this is evil!"
Hey! A Canadian blast from the past!
It's vital to recognize the many unforeseen consequences of school closures, business lockdowns, and mask mandates.
What unforeseen consequences? The totally foreseen ones many of us were shaking our heads over since Day One? The ones we're referring to when we refer to it as a 'Plandemic'? The ones that gave the government carte blanche to rid themselves of the last vestiges of the Constitution that many of us argued was the whole fucking point of the Wuhoo Flu? The ones they're planning on bringing back just in time for the 2024 elections? Those consequences?
Didn't read the article. Came here to say exactly what was said above. It was not unforeseen and ,was,in fact, predicted.
Keep in mind that the people who think the results of closing society for two years also think that the current inflation we're living through is entirely to do with "price gouging" (main data point I've heard is Starbucks increasing their surcharge for oat milk vs soy/almond), and not at all to do with the 30x increase in the Fed Balance sheet from 2008-2021.
Prior to Covid, the US had already "printed money" in a quantity/rate that exceeded what was done by the Weimar Republic (relative the the nations' GDP at the time) in the 1920s, and then in another 2 years we did it again, but the "unforseen consequences" crowd seems to truly believe that this explosion of the M1 money supply is entirely unrelated to a period of high inflation which is following it.
That's a joke to begin with. Everyone knows Florida was fudging their numbers. You can't take their data and use it for anything.
Their economy might be better but that's because they decided that letting their own citizens die was preferable to any economic slowdown.
Freedom is just so terrible, it’s surprising we made it this far.
Can you provide evidence of this "number fudging"?
He is trying to get in that psycho Rebekka Jones ass.
Floridians could have stayed home if they wanted to, no?
"Everyone knows Florida was fudging their numbers."
Go ahead and provide proof of that.
Also, the govt at large spent the whole pandemic fudging the numbers. It took them 2+ years to admit to the "with/of" number discrepancy that literally everyone understood from day 1, but they still kept them all in their daily "death counters"
Show us the data.
Did Sweden also fudge the numbers?
Take note, that there is not that much of a difference now (we just had our summer COVID spike) vs 1-3 years ago.
If they wanted to they could just as easily attribute crazy amounts of deaths to COVID. They just stopped doing it because the hysteria died down.
We just went back to calling a heart attack a "Cardiac death" instead of having the same scenario, swabbing the corpses nose, and calling it a "died OF COVID" death.
Look at some of those spikes lmao. 30% of deaths at one point?! Laughable
The recently published Sweden studies actually accounted for covid fudging (the with covid vs of covid, or over-/under-reporting) by just looking at excess deaths. What was typical vs what happened during the recent years.
People can find just about any numbers they want, if they find a sympathetic researcher who is willing to ignore the right thing. Some studies, like the ones of excess deaths in European countries, are a hell of a lot more sound. Alas, an awful lot of complete junk is out there for the Politicos of the world to spin. Nobody seems to worry about the actual QUALITY of the study they reference, as long as it agrees with them.
Counting just "excess" deaths also allows for the comparisons to capture the net impact of causes which can be exacerbated by the effects of isolation (mental-health related issues like ODs by relapsing addicts and suicides, for example).
Another effect of removing cause from the comparisons is that it reduces the negative-seeming stats from cases where Covid deaths happened within nursing homes and similar palliative care facilities. This might lead to something like washing out of certain major failures, such as the NYC policies around nursing home patients; apparently average "life expectancy" after entering that level of care is under 2 years, so a lot of the "Covid deaths" that came about in a place like New York which forced infected patients into nursing facilities, could sort of vanish in the "excess death" stats since so many of those patients were highly likely to die of something during the timeframe of the pandemic.
You know who finally admitted to fudging numbers? Pro covid death hospitals and the CDC who finally admitted their covid death numbers are inflated by 30 to 50%
The same clowns who forced businesses to shutdown and schools to close claimed it was fine to attend the Mostly Peaceful Protests.
Liars one and all, how anyone could have bought any of their bullshit, let alone their Covid statistics, is beyond me.
True, it was a lot of the same people supporting both.
On the other hand, they weren’t the only ones advocating for lockdowns. Guess whom I am quoting:
“Despite reports to the contrary, Sweden is paying heavily for its decision not to lock down. . . . The United States made the correct decision!”
[Disclaimer: This might look like a whadabout, but it’s actually a bothsides.]
Isn't that "bothsides" a quote from a point in time when people were pretending that deaths had been prevented in "lockdown" areas which had actually been merely postponed?
Even the recent comparisons of OECD excess deaths acknowledged that Sweden's early numbers didn't compare favorably, for the very reason that "flattening the curve" was never intended to reduce the "area under the curve", instead a the same total impact was spread over a longer time-frame but made to happen over a longer time.
people were pretending that deaths had been prevented in “lockdown” areas
And Donald Trump was one of them. In fact the quote shows he was leading the parade at one time.
What makes you think I give a fuck about trump? From an old friend who lived in Stockholm at the time Covid broke out, and who I spoke to in August 2022, the US MSM reporting about the grim conditions throughout non-lockdown Sweden were greatly exaggerated if not fabricated from whole cloth; if you overlay the curves of infections/deaths in Sweden vs completely closed NYC during their first "surge" of the pandemic, the only significant difference is the 4X higher magnitude of both curves in the NYC data compared to Sweden.
To me, about the only interesting thing about trump's actions during Covid after the initial few weeks is that he passed on what could have been his "Reichstag moment" in terms of spinning the crisis into an opportunity to consolidate huge amounts of power, and generally the people who had spent 3 years up till that point "warning" the rest of us that his real agenda was to make himself some kind of "dictator for life" in the USA went totally ripshit that he instead chose to delegate most of the policy-making down to the Governors instead of dictating national mandates from on high.
It turned out that all that was just setting the table for the major reversal where all the Dems who said they wouldn't trust anything developed under "Project Lightspeed" and that trump's "biggest failure" was the prioritization of vax research over manufacturing ventilators (which turned out to be somewhere between ineffective and actually killing patients put on them) up until election day, and then the pivot to demanding universal vax mandates (bodily autonomy be damned) and accusing trump of essentially being the primary leader of the anti-vax/vaccine hesitancy movements while Biden took credit for the coincidental timing of the production rate for doses ramping up between Nov 2020 and Jan 2021 and pretended that some element of his "leadership" had caused the shots to become more widely available. It's hard not to see parallels to the part of 1984 where in the middle of hanging all the anti-Eurasia banners for "hate week", the war (if it actually exists) shifts and Eastasia becomes the enemy, forcing Winston's department to fill the news with coverage of the "foreign misinformation" agents who must have snuck into London and altered/replaced the banners in the night (since at that point, the "enemy" had always then been Eastasia and Eurasia the "ally")
“What makes you think I give a fuck about trump?”
Didn’t say I did. Have no idea who you are.
Here’s some FYI or more-full details about Florida…
https://news.yahoo.com/why-ron-desantis-cant-stop-talking-about-covid-134001001.html Florida had some bad COVID stats!!!
From there...
After reopening, DeSantis went on to ban mask requirements and falsely claim that people who receive COVID boosters are “more likely to get infected.” His senior-heavy state now has one of the lowest booster rates in the country and “by far” the highest vaccine-era COVID death rate of the six most populated states, according to a September analysis by the Tampa Bay Times. (That group includes California, Texas, New York, Illinois and Pennsylvania.)
Wasn't the idea that boosted people being "more likely" to get infected based on the false claims being pushed by Biden, Fauci and Walensky, among others (it was also an official point which all Dems "in good standing" were required to accept as proven) that "if you get the vaccine, you can't get the virus"? Those claims should have been known to be baseless to anyone who had access to the original effectivity studies from Pfizer, Moderna, and J&J, all of which only measured incidence of "severe symptoms" between the test and placebo groups but never even attempted to track infection or re-transmission of the virus among members of either group.
The idea that vaxxed/boosted people could be more likely to get infected in that environment had to do with the idea that if they believed themselves to have absolute immunity to the virus they'd possibly be more likely to engage in activities which increased their probability of exposure without taking other precautions.
Seems like the more mRNA, the more susceptible to COVID people get. All the super boosted paranoids I know keep getting it. Meanwhile, I had one J&J shot and caught what was presumably Omicron in early 2022 (despite NEVER catching it while in restaurants and defying the talismask mandates in every way I could, the only 2 places I had been in a week prior said they had zero cases, which made me start wondering about the "vax shedding" theory as I did see my elderly inlaws who just took boosters in this period) -- anyway I have been near a ton of infected people. I have had no recurrence even though according to their logic/paranoia (circle one), you'd think I would have.
My own theory is that the shots are necessarily designed to be immune suppressing to SOME degree, as if they were not, they'd risk triggering the cytokine storm we heard was the big problem with OG Covid. So the more shots you take, the more you're suppressing your natural immunity, and the more illnesses you're getting.
Sounds very scientific.
All of the Expert Opinions expressed here and in similar chat groups and such? You can TRUST them with your LIFE, to be sure! To the 12-sigma limits, and beyond!
Meanwhile...
https://www.bostonglobe.com/2021/10/21/metro/dying-an-audience/ and ...
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/politics-news/trio-conservative-radio-hosts-died-covid-will-their-deaths-change-n1278258
First it was Dick Farrel. Then Phil Valentine. Most recently, Marc Bernier. Just within the past month, those three conservative radio hosts — all unvaccinated critics of inoculation efforts — died after contracting Covid.
Candidates for Darwin Awards, all of them!
https://www.businessinsider.com/conservative-radio-hosts-anti-maskers-death-covid-19-2021-9
At least 7 conservative radio hosts and anti-mask advocates have died from COVID-19 after bashing the vaccines
Intergalactic or Cosmic-Karmic ironic coincidence, maybe? Or candidates for Darwin Awards?
https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/united-states-rates-of-covid-19-deaths-by-vaccination-status?country=~All+ages
Interactive... Select your age group of interest!
There's nothing inherently "immunity supressing" about anything that triggers an immune response to get the body to produce a particular set of antibodies.
There are some in the medical community positing that people who spent the better part of 2 years in near or total isolation may have weakened their own systems in much the same way that staying in bed for 2 years would cause muscles to atrophy, but that's a whole different effect and hasn't been studied in depth.
In Feb 2022 I did go to an event (surprise birthday party for an old friend in Seattle) where I was likely the only un-boosted (or maybe one of 3) person out of 30-45 attendees, and was also one of the 15 (at least) who tested positive for Covid (probably Omicron) 4 days later, with nobody that I heard of having more than a minor cold in terms of symptoms. Prior to that, I had caught the "OG" virus in June 2020 and got a 2-dose (Pfizer, I think) vaccination in November 2020 just to avoid conflict with my employer and leftist friends over whether or not my existing natural antibodies rendered the vax unneccesary for protection (at the time Fauci, Walensky, and the DNC "scientists" were pushing the narriative that "natural immunity" was somewhere between mythical and inferior to "vaccine immunity" despite that being the opposite of the case for virtually any other virus known to humanity).
The only number-fudging that took place was the number of COVID deaths.
Let's follow the Sweden model. Let citizens practice their own safety precautions.
Dr. Jill Biden has COVID. She has had every vaccine and every booster that Trump's vax producers made. And she is a doctor...
Well, she has a PhD in education, so she’s not really a doctor in any way. I think she does something part time at a community college.
Oh, come on, man. A doctor is a doctor. I have heard her referred to as "doctor" in all the news media. Would they lie by omission?
LOL, I remember when Howard Dean was making a name for himself nationally, his bobbleheaded followers all called him "Dr. Howard Dean" just like they do today with the "Dr. Jill Biden" nonsense. Just because it's technically correct doesn't make them sound any less pretentious when they say it.
Funny how that same courtesy isn't extended to Republicans with similar credentials.
I think that Jill has an EdD, that some call a Summer School Doctorate, and not a PhD.
Yeah, it's nowhere near as tough as even a liberal arts doctorate. Her dissertation was shorter than my master's thesis.
Shit, it was shorter than one of my seminar papers in undergrad. My professor would not have read past the intro of Jill Biden's dissertation, and would have told her to proofread and resubmit it due to the spelling and grammatical errors.
Jill has a "My husband's a US Senator" doctorate.
Her dissertation is online. It's...well, it's online, anyway.
https://reason.com/volokh/2020/12/14/who-should-be-called-dr-probably-not-jill-biden-just-as-lawyers-like-me-arent/
She's a Doctor in the same way that Dr Phil and Dr Laura are.
The honorific is technically applicable to anyone holding a PhD, DDS, DVM, or MD degree (maybe technically also to a JD?), but in my experience people who aren't in medical/dental/veterinary practice and still insist on its use are generally either within a couple years of having earned their Doctorate or need to have their sense of self-importance serviced regularly. It's possible that the effusive use of it regarding Jill Biden in the media is just part of the MSM campaign to blow sunshine up the Biden family's collective buttholes and that she herself couldn't really care less whether or not it's applied to every mention of herself; only people who know her personally would know for sure.
There's a third category around people who were involved in the Civil Rights movements in the era from the 1950s-1990s where demanding the honorifics was a tool to try to force at least the appearance of respect from those who would otherwise address them in derogatory ways. Despite the many claims Joe has made over the years, I doubt this category really applies to his wife though.
But the Nazi-Regime has an agenda and allowing freedom is definitely not part of that agenda.
So they're on step 1 of the standard playbook: "[Bad Thing] isn't happening and anyone who claims otherwise is a 'lunatic conspiracy theorist.'"
It'll be interesting to see how quickly they go to step 2, "OK, [Bad Thing] is happening but not as much as those 'lunatic conspiracy theorist' claim."
It's almost like we have seen this scenario played out before...
It’ll be interesting to see how quickly they go to step 2
I give it two weeks.*
*two weeks is open to interpretation, no wrong answers
What "unforeseen consequences?" I remember quite a few people warning about consequences to the economy, to children's learning, mental health, etc. I also remember many of those people being shouted down by the "follow The Science!" crowd.
Consequences that are easily foreseen are not unintended.
They may have been "unintended," but they were warned about all the consequences. They didn't believe the warnings and then, after the fact, said, "we didn't know this would happen," despite people telling them it would happen. They can't concede that people they don't like might have been correct about something.
People here and others (https://gbdeclaration.org/#read) made the same point years ago; it wa ignored by every tine-pot-dictator wannabe. And will be again.
unforeseen consequences of school closures, business lockdowns, and mask mandates.
Who knew bad things would happen when you force thousands of businesses closed, fire millions of people and turn off schools for three years! Who knew? Let's be REEEEEEEEEEEEasonable guys!
At this point, it's somewhat moot because red states are just going to nullify whatever federal mandates on new variants get passed from here on out, while red areas in blue states will similarly nullify blue state mandates.
That's the consequence of maliciously keeping these things going long after their observed utility has been shown to be useless.
No.
No wonder so many Americans still have PTSD (Post Traumatic Stress Disorder) and assume the worst following every report of a COVID spike.
Can one claim disability for this PTSD? Asking for a friend.
a. thank you. something > nothing
b. took you to the 14th pp for this: Then there's the toll on our freedoms. which should have been pp 1 --> 14 but again ...
Maybe an editor job will open up at Reason, and you can apply.
this place would be fucking great ... I'd hypno-toad Emma until she couldn't remember the word that ... but I love my job now, so ...
Shame.
Dude, just buy her a drink. She'd be grateful.
lolz. anything to not see "that" 157x / article
Hey dil, you got your very own stalker. “Victimhood narrative” laursen is after ya! Lol.
always happy to know somebody reads me. gets me still questionable but ...
He'll melt if you throw some HO2 on him.
I'm seeing maskers everywhere again.
I like to figure out where thier personal bubble is and then just step 1" instead it. Then breath heavily, maybe clear my throat a few times, maybe cough.
I like maskers.
It lets me know who the stupid people are. I've said it before, it's like a Jeff Foxworthy skit, "here's your sign." If you're wearing a cloth mask, or a couple of dumbfucks I used to see regularly wearing dirty surgical masks with their noses hanging out... yeah that's your "stupid" sign.
"then just step 1″ instead it. Then breath heavily, maybe clear my throat a few times, maybe cough."
You're like a got dam hero or something...
Neither the uselessness of masks and lockdowns, nor the deaths caused by so-called vaccines that don’t work, was any surprise to the elites who inflicted them on us. They were intentional harms done to lay the groundwork for outlawing all small businesses, nullifying the Bill of Rights, and turning us into serfs. Which will all happen if the Great Reset isn’t stopped in its tracks.
Yes. The consequences were not unintended.
COVID cases are rising again. Like all contagious viral illnesses, we can expect them to rise and fall seasonally - just like colds and influenza cases rise and fall seasonally; and some seasons are worse than others - COVID is just the latest recognized form of airborne virus that causes problems. Scary! Run for the hills screaming and shouting! Sheesh!
The whole idea of public health is a scam and a fraud, just like Lysenkoism, phrenology, and Nazi racial science!
The current variant is a distant cousin of Covid 19 and far less dangerous than the original which had a .24 IFR.
A recent AP fact-check article declared as "false" claims by "conspiracy theorists" that mask mandates and other COVID-era policies are coming back.
That means they're definitely coming back.
I'm still waiting on 50 intelligence experts to call it Russian disinformation before I can confirm.
There were no "COVID mistakes". Fauci and the federal government utilized COVID for their political aims and it worked for them as desired.
As long as Reason writers operate under the assumption that politicians act in our best interest, rather than to increase their own wealth and power, they will never understand politics.
By who's authority does AP gets to claim fact checker status? I'd like to do a fact check article on the Koran. Will my findings be published as gospel?
Did Sweden beat the pandemic by refusing to lock down? No, its record is disastrous:
"A new study by European scientific researchers buries all those claims in the ground. Published in Nature, the study paints a devastating picture of Swedish policies and their effects."
https://www.latimes.com/business/story/2022-03-31/sweden-covid-policy-was-a-disaster
That study is hilarious. Plus we all know how The Science is really good at things like this: “In this report, we try to understand why, using a narrative approach to evaluate the Swedish COVID-19 policy and the role of scientific evidence and integrity.”
Edit: Science, where the narrative gives you the data!
> COVID cases are increasing again and the pandemic was a serious deal.
lmao, ok groomer.
What makes you think they were "unforeseen" or that politicians didn't achieve their objectives with COVID and lockdowns?