With Parent and Teacher Groups at Odds, School Choice May Be the Winner
Breaking unions’ grip on schools benefits everybody who wants to guide their kids’ education.

The advocacy group Moms for Liberty is all over the news these days in a sign of the growing power of parents over education policy. Teachers unions, which once exercised nearly unquestioned authority over public schools, eroded their own position in recent years by pushing rigid pandemic policies and expressing open hostility to parental concerns. The result is not just an ideological struggle for control of schools, but a huge boost in the prospects for choice in education.
You are reading The Rattler from J.D. Tuccille and Reason. Get more of J.D.'s commentary on government overreach and threats to everyday liberty.
Conservative Parents Make Waves
"The activist group Moms for Liberty has become the loudest voice in the culture wars around education," The Guardian reports. "After forming in 2021, Moms for Liberty spread across the United States, exploiting the Republican-led moral panic over a 'woke ideology' that is supposedly sweeping public schools and 'indoctrinating' children. At present, the group counts 285 chapters in 45 states."
ABC News adds that "Moms for Liberty started with three Florida moms fighting COVID-19 restrictions in 2021" and that "in 2022, slightly more than half of the 500 school board candidates it endorsed across the country won." The headlines, organizational explosion (an estimated 120,000 members), and election victories are signs of rapid success for a new grassroots group.
So is the pushback against Moms for Liberty's gains. Many news stories about the organization feature extensive use of scare quotes, as well as adjectives like "extremist," and "far-right." The Southern Poverty Law Center, once a civil rights organization that now exists to feeds the fears of the dwindling ranks that still take it seriously, describes Moms for Liberty as "antigovernment" (allegedly a bad thing) and "conspiracy propagandist, anti-LGBTQ and anti-gender identity, and anti-inclusive curriculum."
It's true that, as you'd expect from a grassroots organization that experienced rapid growth, the group's ranks contain some cranks and loose cannons who engage in harassment and commit the classic mistake of quoting Hitler (rarely a good idea no matter the intent). But most of what they do is advocate for implementing their ideas in public schools that they see as under the control of ideological opponents in teachers' unions. They have a good point to make about the power of organized labor.
Teachers' Unions Battled Parents Over Closures
"The empirical research suggests that teachers' unions slowed fall school reopening decisions during a worldwide pandemic, and media accounts suggest their efforts continued as schools returned from winter break," the Brookings Institution pointed out in 2021 about a dynamic that was obvious to all.
That's a problem because closed schools, most of which implemented remote learning very poorly, resulted in serious learning losses for children.
"These results are sobering," Peggy G. Carr, commissioner of the National Center for Education Statistics, told The Washington Post. "It's clear that covid-19 shocked American education and stunted the academic growth of this age group."
Well, depriving public school students of instruction in a panicked response to the virus (most charters, private schools, and homeschoolers made their own decisions with better results) stunted academic growth. And many parents blamed teachers' unions for the disaster. To this day, American Federation of Teachers (AFT) President Randi Weingarten is fighting a furious rearguard action to revise her history of advocacy for school closures. Her efforts aren't convincing, but they're amusing to watch.
Teachers unions also made their own very significant contributions to the ongoing debate over lessons infused with controversial takes on race, gender, culture, and history.
Teachers' Unions Picked a Fight Over Curricula
"It is reasonable and appropriate for curriculum to be informed by academic frameworks for understanding and interpreting the impact of the past on current society, including critical race theory," the National Education Association resolved at its 2021 annual meeting. The organization also decided to "join with Black Lives Matter at School and the Zinn Education Project to call for a rally this year on October 14—George Floyd's birthday—as a national day of action to teach lessons about structural racism and oppression."
Agree or disagree with those ideas, they are explicitly ideological positions adopted by a labor union representing public school teachers. They invite opposition from parents with opposing views.
In fact, fracture lines were appearing between parents and teachers even before COVID-19. #RedForEd teachers' strikes in 2018 initially drew support from some parents, but they inconvenienced a lot of families. "By alienating parents, this walk out will empower the opponents of public education and hurt K-12 schools in the long run," columnist Linda Valdez warned in the Arizona Republic.
Then came pandemic closures, curriculum battles, and arrogant hand-waving by union leaders. "There is no such thing as learning loss," the head of United Teachers Los Angeles sniffed to Los Angeles magazine.
Republican Glenn Youngkin won a victory in Virginia's 2021 gubernatorial race fueled by what The New York Times called "frustration with schooling" and public "hostility toward teachers' unions."
Since then, belated outreach by teachers' unions to families has not gone well.
"In 2019, the NEA [National Education Association] opened up a 'community ally' category for non-educators, who could be parents or other supporters of its work," EducationWeek reported this month. "The union had expected to enroll 6,300 community allies by this fiscal year—but instead, the number is closer to 150."
The NEA's draw to teachers is eroding, too. "The NEA lost about 115,500 members who are working teachers and school support staff from the fall of 2017 to the fall of 2022," says EducationWeek.
Opportunity for Everybody in the Battle Over Schools
What all of this means is not just an opening for conservative parents opposed to progressive teachers, but for parents of every conceivable viewpoint who want to guide their children's education. With Moms for Liberty breaking unions' grip on education policy, there's potential benefit here for everybody, no matter their beliefs about how schools should handle public health concerns or what ideas should be taught. In fact, there's been a boom in state-level school choice legislation, with an emphasis on education savings accounts (ESA) that fund students however their families choose for them to learn.
"Florida is the fourth state in 2023 to expand its existing ESA program to cover all students," Ballotpedia reported in March. "Utah, Iowa, and Arkansas did so as well. Arizona and West Virginia expanded their ESA programs to all students in 2022."
The real victors of the struggle for a say in school policy need not be Moms for Liberty or the teachers' unions, but anybody who cares to make their own decisions about education.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
I'm making $90 an hour working from home. I never imagined that it was honest to goodness yet my closest companion is earning sixteen thousand US dollars a month by working on the connection, that was truly astounding for me, she prescribed for me to attempt it simply.
Everybody must try this job now by just using this website... http://www.Payathome7.com
I work an online job from home and earn 185 dollars per hour. I never imagined I could do it, but my best friend, who makes $15,000 a month at the job, encouraged me to find out more about it. This has limitless possibilities.
.
.
Details Are Here------------ http://www.join.salary49.com
Great article, Mike. I appreciate your work, I’m now creating over $35,900 dollars each month simply by doing a simple job online! I do know You currently making a lot of greenbacks online from $28,900 dollars, its simple online operating jobs.
.
.
Just open the link———————————————>>> http://Www.OnlineCash1.Com
End taxpayer funding of public schools and these problems work themselves at the individual household level. As do a host of other issues.
"End taxpayer funding of public schools and these problems work themselves at the individual household level. As do a host of other issues."
Clarification requested: Do you mean end the "funding of public schools" or just that the money should follow the student, and not go to the public schools?
People not using a service should not be forced to pay for it.
The argument you will get is the vast majority of people did use the service either for themselves or their own kids.
Then let them pay directly and leave the others not part of that system from being coerced into funding it.
I'll disagree with Chumby and argue for 'money follows the student'.
There is a plausible argument for publicly-funded education based on the same arguments that support publicly funded national defense. Simply put, it is in my interest to fund public schooling of others to increase the chances that you will become a productive employee somewhere rather than a mugger who threatens my life. Yet the Free Rider problem may make purely voluntary contributions to public schooling inadequate.
"There is a plausible argument for publicly-funded education based on the same arguments that support publicly funded national defense. Simply put, it is in my interest to fund public schooling of others to increase the chances that you will become a productive employee somewhere rather than a mugger who threatens my life."
Yeah. And, given that not providing an education in basic things (like the three Rs), as well as socialization (which is perhaps even more important), would likely increase the likelihood of intergenerational poverty (and, admittedly, the current system often fails in that regard). And given enough intergenerational poverty, one ends up with some type of "caste" system.
I am not disagreeing that the current system of K-12 isn't (generally) overly-expensive and under-performing in reaching its goals.
The same can be said for food, housing, utilities that is being said for education. All of these can be and are being handled by individuals. As a libertarian, I reject socialism and coercive wealth redistribution. If you want to fund the education of folks not under your roof, by all means you currently can and should continue to be able to do so. When parents/student are paying directly, the money does follow the student.
All true. The distinguishing factor for education, I think, is that it is provided (or should be) only to those too young to provide it for themselves. I find it morally difficult to hold children accountable for the failings of their parents.
" I find it morally difficult to hold children accountable for the failings of their parents."
+++
Maybe it should be MORE "morally difficult" to run around with a Gov-Guns threatening and STEALING the labors of others.
This is the very root reason for our Nazi-Empire today. Most people and certainly politicians have grown a HUGE cognitive dissonance to what/how (the means) government operates.
Same for food, housing, and utilities where we are back to socialism.
You would still be free to voluntarily fund the education of others.
“Same for food, housing, and utilities where we are back to socialism.”
Taxpayers fund the food, housing, and utilities, among many other things, of government employees , the military, and senators and congress folks too.
Why should I fund them?
For those not providing you with a good or service, you shouldn’t be required to fund.
That's the point, Chumby - they are providing me with a service. The service is indirect and diffuse but it is still real. The service is a reduction in the number of people likely to mug me.
So your conclusion is Mug Everyone equally (tax)?? Wow. That's pretty dumb. Instead of paying for muggers why not just fund a JUSTICE system? Do you really thinking encouraging muggers to mug you (taxes) will keep them from wanting to mug you more?
"For those not providing you with a good or service, you shouldn’t be required to fund."
So, anarcho-capitalism perhaps? Don't get me wrong -- there is plenty to like about many aspects of anarcho-capitalism, but, such "pure" systems, ("pure" socialism, "pure" democracy, etc., etc.), seem to be unworkable in the real world. Thus we are always going to have a "mix."
It is called libertarian.
Chumby… so, no government at all, which is basically what anarchocapitalism means? (Note, I actually like the concept, but putting it into motion could be rather… well…tricky… to say the least.)
No. Gov-Guns for *DEFENSE* not Aggressive Gov-Guns (i.e. gangster guns). The USA was founded on the principle that the Gov-Guns would only work in *DEFENSE* of ...
Individual Liberty and Justice for all
It was never setup to act aggressively and it did work. It worked amazingly making the most wealthy and powerful nation humanity has ever seen in under a 1/2-century.
That was Reagan's pretext for the Federal gubmint to fire everybody who ever toked a joint or copped a buzz other than from alcohol and tobacco. True the number of minions on the federal tit declined, but those that stayed are mostly mystical Republican toadies. By tithing part of their paychecks to the Party of Prohibition they enabled the Gee-Oh-Pee to buy votes and pack the courts and bureaucracies after 1987. The economy collapsed starting when pee-in-a-cup-or-be-fired became enforceable 01OCT1987.
You'd have to rewrite state constitutions that require the states to educate all children for free... it will never happen, nor should it happen - an educated citizenry is well worth the investment.
When parents choose trips, meals out, etc instead of directly funding their child's education, the community suffers as well as the child.
Commie-Education for the WIN! F-The USA.... /s
I wonder how long until the left makes home schooling and charter schools illegal. I am surprised it has not yet happened in states/locations with one party rule like CA or Seattle. Allowing diversity is what kids are a taught is an existential threat to the Democrat party's future. Look how they howl and malign anyone who opposes them from the Moms for Liberty to the FBI putting concerned parents on terrorist watch lists.
“I wonder how long until the left makes home schooling and charter schools illegal.”
Probably never, given that lots of wealthy folks and politicians seem to prefer not to have their kids exposed to the “lower classes,” no matter their political “leanings.” They want those elite privately-funded educational systems. It takes financial resources to home-school. The most money my father ever made in his career was home-schooling the two kids of a very wealthy family. And charter schools can be seen as the "bread-crumbs" of private education.
Charter schools could easily be made "illegal" by a state (or in some cases a smaller division) of the USA, since they're chartered by the state or local government. That's what "charter" means. However, an attempt by a state (Oregon, I think) to outlaw home and other private schooling was ruled federally unconstitutional over a century ago.
"The Compulsory Education Act" (Oregon) 1922, required all (ALL) children to attend public schools. Thus, effectively, barring private schools from being to serve their communities (their main target were Catholic schools, but it would have effected all the them). SCOTUS declared it unconstitutional (Pierce v. Society of Sisters) in 1925, before the act was enacted.
The head of the Child Advocacy program at Harvard Law has some ideas:
“The homeschooling lobby may be even more powerful than the gun lobby today, because at least with the gun lobby we see a lot of pushback. When it comes to homeschooling, the victims are all children so it’s harder to mount a political movement….
“…Our federal Constitution provides parents with powerful constitutional rights to raise their children, but provides children with no countervailing rights to nurturing parenting or to education. This is by contrast to other countries, which recognize child rights as central in their constitutions…
“…I would not ban all homeschooling but would require that parents demonstrate that they have a legitimate reason to homeschool — maybe their child is a super athlete, maybe the schools in their area are terrible. They should also demonstrate that they’re qualified to provide an adequate education and that they would provide an education comparable in scope to what is required in public schools.”
https://news.harvard.edu/gazette/story/2020/05/law-school-professor-says-there-may-be-a-dark-side-of-homeschooling/
So their vision for homeschooling is like their vision for gun ownership – you need a state permit to do it. And the richer and more influential you are, the more likely you’ll be to get a permit.
I read it. What a fascist twat. It reeks of,"We're smarter and better than you, so we must judge your ability to teach your own children."
I went to a conservative Lutheran school through ninth grade. The principal of my high school talked to my Mom at one time, saying,"Your kids seem so talented, you should sent them to our high quality public schools instead of that backwards religious school." All five of us kids were in the top three in the schools SAT tests. All graduated college, where only 10 percent of the classes were college graduates. Our grade school letter grades were 3 percentage points apart- and many kids got A's. The teaching philosophy was very simple-"You will master these skills or you will die trying." I found out something very important: if you make high standards for children, almost all will achieve them; the bigotry of low expectations is not only racial.
I wish I could find the article. In some areas. Parents must get permission to home school. Opening a charter school requires permission from the public school system. If the school system deems enrollment too low they can deny the request.
I was a big supporter of school choice/vouchers/money that follows the student, but I'd give that up in a heartbeat if we could eliminate tenure and finally start running bad teachers out of our schools. We have schools with no students reading, writing or doing math at grade level, yet teachers take their annual pay raise keep their jobs until they are forced to retire.
Eliminate tenure, start driving bad teachers out if the profession, and I'll stop advocating for School Choice. Let the community decide which teachers keep their jobs.
For sound economic perspective go to https://honesteconomics.substack.com/
When that fails try libertrans.blogspot, no snooping, no fees
Give control of the purse strings to the only people proven to care for the children - the parents.
Parents vote for school boards, parents pay school taxes, parents need to start exercising the control they have over their local public schools.
If that's true then WTF is even the purpose of Arming it with Gov-Guns? How many other subscription based services run free-market massively more successful than "public school" (i.e. Commie-Education).
No. The very purpose/point of even putting government in charge of "public schools" was to indoctrinate and steal from others what some parents didn't want to earn themselves. If it doesn't need gun-force it doesn't need "government".
Getting rid of public schools entirely is the ONLY way.
Everything else is just fiddling while rome burns.
^ This
+1000000000000 exactly.
"they are explicitly ideological positions adopted by a labor union representing public school teachers. They invite opposition from parents with opposing views."
That's the entire culture wars in a nutshell (literally!) - one side pushes way too far in its social agenda using government authority as its platform, inviting the other side to retaliate.
Only gov -------------- Guns ------------ teach children! /s
The stupidity sits steady and firmly in it's most basic of functions.
If it doesn't need 'guns' what is the government doing it for? A monopoly of Gun-Force is the only tool in governments toolbox; the only thing that separates it from any other organization/business.
I can think of at least one other difference. Government officials, especially law enforcement officers are immune from liability for damages they intentionally and illegally cause and, until recently, almost completely immune from prosecution for the crimes they commit while on duty or while doing their official jobs.
Yes indeed +100000. The very idiocy in merging government and the resources-marketable-economy (i.e. crony socialism). Essentially arming corporate self-interests in the market.
Reminds me of the old slogan, "We don't care if you don't like our cars you get to buy them anyways. (by armed-force)." which is truly and purely the "Environmentalists" market at this point. There is NO justice to be found as you point out so well. 🙂
As a fellow student, I understand the challenges of college life all too well. One of the difficulties I often encounter is staying organized and managing my time effectively, especially when there are multiple assignments and exams to prepare for. To tackle this, I recently came across the Storyboard That service. It's been a real game-changer for me! You can find fantastic templates and tools to create engaging game posters and study aids on the website. It has made my study sessions much more enjoyable and productive. I highly recommend checking it out to level up your learning experience and succeed in college!
If you look like Obama you can make $9000 a week as Black Satan in an upcoming Christian Trump special. Goto http://www.orangeJesus.us