Should Drivers Have To Pay More To Register Electric Vehicles?
Texas's $200 annual E.V. fees seem like a lot of money but is largely in line with what owners would likely pay in gas taxes.

Earlier this month, Texas Gov. Greg Abbott signed S.B. 505 into law, which will nearly quintuple the annual cost of registering an electric vehicle (E.V.) in the state. Is Texas punishing its eco-friendly citizens, or is there a legitimate reason to charge more?
The new law adds additional fees for motorists registering an electric vehicle. Currently, registering or renewing a Texas car tag costs between $50.75 and $54. Starting September 1, any "motor vehicle that has a gross weight of 10,000 pounds or less and uses electricity as its only source of motor power" would additionally be assessed a $200 annual registration fee. New E.V.s would require a $400 registration fee good for two years.
At first glance, this may seem like another "statement" law in the fossil fuel fight. When California sought to incentivize E.V.s by banning the sale of new gasoline-powered vehicles in the state by 2035, Abbott deemed the move "Ridiculous!" In January, Republicans in the Wyoming state legislature proposed a bill "phasing out" the sale of electric vehicles by 2035. One co-sponsor deemed the bill "more of a statement" than a piece of active legislation, and it died in committee.
But there is an underlying logic to the new rate hike. Under the new law, the extra revenue from E.V. registrations "must be deposited to the credit of the state highway fund." The highway fund, which builds and maintains the state's roads, is primarily funded by vehicle registration fees and the state gas tax. Historically, Texas drivers who drive a lot and put a lot of wear and tear on the roads bought a lot of gas, which means they paid for road upkeep through gas taxes. E.V. drivers don't pay the gas tax, but they do use the roads. Given that disparity, a higher registration fee is one way to ensure that everyone who drives also contributes toward maintaining the roads.
But it's not perfect.
"Ideally, all transportation funding should be based on a users-pay/users-benefit mechanism," says Baruch Feigenbaum, senior managing director of transportation policy at the Reason Foundation, the nonprofit that publishes Reason. In a 2019 article, Feigenbaum and Joe Hillman advocated scrapping gas taxes entirely and replacing them with tolls. Unlike gas taxes, they argued, tolls "treat vehicles more evenly, are easier to tie to specific highway use, and create a more precise and fair example of the users-pay principle."
According to the National Council of State Legislatures, at least 32 states require additional registration fees for electric vehicles, with costs ranging from $50 in Colorado, Hawaii, and South Dakota, to $225 in Washington. Earlier this year, Tennessee passed legislation that will gradually raise its E.V. registration fee to $274 in 2028. Although Texas's new fees will be higher than some peer states, Feigenbaum says that "assuming someone drives 12,000 miles per year," an annual E.V. registration between $150 to $200 would be akin to how much that driver would have paid in gas taxes.
If anything, the new law might be too generous. The Texas gas tax has been 20 cents per gallon since 1991, one of the lowest in the country. Indexed for inflation, that would be 43 cents per gallon today, meaning the state's gas tax has less than half the purchasing power it did in 1991. And since the bill's text only applies to vehicles that use electricity as their "only" power source, hybrid owners could pay comparatively less for road upkeep than their driving habits might dictate.
Increasing taxes or fees might be unpalatable, but the existence of publicly-funded roads requires some way to pay for them. E.V. fees, while imperfect, are one way to maintain some sense of fairness, in which people who drive more pay more for the time they spend on the road. "It's a blunt instrument," Feigenbaum says. "But it's better than vehicles paying nothing (which is the case for electric vehicles in some states) or having a non-users-pay/users-benefit funding mechanism (sales tax for example), which is the case in others."
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
I am making a good salary from home $6580-$7065/week , which is amazing under a year ago I was jobless in a horrible economy. I thank God every day I was blessed with these instructions and now it’s my duty to pay it forward and share it with Everyone,
🙂 AND GOOD LUCK.:)
Here is I started.……......>> http://WWW.RICHEPAY.COM
Great article, Mike. I appreciate your work, I’m now creating over $35,000 dollars each month simply by doing a simple job online! I do know You currently making a lot of greenbacks online from $28,000 dollars, its simple online operating jobs.
.
Just open the link————>>> http://Www.Pay.hiring9.Com
Great article, Mike. I appreciate your work, I’m now creating over $35,100 dollars each month simply by kav doing a simple job online! I do know You currently making a lot of greenbacks online from $28,100 dollars, its simple online operating jobs
Just open the link————— http://WWW.TOPOFFER1.COM
try this for all your utility payments https://www.invoicecloud.net/industries/utilities
Yeah, electric 18-wheelers (if they ever become more than a curiosity) are going to be interesting. States get really grabby about their IFTA taxes.
Yeah, electric 18-wheelers (if they ever become more than a curiosity) are going to be interesting. States get really
I’m making $90 an hour working from home. i was greatly surprised at the same time as my neighbour advised me she changed into averaging $100 however I see the way it works now. I experience mass freedom now that I’m my non-public boss.Everybody must try this job now by just using this website…
.
.
For Details►————————————➤ https://Www.Coins71.Com
I have made $18625 last month by w0rking 0nline from home in my part time only. Everybody can now get this j0b and start making dollars 0nline just by follow details here..
🙂 AND GOOD LUCK.:)
HERE====)> https://www.apprichs.com
Don’t think we will ever see electric semis-at least not for long distance trucking. The weight of the batteries alone would mean they would probably need to cut their loads by half and it would take a whole day to charge them to maybe go 100 miles.
Semis last upwards of a million miles with maintenance, an electric semi would never last that long. It’s a ridiculous idea in general.
They would be most efficient if set up like modern trains which is to say serial hybrid diesel electric. The diesel is sized for the average energy consumption for the route and operates at peak efficiency the whole way and a battery electric system handles the, literal, ups, downs, starts, & stops of it.
That said, most of it would go away with the repeal of the Jones Act since trucks wouldn't be needed to transport cargo from, let's say, the Port of LA to places as far away as Boston. Instead the same ship could pick up shit in LA and go through the Panama Canal and deliver it in Boston about a day or two later for less than half the cost and with a much lower environmental impact - but there's that whole cabotage thing. Thank {deity} we pay for good old wholesome sugar made right her in these united states?
Democrats want to get rid of diesel. The solution is to keep diesel and get rid of the democrats.
This is what happens when democrats are treated like real humans and aren’t immediately backhanded h when they open their retarded mouths. Why we tolerate their existence is a mystery to me.
How much pain are you all willing to endure to humor these Marxists? I sure as fuck passed my limit years ago.
Nope. The feds and states will give a waiver for the weight of the batteries much like they do for the units that allow heating and cooling when the truck is off to prevent idling. As for the range, wife's company is testing them out right now. Range is about 300 miles so they are indeed local only proposition but the drivers seem to like them ok. The electric yard trucks work ok. They require a 30 min recharge time to get back over 80% reserve and since all drivers are required to take a 30min brake it seems to work out. The problem is that the town has already told the company that the local grid can not handle 100 electric trucks charging so don't even think about it. Another problem is that the company that supplied the yard trucks free for testing just called and told them to stop the truck immediately. They saw a fault on their end in the grounding, all trucks are monitored by satellite, and if it shorted out the driver could get about 150,000 volts straight the backside. Later they called and told them the truck was fine and the wife said "Nope" and parked them until the supplier could show up and physically check them out.
80% from what? A yard truck shouldn't get that LOW from full charge.
80% is enough to complete the shift then the truck is plugged back in during the switch over. Appears to work ok for yard work
"Should Drivers Have To Pay More To Register Electric Vehicles?"
Yep. Not perfect, but maybe one day there will be a "non-privacy-intrusive" way to have drivers pay taxes on the actual mileage they drive. Over the last two-plus years, my hybrid has averaged 85.1 miles per gallon of gas. In fairness, I should be paying a lot more in "road-use" taxes than I am.
Yeah, if we were going to be consistent here they should’ve given me a big registration discount for my aging 6-cyl SUV with the poorly adjusted fuel injection that was getting 14mpg. I literally paid your way, Mr. Ghost.
If the idea is a fee for wear and tear on the pavement, a “better” tax would be on tires, with:
(a) basic tax proportional to the tire volume. (b) a surtax on the warranty. Longer warranty = higher tax.
Even bicycles, baby strollers, and scooters for geriatics could pay their (small) fair share.
"If the idea is a fee for wear and tear on the pavement, a “better” tax would be on tires..."
Agreed.
Denmark has an interesting way to tax: As I understand it, the "road use tax" is calculated and added to the price of a new car when it is purchased, based on the type of vehicle and its estimated impact on roads. So, a new car, depending on the model, might cost as much as an extra $15,000. This cost, of course, also means a much higher resale value when one sells their vehicle. So, the initial cost of the car goes up, but (in a fair world), the cost of operating it goes down. It probably doesn't work that well in the real world, of course.
No. NO. NO NO. A thousand times no. Never. Owners of electric vehicles are pure and virtuous and just and caring and should not have to pay any fees or taxes whatsover. Many of the male owners of such are impotent incels and don't commit patriarchy or sire future polluters either. If you really want to be "fair", the law would allow the owners of EV's to name an (any) ICE-V owner, who would then be responsible for all their taxes and fees - perhaps a neighbor with an ICE-V who ridiculed them for buying their expensive little battery powered feel-good device.
🙂
Was that you speaking out at the local town hall meeting where Supervisors decided to install electric charging stations - paid for by the taxpayers - at the new soccer fields so local soccer moms and dads could charge for free instead of paying for electricity at their home? Yes, the world does owe you a living!
"Was that you speaking out at the local town hall meeting where Supervisors decided to install electric charging stations – paid for by the taxpayers – at the new soccer fields so local soccer moms and dads could charge for free instead of paying for electricity at their home?"
Well, that SUCKS. With my plug-in hybrid, in "electric" mode, I spend the equivalent of about $1.60 for a gallon of gas. Oh, yeah, like I need help off-setting those incredibly high prices!!
Does the visiting team get to charge too?
The most fair, would be distance*weight. I agree that privacy issues are a problem.
Privacy issues abound only because the government keeps insisting that full GPS-tracked accounting is the only viable way to pay a per-mile road tax. This ignores the fact that most cars have actual working odometers in them.
A per-mile tax, as a function of GVW, could easily be assessed with self-reported odometer readings, or from say, odometer readings at annual vehicle inspections already required in many states.
To those that cry "But I drive a lot in other states, why should I pay all that tax to my state?" Let's just say that people from other states may drive a lot in your state and their states are collecting taxes on them for those miles drive in your state and call it a wash. Or do you really want to pay milage taxes in every state you drive in, we could probably work that out too if that's what you really want?
For years, I've thought that the gas tax was one of the most reasonable taxes, as it was a very good proxy for a direct user-fee (heavier vehicles driving more miles inherently pay more taxes than low milage, less damaging small cars).
Isn't Reason against asset forfeiture (i.e. it's not perfect but there is an underlying logic) unless the State can actually prove it's justified, in an adversarial setting?
A "user pays for road use" idea is not asset forfeiture, is not anti-libertarian, and is not unReasonable.
The libertarian angle comes in as to who owns (and maintains and bills for) the roads. But since the State owns most all the roads and that ain't changing any time soon...
Pay for use… Communism!
Only leftists support higher taxes, which makes Reason leftist.
What an uncharacteristically cogent point for you to raise! It *is* interesting that 32 other states require registration fees, some significantly higher than TX's and, apparently, wasn't really a concern to Reason until Abbott did it! And it *is* interesting that they advance highway tolling over excise based on the inefficiencies and cronyism of excise without mentioning tolls' perfectly-equal "Toll Free in '73"-style abuse.
This thoughtful and meaningful counter-consideration really is a breath of intelligent fresh air out of you.
I say the dumbest thing I can think of and of course you think it's intelligent.
It's called a strawman, and you typically plant at least one in every comment section.
Fuck off, you goddamned drunken pussy. Everyone is tired of your shit and you don’t have the balls to back up your pathetic drunken threats you loser.
Run away bitch.
Consider them rare earth mining offset credits.
Im making over $13k a month working part time. I kept hearing other people tell me how much money they can make online so I decided to look into it. Well, it was all true and has totally changed my life.last month her pay check was $12712 just working on the laptop for a few hours. This is what I do,
…
VISIT THIS WEBSITE HERE……………….>>> http://www.works75.com
Is Texas punishing its eco-friendly citizens
What's that got to do with EV drivers?
Beat me to it.
Virginia considers my 2011 Hyundai Elantra a fuel efficient vehicle even though it gets 25 mpg at best in city driving. So I’m getting charged an extra $10 a year to register it. I assume the fees are higher for EVs, but it’s still laughable that they consider it “fuel efficient” and here in NoVa, we pay an extra gas tax anyway.
I have a non plug in hybrid that Washington State is charging me an extra $75/year to pay for the charging infrastructure I can’t possibly use. Fucking retard democrats deserve savage beatings for this kind of crap.
As an electric car owner I'm fine with it, although it's not perfect.
We have annual safety inspections in NC. We should just charge drivers for how many miles they drove over the past year, multiplied by the weight of their vehicle squared. That's the best approximation for wear and tear on roads.
How do you intend to track usage? The honor system?
Good thing we are so steeped in sprawl that we are unable to recognize how to reduce spending and instead must focus entirely on how to increase taxes.
"Good thing we are so steeped in sprawl that we are unable to recognize how to reduce spending and instead must focus entirely on how to increase taxes."
That must be in reply to another article and it somehow ended up here.
Well congrats sevo. I ungrayboxxed you.
Road maintenance costs are mostly a function of surface area - not traffic. The main causes of road deterioration are water, temperature, sunlight, chemicals, faulty construction, and traffic. 'User fees' only cover the latter or they are deemed 'unfair' and 'excessive'. Meaning that most road deterioration should be capitalized into road construction costs when the road is built. We deliberately don't do that because that would increase the up-front costs of constructing roads.
'User fees' also then compel land to be set-aside for the 95% of the time that said 'tax-paying' vehicles are parked rather than moving. And it ain't the garage at home.
User fees never finance construction - which is why 'privatized roads' have never worked unless they are either a real-estate scam or construction cronyism.
Sprawl is what creates the massive surface area that increases road maintenance. Where the 'financing solution' is deemed to be density of cars on road (maybe user fees will pay for the road this time) rather than density of 'destinations' near where one lives.
Don't worry though. I'm sure you'll get back into the gray box soon enough.
No one should have to pay ANY taxes on cars, registrations, fees, gas, electricity or anything else related to vehicles. Hope this helps.
Exactly
The fact that Reason doesn't even bother anymore to advance a libertarian argument is depressing to the extreme.
Why do you care? You’re a far left democrat.
"...Is Texas punishing its eco-friendly citizens,..."
"eco-friendly"? You need to quit bullshitting.
Taxes ?! In Texas ?!
*clutches pearls*
should have to take a retard test before purchasing.
Maybe retarded like a fox. They'll be worth a lot of points on the social score card.
As bad as this is it is much better than putting tracking devices into all registered vehicles and taxing based on miles driven. Much better than all the proposals listed would be to privatize all highways and leave it to counties and cities to figure out how to finance their own local roads and streets. States are all over the map as far as efficiency and quality of highway maintenance.
Privatize? With cities and counties paying for it?
Nothing like advocating cronyism and corruption. But that's not a surprise
Woosh!
I don't understand. Where did I say that cities and counties would pay for privatization of state highways? If you drive on a private highway you would pay the private operator for the privilege.
ok I just noticed you distinguished between highways (limited access) and local roads/streets.
But still - those limited access points of the highway are what then drive construction/maintenance costs for the local road network they join. They also drive the value - or kill the value (see ghost towns created by lack of nearby highway) of that local connection.
That connection is not an arm's length transaction when the highway system is now both private and has a monopoly (a rentier monopoly at that) over all connections to 'elsewhere' (ie federal). And that direct connection re travel and interstate commerce also then forces everything up to the federal level - where the corruption will become worse.
Let's scrap gas taxes at both the state and federal levels, and replace them with a use-based fee approach, i.e., tolls. How would this work in real life? A combination of EZ-Pass style transponders tied to the vehicle's registered owner's bank account or credit card that ping every time you pass the toll-gate, automated license plate readers everywhere to catch the places without toll-readers which will also require adding a bank account or credit card to your auto registration, and an OBD plug-in like the ones insurance companies peddle that track your speed, movements, and everything else. Let's just go ahead and add radar and speed cameras to those plate readers, since they're already there. Don't forget some sort of state-subsidized program for people who won't or can't get bank accounts or credit cards, possibly because they might have crossed a certain river in Texas on their way to our utopia. Bonus: if your car (not you, but your car) is tracked at unfavored places like gun shops, restaurants that serve red meat, or churches, it's easier to freeze your bank account because it's already on file.
That bonus is already planned via the IoT and road I.T. technology.
Gotta be parody.
Nah. It’s just easier to execute all the democrats.
"Increasing taxes or fees might be unpalatable, but the existence of publicly-funded roads requires some way to pay for them." <<<A fucking Libertarian wrote this. Wow. I guess the Mafia gotta make it's money.
Are you going to forgive all the electricity taxes applied to the power used to recharge those electric vehicles? If not, then the logic of the entire article above collapses. Yes, road taxes targeted to road maintenance can make sense. This, however, is a scheme of double-taxation, not a scheme of tax replacement.
Those faggot democrats in Olympia have been working to make vehicle licensing expensive since that initiative passed around 20 years ago that reduced license tabs to a flat $32.
The other thing to consider... EVs tend to be substantially heavier than gas-powered vehicles of the same size. That extra weight translates to additional wear and tear on road surfaces. So, if EV owners aren't going to contribute to the highway fund via gas taxes, it doesn't seem unfair to charge them more for registration to compensate.
I've seen that claim several times in recent articles but every article compares very different vehicles. Yes, a GMC Hummer EV is lots heavier than a GMC Sierra with a gas engine. So what? They are far too different to compare.
In making my own comparisons of the few models that are available in both an EV and gas version, the difference is small. Yes, the batteries are really heavy (especially if you pick an SUV as your example) but the engines and drivetrain are much smaller. It's not an exact offset but it's nowhere near the "thousands of pounds heavier" hyped by the articles.
Well, one good comparison would be the Ford F-150 (gas-powered) vs the Ford F-150 Lightning (EV). The Lightning is about 1,500 lbs heavier than the comparably-equipped gas powered version.
Or the BMW 430i (gas powered) vs the BMW i4 (EV). Like the example above, those are the same vehicle with two different powertrains. The i4 is 1,226 lbs heavier than the gas-powered version. That’s not a drop in the bucket… the EV version is more than 25% heavier.
I read Car and Driver, Motor Trend, etc.. the curb weights are always substantially higher for EV’s or even hybrids relative to their class. A small sedan is typically about 500-700 lbs. more than its ICE equivalent. The difference in trucks and are more pronounced. As an example, the Silverado EV is around 8,000 lbs. where a loaded crew cab half ton I’d about 6,000 lbs. a Hummer EV is even heavier, at over 9,000 lbs.
EV’s are pigs.
I think that this is wrong and better ways to manage this needs to be put in place
Janice
https://www.kundertvolvocars.com/
Im making over $13k a month working part time. I kept hearing other people tell me how much money they can make online so I decided to look into it. Well, it was all true and has totally changed my life.last month her pay check was $12712 just working on the laptop for a few hours. This is what I do,
…
VISIT THIS WEBSITE HERE……………….>>> http://www.works75.com
"assuming someone drives 12,000 miles per year,"
Am I the only one here who read that for a second as 12,000 miles an hour?
No.
Because most 'gas taxes' are simply a form of sin tax that routes into the general slush fund with only a laughable portion being set aside for actual road maintenance and improvement. To raise taxes on gas with the explicit aim of artificially inflating the price to decrease use of low mpg vehicles and then turn around and demand those who responded to your market incentives pay more 'for the roads' is just more political greed.
Now, if all gas taxes and registration fees were dedicated to the roads (and not a fricken light rail nobody uses and which cost 10 times what it was supposed to) my answer would be different.
Yes, gas taxes get used for stupid crap like bike lanes and necessary things like traffic control, signs and similar items. If you drive, you pay.
But gas taxes only cover about 40% of the actual spending on roads.
This reminds me of the kayakers and canoers that use boat access ramps to launch and then get huffy when told they need to pay a registration fee on their watercraft not realizing hunters and fishers paid for those ramps through the Pittman-Robertson Act sportsman pressed for. Of course electric vehicles should pay to use the roadways since they are not paying gasoline taxes which do pay for the roads. Just wait and see what happens if the progressives get their wet dream and ban diesel semi's. Guess how much that fuel tax contributes every year and where will that money come from?
Absolutely.
I can't wait for the Enviro-Gun-Gang out stealing literally 100's of Billions of STOLEN money from everyone to have to actually PAY for their own F'En bills... How's that unicorn fart smelling now... Hahahaha! 🙂
It really is delusional that commenters think gas taxes (or registration fees) (or tolls) pay for road maintenance.
Road maintenance cost a bit over $100 billion in 2020. And was nowhere near enough to maintain roads at a stable condition. Add maybe $50-100 billion annually to that if the maintenance backlog is $800 billion.
Fuel taxes brought in a bit over $50 billion. Tolls – which are also supposed to pay back capital and construction (roughly $100 billion per year) as well as cover maintenance – brought in $22 billion. Though obviously most roads aren’t toll.
These revenues are basically a scam to give people the idea that user fees pay for roads.
When the truth is that roads are part of a Ponzi scheme of sprawl infrastructure. Go into debt for new growth (which doesn’t require maintenance for a few years and can be postponed too) and can reap rewards from land development/sales. Rather than tax those increased land values, the debt gets carried with nominal user fees and general taxes with no significant relation to that road construction. When the SHTF (either the maintenance bills come due or the bond issuance comes due or local peeps growth slows), the feds bail out the state/muni debt from the free money tree. Then sprawl some more and repeat.
The LOWEST maintenance spending is $400-600 per person per state. The highest (rural, low traffic, tough weather) is over $1000. Looked at on a per 10,000 miles traveled – the range is $400 to $2000 with an average of $700.
Gas taxes or registration fees of $200 per year? This is total fraud.
I suppose some forms of theft are more egregious than others, but in the end it's all theft
Well you pay a road tax every time you fill your tank. Maybe all charging stations, whether public or private should have a road tax fee per unit of electricity. That at least seems fair.
Yes, I don't see how this is such a big deal. Pay at the charger just like gas vehicles pay at the pump. No privacy issues associated with tracking miles or location. I don't think it's a problem installing a home charger with a meter. I don't think it would be any more an issue of persons rewiring to avoid the tax as it is now folks rewiring around a house meter.
Electricity is already taxed.
Electricity is not taxed for road use.
(You see to be unable to understand even simple context.)
That is why only charging stations would carry a road tax, not your home meter except for your charging station.
Many items carry multiple taxes, often both Federal and State taxes.
Take booze, there is an alcohol tax, and a sales tax.
Here are the Taxes & Government Fees on a cable bill:
911 Fee
988 Fee
Athletic Fee
Federal Excise Tax
Local Utility User Tax
Public, Educ & Govt Fee
State and Local Communications Services Taxes
Gross Receipts Tax
Sales Tax
State Excise Tax
I never said ‘road tax’. (You seem to be unable to understand even simple reading comprehension.). You’re just babbling about how there are various taxes.
The entire "argument" is another red herring / false dichotomy.
Big rigs do more road damage each year than 7500 passenger cars. There is already a way to track and tax them. Their taxes constitute a majority of road taxes.
So, this brings up a couple of possibilities.
First, eliminate all road taxes for passenger cars and raise taxes on trucks. They will simply pass along their taxes to consumers, so consumers will pay them anyway.
Second option, simply acknowledge that roads "promote the general welfare" (serve everyone) and end all vehicle-specific taxation. Just take it out of the general fund. The COST SAVINGS of not collecting these silly fees will just about offset lost revenues.
Of course, it would be cool to have an expensive car, but I'm not so confident in my driving skills yet, because I just recently got my driver's license. If it weren't for Fresh Car's car repair specialists, who can quickly fix bumper scuffs or scratches in a few hours, I'd have been driving a car that looks terrible a long time ago
I have made $18625 last month by w0rking 0nline from home in my part time only. Everybody can now get this j0b and start making dollars 0nline just by follow details here..
🙂 AND GOOD LUCK.:)
HERE====)> https://www.apprichs.com